Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is andlsquo;strongandrsquo; and which is andlsquo;weakandrsquo;.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

LR Exam > LR Questions > Each question below is followed by three argu...

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.

Statement: Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly? Arguments: I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.

a)
None is strong
b)
I and III are strong
c)
I and IV are strong
d)
II and IV are strong
e)
All are strong

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and ...

Strong or weak or irrelevant.

Example:

Question: Should junk food be banned in schools?

I. Yes, because it is unhealthy and contributes to childhood obesity.
II. No, because it is a personal choice and students should have the freedom to choose what they eat.
III. No, because it will lead to an increase in black market sales of junk food.

Answer: Strong argument is I. Weak argument is II. Irrelevant argument is III.

Now, let's try some more examples:

Question: Should college education be free for all students?

I. Yes, because it will increase access to education and reduce economic inequality.
II. Yes, because it will lead to a more educated and skilled workforce, which will benefit the economy.
III. No, because it will devalue the worth of a college degree and undermine the quality of education.

Answer: Strong arguments are I and II. Weak argument is III.

Question: Should the voting age be lowered to 16?

I. Yes, because 16-year-olds are mature enough to make informed decisions and have a stake in the future.
II. No, because 16-year-olds are not legally adults and do not have the same rights and responsibilities as older voters.
III. No, because it will lead to an increase in immature and uninformed voters.

Answer: Strong argument is I. Weak argument is II. Irrelevant argument is III.

Free Test

FREE

Reasoning MCQ - 6
29 Ques | 30 Min

Start Free Test

View all free LR tests

Community Answer

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and ...

Since these 2 arguments are showing the positive side and also the care regarding to the preciously gifted life .

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for LR exam

Similar LR Doubts

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q. Statement:Should there be a complete ban on genetically modified important seeds?Arguments:I. Yes, this will boost the demand of domestically developed seeds.II. No, this is the only way to increase production substantially.III. Yes, genetically modified products will adversely affect the health of those who consume these products.

View answer

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should be income generated out of agriculture activities be taxed?Arguments:I. No, farmers are otherwise suffering from natural calamities and low yield coupled with low procurement price and their income should not be taxed.II. Yes, majority of the population is dependent on agriculture and hence their income should be taxed to augment the resources.III. Yes, many big farmers earn much more than the majority of the service earners and they should be teased to remove the disparity.

View answer

Directions : In making decisions important questions it is desirable to be able distinguish between strong arguments and Weak arguments Strong arguments must be both importance and directly related to the question. Weak arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be minor importance or may be related to the trivial as of the question. Each question below is followed by there arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the argument (s) is/are strong and indicate your answer accordingly.Q.Statements:Should the Government order closure of all educational institutions for a month to avoid fast spreading of the contagious viral infection?Arguments:I. No, closure of educational institution alone is not the solution for curbing spread of viral infection.II. No, students will visit crowded places like mails, markets, playgrounds etc, in more numbers and spread the disease, as they will have lot of spare time at their disposal.III. Yes, young persons are more prone to get affected by the viral infection and hence they should remain in doors.

View answer

Directions : Each of the questions below consists of a question and three statements numbered I, II and III given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read all the three statements and Give answerQ.Who is the daughter-in-law of P?I. Q is brother of U. S is wife of V’s nephew.II. R is brother of N. T is son of N. S is mother of T.III. P is wife of U. U is father of N. U has two children.

View answer

Directions : Each of the questions below consists a question and three statements numbered I, II and III. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read all the three statements and Give answerQ.Who is youngest among six family members M, N, O, P, Q and R? (Each member is of different ages.)Statement : I. M is the daughter-in-law of P, Q is grandson of R, who is the father of N. II. M is not youngest while R is the eldest.III. N is the father of O, who is grandson of R. P is the wife of Q’s son and O’s father.

View answer

Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for LR 2025 is part of LR preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the LR exam syllabus. Information about Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for LR 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for LR. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for LR Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is ‘strong’ and which is ‘weak’.Q.Statement:Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a rules and less should be followed strictly by all.II. No, each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.III. No, it does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.IV. Yes, it is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by all helmet.a)None is strongb)I and III are strongc)I and IV are strongd)II and IV are stronge)All are strongCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice LR tests.

Explore Courses for LR exam