Directions : In the following questions a statement of assertion (A) ...
Genetic modification of organisms can have unpredictable results when such organisms are introduced into the ecosystem. Therefore, the Indian Government has set up organisations such as GEAC (Genetic Engineering Approval Committee), Which will make decisions regarding the validity of GM research and safety of introducing GM-organisms for public services.
View all questions of this test
Directions : In the following questions a statement of assertion (A) ...
Assertion (A) : GEAC will decide the safety of introducing GM organisms for public use.
Reason (R) : Genetic modifications of organisms may have opposite results when introduced into the ecosystem.
The correct answer is option 'A', which states that both assertion (A) and reason (R) are true and reason (R) is the correct explanation of assertion (A). Let's understand why this is the correct answer by analyzing each statement.
Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC)
The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) is a regulatory body in India that is responsible for evaluating the safety and environmental impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). It is the authority that decides whether GM organisms can be introduced for public use.
Genetic Modifications and Ecosystem Impact
Genetic modifications of organisms involve altering their genetic material to introduce new traits or characteristics. These modifications can be done through various techniques, such as gene editing or genetic engineering. When genetically modified organisms are introduced into the ecosystem, there can be potential consequences.
Opposite Results of Genetic Modifications
The reason (R) states that genetic modifications of organisms may have opposite results when introduced into the ecosystem. This means that the intended benefits or outcomes of genetic modifications may not always be realized and can sometimes have unintended consequences.
Examples of Opposite Results
There are several examples where the introduction of GM organisms has had unexpected effects on the ecosystem. For instance, genetically modified crops designed to resist pests can sometimes lead to the emergence of resistant pests, creating new challenges for farmers. Similarly, genetically modified fish or animals released into the wild may interbreed with wild populations, potentially altering the genetic diversity and ecological balance.
GEAC's Role in Assessing Safety
Given the potential risks associated with introducing GM organisms into the ecosystem, it is crucial to evaluate their safety before allowing public use. The assertion (A) states that GEAC will decide the safety of introducing GM organisms for public use. This means that GEAC's role is to assess the potential risks and benefits of GM organisms and make informed decisions regarding their safety.
Reason as the Explanation for Assertion
The reason (R) provides an explanation for the assertion (A). It states that genetic modifications of organisms may have opposite results when introduced into the ecosystem. This implies that assessing the safety of GM organisms is necessary because their introduction can have unpredictable and potentially negative impacts on the ecosystem.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. GEAC's role is to evaluate the safety of introducing GM organisms for public use, considering the potential opposite results of genetic modifications when introduced into the ecosystem.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed NEET study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in NEET.