In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

SSC Exam > SSC Questions > In the question a statement is given, followe...

Join the Discussion on the App

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?
Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.
Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.

a)
if only argument I is strong.
b)
if only argument II is strong.
c)
if both I and II are strong.
d)
if neither I nor II is strong.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Mock Test: SSC JE Civil Engineering (CE)- 5

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and...

Constitution of India has given fundamental right of freedom to people of India to decide from where to buy goods they need. So banning sale of alcohol near highways would be against it. Thus Argument I is strong.
The statement given in argument II that 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under the influence of alcohol is also true. Thus Argument II also holds strong.
Thus both the given arguments I and II are strong.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and...

Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?

Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.

Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under the influence of alcohol.

Explanation:

To determine which argument is strong, we need to evaluate the merits of each argument in relation to the statement.

Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.

This argument emphasizes the importance of personal freedom and individual rights. It suggests that individuals should have the autonomy to make their own choices, including whether or not to consume alcohol near highways. While personal freedom is indeed a fundamental right, it should be balanced with other considerations, such as public safety and the greater good.

Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under the influence of alcohol.

This argument highlights a significant statistic that suggests a strong correlation between alcohol consumption and road accidents. It implies that banning the sale of alcohol near highways could potentially reduce the number of accidents caused by intoxicated drivers. Public safety is a crucial factor to consider, and if a large percentage of accidents are indeed alcohol-related, then banning the sale of alcohol near highways could be a reasonable measure to prevent such incidents.

Conclusion:

Both arguments have their own merits. Argument I emphasizes personal freedom and individual rights, while Argument II focuses on public safety and the high percentage of alcohol-related accidents.

However, when considering the greater good and the potential to save lives, Argument II appears to be stronger. Preventing road accidents and ensuring public safety should be a priority, and banning the sale of alcohol near highways can be a step in the right direction. Therefore, both arguments are strong, and the correct answer is option 'C' – if both I and II are strong.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for SSC exam

Similar SSC Doubts

In the question one statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should the village authorities build a water tank in their village?Argument I: Yes, a tank is essential as it will provide water for dry summer months.Argument II: No, the sharing of tank water will lead to disharmony amongst the villagers.

View answer

One or two statements are given, followed by three-four conclusions Arguments. I, II, II and IV. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given Conclusion Arguments can definitely be drawn from the given statement (s). Indicate your answer.Statement: Should little children be loaded with such heavy school bags?Arguments:I. Yes, a heavy bags means more knowledge.II. No heavy school bags spoil the posture of the children.III. Yes, children need to be adapted for earning knowledgeIV. No, a heavy bag never ensures knowledge gathering

View answer

Direction: Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so far as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.Statement :Should cameras be installed in public school class-rooms to monitor teachers?Argument :I. No, This will violate privacy norms.II. Yes, This will make teachers more accountable, increasing their productivity.

View answer

Direction: Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so far as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are of minor importance and may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Select the correct answer using the codes given below.Statement: Should cameras be installed in public school classrooms to monitor teachers?Argument :I. No, This will violate privacy norms.II. Yes, This will make the teacher more accountable, increasing their productivity.

View answer

Direction: Each question below is followed by a statement/ Question and arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are of minor importance and may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. GIVE ANSWER (

View answer

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for SSC 2024 is part of SSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SSC exam syllabus. Information about In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should sale of alcohol near highways be banned?Argument I: No, people should have freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.a)if only argument I is strong.b)if only argument II is strong.c)if both I and II are strong.d)if neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SSC tests.

Explore Courses for SSC exam