Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: The sentence given below is a le...

Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.

Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.

Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.

Can X claim damages from Y?

a)
Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.
b)
No, X has reduced the fee on his own.
c)
Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.
d)
No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by...

'X' cannot claim damages from 'Y' because though there was damage, there was no legal injury as he just used his right to work.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

SLAT Mock Test - 4 (New Pattern)
60 Ques | 60 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by...

Legal Principle:
Violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.

Factual Situation:
X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to Rs. 1 lakh.

Explanation:
- Legal injury: In this case, X's legal right to set his fee at Rs. 2 lakh per annum was violated by Y's actions.
- Damage: X suffered a monetary loss as he had to reduce his fee to match Y's price.
- Legal injury without damage: The principle states that a violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort. Even though X suffered a financial loss, the reduction in fee was a result of competition in the market and not a direct violation of his legal right.
- Claim for damages: X cannot claim damages from Y in this situation as there was damage but no legal injury. Y's actions were within the legal boundaries of competition, and X voluntarily chose to lower his fee in response.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Given below are Legal Principles followed by a Factual Situation. Apply the principles followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to it and select the most appropriate answer for question among the four choices given.LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.FACTUAL SITUATION: X runs a coaching center and charges Rs. 1800 per month as fees per candidate. Y runs another coaching center and charges Rs. 1300 per month as fees per candidate for completing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1300.QUESTION: Can X claim for damages from Y?

View answer

Question numbers 1-35 consists of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as principl e) and facts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability, even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.Therefore, to answer a question, principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.Q.Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?

View answer

Directions: Questions 17- 20 are based on a common set of Principles and Facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1 – An action against violation of Fundamental Rights can only be brought against legislative or administrative actions of the state, and not against private actions.Principle 2- 'State‘ includes the Government of India, the Parliament, the state governments and legislatures, and all local and other authorities under the control of the government of India.Principle 3 – The fundamental right to equality entails that equals be treated equally.Principle 4 – No citizen shall on the grounds of caste (among other grounds), be ineligible for an office under the State.Principle 5 – Any law or action of the State that contravenes fundamental rights will be void to the extent of that contravention.Facts – Nirmala and Sitara are both civil servants who have served in different capacities for about twelve years now. Despite several transfers and changes in designation, they have continued to remain friends. One day, they both attend a stirring talk by a Dalit rights activist, and are so influenced by this talk, that they want to contribute to the Dalit movement in their capacity as civil servants. They decide to apply for managerial posts at the Department for Minority Affairs. Nirmala‘s application for the post was rejected on the grounds that she was Brahmin herself, and not eligible to manage the affairs of SCs and STs. Sitara‘s application for the post was rejected due to past animosity with Mr. Kapur, head of the Minority Affairs Department. Mr. Kapur, in a scathing email, informed her that she would not be considered for any post that required his approval. Nirmala and Sitara are both enraged by these rejections, and allege that their fundamental rights have been violated.Q.Have the fundamental rights of Sitara been violated?

View answer

Directions: Questions 4 - 6 are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Q.Did Annubai and Aggubai have a principalagent relationship?

View answer

Directions: Questions 4 - 6are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Que: Had Aggubai clearly instructed Annubai totravel only by train, who would then beliable for the accident?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: The violation of legal right without damage gives rise to tort.Factual Situation: X runs a Medical coaching centre and charges Rs. 2 lakh per annum as fee. Y started another Medical coaching centre and started charging Rs. 1 lakh per annum fee for competing with X. This act of Y compelled X to reduce his charge to such Rs. 1 lakh.Can X claim damages from Y?a)Yes, he can as Y violated his legal right.b)No, X has reduced the fee on his own.c)Yes because as there was damage there was legal injury.d)No because though there was damage, there was no legal injury.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam