Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following statements about the G...

Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.

1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off

2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices

3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given price

Which of these statements are correct?

a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
All of the above

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was...

1. Background of the Green Revolution:
- The Green Revolution was a period in the 1960s and 1970s when agricultural productivity significantly increased due to the adoption of modern agricultural techniques.
- The primary aim of the Green Revolution was to increase food production to meet the growing demands of the increasing population.

2. Implementation of the Green Revolution:
- The government decided to focus its resources on areas with existing irrigation facilities and farmers who were already well-off.
- High-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and better irrigation methods were provided to farmers at highly subsidized prices to boost productivity.
- This approach aimed to ensure that those who were already in a better position to maximize agricultural output would benefit the most from the Green Revolution.

3. Government support to farmers:
- As part of the Green Revolution strategy, the government also guaranteed to buy the produce of farmers at a predetermined price.
- This ensured that farmers had a guaranteed market for their increased production and were incentivized to adopt modern agricultural practices.
- The government's support in purchasing the produce at a fixed price provided stability and security to farmers, encouraging them to invest in high-yielding variety seeds and other inputs.

4. Conclusion:
- In summary, all the statements provided in the question are correct as they highlight the key aspects of the Green Revolution, including the targeted allocation of resources, provision of modern agricultural inputs, and government support to farmers through price guarantees.

Answered by Notes Wala · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?

View answer

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. With reference to the passage, consider the following statements:1. Use of chemical pesticides has become imperative in all the poor countries of the world.2. Chemical pesticides should not have any role in sustainable agriculture3. One pest can develop resistance to many pesticidesWhich of the statements given above is/are correct?

View answer

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. Why is the use of chemical pesticides generally justified by giving the examples of poor and developing countries?1. Developed countries can afford to do away with use of pesticides by adapting to organic farming, but it is imperative for poor and developing countries to use chemical pesticides.2. In poor and developing countries, the pesticide addresses the problem of epidemic diseases of crops and eases the food problem.3. The social and health costs of pesticide use are generally ignored in poor and developing countries. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

View answer

Passage IIChemical pesticides lose their role in sustainable agriculture if the pests evolve resistance. The evolution of the pesticide resistance is simply natural selection in action. It is almost certain to occur when vast numbers of a genetically variable population are killed. One or a few individuals may be unusually resistant (perhaps because they possess an enzyme that can detoxify the pesticid e). If the pesticide is applied repeatedly, each successive generation of the pest will contain a larger proportion of resistant individuals. Pests typically have a high intrinsic rate of reproduction, and so a few individuals in one generation may give rise to hundreds or thousands in the next, and resistance spreads very rapidly in a population.This problem was often ignored in the past, even though the first case of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) resistance was reported as early as 1946. There is an exponential increase in the numbers of invertebrates that have evolved resistance and in the number pesticides against which resistance has evolved. Resistance has been recorded in every family of arthropod pests (including dipterans such as mosquitoes and house flies, as well as beetles, moths, wasps, fleas, lice and mites) as well as in weeds and plant pathogens. Take the Alabama leaf worm, a moth pest of cotton, as an example. It has developed resistance in one or more regions of the world to aldrin, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, lindane and toxaphene.If chemical pesticides brought nothing but problems, - if their use was intrinsically and acutely unsustainable then they would already have fallen out of widespread use. This has not happened. Instead, their rate of production has increased rapidly. The ratio of cost to benefit for the individual agricultural producer has remained in favour of pesticide use. In the USA, insecticides have been estimated to benefit the agricultural products to the tune of around $5 for every $1 spent.Moreover, in many poorer countries, the prospect of imminent mass starvation, or of an epidemic disease, are so frightening that the social and health costs of using pesticides have to be ignored. In general the use of pesticides is justified by objective measures such as lives saved, economic efficiency of food production and total food produced. In these very fundamental senses, their use may be described as sustainable. In practice, sustainability depends on continually developing new pesticides that keep at least one step ahead of the pests pesticides that are less persistent, biodegradable and more accurately targeted at the pests.Q. How do pesticides act as agents for the selection of resistant individuals in any pest population?1. It is possible that in a pest population the individuals will behave differently due to their genetic makeup.2. Pests do possess the ability to detoxify the pesticides.3. Evolution of pesticide resistance is equally distributed in pest population. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

View answer

Consider the following statements about the impact of the Green Revolution? 1. Due to excessive and uncontrolled use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides have degraded the environment by increasing pollution levels in land, water and air.2. In India it is more due to deforestation and extension of cultivation in ecologically fragile areas.Which of these statements is/are correct?

View answer

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

History for UPSC CSE

Indian Polity for UPSC CSE

CSAT Preparation

Top Courses for UPSC

View all

Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements about the Green Revolution.1. It was decided to put more resources into those areas which already had irrigation and those farmers who were already well-off2. Thus the government offered high-yielding variety seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and better irrigation at highly subsidised prices3. The government also gave a guarantee to buy the produce of the farmers at a given priceWhich of these statements are correct?a)1 and 2 onlyb)2 and 3 onlyc)1 and 3 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.

Explore Courses for UPSC exam