Non-cooperation Movement vs Civil Disobedience Movement

Non-cooperation Movement:
- Started in 1920
- Led by Mahatma Gandhi
- Aimed to resist British rule through nonviolent means
- Encouraged Indians to boycott British institutions, goods, and services
- Resulted in the surrender of titles, resignations from government jobs, and closure of educational institutions

Civil Disobedience Movement:
- Started in 1930
- Also led by Mahatma Gandhi
- Aimed to challenge specific British laws and taxes
- Encouraged Indians to break laws peacefully and accept punishment
- Included the famous Salt March to Dandi in protest against salt taxes
- Resulted in mass civil disobedience and arrests of thousands of Indians

Differences:
- Time Period: The Non-cooperation Movement started in 1920, while the Civil Disobedience Movement started in 1930.
- Focus: The Non-cooperation Movement focused on boycotting British institutions and goods, while the Civil Disobedience Movement aimed to challenge specific laws and taxes.
- Methods: Non-cooperation involved nonviolent resistance and boycotts, while Civil Disobedience included breaking laws peacefully and accepting punishment.
- Consequences: Non-cooperation led to the surrender of titles and closure of institutions, while Civil Disobedience resulted in mass civil disobedience and arrests.
In conclusion, both movements were crucial in India's struggle for independence, with each having its own unique focus and impact on the British colonial rule.