Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  "The food in this hotel is no match to w... Start Learning for Free
"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......
  • a)
    The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoor
  • b)
    Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get here
  • c)
    Both hotels have maintained good quality of food
  • d)
    Both hotels serve poor quality of food
  • e)
    it is better to eat food than remain hungry
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at lat...
  • From the given statement, it refers the meaning that the food provided in this hotel is not good and it didn't match with the food which we were eating in the Kohinoor hotel at the late hours.
  • So, the correct meaning of the given is "Hotel Kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get here".
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at lat...
  • From the given statement, it refers the meaning that the food provided in this hotel is not good and it didn't match with the food which we were eating in the Kohinoor hotel at the late hours.
  • So, the correct meaning of the given is "Hotel Kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get here".
Free Test
Community Answer
"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at lat...
  • From the given statement, it refers the meaning that the food provided in this hotel is not good and it didn't match with the food which we were eating in the Kohinoor hotel at the late hours.
  • So, the correct meaning of the given is "Hotel Kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get here".
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980s.The first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace.These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies. Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a products total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers. The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products.Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods.American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach. The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quickto exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.The passage suggests that compared to Japanese workers, American workers are often considered

The original Hellenistic community was idealized, the Greeks own golden dreama community never achieved but only imagined by the Macedonian Alexander, who was possessed of the true faith of all converts to a larger vision. The evolving system of city-states had produced not only unity with a healthy diversity but also narrow rivalries. No Hellenic empire arose, only scores of squabbling cities pursuing bitter feuds born of ancient wrongs and existing ambitions. It was civil strife made possible by isolation from the great armies and ambitions of Asia. Greek history could arguably begin in July of 776 B.C., the First Olympiad, and end with Theodosuss ban on the games in 393 A.D. Before this there had been a long era of two tribes, the Dorians and Ionians, scarcely distinguishable to the alien eye, but distinctly separate in their own eyes until 776. After Theodosus ban most of the Mediterranean world was Greek-like, in fact, but the central core had been rendered impotent by diffusion. During the eventful Greek millennium, the Olympics reflected not the high ideals of Hellenes but rather the mean reality of the times. Its founders had created a monster, games that twisted the strategists aspirations to unity to fit the unpleasant reality of the Hellenistic world. The games not only mirrored the central practices of the Greek world that reformers would deny but also imposed the flaws of that world. Like the atomic theory of the Greek philosophers, the Greek gamers theories were far removed from reality; they were elegant, consistent, logical, and irrelevant.Part religious ritual, part game rite, in the five-day Olympic Games, various athletes coming together under the banner of their cities; winning became paramount, imposing defeat a delight. As Greek society evolved, so, too, did the games, but rarely as a unifying force. Athletes supposedly competing for the laurel of accomplishment in the name of idealism found that dried olive leaves changed to gold. Each local polis (city-stat e) sought not to contribute to the grandeur of Greece, but to achieve its own glory. As in the real world, in the games no Greek could trust another, and each envied rivals victories. The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.The statement: The Olympic spirit was not one of communal bliss but bitter lasting competition institutionalized in games indicates that the author believes that

"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
"The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2024 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "The food in this hotel is no match to what we were served at late hours in Hotel Kohinoor " means ......a)The food in this hotel is quite good compared to what we ate at kohinoorb)Hotel kohinoor served us good quality food than what we get herec)Both hotels have maintained good quality of foodd)Both hotels serve poor quality of foode)it is better to eat food than remain hungryCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev