All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  James went to the game with Susan and ___.Cor... Start Learning for Free
James went to the game with Susan and ___.
Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Verbal doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can ...
Explanation:


The correct answer to the question is "me". The sentence "James went to the game with Susan and me" is grammatically correct because "me" is the object pronoun, which is used when the pronoun is the object of the sentence. In this case, "me" is the object of the preposition "with".

Object Pronouns


Object pronouns are used when the pronoun is the object of the sentence. Examples of object pronouns are me, you, him, her, it, us, and them.

Prepositions


Prepositions are words that show the relationship between a noun or pronoun and other words in a sentence. Examples of prepositions are with, by, for, from, in, on, etc.

Subject Pronouns vs Object Pronouns


Subject pronouns are used when the pronoun is the subject of the sentence. Examples of subject pronouns are I, you, he, she, it, we, and they.

Object pronouns are used when the pronoun is the object of the sentence. Examples of object pronouns are me, you, him, her, it, us, and them.

Conclusion


In the sentence "James went to the game with Susan and me", "me" is the object pronoun because it is the object of the preposition "with". Therefore, the correct answer to the question is "me".
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can ...
"James went to the game with Susan and me”.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

The original Hellenistic community was idealized, the Greeks own golden dreama community never achieved but only imagined by the Macedonian Alexander, who was possessed of the true faith of all converts to a larger vision. The evolving system of city-states had produced not only unity with a healthy diversity but also narrow rivalries. No Hellenic empire arose, only scores of squabbling cities pursuing bitter feuds born of ancient wrongs and existing ambitions. It was civil strife made possible by isolation from the great armies and ambitions of Asia. Greek history could arguably begin in July of 776 B.C., the First Olympiad, and end with Theodosuss ban on the games in 393 A.D. Before this there had been a long era of two tribes, the Dorians and Ionians, scarcely distinguishable to the alien eye, but distinctly separate in their own eyes until 776. After Theodosus ban most of the Mediterranean world was Greek-like, in fact, but the central core had been rendered impotent by diffusion. During the eventful Greek millennium, the Olympics reflected not the high ideals of Hellenes but rather the mean reality of the times. Its founders had created a monster, games that twisted the strategists aspirations to unity to fit the unpleasant reality of the Hellenistic world. The games not only mirrored the central practices of the Greek world that reformers would deny but also imposed the flaws of that world. Like the atomic theory of the Greek philosophers, the Greek gamers theories were far removed from reality; they were elegant, consistent, logical, and irrelevant.Part religious ritual, part game rite, in the five-day Olympic Games, various athletes coming together under the banner of their cities; winning became paramount, imposing defeat a delight. As Greek society evolved, so, too, did the games, but rarely as a unifying force. Athletes supposedly competing for the laurel of accomplishment in the name of idealism found that dried olive leaves changed to gold. Each local polis (city-stat e) sought not to contribute to the grandeur of Greece, but to achieve its own glory. As in the real world, in the games no Greek could trust another, and each envied rivals victories. The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.The statement: The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games indicates that the author believes that

The original Hellenistic community was idealized, the Greeks own golden dreama community never achieved but only imagined by the Macedonian Alexander, who was possessed of the true faith of all converts to a larger vision. The evolving system of city-states had produced not only unity with a healthy diversity but also narrow rivalries. No Hellenic empire arose, only scores of squabbling cities pursuing bitter feuds born of ancient wrongs and existing ambitions. It was civil strife made possible by isolation from the great armies and ambitions of Asia. Greek history could arguably begin in July of 776 B.C., the First Olympiad, and end with Theodosuss ban on the games in 393 A.D. Before this there had been a long era of two tribes, the Dorians and Ionians, scarcely distinguishable to the alien eye, but distinctly separate in their own eyes until 776. After Theodosus ban most of the Mediterranean world was Greek-like, in fact, but the central core had been rendered impotent by diffusion. During the eventful Greek millennium, the Olympics reflected not the high ideals of Hellenes but rather the mean reality of the times. Its founders had created a monster, games that twisted the strategists aspirations to unity to fit the unpleasant reality of the Hellenistic world. The games not only mirrored the central practices of the Greek world that reformers would deny but also imposed the flaws of that world. Like the atomic theory of the Greek philosophers, the Greek gamers theories were far removed from reality; they were elegant, consistent, logical, and irrelevant.Part religious ritual, part game rite, in the five-day Olympic Games, various athletes coming together under the banner of their cities; winning became paramount, imposing defeat a delight. As Greek society evolved, so, too, did the games, but rarely as a unifying force. Athletes supposedly competing for the laurel of accomplishment in the name of idealism found that dried olive leaves changed to gold. Each local polis (city-stat e) sought not to contribute to the grandeur of Greece, but to achieve its own glory. As in the real world, in the games no Greek could trust another, and each envied rivals victories. The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ. For which of the following statements does the passage provide some evidence or explanation? I. Alexander united ancient Greece through a series of military conquests. II. The divisions among Greek city-states were reflected in the Olympics. III. The Olympic Games could not have occurred without a city-state system.

James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice James went to the game with Susan and ___.Correct answer is 'me'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup