All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  Can you explain the answer of this question b... Start Learning for Free
Can you explain the answer of this question below:
Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......
  • A:
    his today speech was not fairly audible
  • B:
    his promises had always been realistic
  • C:
    his speech was very interesting
  • D:
    people follow whatever he instructs to them
  • E:
    his today's statements were very ambiguous
The answer is E.
Clear all your Verbal doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is repu...
Answer:

Explanation:

The question is asking to identify the correct statement that contradicts the reputation of the person being discussed. The given statement suggests that the person is known for making candid statements but the correct option should indicate that the person did not make candid statements on a specific occasion.

The correct option is E, "his today's statements were very ambiguous". This option contradicts the reputation of the person for making candid statements. Ambiguous statements are vague and unclear, which is the opposite of being candid and straightforward.

To summarize,

Key Points:

- The question asks to identify the option that contradicts the reputation of a person for making candid statements.
- The correct option is E, which indicates that the person's statements were ambiguous, contrary to being candid.
- Ambiguity is the opposite of candidness, which is why option E is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is repu...
Although would imply that the blank sentence should contradict with the given sentence, so our answer should have the world which is almost opposite to the word candid. Audible refers to the vocal part of the speach, hence it's not relevant. realistic is not opposite to candid. interesting and following has nothing to do with candid. hence it's option E.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward. If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos. The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward.If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos. The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:In the context of the passage, the phrase age-old debate (line 31) refers to

Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E.
Question Description
Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E..
Solutions for Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E., a detailed solution for Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. has been provided alongside types of Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Can you explain the answer of this question below:Although, he is reputed for making very candid statements ......A:his today speech was not fairly audibleB:his promises had always been realisticC:his speech was very interestingD:people follow whatever he instructs to themE:his today's statements were very ambiguousThe answer is E. tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup