Comparison between Quit India Movement of 1942 and previous mass movements

Difference in Goals:
- The Quit India Movement aimed at demanding an immediate end to British rule in India, while previous movements focused on specific issues like the partition of Bengal or the Rowlatt Act.
- The Quit India Movement called for complete independence, unlike earlier movements that sought reforms within the British colonial system.

Difference in Leadership:
- The Quit India Movement was led by Mahatma Gandhi and the Congress party, whereas previous movements had leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bhagat Singh.
- Gandhi's leadership during the Quit India Movement brought together a wider range of participants from different regions and backgrounds.

Difference in Strategy:
- The Quit India Movement adopted a more aggressive strategy of non-violent non-cooperation and civil disobedience, leading to widespread protests and strikes.
- Previous movements used a combination of non-violent protests, petitions, and legal challenges to address specific grievances.

Difference in Impact:
- The Quit India Movement led to a severe crackdown by the British authorities, with thousands of activists arrested and imprisoned.
- Previous movements had varying degrees of success in achieving their goals, such as the repeal of certain laws or the granting of limited reforms.
Overall, the Quit India Movement of 1942 marked a significant shift in the Indian freedom struggle towards a more unified and assertive demand for complete independence from British colonial rule.