Question Description
Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's intervention on the directives to eateries during the Kanwar Yatra:1. The Supreme Court extended an interim order staying the directives of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwariya route to display the names of their owners and staff.2. The petitioners argued that the directive was discriminatory and targeted businesses based on religion.3. The court ruled that the directive violated the right to privacy of the shop owners and employees under Article 21 of the Constitution.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?a)1 Onlyb)1 and 2 Onlyc)1 and 3 Onlyd)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.