---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The...

---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.

a)
The most expensive / the most comfortable
b)
The more expensive / the more comfortable
c)
The most expensive / more comfortable
d)
The more expensive / the most comfortable
e)
More expensive / more comfortable

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the mos...

The more expensive a room is the more comfortable it is likely to be.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the mos...

Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B'. Let's understand why.

Comparing two qualities:

When we compare two qualities, we use the comparative degree. The comparative degree is formed by adding '-er' to the adjective for short adjectives and by using 'more' before the adjective for long adjectives.

For example:

- Short adjective: Expensive → Comparative degree: More expensive
- Long adjective: Comfortable → Comparative degree: More comfortable

Comparing three or more qualities:

When we compare three or more qualities, we use the superlative degree. The superlative degree is formed by adding '-est' to the adjective for short adjectives and by using 'the most' before the adjective for long adjectives.

For example:

- Short adjective: Expensive → Superlative degree: The most expensive
- Long adjective: Comfortable → Superlative degree: The most comfortable

Now, let's look at the given sentence:

"A room is, the more expensive it is likely to be."

Here, we are comparing two qualities: the price and the comfort level of a room. The given sentence is using the comparative degree correctly by using 'more' before 'expensive' and 'more' before 'comfortable'. Therefore, option 'B' is the correct answer.

Option analysis:

- Option 'A': This option is incorrect because it uses the superlative degree for 'comfortable' which is not appropriate for comparing two qualities.
- Option 'B': This option is correct because it uses the comparative degree for both 'expensive' and 'comfortable'.
- Option 'C': This option is incorrect because it uses the superlative degree for 'expensive' which is not appropriate for comparing two qualities.
- Option 'D': This option is incorrect because it uses the superlative degree for 'comfortable' which is not appropriate for comparing two qualities.
- Option 'E': This option is incorrect because it uses 'more' only for 'expensive' and not for 'comfortable', which is not appropriate for comparing two qualities.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.If the author of the passage travelled to a political convention and saw various candidates speak he would most likely have the highest regard for an orator who

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Historians agree that those seeking public office in modern America make far fewer speeches in the course of their campaign than those seeking a public position in ancient Greece did. The author would most likely explain this by pointing out that

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

View answer

It ismoreexpensive to travel on Friday, so I will leave on Thursday evening.

View answer

They like to keep their old houses rather than building the new ones ---- it is very hard and expensive to maintain them.

View answer

---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice ---- a room is, ---- it is likely to be.a)The most expensive / the most comfortableb)The more expensive / the more comfortablec)The most expensive / more comfortabled)The more expensive / the most comfortablee)More expensive / more comfortableCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam