Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three y... Start Learning for Free
Bryan ____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.
Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'h...
Bryan has been learning Spanish for three years.

Explanation:
To understand why the correct answer is "has been learning," we need to look at the context and the verb tense being used.

Present Perfect Continuous Tense:
The phrase "has been learning" is an example of the present perfect continuous tense. This tense is used to describe actions that started in the past, continue in the present, and are likely to continue in the future.

Key Points:
- Present perfect continuous tense describes actions that started in the past, continue in the present, and are likely to continue in the future.
- "Has been learning" is an example of the present perfect continuous tense.

Context:
The sentence in question states that Bryan has been learning Spanish for three years. This means that Bryan started learning Spanish in the past, has been learning it continuously up until now, and is likely to continue learning it in the future.

Explanation:
By using the present perfect continuous tense, we are emphasizing the ongoing nature of Bryan's learning process. It indicates that he has been actively engaged in the process of learning Spanish for the past three years.

Example:
To further illustrate the use of the present perfect continuous tense, consider the following example:

- I have been studying English for five years.

This sentence conveys that the speaker started studying English in the past, has been studying it continuously, and will likely continue studying it in the future. The emphasis is on the ongoing nature of the action.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct answer is "has been learning" because it accurately reflects the ongoing nature of Bryan's Spanish learning process over the past three years.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward. If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos. The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward. If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos.The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.Why does the author compare the universe to a motion picture?

Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Bryan____________ (learn) Spanish for three years.Correct answer is 'has been learning'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev