Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  The critics ---- that the review ---- as a bo... Start Learning for Free
The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.
  • a)
    are said / could be published
  • b)
    say / can be published
  • c)
    will say / had been published
  • d)
    said / may be published
  • e)
    have said / should publish
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many...
Subject-verb agreement is tested in this question. The sentence is in the present tense, so the verb tense used should also be in the present tense.

Explanation of options:

a)are said / could be published - Incorrect. The use of "could" is incorrect here as it indicates a possibility, and the sentence needs to reflect a fact. Also, "are said" is in the present tense, but "could be published" is in the conditional tense, making the sentence grammatically incorrect.

b)say / can be published - Correct. "Say" is in the present tense, and "can be published" is in the present tense, making the sentence grammatically correct.

c)will say / had been published - Incorrect. "Will say" is in the future tense, but the sentence is in the present tense. "Had been published" is in the past perfect tense, which is incorrect in this sentence.

d)said / may be published - Incorrect. "Said" is in the past tense, which is incorrect as the sentence is in the present tense. "May be published" is in the conditional tense, which is not suitable for this sentence.

e)have said / should publish - Incorrect. "Have said" is in the present perfect tense, which is incorrect in this sentence. "Should publish" is in the conditional tense, which is not suitable for this sentence.

Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

Of course, in his attempts at field investigation, the historian is at the disadvantage that the countryside has changed in many respects since the period which he is studying. He is not permitted to use H.G. Wellss time machine, to enable him to see it as it actually was. Inevitably he is concerned in the main, if not exclusively, with literary and other materials, which have survived from that stretch of the past which interests him.Old maps may be plans of cities, charts of sea coasts and estuaries, cartularies of landed estates, or topographic delineations of land areas. These clearly engage the interest of historians and geographers alike, and they call for a combination of the methods and viewpoints of each. Maps can be conceived of and considered in several quite different ways, being properly regarded, and so assessed, as works of artat best as objects of colour, skill, form, and beauty. They may alternatively be regarded purely for their cartographic aesthetic. The main queries which then arise are the following: how is it that the map-maker has carried out his task and with skill of what echelon and with what degree of success has he done so? Such an inquiry falls to the specialist field of historical cartography. An antiquarian map may also be approached in a means akin to that of the student who conceives it as a font contemporaneous with the time of its production. Thus, the historical cartographer may seek to bring grist to his mill and to consider the maps reliability as a satisfactory source of empirical evidence. By such means also the regional historian, in his search for essentials about such past matters as the availability of roads, the extent of enclosed farmland, or the number and location of mines and quarries, is no less an interested party.The value of old maps as documents useful for historicity depends necessarily on to what degree they depict and on how accurately. For virtually all periods of pre-modern history some maps have survived to serve as historiography, depicting, however imperfectly, certain features of past geography. The work of Claudius Ptolemywho lived in the 2nd century A.D.for centuries provided the basis for maps of the known world and its major regions. Although many were drawn on the scientific basis which he provided, they nevertheless embodied many errorsof location, distance, and the shape of areas of land and sea. The medieval portolan charts of the Mediterranean Sea and the later charts which provided sailing directions, produced in Holland, were accurate enough to be useful in practical navigation. Plans of important cities of Europe, so well-drawn as to yield evidence of their earlier form and extent, are notably offered in Braun and Hogenbergs Civitates Orbis Terrarum, published at Cologne and, in England, in John Speeds plans of cities. Similarly, John Ogilbys Britannia, Volume the First, appearing in 1675, gives detailed information of Englands road system as it existed nearly three centuries ago. However, few of the early maps approach modern standards, which require accurate representation of distances and of heights above mean sea-level and the use of carefullydistinguished symbols. This is because it was not until the 18th century that cartography, as an exact science, was born. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.With which of the following statements would the author be most likely to agree?

Of course, in his attempts at field investigation, the historian is at the disadvantage that the countryside has changed in many respects since the period which he is studying. He is not permitted to use H.G. Wellss time machine, to enable him to see it as it actually was. Inevitably he is concerned in the main, if not exclusively, with literary and other materials, which have survived from that stretch of the past which interests him. Old maps may be plans of cities, charts of sea coasts and estuaries, cartularies of landed estates, or topographic delineations of land areas. These clearly engage the interest of historians and geographers alike, and they call for a combination of the methods and viewpoints of each. Maps can be conceived of and considered in several quite different ways, being properly regarded, and so assessed, as works of artat best as objects of colour, skill, form, and beauty. They may alternatively be regarded purely for their cartographic aesthetic. The main queries which then arise are the following: how is it that the map-maker has carried out his task and with skill of what echelon and with what degree of success has he done so? Such an inquiry falls to the specialist field of historical cartography. An antiquarian map may also be approached in a means akin to that of the student who conceives it as a font contemporaneous with the time of its production. Thus, the historical cartographer may seek to bring grist to his mill and to consider the maps reliability as a satisfactory source of empirical evidence. By such means also the regional historian, in his search for essentials about such past matters as the availability of roads, the extent of enclosed farmland, or the number and location of mines and quarries, is no less an interested party.The value of old maps as documents useful for historicity depends necessarily on to what degree they depict and on how accurately. For virtually all periods of pre-modern history some maps have survived to serve as historiography, depicting, however imperfectly, certain features of past geography. The work of Claudius Ptolemywho lived in the 2nd century A.D.for centuries provided the basis for maps of the known world and its major regions. Although many were drawn on the scientific basis which he provided, they nevertheless embodied many errorsof location, distance, and the shape of areas of land and sea. The medieval portolan charts of the Mediterranean Sea and the later charts which provided sailing directions, produced in Holland, were accurate enough to be useful in practical navigation. Plans of important cities of Europe, so well-drawn as to yield evidence of their earlier form and extent, are notably offered in Braun and Hogenbergs Civitates Orbis Terrarum, published at Cologne and, in England, in John Speeds plans of cities. Similarly, John Ogilbys Britannia, Volume the First, appearing in 1675, gives detailed information of Englands road system as it existed nearly three centuries ago. However, few of the early maps approach modern standards, which require accurate representation of distances and of heights above mean sea-level and the use of carefullydistinguished symbols. This is because it was not until the 18th century that cartography, as an exact science, was born. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q. According to the passage, which of the following statements is/are NOT true? I. Most maps produced before the 18th century are not as accurate as maps produced after the 18th century. II. The maps of Claudius Ptolemy were not used as a model by later mapmakers.III. Historians have generally been uninterested in using maps as a tool to learn about the past.

Of course, in his attempts at field investigation, the historian is at the disadvantage that the countryside has changed in many respects since the period which he is studying. He is not permitted to use H.G. Wellss time machine, to enable him to see it as it actually was. Inevitably he is concerned in the main, if not exclusively, with literary and other materials, which have survived from that stretch of the past which interests him.Old maps may be plans of cities, charts of sea coasts and estuaries, cartularies of landed estates, or topographic delineations of land areas. These clearly engage the interest of historians and geographers alike, and they call for a combination of the methods and viewpoints of each. Maps can be conceived of and considered in several quite different ways, being properly regarded, and so assessed, as works of artat best as objects of colour, skill, form, and beauty. They may alternatively be regarded purely for their cartographic aesthetic. The main queries which then arise are the following: how is it that the map-maker has carried out his task and with skill of what echelon and with what degree of success has he done so? Such an inquiry falls to the specialist field of historical cartography. An antiquarian map may also be approached in a means akin to that of the student who conceives it as a font contemporaneous with the time of its production. Thus, the historical cartographer may seek to bring grist to his mill and to consider the maps reliability as a satisfactory source of empirical evidence. By such means also the regional historian, in his search for essentials about such past matters as the availability of roads, the extent of enclosed farmland, or the number and location of mines and quarries, is no less an interested party.The value of old maps as documents useful for historicity depends necessarily on to what degree they depict and on how accurately. For virtually all periods of pre-modern history some maps have survived to serve as historiography, depicting, however imperfectly, certain features of past geography. The work of Claudius Ptolemywho lived in the 2nd century A.D.for centuries provided the basis for maps of the known world and its major regions. Although many were drawn on the scientific basis which he provided, they nevertheless embodied many errorsof location, distance, and the shape of areas of land and sea. The medieval portolan charts of the Mediterranean Sea and the later charts which provided sailing directions, produced in Holland, were accurate enough to be useful in practical navigation. Plans of important cities of Europe, so well-drawn as to yield evidence of their earlier form and extent, are notably offered in Braun and Hogenbergs Civitates Orbis Terrarum, published at Cologne and, in England, in John Speeds plans of cities. Similarly, John Ogilbys Britannia, Volume the First, appearing in 1675, gives detailed information of Englands road system as it existed nearly three centuries ago. However, few of the early maps approach modern standards, which require accurate representation of distances and of heights above mean sea-level and the use of carefullydistinguished symbols. This is because it was not until the 18th century that cartography, as an exact science, was born. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.According to the passage, all of the following would be considered maps EXCEPT

The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The critics ---- that the review ---- as a book in English and in many other languages.a)are said / could be publishedb)say / can be publishedc)will say / had been publishedd)said / may be publishede)have said / should publishCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev