Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I... Start Learning for Free
Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.
  • a)
    was supposed to
  • b)
    was to
  • c)
     was used to
  • d)
    would
  • e)
    used to
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bo...
Explanation:

The given sentence is in the past tense, which suggests that the speaker is talking about a past experience or situation. The sentence talks about the speaker's experience of working alone during the night shift.

The correct answer is "was used to" because it implies that the speaker was accustomed to working alone during the night shift, and it was not a new or uncomfortable experience for them.

Let's break down the options and see why they are incorrect:

a) "was supposed to" implies that there was some expectation or obligation for the speaker to work alone during the night shift, but it doesn't convey the idea that the speaker was comfortable with it.

b) "was" is a simple past tense verb that doesn't convey any sense of habit or routine, so it doesn't fit in the context of the sentence.

c) "was used to" is the correct answer because it implies that the speaker had become accustomed to working alone during the night shift, and it was a familiar experience for them.

d) "would" suggests a hypothetical or conditional situation, which doesn't fit in the context of the sentence.

e) "used to" is incorrect because it is a present tense verb that doesn't match the past tense of the sentence.

In summary, the correct answer is "was used to" because it accurately conveys the idea that the speaker was accustomed to working alone during the night shift.
Free Test
Community Answer
Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bo...
Here otherwise handles the sentence with option C and in other terms we can say the person try to tell us about his or her habit while in a working place.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

Henry Varnum Poor, editor of American Railroad Journal, drew the important elements of the image of the railroad together in 1851, Look at the results of this material progress...the vigor, life, and executive energy that followed in its train, rapidly succeeded by wealth, the refinement and intellectual culture of a high civilization. All this is typified, in a degree, by a locomotive. The combination in its construction of nice art and scientific application of power, its speed surpassing that of our proudest courser, and its immense strength, are all characteristic of our age and tendencies. To us, like the telegraph, it is essential, it constitutes a part of our nature, is a condition of our being what we are.In the third decade of the nineteenth century, Americans began to define their character in light of the new railroads. They liked the idea that it took special people to foresee and capitalize on the promise of science. Railroad promoters, using the steam engine as a metaphor for what they thought Americans were and what they thought Americans were becoming, frequently discussed parallels between the locomotive and national character, pointing out that both possessed youth, power, speed, single-mindedness, and bright prospects.Poor was, of course, promoting acceptance of railroads and enticing his readers to open their pocketbooks. But his metaphors had their dark side. A locomotive was quite unlike anything Americans had ever seen. It was large, mysterious and dangerous; many thought that it was a monster waiting to devour the unwary. There was a suspicion that a country founded upon Jeffersonian agrarian principles had bought a ticket and boarded a train pulled by some iron monster into the dark recesses of an unknown future. TTo ease such public apprehensions, promoters, poets, editors, and writers alike adopted the notion that locomotives were really only iron horses, an early metaphor that lingered because it made steam technology ordinary and understandable. Iron horse metaphors assuaged fears about inherent defects in the national character, prompting images of a more secure future, and made an alien technology less frightening, and even comforting and congenial. Essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson saw the locomotive as an agent of domestic harmony. He observed that the locomotive and the steamboat, like enormous shuttles, shoot every day across the thousand various threads of national descent and employment and bind them fast in one web,adding an hourly assimilation goes forward, and there is no danger that local peculiarities and hostilities should be preserved. To us Americans, it seems to have fallen as a political aid. We could not else have held the vast North America together, which we now engage to do.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ. Suppose thatan early nineteenth-century American inventor had developed a device that made it easier to construct multi-story building. How would early nineteenth-century Americans be expected to react to this invention?

The original Hellenistic community was idealized, the Greeks own golden dreama community never achieved but only imagined by the Macedonian Alexander, who was possessed of the true faith of all converts to a larger vision. The evolving system of city-states had produced not only unity with a healthy diversity but also narrow rivalries. No Hellenic empire arose, only scores of squabbling cities pursuing bitter feuds born of ancient wrongs and existing ambitions. It was civil strife made possible by isolation from the great armies and ambitions of Asia. Greek history could arguably begin in July of 776 B.C., the First Olympiad, and end with Theodosuss ban on the games in 393 A.D. Before this there had been a long era of two tribes, the Dorians and Ionians, scarcely distinguishable to the alien eye, but distinctly separate in their own eyes until 776. After Theodosus ban most of the Mediterranean world was Greek-like, in fact, but the central core had been rendered impotent by diffusion. During the eventful Greek millennium, the Olympics reflected not the high ideals of Hellenes but rather the mean reality of the times. Its founders had created a monster, games that twisted the strategists aspirations to unity to fit the unpleasant reality of the Hellenistic world. The games not only mirrored the central practices of the Greek world that reformers would deny but also imposed the flaws of that world. Like the atomic theory of the Greek philosophers, the Greek gamers theories were far removed from reality; they were elegant, consistent, logical, and irrelevant.Part religious ritual, part game rite, in the five-day Olympic Games, various athletes coming together under the banner of their cities; winning became paramount, imposing defeat a delight. As Greek society evolved, so, too, did the games, but rarely as a unifying force. Athletes supposedly competing for the laurel of accomplishment in the name of idealism found that dried olive leaves changed to gold. Each local polis (city-stat e) sought not to contribute to the grandeur of Greece, but to achieve its own glory. As in the real world, in the games no Greek could trust another, and each envied rivals victories. The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ. For which of the following statements does the passage provide some evidence or explanation? I. Alexander united ancient Greece through a series of military conquests. II. The divisions among Greek city-states were reflected in the Olympics. III. The Olympic Games could not have occurred without a city-state system.

Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Fortunately, I .... working alone otherwise I would have got really bored at the night shift.a)was supposed tob)was toc)was used tod)woulde)used toCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev