Liberals and Radicals differed on the issue of dynastic rule.

Explanation:

1. Introduction:
Liberals and Radicals were political ideologies that emerged during the 19th century in Europe. While they shared some common goals, they also had significant differences on various issues.

2. Definition of Liberals and Radicals:
- Liberals: Liberals believed in the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and equality before the law. They advocated for representative democracy and the protection of individual rights.
- Radicals: Radicals held more extreme political views and sought to bring about radical changes in society. They often advocated for the overthrow of established institutions and the creation of a more egalitarian society.

3. Differences between Liberals and Radicals:
While Liberals and Radicals had some similarities in their goals, they differed on certain key issues. One such issue was dynastic rule.

4. Dynastic Rule:
- Definition: Dynastic rule refers to the system of governance in which power is held by members of a particular ruling family or dynasty.
- Historical context: During the 19th century, many European countries were still governed by hereditary monarchies, where power was passed down through generations within a particular family.

5. Liberal view on dynastic rule:
- Opposition to dynastic rule: Liberals generally opposed dynastic rule as it went against their principles of individual freedom and representative democracy. They believed that political power should be based on merit and not inherited privilege.
- Advocacy for constitutional monarchy: Some liberals advocated for a constitutional monarchy, where the power of the monarch is limited by a constitution and the rule of law. They believed that this would provide a check on the arbitrary exercise of power by the ruling family.

6. Radical view on dynastic rule:
- Rejection of dynastic rule: Radicals, on the other hand, rejected dynastic rule altogether. They believed that power should be held by the people and that hereditary privilege was inherently unjust. They called for the abolition of monarchy and the establishment of a republic.

7. Conclusion:
Liberals and Radicals differed on the issue of dynastic rule. While liberals often advocated for a constitutional monarchy, radicals rejected dynastic rule altogether and called for the establishment of a republic.