Question Description
A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for SSC 2024 is part of SSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SSC exam syllabus. Information about A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A passage is given with 5 questions following it. Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives and click the button corresponding to it.Undercover investigations or so-called sting operations occupy a complex and problematical ethical space in journalism, but it is impossible to faultThe Tribune’s exposé, published after accessingAadhaar'sdatabase of names, numbers, and addresses. To begin with, the public interest — which lay in showing how easily the database could be breached and drawing attention to the existence of an organised racket to facilitate this — far outweighed, or more than compensated for, the act of unauthorised access, in this case, secured on payment of a few hundred rupees. The investigation was written up in the best journalistic tradition — it focussed on how the data were being mined for money, it did not leak any Aadhaar numbers or other details to establish this, and it sought and received a response from shocked officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India before going to print. So it would have been a travesty of justice ifThe Tribuneand the reporter who broke the story were treated as accused in the case where the charges include cheating under impersonation. It would have amounted to more than shooting the messenger. It would have constituted a direct attack on free public-spirited journalism and dissuaded attempts to hold public authorities and institutions accountable for shortcomings and promises.Q. What is the meaning of the phrase given below, as used in the above passage?Shoot the messengera)Blaming the bearer of bad newsb)Blaming the one who spreads gossipc)Shooting the one who is about to leak sensitive infomationd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SSC tests.