Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  It was a funny situation but nobody _________... Start Learning for Free
It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)
Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer i...
The simple past (also called past simple, past indefinite) is a verb tense which is used to show that a completed action took place at a specific time in the past. The simple past is also frequently used to talk about past habits and generalizations. The simple past is formed using the verb + ed. Questions are made with did and negative forms are made with did not.
Since, we are talking about an action which has happened in the past, we will be using simple past tense. The verb here is "laugh" thus the simple past tense is laughed
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer i...
It will be " laughed " because...it is the simple past tense....See...firstly there is a "was"..so..secondly..it should be "laughed "
Free Test
Community Answer
It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer i...
Answer:

Verb Tenses:

The correct answer is 'laughed', which is the past tense of the verb 'laugh'. This is the correct tense because the situation being described happened in the past.

Subject-Verb Agreement:

The subject of the sentence is 'nobody', which is a singular pronoun. Therefore, the verb must also be singular. In this case, the singular verb is 'laughed'.

Explanation:

The sentence is describing a situation that happened in the past that was funny. However, despite the humor of the situation, nobody laughed. The correct verb tense to describe this situation is the past tense 'laughed', which is the action that did not occur. Additionally, the singular verb 'laughed' agrees with the singular subject 'nobody'.

In summary, the sentence should read: "It was a funny situation but nobody laughed."
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

While many points are worth making in an evaluation of the single sixyear presidential term, one of the most telling points against the single term has not been advanced. This kind of constitutional limitation on elections is generally a product of systems with weak or non-existent political parties.Since there is no party continuity or corporate party integrity in such systems, there is no basis for putting trust in the desire for re-election as a safeguard against mismanagement in the executive branch. Better under those conditions to operate on the basis of negative assumptions against incumbents. I do not know if the earliest proposal for a single, nonrepeatable term was made in the 1820s because that was a period of severely weak political parties. But I do feel confident that this is a major reason, if not the only reason, that such a proposal has been popular since the 1940s.Though the association of the non-repeatable election with weak political parties is not in itself an argument against the limitation, the fallout from this association does contribute significantly to the negative argument. Single-term limitations are strongly associated with corruption. In any weak party system, including the presidential system, the onus of making deals and compromises, both shady and honourable, rests heavily upon individual candidates. Without some semblance of corporate integrity in a party, individual candidates have few opportunities to amortize their obligations across the spectrum of elective and appointive jobs and policy proposals.The deals tend to be personalized and the payoffs come home to roost accordingly. If that situation is already endemic in conditions of weak or nonexistent parties, adding to it the limitation against re-election means that candidates and officials, already prevented from amortizing their deals across space, are also unable to amortize their obligations temporally. This makes for a highly beleaguered situation. The single six-year term for presidents is an effort to compensate for the absence of a viable party system, but it is a compensation ultimately paid for by further weakening the party system itself.Observers, especially foreign observers, have often noted that one source of weakness in American political parties is the certainty of election every two or four years, not only because any artificial limitation on elections is a violation of democratic principles but also because when elections are set in a certain and unchangeable cycle, political parties do not have to remain alert but can disappear into inactivity until a known point prior to the next election. To rigidify matters by going beyond the determinacy of the electoral cycle to add an absolute rule of one term would hang still another millstone around the neck of already doddering political parties. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:According to the passage, which of the following is most likely to be true of a political system with weak political parties?

It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It was a funny situation but nobody _________. (laugh)Correct answer is 'laughed'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev