UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >   Consider the following statements about the ... Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.
1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off
2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices
3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given price
Which of these statements are correct?
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It wa...
  • The Green Revolution: In the face of the prevailing food-crisis, the country was clearly vulnerable to external pressures and dependent on food aid, mainly from the United States. The United States, in turn, pushed India to change its economic policies.
  • The government adopted a new strategy for agriculture in order to ensure food sufficiency. Instead of the earlier policy of giving more support to the areas and farmers that were lagging behind, now it was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off.
  • The argument was that those who already had the capacity could help increase production rapidly in the short run. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices.
  • The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given price. This was the beginning of what was called the ‘green revolution’.
Free Test
Community Answer
Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It wa...
Understanding the Green Revolution

Statement 1:
- The statement is correct as the Green Revolution primarily focused on areas with existing irrigation systems and farmers who were already well-off.

Statement 2:
- This statement is accurate as the government provided high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and improved irrigation facilities at highly subsidized rates to boost agricultural productivity.

Statement 3:
- The statement is true as the government offered a price guarantee to farmers for their produce, ensuring a stable income for them.

Conclusion:
- All the statements are correct as they highlight key aspects of the Green Revolution, which aimed to increase agricultural output through the adoption of modern techniques and technologies. By providing resources to well-off farmers in irrigated areas and ensuring a fair price for their produce, the government sought to revolutionize the agricultural sector and improve food security in the country.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. With reference to the passage, consider the following statements:1. Use of chemical pesticides has become imperative in all the poor countries of the world.2. Chemical pesticides should not have any role in sustainable agriculture3. One pest can develop resistance to many pesticidesWhich of the statements given above is/are correct?

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. Why is the use of chemical pesticides generally justified by giving the examples of poor and developing countries?1. Developed countries can afford to do away with use of pesticides by adapting to organic farming, but it is imperative for poor and developing countries to use chemical pesticides.2. In poor and developing countries, the pesticide addresses the problem of epidemic diseases of crops and eases the food problem.3. The social and health costs of pesticide use are generally ignored in poor and developing countries. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. How do pesticides act as agents for the selection of resistant individuals in any pest population?1. It is possible that in a pest population the individuals will behave differently due to their genetic makeup.2. Pests do possess the ability to detoxify the pesticides.3. Evolution of pesticide resistance is equally distributed in pest population. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Top Courses for UPSC

Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a) 1 and 2 onlyb) 2 and 3 onlyc) 1 and 3 onlyd) All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev