Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been crea... Start Learning for Free
Who is creating this mess?
  • a)
    Who has been created this mess?
  • b)
    By whom has this mess been created?
  • c)
    By whom this mess is being created?
  • d)
    By whom is this mess being created?
Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom h...
By whom is this mess being created?
Given sentence is in present continuous tense and it is in active voice.
Rule :
Subject + (is /am /are) + being + V3 + Other agents.
Free Test
Community Answer
Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom h...
Answer:

Explanation:

The correct answer is 'By whom is this mess being created?', option (d). Let us understand why this is the correct option by breaking it down into headings and HTML bullet points.

Passive Voice:

The given sentence is in passive voice. Passive voice is used when we want to emphasize the action being done rather than the doer of the action.

Subject-Verb Agreement:

In a passive voice sentence, the subject and the verb have to agree with each other in terms of number. Here, the subject is 'this mess', which is singular, and the verb has to be 'is being created', which is also singular.

Interrogative Sentence:

The given sentence is an interrogative sentence, which means it is a question. In an interrogative sentence, the subject and the auxiliary verb switch positions. Here, the auxiliary verb 'is' comes before the subject 'this mess'.

By Whom:

In a passive voice sentence, the doer of the action is expressed using the preposition 'by' followed by the doer. Here, the doer is not mentioned in the sentence, but it is implied that someone or something is creating the mess. Hence, the question is asking 'by whom' the mess is being created.

Therefore, the correct option is 'By whom is this mess being created?' (d) as it follows the rules of passive voice, subject-verb agreement, and interrogative sentence.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chief: to make a good plan for his army and to keep a strong reserve. Both of these are also obligatory for the painter. To make a plan, thorough reconnaissance of the country where the battle is to be fought is needed. Its fields, its mountains, its rivers, its bridges, its trees, its flowers, its atmosphereall require and repay attentive observation from a special point of view.I think this is one of the chief delights that have come to me through painting. No doubt many people who are lovers of art have acquired it to a high degree without actually practicing. But I expect that nothing will make one observe more quickly or more thoroughly than having to face the difficulty of representing the thing observed. And mind you, if you do observe accurately and with refinement, and if you do record what you have seen with tolerable correspondence, the result follows on the canvas with startling obedience.But in order to make his plan, the General must not only reconnoitre the battle-ground; he must also study the achievements of the great Captains of the past. He must bring the observations he has collected in the field into comparison with the treatment of similar incidents by famous chiefs.Considering this fact, the galleries of Europe take on a newand to me at least a severely practical interest. You see the difficulty that baffled you yesterday; and you see how easily it has been overcome by a great or even by a skilful painter. Not only is your observation of Nature sensibly improved and developed, but also your comprehension of the masterpieces of art.But it is in the use and withholding of their reserves that the great commanders have generally excelled. After all, when once the last reserve has been thrown in, the commanders part is played. If that does not win the battle, he has nothing else to give. Everything must be left to luck and to the fighting troops. But these last reserves, in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or planand consequently without effect. Mere masses count no more. The largest brush, the brightest colours cannot even make an impression. The pictorial battlefield becomes a sea of mud mercifully veiled by the fog of war. Even though the General plunges in himself and emerges bespattered, as he sometimes does, he will not retrieve the day. In painting, the reserves consist in Proportion or Relation. And it is here that the art of the painter marches along the road which is traversed by all the greatest harmonies in thought. At one side of the palette there is white, at the other black; and neither is ever used neat. Between these two rigid limits all the action must lie, all the power required must be generated. Black and white themselves placed in juxtaposition make no great impression; and yet they are the most that you can do in pure contrast. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980s.The first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace.These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies. Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers. The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products.Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods.American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.The passage suggests that compared to Japanese workers, American workers are often considered

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980sThe first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace. These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies.Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products. Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods. American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.With which of the following general statements would the author most likely NOT agree?

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward. If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos. The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?

Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Who is creating this mess?a)Who has been created this mess?b)By whom has this mess been created?c)By whom this mess is being created?d)By whom is this mess being created?Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev