All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  The five permanent members of UN security cou... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The five permanent members of UN security council are
  • a)
    Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USA
  • b)
    Canada, China, France, USSR and USA
  • c)
    Germany, China, USSR, UK and USA
  • d)
    China, France, USSR, UK and USA
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Ger...
Correct. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council are China, France, Russia (formerly USSR), United Kingdom, and the United States. These countries are also known as the P5 or the Big Five, and they hold veto power in the Security Council, which means that any substantive resolution requires the approval of all five members in order to be adopted.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Ger...
Explanation:

Permanent Members of the UN Security Council:
- The five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council are China, France, Russia (formerly USSR), United Kingdom, and the United States.
- These five countries hold veto power, which means that any substantive resolution proposed in the Security Council requires the affirmative votes of these five members to pass.
- The status of permanent membership was established after World War II to ensure that the major Allied powers had a prominent role in maintaining international peace and security.

Correct Option:
- The correct option in this case is option 'D', which lists China, France, USSR (now Russia), UK, and USA as the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.
- It is important to note that the composition of the permanent members has remained the same since the establishment of the United Nations in 1945.
- These five countries play a crucial role in shaping the decisions and actions of the Security Council in response to global conflicts and crises.

Conclusion:
- Understanding the composition and role of the permanent members of the UN Security Council is essential for comprehending the dynamics of international relations and diplomacy.
- These five countries hold significant influence in the realm of global security and must work together to address complex challenges facing the international community.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

At a special session marking 75 years of the United Nations on Tuesday (September, 2020), Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for reform of its “outdated structures”, pointing out that in the absence of comprehensive changes, the world body today faces a “crisis of confidence”. While the words appear harsh given the occasion, they can hardly be faulted. India has been at the forefront of demanding reform in the UN, particularly its principal organ, the Security Council, for decades, staking its claim as one of the world’s largest economies and most populous countries, with a track record in promoting a rules-based international order, and contributing to peacekeeping through UN forces. The UN was born in the crisis of the World War era, and the realities of that time can hardly be compared to the present. The UNSC’s permanent, veto-carrying members, chosen by virtue of being “winners” of World War II — the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia and later China — can hardly claim adequate representation of the world’s leadership today. The UNSC does not include a permanent member from the African, Australian and South American continents, and the pillars of the multilateral order, such as the G-4 group of Brazil, India, Germany and Japan, have been ignored for long. Other, more representative options exist, and that has been the crux of the battle for change. Also, there is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded. Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions. These issues are underlined in a year where the coronavirus pandemic has brought the world to a standstill; yet, the UN, the UNSC, and WHO have failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.For India, what has been most frustrating is that despite the dysfunctional power balance that prevails, the UN’s reform process, held through Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has not made progress over decades, despite commitments. The UN has chosen to “rollover” the discussions of the IGN, which are looking at five major issues: enlarging the Security Council, categories of membership, the question of the veto that five Permanent members of the UNSC wield, regional representation, and redistributing the Security Council-General Assembly power balance. It is some comfort that the UN’s 75th anniversary declaration passed by all member countries this week pledges to “upgrade the United Nations” with a commitment to “instil new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council”. Those words can only be realised if the UNSC’s permanent members recognise the deep peril the UN faces and support the reform process, an act that will require looking beyond their own interests for the greater good of the world and its peace-buildingWhich of the following factors seems to be the qualifying criteria for the present members of the security council, which got them to the security council in the first place?1.They were the wealthiest of all the countries present in the world2.The 5 countries won the World War II3.The five countries have the world’s strongest security forces

At a special session marking 75 years of the United Nations on Tuesday (September, 2020), Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for reform of its “outdated structures”, pointing out that in the absence of comprehensive changes, the world body today faces a “crisis of confidence”. While the words appear harsh given the occasion, they can hardly be faulted. India has been at the forefront of demanding reform in the UN, particularly its principal organ, the Security Council, for decades, staking its claim as one of the world’s largest economies and most populous countries, with a track record in promoting a rules-based international order, and contributing to peacekeeping through UN forces. The UN was born in the crisis of the World War era, and the realities of that time can hardly be compared to the present. The UNSC’s permanent, veto-carrying members, chosen by virtue of being “winners” of World War II — the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia and later China — can hardly claim adequate representation of the world’s leadership today. The UNSC does not include a permanent member from the African, Australian and South American continents, and the pillars of the multilateral order, such as the G-4 group of Brazil, India, Germany and Japan, have been ignored for long. Other, more representative options exist, and that has been the crux of the battle for change. Also, there is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded. Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions. These issues are underlined in a year where the coronavirus pandemic has brought the world to a standstill; yet, the UN, the UNSC, and WHO have failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.For India, what has been most frustrating is that despite the dysfunctional power balance that prevails, the UN’s reform process, held through Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has not made progress over decades, despite commitments. The UN has chosen to “rollover” the discussions of the IGN, which are looking at five major issues: enlarging the Security Council, categories of membership, the question of the veto that five Permanent members of the UNSC wield, regional representation, and redistributing the Security Council-General Assembly power balance. It is some comfort that the UN’s 75th anniversary declaration passed by all member countries this week pledges to “upgrade the United Nations” with a commitment to “instil new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council”. Those words can only be realised if the UNSC’s permanent members recognise the deep peril the UN faces and support the reform process, an act that will require looking beyond their own interests for the greater good of the world and its peace-buildingWhich of the following organs of the UN does India wish to be a part of, as per the passage?

At a special session marking 75 years of the United Nations on Tuesday (September, 2020), Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for reform of its “outdated structures”, pointing out that in the absence of comprehensive changes, the world body today faces a “crisis of confidence”. While the words appear harsh given the occasion, they can hardly be faulted. India has been at the forefront of demanding reform in the UN, particularly its principal organ, the Security Council, for decades, staking its claim as one of the world’s largest economies and most populous countries, with a track record in promoting a rules-based international order, and contributing to peacekeeping through UN forces. The UN was born in the crisis of the World War era, and the realities of that time can hardly be compared to the present. The UNSC’s permanent, veto-carrying members, chosen by virtue of being “winners” of World War II — the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia and later China — can hardly claim adequate representation of the world’s leadership today. The UNSC does not include a permanent member from the African, Australian and South American continents, and the pillars of the multilateral order, such as the G-4 group of Brazil, India, Germany and Japan, have been ignored for long. Other, more representative options exist, and that has been the crux of the battle for change. Also, there is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded. Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions. These issues are underlined in a year where the coronavirus pandemic has brought the world to a standstill; yet, the UN, the UNSC, and WHO have failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.For India, what has been most frustrating is that despite the dysfunctional power balance that prevails, the UN’s reform process, held through Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has not made progress over decades, despite commitments. The UN has chosen to “rollover” the discussions of the IGN, which are looking at five major issues: enlarging the Security Council, categories of membership, the question of the veto that five Permanent members of the UNSC wield, regional representation, and redistributing the Security Council-General Assembly power balance. It is some comfort that the UN’s 75th anniversary declaration passed by all member countries this week pledges to “upgrade the United Nations” with a commitment to “instil new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council”. Those words can only be realised if the UNSC’s permanent members recognise the deep peril the UN faces and support the reform process, an act that will require looking beyond their own interests for the greater good of the world and its peace-buildingWhich of the following is the most appropriate title to the passage?

At a special session marking 75 years of the United Nations on Tuesday (September, 2020), Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for reform of its “outdated structures”, pointing out that in the absence of comprehensive changes, the world body today faces a “crisis of confidence”. While the words appear harsh given the occasion, they can hardly be faulted. India has been at the forefront of demanding reform in the UN, particularly its principal organ, the Security Council, for decades, staking its claim as one of the world’s largest economies and most populous countries, with a track record in promoting a rules-based international order, and contributing to peacekeeping through UN forces. The UN was born in the crisis of the World War era, and the realities of that time can hardly be compared to the present. The UNSC’s permanent, veto-carrying members, chosen by virtue of being “winners” of World War II — the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia and later China — can hardly claim adequate representation of the world’s leadership today. The UNSC does not include a permanent member from the African, Australian and South American continents, and the pillars of the multilateral order, such as the G-4 group of Brazil, India, Germany and Japan, have been ignored for long. Other, more representative options exist, and that has been the crux of the battle for change. Also, there is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded. Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions. These issues are underlined in a year where the coronavirus pandemic has brought the world to a standstill; yet, the UN, the UNSC, and WHO have failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.For India, what has been most frustrating is that despite the dysfunctional power balance that prevails, the UN’s reform process, held through Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has not made progress over decades, despite commitments. The UN has chosen to “rollover” the discussions of the IGN, which are looking at five major issues: enlarging the Security Council, categories of membership, the question of the veto that five Permanent members of the UNSC wield, regional representation, and redistributing the Security Council-General Assembly power balance. It is some comfort that the UN’s 75th anniversary declaration passed by all member countries this week pledges to “upgrade the United Nations” with a commitment to “instil new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council”. Those words can only be realised if the UNSC’s permanent members recognise the deep peril the UN faces and support the reform process, an act that will require looking beyond their own interests for the greater good of the world and its peace-buildingWhat does the author mean when he states “outdated structures”?

At a special session marking 75 years of the United Nations on Tuesday (September, 2020), Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for reform of its “outdated structures”, pointing out that in the absence of comprehensive changes, the world body today faces a “crisis of confidence”. While the words appear harsh given the occasion, they can hardly be faulted. India has been at the forefront of demanding reform in the UN, particularly its principal organ, the Security Council, for decades, staking its claim as one of the world’s largest economies and most populous countries, with a track record in promoting a rules-based international order, and contributing to peacekeeping through UN forces. The UN was born in the crisis of the World War era, and the realities of that time can hardly be compared to the present. The UNSC’s permanent, veto-carrying members, chosen by virtue of being “winners” of World War II — the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia and later China — can hardly claim adequate representation of the world’s leadership today. The UNSC does not include a permanent member from the African, Australian and South American continents, and the pillars of the multilateral order, such as the G-4 group of Brazil, India, Germany and Japan, have been ignored for long. Other, more representative options exist, and that has been the crux of the battle for change. Also, there is a deep polarisation within the UN’s membership, so decisions are either not taken, or not heeded. Frequent divisions within the UNSC P-5 end up blocking key decisions. These issues are underlined in a year where the coronavirus pandemic has brought the world to a standstill; yet, the UN, the UNSC, and WHO have failed to play an effective role in helping nations deal with the spread.For India, what has been most frustrating is that despite the dysfunctional power balance that prevails, the UN’s reform process, held through Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) has not made progress over decades, despite commitments. The UN has chosen to “rollover” the discussions of the IGN, which are looking at five major issues: enlarging the Security Council, categories of membership, the question of the veto that five Permanent members of the UNSC wield, regional representation, and redistributing the Security Council-General Assembly power balance. It is some comfort that the UN’s 75th anniversary declaration passed by all member countries this week pledges to “upgrade the United Nations” with a commitment to “instil new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council”. Those words can only be realised if the UNSC’s permanent members recognise the deep peril the UN faces and support the reform process, an act that will require looking beyond their own interests for the greater good of the world and its peace-buildingWhich of the following could be a suitable synonym for crux?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The five permanent members of UN security council area)Japan, West Germany, USSR, UK and USAb)Canada, China, France, USSR and USAc)Germany, China, USSR, UK and USAd)China, France, USSR, UK and USACorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily