All Exams >
UPSC >
Lucent for GK >
All Questions
All questions of The Northern India (800-1200 A.D.) for UPSC CSE Exam
Which choice gives the correct historical order of the following Rashtrakuta kings?I. Krishna III
II Indra III
III. Amoghavarsa-I
IV Dhruva
V. Krishna-I
VI Dantidurga- a)VI, V, IV, III, II, I
- b)I, II, III, V, IV, VI
- c)II, III, I, IV, V, VI
- d)IV, V, VI, III, II,I
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which choice gives the correct historical order of the following Rashtrakuta kings?
I. Krishna III
II Indra III
III. Amoghavarsa-I
IV Dhruva
V. Krishna-I
VI Dantidurga
II Indra III
III. Amoghavarsa-I
IV Dhruva
V. Krishna-I
VI Dantidurga
a)
VI, V, IV, III, II, I
b)
I, II, III, V, IV, VI
c)
II, III, I, IV, V, VI
d)
IV, V, VI, III, II,I
|
Updesh Tripathi answered |
A
Whose kingdom was visited by Al-Masudi, an Arab traveller of the early 10th century A.D.?- a)Indra-III
- b)Dharmapala
- c)Mihira Bhoja
- d)Lakshmana Sena
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Whose kingdom was visited by Al-Masudi, an Arab traveller of the early 10th century A.D.?
a)
Indra-III
b)
Dharmapala
c)
Mihira Bhoja
d)
Lakshmana Sena
|
Sameer Nambiar answered |
A is the correct option.The Arab traveller, al Masudi, visited Kannauj in the early tenth century and wrote that "the king of Kannauj was the natural enemy of the king of the Deccan : that he kept a large army and was surrounded by smaller kings always ready to go to war."
Which of the following was the Rajput clans of Agni-kula?- a)Pratiharas, Tomars, Paramaras, Gahadavalas
- b)Pratiharas, Paramaras, Chalukyas and Chahmanas (Chauhans)
- c)Pratiharas, Chalukyas, Tomars, Paramaras
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following was the Rajput clans of Agni-kula?
a)
Pratiharas, Tomars, Paramaras, Gahadavalas
b)
Pratiharas, Paramaras, Chalukyas and Chahmanas (Chauhans)
c)
Pratiharas, Chalukyas, Tomars, Paramaras
d)
None of the above
|
Zenith Career Point Nrip answered |
The four Rajput clans from Agni kunla are Chauhans, Chalukyas, Parmaras and Pratiharas.
When Mahmud of Ghazni attacked Somnath, the Chalukya or Solanki ruler of Gujarat was- a)Kumarpala
- b)Somesvara
- c)Bhima
- d)Jayasimha Siddharaja
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When Mahmud of Ghazni attacked Somnath, the Chalukya or Solanki ruler of Gujarat was
a)
Kumarpala
b)
Somesvara
c)
Bhima
d)
Jayasimha Siddharaja
|
Vikas Choudhury answered |
The Chalukya or Solanki ruler of Gujarat at the time of Mahmud of Ghazni's attack on Somnath was Bhima.
Mahmud of Ghazni was a ruler of the Ghaznavid Empire, which was a Muslim dynasty that ruled parts of present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan, and northern India in the 11th and 12th centuries. In 1025, Mahmud of Ghazni launched an attack on the city of Somnath, which was located on the western coast of India in present-day Gujarat. The city was an important center of Hindu worship and was known for its rich cultural and economic significance.
At the time of the attack, the ruler of Gujarat was Bhima, who was a member of the Chalukya or Solanki dynasty. The Chalukyas were a Hindu dynasty that ruled over parts of present-day Gujarat and Rajasthan in western India from the 10th to the 13th centuries. Bhima was known for his strong and able administration, and he successfully defended Gujarat against several invasions and attacks during his reign. However, he was unable to prevent the destruction of Somnath by Mahmud of Ghazni, and the city was plundered and its temple was razed to the ground.
Who was the builder of the Martanda temple in Kashmir ?- a)Lalitaditya Muktapida
- b)Durlabhavarman
- c)Avantivarman
- d)Jayapala Vinayaditya
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the builder of the Martanda temple in Kashmir ?
a)
Lalitaditya Muktapida
b)
Durlabhavarman
c)
Avantivarman
d)
Jayapala Vinayaditya
|
Anshul Verma answered |
Builder of the Martanda Temple in Kashmir
The builder of the Martanda temple in Kashmir was Lalitaditya Muktapida. He was a powerful ruler of the Karkota dynasty who reigned over Kashmir during the 8th century.
Significance of Martanda Temple
The Martanda temple, also known as the Sun Temple, is one of the most important ancient temples in Kashmir. It is dedicated to the Hindu deity Surya, the Sun God, and is considered a masterpiece of Kashmiri temple architecture.
Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida was a great patron of art and architecture. During his reign, he undertook several ambitious building projects, including the construction of the Martanda temple. He was known for his military conquests as well as his patronage of the arts.
Legacy of Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida is remembered as one of the greatest rulers of Kashmir. His reign is considered a golden age in the history of Kashmir, marked by prosperity, cultural flourishing, and architectural marvels like the Martanda temple.
In conclusion, the Martanda temple in Kashmir was built by the renowned ruler Lalitaditya Muktapida, who left behind a lasting legacy of architectural splendor and cultural richness in the region.
The builder of the Martanda temple in Kashmir was Lalitaditya Muktapida. He was a powerful ruler of the Karkota dynasty who reigned over Kashmir during the 8th century.
Significance of Martanda Temple
The Martanda temple, also known as the Sun Temple, is one of the most important ancient temples in Kashmir. It is dedicated to the Hindu deity Surya, the Sun God, and is considered a masterpiece of Kashmiri temple architecture.
Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida was a great patron of art and architecture. During his reign, he undertook several ambitious building projects, including the construction of the Martanda temple. He was known for his military conquests as well as his patronage of the arts.
Legacy of Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida is remembered as one of the greatest rulers of Kashmir. His reign is considered a golden age in the history of Kashmir, marked by prosperity, cultural flourishing, and architectural marvels like the Martanda temple.
In conclusion, the Martanda temple in Kashmir was built by the renowned ruler Lalitaditya Muktapida, who left behind a lasting legacy of architectural splendor and cultural richness in the region.
Which of the following books was written by Bhoja Paramara?- a)Ayurveda-Sarvasva
- b)Samarangan-Sutradhara
- c)Vyavahara-Samuktchaya
- d)All of the above.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following books was written by Bhoja Paramara?
a)
Ayurveda-Sarvasva
b)
Samarangan-Sutradhara
c)
Vyavahara-Samuktchaya
d)
All of the above.
|
Jyoti Mehta answered |
Explanation:
Bhoja Paramara was a king of the Paramara dynasty who ruled the Malwa region of central India in the 11th century. He was not only a great ruler but also a scholar, writer, and patron of the arts.
Ayurveda-Sarvasva:
Ayurveda-Sarvasva is a book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a comprehensive treatise on Ayurveda, the traditional system of medicine of India. The book covers a wide range of topics including anatomy, physiology, diagnosis, treatment, and pharmacology. It is considered to be one of the most important works on Ayurveda and is still studied and revered by practitioners of Ayurvedic medicine.
Samarangan-Sutradhara:
Samarangan-Sutradhara is another book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a treatise on architecture and engineering and covers topics such as town planning, construction of buildings, and design of water systems. The book is considered to be an important source of information on ancient Indian architecture and engineering.
Vyavahara-Samuktchaya:
Vyavahara-Samuktchaya is a third book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a treatise on law and covers topics such as property rights, contracts, and legal procedures. The book is considered to be an important source of information on ancient Indian law and is still studied by scholars of Indian legal history.
All of the above:
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', i.e., all of the above.
Bhoja Paramara was a king of the Paramara dynasty who ruled the Malwa region of central India in the 11th century. He was not only a great ruler but also a scholar, writer, and patron of the arts.
Ayurveda-Sarvasva:
Ayurveda-Sarvasva is a book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a comprehensive treatise on Ayurveda, the traditional system of medicine of India. The book covers a wide range of topics including anatomy, physiology, diagnosis, treatment, and pharmacology. It is considered to be one of the most important works on Ayurveda and is still studied and revered by practitioners of Ayurvedic medicine.
Samarangan-Sutradhara:
Samarangan-Sutradhara is another book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a treatise on architecture and engineering and covers topics such as town planning, construction of buildings, and design of water systems. The book is considered to be an important source of information on ancient Indian architecture and engineering.
Vyavahara-Samuktchaya:
Vyavahara-Samuktchaya is a third book written by Bhoja Paramara. It is a treatise on law and covers topics such as property rights, contracts, and legal procedures. The book is considered to be an important source of information on ancient Indian law and is still studied by scholars of Indian legal history.
All of the above:
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', i.e., all of the above.
Why did Jaychandra not help Prithviraja Chauhan on his war against Gori?- a)Jaychandra was engaged in a war against the Chandelas.
- b)Jayachandra thought if the power of the Chauhan’s were destroyed it would clear the way for his own supremacy in the North.
- c)Jayachandra’s offer of help was rejected by Prithviraja Chauhan.
- d)Jayachandra’s army was very small.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Why did Jaychandra not help Prithviraja Chauhan on his war against Gori?
a)
Jaychandra was engaged in a war against the Chandelas.
b)
Jayachandra thought if the power of the Chauhan’s were destroyed it would clear the way for his own supremacy in the North.
c)
Jayachandra’s offer of help was rejected by Prithviraja Chauhan.
d)
Jayachandra’s army was very small.
|
Alok Verma answered |
There was few different reason for it.
Jai Chandra was a mighty king and he was cousin brother of PrithviRaj Chauhan. Being elder to PrithviRaj Chauhan he should get the Thrown of Delhi instead of PrithviRaj Chauhan.
PrithviRaj Chauhan has proved himself superior to Jai Chandra everytime. So he was rewarded with the thrown of Delhi.
PrithviRaj Chauhan eloped with the daughter of Jai Chandra, Sanyogita on her wish , in day light from her sawyamvar. Which Jai Chandra took as a matter of humiliation and started planning revenge.
Since Jai Chandra could not win in face to face battle with PrithviRaj Chauhan, So He planned to help Md. Ghori to attack PrithviRaj Chauhan again after a year.
And it was the part of plan of Jai Chandra to make Md.Ghori to attack PrithviRaj Chauhan, So he refused to help PrithviRaj Chauhan, when He was asking all the Rajput King to come together and retreat Md. Ghori attack.
Which one of the following was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala?- a)Pratihara ruler Vatsaraja
- b)Rashtrakuta ruler Govinda III
- c)Rashtrakuta king Dhurva
- d)Pratihara king Nagabhatta III
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala?
a)
Pratihara ruler Vatsaraja
b)
Rashtrakuta ruler Govinda III
c)
Rashtrakuta king Dhurva
d)
Pratihara king Nagabhatta III
|
Sahana Menon answered |
Answer:
Pratihara ruler Vatsaraja was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala.
Explanation:
- Kanauj was an important political center during the early medieval period.
- Dharmapala was the ruler of Kanauj in the 8th century.
- Pratihara rulers were one of the major powers in North India during that time.
- Vatsaraja was a powerful ruler of the Pratihara dynasty who reigned from 775 to 805 CE.
- He defeated Dharmapala and took control of Kanauj.
- This victory established the Pratihara dynasty as a major power in North India and they continued to dominate the region for several centuries.
- The Rashtrakutas were also a powerful dynasty during that time and they had conflicts with the Pratiharas over the control of Kanauj.
- Govinda III and Dhruva were two powerful Rashtrakuta rulers who had conflicts with the Pratihara rulers over Kanauj.
- But it was Vatsaraja who was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala.
Pratihara ruler Vatsaraja was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala.
Explanation:
- Kanauj was an important political center during the early medieval period.
- Dharmapala was the ruler of Kanauj in the 8th century.
- Pratihara rulers were one of the major powers in North India during that time.
- Vatsaraja was a powerful ruler of the Pratihara dynasty who reigned from 775 to 805 CE.
- He defeated Dharmapala and took control of Kanauj.
- This victory established the Pratihara dynasty as a major power in North India and they continued to dominate the region for several centuries.
- The Rashtrakutas were also a powerful dynasty during that time and they had conflicts with the Pratiharas over the control of Kanauj.
- Govinda III and Dhruva were two powerful Rashtrakuta rulers who had conflicts with the Pratihara rulers over Kanauj.
- But it was Vatsaraja who was the first to wrest the control of Kanauj from Dharmapala.
The struggle for the supremacy of northern India among three leading ruling dynasties of India viz, the Palas, Pratiharas and the Rashtrakutas towards the close of the 8th century is known as Tripartite struggle. What was the bone of contention between the three during that period?- a)Control of trade with Suvarnadweep
- b)Control of Bengal
- c)Control of Kanauj
- d)Trade with South-East Asia
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The struggle for the supremacy of northern India among three leading ruling dynasties of India viz, the Palas, Pratiharas and the Rashtrakutas towards the close of the 8th century is known as Tripartite struggle. What was the bone of contention between the three during that period?
a)
Control of trade with Suvarnadweep
b)
Control of Bengal
c)
Control of Kanauj
d)
Trade with South-East Asia
|
Parul Sharma answered |
A
“The Hindus believe that there is no country like theirs, no King like theirs, no religion like theirs, no science like theirs. If they travelled and mixed with other nations, they would soon change their mind, for their ancestors were not so narrow minded as the present generation.” In this the author is referring to which period of the Hindu generation?- a)Early 10th Century
- b)Early 9th Century
- c)Early 11th Century
- d)Early 12th Century
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
“The Hindus believe that there is no country like theirs, no King like theirs, no religion like theirs, no science like theirs. If they travelled and mixed with other nations, they would soon change their mind, for their ancestors were not so narrow minded as the present generation.” In this the author is referring to which period of the Hindu generation?
a)
Early 10th Century
b)
Early 9th Century
c)
Early 11th Century
d)
Early 12th Century
|
|
Kunal Roy answered |
The 11th century is the period from 1001 to 1100 in accordance with the Julian calendar in the Common Era, and the 1st century of the 2nd millennium. In the history of Europe, this period is considered theearly part of the High Middle Ages.
Who of the following Pala king founded the Vikramasila University?- a)Mahipala
- b)Gopala
- c)Devapala
- d)Dharmapala
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who of the following Pala king founded the Vikramasila University?
a)
Mahipala
b)
Gopala
c)
Devapala
d)
Dharmapala
|
Anjana Nair answered |
Dharmapala (ruled 8th century) was the second ruler of the Pala Empire of Bengal region in the Indian Subcontinent. He was the son and successor of Gopala, the founder of the Pala Dynasty.
Which one of the following statements about the Pala empire is incorrect?- a)The Pala empire was founded by Gopala in 750 A.D.
- b)The greatest king of the Pala dynasty was Dharmapala.
- c)After the death of Dharmapala, the Pala empire disintegrated.
- d)The pala empire was revived in the eleventh century and continued till the early thirteenth century.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following statements about the Pala empire is incorrect?
a)
The Pala empire was founded by Gopala in 750 A.D.
b)
The greatest king of the Pala dynasty was Dharmapala.
c)
After the death of Dharmapala, the Pala empire disintegrated.
d)
The pala empire was revived in the eleventh century and continued till the early thirteenth century.
|
|
Shounak Malik answered |
The empire started disintegrated after the death of Devapala, and his successor Narayanapala lost control of Assam and Orissa. He also briefly lost control over Magadha and north Bengal. The Pala empire disintegrated into smaller kingdoms during the reign of Vigrahapala II.
“On having made some progress, I began to show them the elements on which this science rests............. They thought me to be a sorcerer and when speaking of me to their leading men in their native tongue, they spoke of me as the sea....- a)Marco Polo
- b)Al-Masudi
- c)Alberuni
- d)Sulaiman
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
“On having made some progress, I began to show them the elements on which this science rests............. They thought me to be a sorcerer and when speaking of me to their leading men in their native tongue, they spoke of me as the sea....
a)
Marco Polo
b)
Al-Masudi
c)
Alberuni
d)
Sulaiman
|
Kaavya Dey answered |
C is the correct option. Abu Rayhan al-Biruni was an Iranian scholar and polymath during the Islamic Golden Age. He has been variously called as the "founder of Indology", "Father of Comparative Religion", "Father of modern geodesy", and the first anthropologist. The above sentence was quoted by im.
What was the name of the Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned a king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family?- a)Lalitaditya Muktapida
- b)Jayapala Vinayaditya
- c)Avantivarman
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the name of the Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned a king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family?
a)
Lalitaditya Muktapida
b)
Jayapala Vinayaditya
c)
Avantivarman
d)
None of these
|
Malavika Chavan answered |
Jayapala Vinayaditya
The Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned a king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family was Jayapala Vinayaditya. This event took place during the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida, who was a powerful ruler of the Kashmir Kingdom.
Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida was a renowned king of the Kashmir Kingdom who ruled from 724 to 761 AD. He was known for his military campaigns and conquests, expanding his kingdom's territory and influence.
Victory over King of Kanauj
During his reign, Lalitaditya Muktapida led a successful military campaign against the king of Kanauj, who belonged to the Ayudha family. Jayapala Vinayaditya, the king of Kashmir, emerged victorious in this conflict and dethroned the king of Kanauj.
Significance
This victory over the king of Kanauj further solidified the power and influence of the Kashmir Kingdom under the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida. It also demonstrated the military might and strategic acumen of the Kashmiri forces during that period.
In conclusion, Jayapala Vinayaditya was the Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned the king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family, under the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida. This event showcased the strength and prowess of the Kashmir Kingdom during that era.
The Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned a king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family was Jayapala Vinayaditya. This event took place during the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida, who was a powerful ruler of the Kashmir Kingdom.
Lalitaditya Muktapida
Lalitaditya Muktapida was a renowned king of the Kashmir Kingdom who ruled from 724 to 761 AD. He was known for his military campaigns and conquests, expanding his kingdom's territory and influence.
Victory over King of Kanauj
During his reign, Lalitaditya Muktapida led a successful military campaign against the king of Kanauj, who belonged to the Ayudha family. Jayapala Vinayaditya, the king of Kashmir, emerged victorious in this conflict and dethroned the king of Kanauj.
Significance
This victory over the king of Kanauj further solidified the power and influence of the Kashmir Kingdom under the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida. It also demonstrated the military might and strategic acumen of the Kashmiri forces during that period.
In conclusion, Jayapala Vinayaditya was the Kashmir king who defeated and dethroned the king of Kanauj belonging to the Ayudha family, under the rule of Lalitaditya Muktapida. This event showcased the strength and prowess of the Kashmir Kingdom during that era.
Who of the following Rashtrakuta king invaded north India?- a)Krishna III
- b)Govinda III
- c)Dhruva
- d)Amoghavarsha
- e)All of the above
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Who of the following Rashtrakuta king invaded north India?
a)
Krishna III
b)
Govinda III
c)
Dhruva
d)
Amoghavarsha
e)
All of the above
|
Arshiya Mehta answered |
All of the following Rashtrakuta kings invaded North India:
a) Krishna III
b) Govinda III
c) Dhruva
d) Amoghavarsha
The Rashtrakuta dynasty was a royal Indian dynasty that ruled over a large empire in the Deccan region of southern India and parts of central and northern India from the 8th to the 10th centuries. The Rashtrakutas were known for their military prowess and expansionist policies, and they frequently invaded and conquered new territories. Krishna III, Govinda III, Dhruva, and Amoghavarsha were all Rashtrakuta kings who are known to have invaded North India at some point in their reigns.
Bengal passed from Palas to the control of a new dynasty, the Senas. Where did the Senas come from?- a)Orissa
- b)Central India
- c)Kamrupa
- d)The Deccan
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Bengal passed from Palas to the control of a new dynasty, the Senas. Where did the Senas come from?
a)
Orissa
b)
Central India
c)
Kamrupa
d)
The Deccan
|
|
Tejas Verma answered |
D is the correct option.Sena Dynasty ruled Bengal for little over a century (c 1097-1225). Sena rule in Bengal is that the whole of Bengal was brought under a single rule .Senas came to Bengal along with some invaders from the Deccan.
Who of the following destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal?- a)Dhruva
- b)Vijayasena
- c)Govinda III
- d) Rajendra Chola I
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who of the following destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal?
a)
Dhruva
b)
Vijayasena
c)
Govinda III
d)
Rajendra Chola I
|
Pranjal Chatterjee answered |
Destroying Pala Supremacy in Bengal
Introduction:
The Pala dynasty was a powerful dynasty that ruled over Bengal and Bihar from the 8th to the 12th century. However, their supremacy was destroyed by various factors, including invasion and internal conflict. In this context, the following discussion explains who destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal.
Vijayasena:
Vijayasena was one of the most significant kings of the Sena dynasty that ruled over Bengal from the 11th to the 12th century. He was the son of the founder of the dynasty, Samantasena. Vijayasena's reign was marked by various achievements, including his conquest of the Gaur region and his patronage of the arts and literature. However, he is also known for his role in destroying the Pala supremacy in Bengal.
The Decline of the Palas:
The decline of the Pala dynasty began in the 10th century, when they were weakened by various factors, including internal conflict, invasion, and economic decline. By the 11th century, the Palas had lost much of their power and influence, and their kingdom was in a state of decline.
The Rise of the Senas:
The Sena dynasty arose as a powerful force in Bengal in the 11th century, with their capital at Nadia. They were a martial people who were known for their military prowess and their ability to resist invasion. Under Vijayasena's leadership, the Senas expanded their kingdom and became a significant power in the region.
The Role of Vijayasena:
Vijayasena played a crucial role in the destruction of the Pala supremacy in Bengal. He launched a series of military campaigns against the Palas, defeating them in battle and driving them out of Bengal. He also captured their capital, Vikramapura, and made it his own capital.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, it was Vijayasena of the Sena dynasty who destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal. His military campaigns and conquests weakened the Palas and paved the way for the Senas to emerge as a significant power in the region.
Introduction:
The Pala dynasty was a powerful dynasty that ruled over Bengal and Bihar from the 8th to the 12th century. However, their supremacy was destroyed by various factors, including invasion and internal conflict. In this context, the following discussion explains who destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal.
Vijayasena:
Vijayasena was one of the most significant kings of the Sena dynasty that ruled over Bengal from the 11th to the 12th century. He was the son of the founder of the dynasty, Samantasena. Vijayasena's reign was marked by various achievements, including his conquest of the Gaur region and his patronage of the arts and literature. However, he is also known for his role in destroying the Pala supremacy in Bengal.
The Decline of the Palas:
The decline of the Pala dynasty began in the 10th century, when they were weakened by various factors, including internal conflict, invasion, and economic decline. By the 11th century, the Palas had lost much of their power and influence, and their kingdom was in a state of decline.
The Rise of the Senas:
The Sena dynasty arose as a powerful force in Bengal in the 11th century, with their capital at Nadia. They were a martial people who were known for their military prowess and their ability to resist invasion. Under Vijayasena's leadership, the Senas expanded their kingdom and became a significant power in the region.
The Role of Vijayasena:
Vijayasena played a crucial role in the destruction of the Pala supremacy in Bengal. He launched a series of military campaigns against the Palas, defeating them in battle and driving them out of Bengal. He also captured their capital, Vikramapura, and made it his own capital.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, it was Vijayasena of the Sena dynasty who destroyed the Pala supremacy in Bengal. His military campaigns and conquests weakened the Palas and paved the way for the Senas to emerge as a significant power in the region.
Which of the following points regarding achievements of the Pala is incorrect?- a)The Pala style of sculpture was adapted in Bengal and Tibet and this in course of time influenced the art of Burma, Indo-China and Indonesia.
- b)The famous Buddhist missionaries of this period were Dharmapala and Atisha Dipankara.
- c)It was in the Pala period that Buddhism developed its own tantrics which degenerated into magic.
- d)The Palas were able to revive the vigour of Buddhism.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following points regarding achievements of the Pala is incorrect?
a)
The Pala style of sculpture was adapted in Bengal and Tibet and this in course of time influenced the art of Burma, Indo-China and Indonesia.
b)
The famous Buddhist missionaries of this period were Dharmapala and Atisha Dipankara.
c)
It was in the Pala period that Buddhism developed its own tantrics which degenerated into magic.
d)
The Palas were able to revive the vigour of Buddhism.
|
|
Arnav Malik answered |
The Pala period was a period of excellence in architecture and sculpture. The stupas at Naianda display how the Gupta style continued to exist as a model in arc Mtecture during the Palas. Chandraprabha, the prince of Bikrampur, was a student of Sil Rakshit. Chandraprabha is famous by the name ‘Atisa Dipankara’.
Which of the statements on Amoghavarsha is not correct?- a)He was the author of Kavirajamarga and Prashnottaramalika.
- b)He extended his influence over Bihar and Bengal.
- c)He shifted his influence over Bihar and Bengal.
- d)He was defeated by Chalukyas.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the statements on Amoghavarsha is not correct?
a)
He was the author of Kavirajamarga and Prashnottaramalika.
b)
He extended his influence over Bihar and Bengal.
c)
He shifted his influence over Bihar and Bengal.
d)
He was defeated by Chalukyas.
|
|
Meghana Shah answered |
The Battle of Vatapi was a decisive engagement which took place between thePallavas and Chalukyas near the Chalukya capital of Vatapi (present day Badami) in 642. The battle resulted in the defeat and death of the Chalukya king Pulakeshin II and the commencement of Pallava occupation of Vatapi which lasted until 654.
Which fact regarding the Senas of Bengal is not correct?- a)Ballala Sena introduced social reforms and revived orthodox Hindu rites.
- b)Bhalla Sena probably founded Kulinism, a system of nobility.
- c)The last ruler of the dynasty was Keshava Sena.
- d)They never experienced the terror of Islamic invaders.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which fact regarding the Senas of Bengal is not correct?
a)
Ballala Sena introduced social reforms and revived orthodox Hindu rites.
b)
Bhalla Sena probably founded Kulinism, a system of nobility.
c)
The last ruler of the dynasty was Keshava Sena.
d)
They never experienced the terror of Islamic invaders.
|
|
Abhay Mukherjee answered |
Incorrect Fact: They never experienced the terror of Islamic invaders
Explanation:
Ballala Sena's Social Reforms:
- Ballala Sena did introduce social reforms and revived orthodox Hindu rites during his rule.
- He was known for his efforts to promote Hindu culture and traditions in Bengal.
Bhalla Sena and Kulinism:
- Bhalla Sena is credited with founding Kulinism, a system of nobility based on Brahmin genealogy.
- This system played a significant role in the social structure of Bengal during that time.
Last Ruler of the Dynasty:
- The last ruler of the Sena dynasty was Lakshmana Sena, not Keshava Sena.
- Lakshmana Sena ruled Bengal until the dynasty was eventually overthrown by the Muslim conquest.
Islamic Invasions:
- The Senas of Bengal did indeed face the terror of Islamic invaders during their rule.
- The invasion of Bengal by Muslims led to the downfall of the Sena dynasty and the establishment of Muslim rule in the region.
In conclusion, the statement that the Senas of Bengal never experienced the terror of Islamic invaders is not correct. They did face invasions by Muslim forces, which eventually led to the end of their rule in Bengal.
Explanation:
Ballala Sena's Social Reforms:
- Ballala Sena did introduce social reforms and revived orthodox Hindu rites during his rule.
- He was known for his efforts to promote Hindu culture and traditions in Bengal.
Bhalla Sena and Kulinism:
- Bhalla Sena is credited with founding Kulinism, a system of nobility based on Brahmin genealogy.
- This system played a significant role in the social structure of Bengal during that time.
Last Ruler of the Dynasty:
- The last ruler of the Sena dynasty was Lakshmana Sena, not Keshava Sena.
- Lakshmana Sena ruled Bengal until the dynasty was eventually overthrown by the Muslim conquest.
Islamic Invasions:
- The Senas of Bengal did indeed face the terror of Islamic invaders during their rule.
- The invasion of Bengal by Muslims led to the downfall of the Sena dynasty and the establishment of Muslim rule in the region.
In conclusion, the statement that the Senas of Bengal never experienced the terror of Islamic invaders is not correct. They did face invasions by Muslim forces, which eventually led to the end of their rule in Bengal.
Which of the following temples of the Nagara style are located at Khajuraho?I. Devi Jagadamba
II. Kandariya Mahadeva
III. Parsvanatha
IV. Duladeo- a)I, II, III
- b)III, IV
- c)II, III, IV
- d)I, II, III, IV
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following temples of the Nagara style are located at Khajuraho?
I. Devi Jagadamba
II. Kandariya Mahadeva
III. Parsvanatha
IV. Duladeo
II. Kandariya Mahadeva
III. Parsvanatha
IV. Duladeo
a)
I, II, III
b)
III, IV
c)
II, III, IV
d)
I, II, III, IV
|
|
Shounak Desai answered |
The correct option is D.
All of these temples of the Nagara style are located at Khajuraho
All of these temples of the Nagara style are located at Khajuraho
Which parts of India were dominated by the Pratihara empire from the middle of the 9th century A.D. till the middle of the 10th century A.D.?- a)Western and Northern India
- b)Deccan
- c)Deccan and Eastern India
- d)Eastern and Northern India
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which parts of India were dominated by the Pratihara empire from the middle of the 9th century A.D. till the middle of the 10th century A.D.?
a)
Western and Northern India
b)
Deccan
c)
Deccan and Eastern India
d)
Eastern and Northern India
|
Upasana Mehta answered |
A is the correct option.The Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty was an imperial power during the Late Classical period on the Indian subcontinent, that ruled much of Northern and westrn India from the mid-8th to the 11th century. They ruled first at Ujjain and later at Kannauj(the western part).
Which one of the following was the second Pratihara king to defeat Dharmapala and drive away his protege from Kanauj?- a)Rambhadra
- b)Vatsaraja
- c)Bhoja I
- d)Nagabhatta I
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following was the second Pratihara king to defeat Dharmapala and drive away his protege from Kanauj?
a)
Rambhadra
b)
Vatsaraja
c)
Bhoja I
d)
Nagabhatta I
|
|
Prasad Chatterjee answered |
The second Pratihara king to defeat Dharmapala and drive away his protege from Kanauj was Nagabhatta I. The following points explain the significance of Nagabhatta I's victory over Dharmapala:
Background:
- Dharmapala was the ruler of the Pala dynasty which had established its supremacy over northern India, including Kanauj, in the mid-8th century.
- However, Dharmapala faced a challenge from the Pratiharas, a Rajput clan that originated in Rajasthan and gradually expanded its power in the Gangetic plains.
- The first Pratihara king to confront Dharmapala was Nagabhata I's father, Vatsaraja, who defeated Dharmapala in a battle near Kanauj in 783 CE.
Nagabhatta I's reign:
- Nagabhatta I succeeded Vatsaraja as the ruler of the Pratihara dynasty in 805 CE.
- In 815 CE, he led an army against Dharmapala and defeated him in a fierce battle near Kannauj.
- Dharmapala's protege, Devapala, who had been appointed as the governor of Kannauj, was also expelled from the city.
- Nagabhatta I's victory over Dharmapala marked a significant shift in the balance of power in northern India, as the Pala dynasty's influence declined and the Pratiharas emerged as a major force.
Impact:
- The defeat of Dharmapala and Devapala weakened the Pala dynasty's hold over northern India and paved the way for the resurgence of other regional powers.
- The Pratihara dynasty, under Nagabhatta I and his successors, went on to establish a vast empire that extended from present-day Rajasthan to Bengal and played a key role in shaping the political and cultural landscape of medieval India.
Conclusion:
Nagabhatta I's victory over Dharmapala was a significant event in Indian history as it marked the beginning of the decline of the Pala dynasty and the rise of the Pratiharas. It also highlights the importance of regional powers in shaping the political dynamics of medieval India.
Background:
- Dharmapala was the ruler of the Pala dynasty which had established its supremacy over northern India, including Kanauj, in the mid-8th century.
- However, Dharmapala faced a challenge from the Pratiharas, a Rajput clan that originated in Rajasthan and gradually expanded its power in the Gangetic plains.
- The first Pratihara king to confront Dharmapala was Nagabhata I's father, Vatsaraja, who defeated Dharmapala in a battle near Kanauj in 783 CE.
Nagabhatta I's reign:
- Nagabhatta I succeeded Vatsaraja as the ruler of the Pratihara dynasty in 805 CE.
- In 815 CE, he led an army against Dharmapala and defeated him in a fierce battle near Kannauj.
- Dharmapala's protege, Devapala, who had been appointed as the governor of Kannauj, was also expelled from the city.
- Nagabhatta I's victory over Dharmapala marked a significant shift in the balance of power in northern India, as the Pala dynasty's influence declined and the Pratiharas emerged as a major force.
Impact:
- The defeat of Dharmapala and Devapala weakened the Pala dynasty's hold over northern India and paved the way for the resurgence of other regional powers.
- The Pratihara dynasty, under Nagabhatta I and his successors, went on to establish a vast empire that extended from present-day Rajasthan to Bengal and played a key role in shaping the political and cultural landscape of medieval India.
Conclusion:
Nagabhatta I's victory over Dharmapala was a significant event in Indian history as it marked the beginning of the decline of the Pala dynasty and the rise of the Pratiharas. It also highlights the importance of regional powers in shaping the political dynamics of medieval India.
Which one of the following was the greatest ruler of the Pratihara dynasty?- a)Mihira Bhoja
- b)Dantidurga
- c)Nagabhatta II
- d)Vatsaraja
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following was the greatest ruler of the Pratihara dynasty?
a)
Mihira Bhoja
b)
Dantidurga
c)
Nagabhatta II
d)
Vatsaraja
|
Innovative Classes answered |
Mihira Bhoja (ruled c. 836–885 CE) was the greatest ruler of the Pratihara dynasty. He is best known for his extensive military conquests, efficient administration, and promotion of art and culture. Under Mihira Bhoja, the Pratihara Empire reached its zenith, controlling vast territories across northern India. He successfully resisted invasions from the Palas and the Rashtrakutas during the tripartite struggle over Kanauj and maintained the empire's dominance for decades.
Therefore, Correct Answer - Option A
Which statement on Lakshmana Sena is not correct?- a)He was a devout Vaishnava.
- b)He was a great conqueror and probably he defeated the rulers of Kamarupa, Kalinga and Kashi.
- c)Aibak defeated him in 1208 A.D.
- d)Jayadeva, the author of Gita Govinda and Dhoyi, the author of thePavanadura, adorned his court.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which statement on Lakshmana Sena is not correct?
a)
He was a devout Vaishnava.
b)
He was a great conqueror and probably he defeated the rulers of Kamarupa, Kalinga and Kashi.
c)
Aibak defeated him in 1208 A.D.
d)
Jayadeva, the author of Gita Govinda and Dhoyi, the author of thePavanadura, adorned his court.
|
|
Ameya Banerjee answered |
Incorrect Statement:
c) Aibak defeated him in 1208 A.D.
Explanation:
Lakshmana Sena was a prominent ruler of the Sena dynasty in Bengal during the 12th century. He was known for his military campaigns and cultural patronage.
Devout Vaishnava:
Lakshmana Sena was indeed a devout Vaishnava, known for his devotion to Lord Vishnu.
Great Conqueror:
Lakshmana Sena was a great conqueror who expanded his kingdom through military conquests. He is believed to have defeated the rulers of Kamarupa, Kalinga, and Kashi among others.
Court Poets:
Jayadeva, the renowned poet and author of Gita Govinda, and Dhoyi, the author of Pavanadura, were known to have adorned his court. They contributed significantly to the cultural and literary development during his reign.
Defeat by Aibak:
The statement that Aibak defeated Lakshmana Sena in 1208 A.D. is not correct. Aibak was a prominent ruler of the Delhi Sultanate, but there is no historical evidence to suggest that he defeated Lakshmana Sena. In fact, Lakshmana Sena's reign continued beyond 1208 A.D. and he played a significant role in the political landscape of Bengal during that time.
In conclusion, while Lakshmana Sena was indeed a devout Vaishnava, a great conqueror, and had renowned poets in his court, the claim of his defeat by Aibak in 1208 A.D. is not historically accurate.
c) Aibak defeated him in 1208 A.D.
Explanation:
Lakshmana Sena was a prominent ruler of the Sena dynasty in Bengal during the 12th century. He was known for his military campaigns and cultural patronage.
Devout Vaishnava:
Lakshmana Sena was indeed a devout Vaishnava, known for his devotion to Lord Vishnu.
Great Conqueror:
Lakshmana Sena was a great conqueror who expanded his kingdom through military conquests. He is believed to have defeated the rulers of Kamarupa, Kalinga, and Kashi among others.
Court Poets:
Jayadeva, the renowned poet and author of Gita Govinda, and Dhoyi, the author of Pavanadura, were known to have adorned his court. They contributed significantly to the cultural and literary development during his reign.
Defeat by Aibak:
The statement that Aibak defeated Lakshmana Sena in 1208 A.D. is not correct. Aibak was a prominent ruler of the Delhi Sultanate, but there is no historical evidence to suggest that he defeated Lakshmana Sena. In fact, Lakshmana Sena's reign continued beyond 1208 A.D. and he played a significant role in the political landscape of Bengal during that time.
In conclusion, while Lakshmana Sena was indeed a devout Vaishnava, a great conqueror, and had renowned poets in his court, the claim of his defeat by Aibak in 1208 A.D. is not historically accurate.
What was the name of the Gurjara Pratihara king whose court was adorned by Raja Sekhar?
- a)Mahendrapala
- b)Mahipala, a grandson of Bhuja
- c)Nagabhatta II
- d)Mihira Bhoja
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the name of the Gurjara Pratihara king whose court was adorned by Raja Sekhar?
a)
Mahendrapala
b)
Mahipala, a grandson of Bhuja
c)
Nagabhatta II
d)
Mihira Bhoja
|
|
Sanjana Basak answered |
The name of the Gurjara Pratihara king whose court was adorned by Raja Sekhar was Mahipala, a grandson of Bhuja.
Explanation:
The Gurjara Pratihara dynasty was a prominent Indian dynasty that ruled over a major part of North India from the 8th to the 11th century. They were known for their military prowess and patronage of art and culture.
Raja Sekhar, also known as Rajashekhara, was a renowned Sanskrit poet and playwright who lived during the 9th century. He was a court poet in the court of Mahipala, who was a ruler of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty.
Mahipala, the grandson of Bhuja, was one of the prominent rulers of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty. He ascended the throne around the mid-9th century and ruled for a significant period. During his reign, the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty reached its peak of power and prosperity.
Mahipala was known for his patronage of arts and literature, and he had a keen interest in promoting Sanskrit literature. He was a great admirer of Raja Sekhar's literary works and invited him to his court. Raja Sekhar's plays and poetry were highly esteemed and respected by Mahipala, who adorned his court with the presence of the talented poet.
Raja Sekhar's plays, such as "Karpuramanjari" and "Balaramayana," were performed in the court of Mahipala, and he received generous patronage and support from the king. Raja Sekhar's writings reflect the cultural and social aspects of the time, and his association with the Gurjara Pratihara court under Mahipala's reign further elevated his status as a renowned poet.
Overall, Mahipala, the Gurjara Pratihara king, had a deep admiration for Raja Sekhar's literary talent and invited him to his court, where the poet's works were highly valued and performed. This association between the king and the poet played a significant role in the promotion of Sanskrit literature during that period.
Explanation:
The Gurjara Pratihara dynasty was a prominent Indian dynasty that ruled over a major part of North India from the 8th to the 11th century. They were known for their military prowess and patronage of art and culture.
Raja Sekhar, also known as Rajashekhara, was a renowned Sanskrit poet and playwright who lived during the 9th century. He was a court poet in the court of Mahipala, who was a ruler of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty.
Mahipala, the grandson of Bhuja, was one of the prominent rulers of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty. He ascended the throne around the mid-9th century and ruled for a significant period. During his reign, the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty reached its peak of power and prosperity.
Mahipala was known for his patronage of arts and literature, and he had a keen interest in promoting Sanskrit literature. He was a great admirer of Raja Sekhar's literary works and invited him to his court. Raja Sekhar's plays and poetry were highly esteemed and respected by Mahipala, who adorned his court with the presence of the talented poet.
Raja Sekhar's plays, such as "Karpuramanjari" and "Balaramayana," were performed in the court of Mahipala, and he received generous patronage and support from the king. Raja Sekhar's writings reflect the cultural and social aspects of the time, and his association with the Gurjara Pratihara court under Mahipala's reign further elevated his status as a renowned poet.
Overall, Mahipala, the Gurjara Pratihara king, had a deep admiration for Raja Sekhar's literary talent and invited him to his court, where the poet's works were highly valued and performed. This association between the king and the poet played a significant role in the promotion of Sanskrit literature during that period.
Which factor brings out clearly the feudal nature of regional states from 800 to 1200 A.D.?- a)The practice of sub-infeudation.
- b)Part of the revenue was sent to the king.
- c)To break the oath of loyalty to the king was regarded as an atrocious crime.
- d)King granted land to officers and select holders like Brahmanas.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which factor brings out clearly the feudal nature of regional states from 800 to 1200 A.D.?
a)
The practice of sub-infeudation.
b)
Part of the revenue was sent to the king.
c)
To break the oath of loyalty to the king was regarded as an atrocious crime.
d)
King granted land to officers and select holders like Brahmanas.
|
|
Sanjana Saha answered |
The factor that clearly brings out the feudal nature of regional states from 800 to 1200 A.D. is the practice of sub-infeudation.
Explanation:
- Sub-infeudation refers to the process in which a vassal would divide their land and grant portions of it to their own vassals, creating a hierarchical system of land ownership.
- This practice was prevalent during the feudal period, where the king or lord would grant land to a vassal in exchange for their loyalty and military service.
- The vassal would then sub-infeudate their land, granting smaller portions of it to their own vassals, who in turn would owe them loyalty and military service.
- This created a complex web of feudal relationships, with each vassal owing allegiance to their immediate superior and ultimately to the king or lord.
- The vassals held their land as a fief, which was a hereditary right, and they had the power to govern and collect revenue from their own vassals.
- The vassals were responsible for providing military support to their superior in times of war and maintaining law and order in their territories.
- In return, the vassals received protection and support from their superior, who had the authority to settle disputes and provide justice.
- This hierarchical structure of land ownership and loyalty clearly reflects the feudal nature of regional states during this period.
In contrast, the other options do not adequately capture the feudal nature of regional states during this time:
- Part of the revenue being sent to the king was a common practice in feudal systems, but it does not specifically highlight the sub-infeudation and hierarchical land ownership characteristic of feudalism.
- The idea of breaking the oath of loyalty to the king being regarded as an atrocious crime is a general characteristic of feudal systems, but it does not directly address the sub-infeudation aspect.
- The granting of land to officers and select holders like Brahmanas by the king is a practice that can be found in feudal systems, but it does not explicitly emphasize the sub-infeudation and hierarchical land ownership that define feudalism.
Therefore, option A, the practice of sub-infeudation, is the factor that brings out clearly the feudal nature of regional states from 800 to 1200 A.D.
Explanation:
- Sub-infeudation refers to the process in which a vassal would divide their land and grant portions of it to their own vassals, creating a hierarchical system of land ownership.
- This practice was prevalent during the feudal period, where the king or lord would grant land to a vassal in exchange for their loyalty and military service.
- The vassal would then sub-infeudate their land, granting smaller portions of it to their own vassals, who in turn would owe them loyalty and military service.
- This created a complex web of feudal relationships, with each vassal owing allegiance to their immediate superior and ultimately to the king or lord.
- The vassals held their land as a fief, which was a hereditary right, and they had the power to govern and collect revenue from their own vassals.
- The vassals were responsible for providing military support to their superior in times of war and maintaining law and order in their territories.
- In return, the vassals received protection and support from their superior, who had the authority to settle disputes and provide justice.
- This hierarchical structure of land ownership and loyalty clearly reflects the feudal nature of regional states during this period.
In contrast, the other options do not adequately capture the feudal nature of regional states during this time:
- Part of the revenue being sent to the king was a common practice in feudal systems, but it does not specifically highlight the sub-infeudation and hierarchical land ownership characteristic of feudalism.
- The idea of breaking the oath of loyalty to the king being regarded as an atrocious crime is a general characteristic of feudal systems, but it does not directly address the sub-infeudation aspect.
- The granting of land to officers and select holders like Brahmanas by the king is a practice that can be found in feudal systems, but it does not explicitly emphasize the sub-infeudation and hierarchical land ownership that define feudalism.
Therefore, option A, the practice of sub-infeudation, is the factor that brings out clearly the feudal nature of regional states from 800 to 1200 A.D.
What was the supreme contribution of the Palas of Bengal?- a)Dipankara and Shantarakshita introduced Buddhism in Tibet.
- b)Checkmating the ambitions of the Pratiharas.
- c)Making Vikramashila a great centre of education.
- d)Sending of Buddhist scholars to Sailendra empire.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the supreme contribution of the Palas of Bengal?
a)
Dipankara and Shantarakshita introduced Buddhism in Tibet.
b)
Checkmating the ambitions of the Pratiharas.
c)
Making Vikramashila a great centre of education.
d)
Sending of Buddhist scholars to Sailendra empire.
|
|
Aashna Nambiar answered |
The reign of King Trisong Detsen, which began about 755 CE, Buddhismbecame the official religion of the Tibetan people. The King also invited famousBuddhist teachers such as Shantarakshita and Padmasambhava to Tibet. He is credited with building Samye, the first monastery in Tibet, in the late 8th century.
Which of the following can be considered as the causes for the decline of trade and commerce in North India between 750 & 1200 A.D.
I. Decrease in the use of coins.
II. Emergence of a wide variety of local weights and measures.
III. Unstable political conditions.
IV. Availability of little surplus production.
V. Decline of the Roman and Sassanid empires.- a)I, II, III
- b)II, III, IV, V
- c)I, III, IV, V
- d)I, II, III, IV, V
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following can be considered as the causes for the decline of trade and commerce in North India between 750 & 1200 A.D.
I. Decrease in the use of coins.
II. Emergence of a wide variety of local weights and measures.
III. Unstable political conditions.
IV. Availability of little surplus production.
V. Decline of the Roman and Sassanid empires.
I. Decrease in the use of coins.
II. Emergence of a wide variety of local weights and measures.
III. Unstable political conditions.
IV. Availability of little surplus production.
V. Decline of the Roman and Sassanid empires.
a)
I, II, III
b)
II, III, IV, V
c)
I, III, IV, V
d)
I, II, III, IV, V
|
|
Sanchita Datta answered |
The correct option is D.
All the following are considered as the causes for the decline of trade and commerce in North India between 750 & 1200 A.D.
All the following are considered as the causes for the decline of trade and commerce in North India between 750 & 1200 A.D.
Which two Buddhist monks of the Pala period are responsible for the introduction of Buddhism in Tibet?I. Atisha Dipankara
II. Santarakshita
III. Dharmarajika
IV. Asvaghosa- a)I, II, III
- b)I, II
- c)II, IV
- d)III, IV
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which two Buddhist monks of the Pala period are responsible for the introduction of Buddhism in Tibet?
I. Atisha Dipankara
II. Santarakshita
III. Dharmarajika
IV. Asvaghosa
II. Santarakshita
III. Dharmarajika
IV. Asvaghosa
a)
I, II, III
b)
I, II
c)
II, IV
d)
III, IV
|
|
Deepika Ahuja answered |
In the 8th century Buddhism really took hold in Tibet. Trisong Detsen invited Indian Buddhist scholars to his court, and Tibetan Buddhists today trace their oldest spiritual roots to the Indian masters Padmasambhāva (8th century) and Śāntarakṣita (725–788), who founded the Nyingma, The Ancient Ones, the oldest school of Tibetan Buddhism. At this early time also, from the south came the influence of scholars under the Pāla dynasty in the Indian state of Magadha. They had achieved a blend of Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna that has come to characterize all forms of Tibetan Buddhism. Their teaching in sutra centered on The Abhisamayālankāra, a 4th-century Yogācārin text, but prominent among them were the Mādhyamika scholars Śāntarakṣita and Atisha Dipankara.
Which one of the following did not rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D.?- a)The Utpala dynasty
- b)The Lohara dynasty
- c)The Karnata dynasty
- d)The Karkotaka dynasty
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following did not rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D.?
a)
The Utpala dynasty
b)
The Lohara dynasty
c)
The Karnata dynasty
d)
The Karkotaka dynasty
|
|
Aashna Bose answered |
Explanation:
The Karnata dynasty did not rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D.
The other three dynasties mentioned - the Utpala, Lohara, and Karkotaka dynasties - were indeed ruling over Kashmir during this time period.
The Utpala dynasty:
- The Utpala dynasty ruled over Kashmir from the mid-9th century to the late 10th century.
- They were known for their patronage of art, literature, and architecture.
The Lohara dynasty:
- The Lohara dynasty succeeded the Utpala dynasty in the late 10th century and ruled over Kashmir till the early 12th century.
- They were known for their military conquests and administrative reforms.
The Karkotaka dynasty:
- The Karkotaka dynasty ruled over Kashmir from the 7th century to the mid-9th century.
- They are credited with establishing Kashmir as a significant political and cultural center in the region.
Conclusion:
While the Utpala, Lohara, and Karkotaka dynasties all had their respective periods of rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D., the Karnata dynasty did not have a presence in Kashmir during this time frame.
The Karnata dynasty did not rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D.
The other three dynasties mentioned - the Utpala, Lohara, and Karkotaka dynasties - were indeed ruling over Kashmir during this time period.
The Utpala dynasty:
- The Utpala dynasty ruled over Kashmir from the mid-9th century to the late 10th century.
- They were known for their patronage of art, literature, and architecture.
The Lohara dynasty:
- The Lohara dynasty succeeded the Utpala dynasty in the late 10th century and ruled over Kashmir till the early 12th century.
- They were known for their military conquests and administrative reforms.
The Karkotaka dynasty:
- The Karkotaka dynasty ruled over Kashmir from the 7th century to the mid-9th century.
- They are credited with establishing Kashmir as a significant political and cultural center in the region.
Conclusion:
While the Utpala, Lohara, and Karkotaka dynasties all had their respective periods of rule over Kashmir between 800 A.D. and 1200 A.D., the Karnata dynasty did not have a presence in Kashmir during this time frame.
It is said that Vakpati Munja defeated a Chalukya king six times. What was his name?- a)Krishnaraja
- b)Tailapa II
- c)Bhoja
- d)Siddharaja
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
It is said that Vakpati Munja defeated a Chalukya king six times. What was his name?
a)
Krishnaraja
b)
Tailapa II
c)
Bhoja
d)
Siddharaja
|
|
Mihir Mehta answered |
Explanation:
Background:
Vakpati Munja was a ruler of the Paramara dynasty in Malwa. He is known for his military exploits and his conflicts with the Chalukya kings.
Defeat of Chalukya King:
- Vakpati Munja defeated a Chalukya king six times in battle.
- The Chalukya king who was defeated by Vakpati Munja six times was Tailapa II.
Importance of the Defeats:
- Vakpati Munja's victories over Tailapa II were significant as they showcased his military prowess and strategic acumen.
- These victories also demonstrated the strength and power of the Paramara dynasty under Vakpati Munja's rule.
Legacy of Vakpati Munja:
- Vakpati Munja's victories over the Chalukya king contributed to the expansion and consolidation of the Paramara dynasty's territories.
- His military successes further solidified his reputation as a formidable ruler in the region.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Vakpati Munja's defeats of the Chalukya king Tailapa II six times exemplify his skill as a military leader and the strength of the Paramara dynasty under his rule. These victories played a crucial role in shaping the history of the region during that period.
Background:
Vakpati Munja was a ruler of the Paramara dynasty in Malwa. He is known for his military exploits and his conflicts with the Chalukya kings.
Defeat of Chalukya King:
- Vakpati Munja defeated a Chalukya king six times in battle.
- The Chalukya king who was defeated by Vakpati Munja six times was Tailapa II.
Importance of the Defeats:
- Vakpati Munja's victories over Tailapa II were significant as they showcased his military prowess and strategic acumen.
- These victories also demonstrated the strength and power of the Paramara dynasty under Vakpati Munja's rule.
Legacy of Vakpati Munja:
- Vakpati Munja's victories over the Chalukya king contributed to the expansion and consolidation of the Paramara dynasty's territories.
- His military successes further solidified his reputation as a formidable ruler in the region.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Vakpati Munja's defeats of the Chalukya king Tailapa II six times exemplify his skill as a military leader and the strength of the Paramara dynasty under his rule. These victories played a crucial role in shaping the history of the region during that period.
Which one of the following statements about the role of Jayachandra Gahadavala during Muhammad Gori’s invasion of India is correct?- a)He invited Gori to invade India and attack Prithviraja Chauhan.
- b)He did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Muhammad of Gori invaded India.
- c)He bought his peace with Gori by promising not to support Prithviraja.
- d)At that time Jaychandra was himself busy setting the score with the Chandelas
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following statements about the role of Jayachandra Gahadavala during Muhammad Gori’s invasion of India is correct?
a)
He invited Gori to invade India and attack Prithviraja Chauhan.
b)
He did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Muhammad of Gori invaded India.
c)
He bought his peace with Gori by promising not to support Prithviraja.
d)
At that time Jaychandra was himself busy setting the score with the Chandelas
|
|
Atharva Chaudhary answered |
Role of Jayachandra Gahadavala during Muhammad Gori's invasion of India
Background: Muhammad Gori was a ruler of the Ghurid dynasty who invaded India multiple times in the 12th century. His most significant invasion was in 1191 when he attacked the kingdom of Prithviraja Chauhan.
Statement: He did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Muhammad of Gori invaded India.
Explanation:
- Jayachandra Gahadavala was a king of the Gahadavala dynasty, which ruled over parts of present-day Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in the 12th century.
- When Muhammad Gori invaded India in 1191, Prithviraja Chauhan, the king of Delhi, was one of his main targets.
- Prithviraja sent messages to other kings in the region, including Jayachandra, seeking their help in repelling the invasion.
- However, Jayachandra did not respond to Prithviraja's call for help and did not ally himself with him against Gori.
- According to some historical accounts, Jayachandra may have even facilitated Gori's invasion by not guarding the important routes to Delhi, which allowed Gori's army to march unopposed.
- It is unclear why Jayachandra did not support Prithviraja, but some historians speculate that he may have had a rivalry with Prithviraja or may have wanted to expand his own territory by aligning with Gori.
- In any case, Jayachandra's decision not to support Prithviraja proved to be a costly mistake, as Gori defeated Prithviraja in the Battle of Tarain and established the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct statement about the role of Jayachandra Gahadavala during Muhammad Gori's invasion of India is that he did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Gori attacked. This decision may have been a result of personal rivalry or ambition, but it ultimately allowed Gori to conquer northern India and establish a new dynasty.
Background: Muhammad Gori was a ruler of the Ghurid dynasty who invaded India multiple times in the 12th century. His most significant invasion was in 1191 when he attacked the kingdom of Prithviraja Chauhan.
Statement: He did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Muhammad of Gori invaded India.
Explanation:
- Jayachandra Gahadavala was a king of the Gahadavala dynasty, which ruled over parts of present-day Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in the 12th century.
- When Muhammad Gori invaded India in 1191, Prithviraja Chauhan, the king of Delhi, was one of his main targets.
- Prithviraja sent messages to other kings in the region, including Jayachandra, seeking their help in repelling the invasion.
- However, Jayachandra did not respond to Prithviraja's call for help and did not ally himself with him against Gori.
- According to some historical accounts, Jayachandra may have even facilitated Gori's invasion by not guarding the important routes to Delhi, which allowed Gori's army to march unopposed.
- It is unclear why Jayachandra did not support Prithviraja, but some historians speculate that he may have had a rivalry with Prithviraja or may have wanted to expand his own territory by aligning with Gori.
- In any case, Jayachandra's decision not to support Prithviraja proved to be a costly mistake, as Gori defeated Prithviraja in the Battle of Tarain and established the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct statement about the role of Jayachandra Gahadavala during Muhammad Gori's invasion of India is that he did not ally himself with Prithviraja when Gori attacked. This decision may have been a result of personal rivalry or ambition, but it ultimately allowed Gori to conquer northern India and establish a new dynasty.
Which of the following Orissa type of Nagara styles of temples are found at Bhuvaneswar?
I. Mukteswara Temple
II. Lingaraja Temple
III. Parasurameswara Temple
IV. Jagannath Temple
- a)I, II, III
- b)II, III, IV
- c)III, IV
- d)I, III
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following Orissa type of Nagara styles of temples are found at Bhuvaneswar?
I. Mukteswara Temple
II. Lingaraja Temple
III. Parasurameswara Temple
IV. Jagannath Temple
II. Lingaraja Temple
III. Parasurameswara Temple
IV. Jagannath Temple
a)
I, II, III
b)
II, III, IV
c)
III, IV
d)
I, III
|
Mihir Mukherjee answered |
The correct answer is option 'A' - I, II, III.
Here is a detailed explanation:
I. Mukteswara Temple:
The Mukteswara Temple is one of the finest examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture and is located in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. It was built in the 10th century during the reign of the Somavamsi dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is known for its exquisite carvings and sculptures. It is built on a raised platform and has a square sanctum with a pyramidal roof (vimana) above it. The temple is adorned with beautiful sculptures depicting various scenes from Hindu mythology.
II. Lingaraja Temple:
The Lingaraja Temple is another prominent temple in Bhubaneswar and is considered one of the best examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It was built in the 11th century during the reign of the Somavamsi dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is one of the most important pilgrimage sites in Odisha. The Lingaraja Temple is characterized by its towering spire (shikhara) and the large number of smaller shrines surrounding the main temple. The exterior of the temple is adorned with intricate carvings depicting various gods, goddesses, and mythological creatures.
III. Parasurameswara Temple:
The Parasurameswara Temple is another significant temple in Bhubaneswar and is also built in the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It was built in the 7th century during the rule of the Bhaumakara dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is known for its beautiful sculptures and carvings. The Parasurameswara Temple is relatively small in size compared to the other temples in Bhubaneswar but is highly revered by devotees.
IV. Jagannath Temple:
The Jagannath Temple, although a famous and significant temple, is not an example of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It is located in Puri, Odisha, and is built in the Kalinga style of architecture. The temple is dedicated to Lord Jagannath (a form of Lord Krishna) and is one of the Char Dham pilgrimage sites for Hindus.
In conclusion, among the given options, the Mukteswara Temple, Lingaraja Temple, and Parasurameswara Temple are examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture and are found in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The Jagannath Temple, on the other hand, is not an example of this particular style and is located in Puri, Odisha.
Here is a detailed explanation:
I. Mukteswara Temple:
The Mukteswara Temple is one of the finest examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture and is located in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. It was built in the 10th century during the reign of the Somavamsi dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is known for its exquisite carvings and sculptures. It is built on a raised platform and has a square sanctum with a pyramidal roof (vimana) above it. The temple is adorned with beautiful sculptures depicting various scenes from Hindu mythology.
II. Lingaraja Temple:
The Lingaraja Temple is another prominent temple in Bhubaneswar and is considered one of the best examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It was built in the 11th century during the reign of the Somavamsi dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is one of the most important pilgrimage sites in Odisha. The Lingaraja Temple is characterized by its towering spire (shikhara) and the large number of smaller shrines surrounding the main temple. The exterior of the temple is adorned with intricate carvings depicting various gods, goddesses, and mythological creatures.
III. Parasurameswara Temple:
The Parasurameswara Temple is another significant temple in Bhubaneswar and is also built in the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It was built in the 7th century during the rule of the Bhaumakara dynasty. The temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva and is known for its beautiful sculptures and carvings. The Parasurameswara Temple is relatively small in size compared to the other temples in Bhubaneswar but is highly revered by devotees.
IV. Jagannath Temple:
The Jagannath Temple, although a famous and significant temple, is not an example of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture. It is located in Puri, Odisha, and is built in the Kalinga style of architecture. The temple is dedicated to Lord Jagannath (a form of Lord Krishna) and is one of the Char Dham pilgrimage sites for Hindus.
In conclusion, among the given options, the Mukteswara Temple, Lingaraja Temple, and Parasurameswara Temple are examples of the Orissa style of Nagara architecture and are found in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The Jagannath Temple, on the other hand, is not an example of this particular style and is located in Puri, Odisha.
Amoghavarsha-I, the famous Rashtrakuta ruler, was the author ofI. Sibakasindamani
II. Gita Govind
III. Kavirajamarga
IV. Ratnamalika- a)I, III
- b)I, II, III
- c)I, II, III, IV
- d)III, IV
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Amoghavarsha-I, the famous Rashtrakuta ruler, was the author of
I. Sibakasindamani
II. Gita Govind
III. Kavirajamarga
IV. Ratnamalika
II. Gita Govind
III. Kavirajamarga
IV. Ratnamalika
a)
I, III
b)
I, II, III
c)
I, II, III, IV
d)
III, IV
|
|
Ankita Kulkarni answered |
Amoghavarsha-I was one of the most famous Rashtrakuta rulers who ruled from 814 CE to 878 CE. He was a great patron of literature and encouraged the development of Sanskrit literature in his court.
The correct answer is option D, which means that Amoghavarsha-I was the author of Kavirajamarga and Ratnamalika.
Kavirajamarga:
• Kavirajamarga is a Sanskrit text written by Amoghavarsha-I in the 9th century CE.
• It is the earliest known work on literary criticism in Kannada and is considered as a landmark in the history of Kannada literature.
• The text deals with the principles of poetry, grammar, and rhetoric and provides guidelines for literary composition.
Ratnamalika:
• Ratnamalika is a collection of 21 Sanskrit poems written by Amoghavarsha-I.
• The poems are dedicated to various deities and are known for their lyrical beauty and philosophical depth.
• The poems are also significant for their contribution to the development of early medieval Indian poetry.
Sibakasindamani and Gita Govind are not attributed to Amoghavarsha-I. Sibakasindamani is a Tamil epic written by the Jain monk Tirutakkatevar in the 10th century CE, while Gita Govind is a Sanskrit poem written by the 12th-century poet Jayadeva.
The correct answer is option D, which means that Amoghavarsha-I was the author of Kavirajamarga and Ratnamalika.
Kavirajamarga:
• Kavirajamarga is a Sanskrit text written by Amoghavarsha-I in the 9th century CE.
• It is the earliest known work on literary criticism in Kannada and is considered as a landmark in the history of Kannada literature.
• The text deals with the principles of poetry, grammar, and rhetoric and provides guidelines for literary composition.
Ratnamalika:
• Ratnamalika is a collection of 21 Sanskrit poems written by Amoghavarsha-I.
• The poems are dedicated to various deities and are known for their lyrical beauty and philosophical depth.
• The poems are also significant for their contribution to the development of early medieval Indian poetry.
Sibakasindamani and Gita Govind are not attributed to Amoghavarsha-I. Sibakasindamani is a Tamil epic written by the Jain monk Tirutakkatevar in the 10th century CE, while Gita Govind is a Sanskrit poem written by the 12th-century poet Jayadeva.
Between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D., the most important ruling dynasty in the northernwestern India was the Hindu Shahis. Who was the founder of this dynasty?- a)Kamahi
- b)Kalles
- c)Bhima
- d)Samand
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D., the most important ruling dynasty in the northernwestern India was the Hindu Shahis. Who was the founder of this dynasty?
a)
Kamahi
b)
Kalles
c)
Bhima
d)
Samand
|
|
Priya Sengupta answered |
Founder of Hindu Shahi Dynasty
The Hindu Shahi dynasty was an important ruling dynasty in northwestern India between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D. The founder of this dynasty was Kalles, who was also known as Kallar or Kallaraja. He was the first ruler of the Shahi dynasty and established his rule in the Kabul Valley in the early 9th century.
Kalles was a descendant of the ancient Hindu king Porus, who had fought against Alexander the Great in the 4th century B.C. He was also related to the famous Gupta dynasty of India, which had ruled during the Golden Age of Indian history.
Kalles' Reign
Kalles was a powerful ruler who expanded his kingdom by conquering neighboring territories. He established his capital at Kapisa, near modern-day Kabul, and built a magnificent palace there. He also constructed several temples and other public buildings.
During his reign, Kalles maintained friendly relations with the neighboring Arab caliphates and was a patron of the arts and sciences. He was known for his love of music and poetry and was a great admirer of the works of the famous Indian poet Kalidasa.
Kalles was succeeded by his son Bhima, who continued to expand the Shahi dynasty's territories. Under Bhima's rule, the Shahi dynasty reached its height of power and prosperity.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Kalles was the founder of the Hindu Shahi dynasty, which was an important ruling dynasty in northwestern India between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D. He was a powerful ruler who expanded his kingdom and was known for his patronage of the arts and sciences. His reign marked the beginning of a golden age in Indian history, which lasted for several centuries.
The Hindu Shahi dynasty was an important ruling dynasty in northwestern India between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D. The founder of this dynasty was Kalles, who was also known as Kallar or Kallaraja. He was the first ruler of the Shahi dynasty and established his rule in the Kabul Valley in the early 9th century.
Kalles was a descendant of the ancient Hindu king Porus, who had fought against Alexander the Great in the 4th century B.C. He was also related to the famous Gupta dynasty of India, which had ruled during the Golden Age of Indian history.
Kalles' Reign
Kalles was a powerful ruler who expanded his kingdom by conquering neighboring territories. He established his capital at Kapisa, near modern-day Kabul, and built a magnificent palace there. He also constructed several temples and other public buildings.
During his reign, Kalles maintained friendly relations with the neighboring Arab caliphates and was a patron of the arts and sciences. He was known for his love of music and poetry and was a great admirer of the works of the famous Indian poet Kalidasa.
Kalles was succeeded by his son Bhima, who continued to expand the Shahi dynasty's territories. Under Bhima's rule, the Shahi dynasty reached its height of power and prosperity.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Kalles was the founder of the Hindu Shahi dynasty, which was an important ruling dynasty in northwestern India between the 9th and 11th centuries A.D. He was a powerful ruler who expanded his kingdom and was known for his patronage of the arts and sciences. His reign marked the beginning of a golden age in Indian history, which lasted for several centuries.
The feudatories during 800-1200 A.D. had a number of minor obligations and privileges but one of them is the most revealing which one is that?- a)The title of feudatories varied according to their ranks.
- b)Attendence at the court on days like king’s birthday was bounden duty of the feudatories.
- c)The military obligation of the feudatories grew in importance as the time passed by.
- d)The feudatories were permitted to use various symbols of dignity and royalty.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The feudatories during 800-1200 A.D. had a number of minor obligations and privileges but one of them is the most revealing which one is that?
a)
The title of feudatories varied according to their ranks.
b)
Attendence at the court on days like king’s birthday was bounden duty of the feudatories.
c)
The military obligation of the feudatories grew in importance as the time passed by.
d)
The feudatories were permitted to use various symbols of dignity and royalty.
|
Pooja Yadav answered |
The correct option is D as The feudatories were permitted to use various symbols of dignity and royalty. Is one of the most revealing.
Which one of the following Rashtrakuta kings defeated Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I?- a)Indra III
- b)Krishna III
- c)Amoghavarsha I
- d)Govinda III
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following Rashtrakuta kings defeated Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I?
a)
Indra III
b)
Krishna III
c)
Amoghavarsha I
d)
Govinda III
|
Ameya Chawla answered |
Answer:
Introduction:
The Rashtrakuta dynasty was one of the most powerful and influential dynasties in the history of India. They ruled a large part of the Deccan Plateau from the 6th to the 10th century AD. One of the notable kings of this dynasty was Govinda III, who defeated the Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I.
Background:
The Pratihara dynasty was a prominent dynasty that ruled over northern India from the 6th to the 11th century AD. They were known for their military prowess and had a fierce rivalry with the Rashtrakutas.
Govinda III's Reign:
Govinda III was one of the most powerful kings of the Rashtrakuta dynasty. He ruled from 793 to 814 AD and his reign was marked by several military conquests and territorial expansions. He is known for his successful campaigns against various kingdoms and rulers, including the defeat of Nagabhata I, the Pratihara ruler.
Defeat of Nagabhata I:
Nagabhata I was one of the early rulers of the Pratihara dynasty. He was known for his military feats and had expanded his kingdom in northern India. However, his ambitions clashed with those of Govinda III.
In the early 9th century, Govinda III launched a military campaign against Nagabhata I. The exact details of the battle are not well-documented, but it is believed that Govinda III was able to defeat Nagabhata I and establish his dominance over the Pratihara ruler.
Implications:
The defeat of Nagabhata I by Govinda III had significant implications for the political landscape of northern India. It marked a major setback for the Pratihara dynasty and enhanced the power and influence of the Rashtrakutas.
The defeat also showcased the military prowess of Govinda III and solidified his reputation as a formidable ruler. It further strengthened the Rashtrakuta kingdom and allowed them to expand their territories in northern India.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Govinda III, one of the powerful kings of the Rashtrakuta dynasty, defeated the Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I. This victory had important implications for the political landscape of northern India and further enhanced the power and influence of the Rashtrakutas.
Introduction:
The Rashtrakuta dynasty was one of the most powerful and influential dynasties in the history of India. They ruled a large part of the Deccan Plateau from the 6th to the 10th century AD. One of the notable kings of this dynasty was Govinda III, who defeated the Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I.
Background:
The Pratihara dynasty was a prominent dynasty that ruled over northern India from the 6th to the 11th century AD. They were known for their military prowess and had a fierce rivalry with the Rashtrakutas.
Govinda III's Reign:
Govinda III was one of the most powerful kings of the Rashtrakuta dynasty. He ruled from 793 to 814 AD and his reign was marked by several military conquests and territorial expansions. He is known for his successful campaigns against various kingdoms and rulers, including the defeat of Nagabhata I, the Pratihara ruler.
Defeat of Nagabhata I:
Nagabhata I was one of the early rulers of the Pratihara dynasty. He was known for his military feats and had expanded his kingdom in northern India. However, his ambitions clashed with those of Govinda III.
In the early 9th century, Govinda III launched a military campaign against Nagabhata I. The exact details of the battle are not well-documented, but it is believed that Govinda III was able to defeat Nagabhata I and establish his dominance over the Pratihara ruler.
Implications:
The defeat of Nagabhata I by Govinda III had significant implications for the political landscape of northern India. It marked a major setback for the Pratihara dynasty and enhanced the power and influence of the Rashtrakutas.
The defeat also showcased the military prowess of Govinda III and solidified his reputation as a formidable ruler. It further strengthened the Rashtrakuta kingdom and allowed them to expand their territories in northern India.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Govinda III, one of the powerful kings of the Rashtrakuta dynasty, defeated the Pratihara ruler Nagabhata I. This victory had important implications for the political landscape of northern India and further enhanced the power and influence of the Rashtrakutas.
Which was the chief reason for the dominant role of the Rashtrakutas in the 9th century? - a)Geographical position of the Rashtrakutas.
- b)The ambitions of rulers like Govinda III, Amoghavarsha I and Krishna.
- c)No Northern king was strong enough to intervene in the affair of northern Deccan.
- d)The decline of the Pallavas.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which was the chief reason for the dominant role of the Rashtrakutas in the 9th century?
a)
Geographical position of the Rashtrakutas.
b)
The ambitions of rulers like Govinda III, Amoghavarsha I and Krishna.
c)
No Northern king was strong enough to intervene in the affair of northern Deccan.
d)
The decline of the Pallavas.
|
|
Sameer Nambiar answered |
The chief reason for the dominant role of the Rashtrakutas in the 9th century was the geographical position of the Rashtrakutas.
Explanation:
The Rashtrakutas were located in the northern Deccan region, which was strategically located between the northern and southern parts of India. This made them a key power in the region and allowed them to control the trade routes that passed through the Deccan.
Other factors that contributed to the Rashtrakutas' dominance include:
- Ambitious rulers: Govinda III, Amoghavarsha I, and Krishna were all ambitious rulers who expanded the Rashtrakuta empire through military conquests.
- Weakness of northern kings: The northern kings were not strong enough to intervene in the affairs of the northern Deccan, which allowed the Rashtrakutas to assert their dominance in the region.
- Decline of the Pallavas: The Pallavas, who had previously been a dominant power in the region, were in decline during the 9th century. This created a power vacuum in the region that the Rashtrakutas were able to fill.
However, the dominant reason for the Rashtrakutas' power was their strategic location in the northern Deccan.
Explanation:
The Rashtrakutas were located in the northern Deccan region, which was strategically located between the northern and southern parts of India. This made them a key power in the region and allowed them to control the trade routes that passed through the Deccan.
Other factors that contributed to the Rashtrakutas' dominance include:
- Ambitious rulers: Govinda III, Amoghavarsha I, and Krishna were all ambitious rulers who expanded the Rashtrakuta empire through military conquests.
- Weakness of northern kings: The northern kings were not strong enough to intervene in the affairs of the northern Deccan, which allowed the Rashtrakutas to assert their dominance in the region.
- Decline of the Pallavas: The Pallavas, who had previously been a dominant power in the region, were in decline during the 9th century. This created a power vacuum in the region that the Rashtrakutas were able to fill.
However, the dominant reason for the Rashtrakutas' power was their strategic location in the northern Deccan.
To which of the following dynasties did Gangeyadeva belong? - a)The Pala Dynasty
- b)The Pratihara Dynasty
- c)The Kalachuri dynasty
- d)The Gahadavala dynasty
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
To which of the following dynasties did Gangeyadeva belong?
a)
The Pala Dynasty
b)
The Pratihara Dynasty
c)
The Kalachuri dynasty
d)
The Gahadavala dynasty
|
|
Aarya Mehta answered |
Gangeyadeva was a ruler of the Kalachuri dynasty of Tripuri in central India. His kingdom was centered around the Chedi or Dahala region in present-day Madhya Pradesh. During the early part of his reign, Gangeyadeva seems to have ruled as a vassal, possibly that of the Paramara king Bhoja.
Which of the following kings was the founder of Gahadavala dynasty with Kanyakubja as its seat of power?- a)Jaya Chandra
- b)Vijay Chandra
- c)Chandradeva
- d)Govinda
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following kings was the founder of Gahadavala dynasty with Kanyakubja as its seat of power?
a)
Jaya Chandra
b)
Vijay Chandra
c)
Chandradeva
d)
Govinda
|
|
Meghana Shah answered |
Rudolf Hoernlé once proposed that the Gahadavalas were an offshoot of the Pala dynasty of Gauda, but this theory has been totally rejected now. Another theory identifies the dynasty's founder Chandradeva as the Kannauj Rashtrakuta scion Chandra.
What was the name of the Pratihara king who defeated the Arab invaders?- a)Mihira Bhoja
- b)Nagabhatta I
- c)Vijayapala
- d)Nagabhatta II
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the name of the Pratihara king who defeated the Arab invaders?
a)
Mihira Bhoja
b)
Nagabhatta I
c)
Vijayapala
d)
Nagabhatta II
|
|
Sagar Chakraborty answered |
Nagabhata I defeated the Arab army under Junaid and Tamin during the Caliphate campaigns in India. Under Nagabhata II, the Gurjara-Pratiharas became the most powerful dynasty in northern India. He was succeeded by his son Ramabhadra, who ruled briefly before being succeeded by his son, Mihira Bhoja.
Who of the following was the founder of the Rashtrakuta kingdom?- a)Krishna I
- b)Valabharaja
- c)Indra I
- d)Dantidurga
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who of the following was the founder of the Rashtrakuta kingdom?
a)
Krishna I
b)
Valabharaja
c)
Indra I
d)
Dantidurga
|
|
Poulomi Nair answered |
The Elichpur clan was a feudatory of the Badami Chalukyas, and during the rule of Dantidurga, it overthrew Chalukya Kirtivarman II and went on to build an empire with the Gulbarga region in modern Karnataka as its base. This clan came to be known as the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta, rising to power in South India in 753.
Which parts of India were dominated by the Pala empire from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D.- a)Eastern India and Deccan
- b)Eastern and Northern India
- c)Eastern and Western India
- d)Northern India
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which parts of India were dominated by the Pala empire from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D.
a)
Eastern India and Deccan
b)
Eastern and Northern India
c)
Eastern and Western India
d)
Northern India
|
|
Saranya Roy answered |
The Pala Empire was a powerful Buddhist dynasty that ruled over a significant portion of Eastern India from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D. The empire was known for its artistic, literary, and architectural achievements, and it played a significant role in promoting Buddhism in the region.
Parts of India Dominated by the Pala Empire
The Pala Empire was primarily centered in Eastern India, with its capital at Pataliputra (modern-day Patna). However, the empire's influence extended beyond its heartland, and it controlled vast territories in other parts of the country as well.
The following parts of India were dominated by the Pala Empire from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D.:
- Eastern India: The Pala Empire's core territory was in Eastern India, which included present-day Bihar, West Bengal, and parts of Odisha. The empire's capital, Pataliputra, was located in Bihar, and the region was the center of the empire's economic, cultural, and political life.
- Northern India: The Pala Empire's influence extended to Northern India, including present-day Uttar Pradesh and parts of Uttarakhand. The empire's expansion into this region was facilitated by its military prowess, and it established several military outposts to maintain control.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Pala Empire dominated Eastern and Northern India from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D. The empire's core territory was in Eastern India, and it extended its influence to Northern India as well. The Pala Empire's legacy can still be seen in the region's art, literature, and architecture, and it played a significant role in promoting Buddhism in the region.
Parts of India Dominated by the Pala Empire
The Pala Empire was primarily centered in Eastern India, with its capital at Pataliputra (modern-day Patna). However, the empire's influence extended beyond its heartland, and it controlled vast territories in other parts of the country as well.
The following parts of India were dominated by the Pala Empire from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D.:
- Eastern India: The Pala Empire's core territory was in Eastern India, which included present-day Bihar, West Bengal, and parts of Odisha. The empire's capital, Pataliputra, was located in Bihar, and the region was the center of the empire's economic, cultural, and political life.
- Northern India: The Pala Empire's influence extended to Northern India, including present-day Uttar Pradesh and parts of Uttarakhand. The empire's expansion into this region was facilitated by its military prowess, and it established several military outposts to maintain control.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Pala Empire dominated Eastern and Northern India from the middle of the 8th century A.D. till the middle of the 9th century A.D. The empire's core territory was in Eastern India, and it extended its influence to Northern India as well. The Pala Empire's legacy can still be seen in the region's art, literature, and architecture, and it played a significant role in promoting Buddhism in the region.
During the reign of which one of the following kings, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal?- a)Dharmapala
- b)Devapala
- c)Mahipala
- d)Nayapala
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
During the reign of which one of the following kings, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal?
a)
Dharmapala
b)
Devapala
c)
Mahipala
d)
Nayapala
|
|
Anjali Chavan answered |
Chola King Rajendra I's Invasion of Bengal during the Reign of Mahipala
During the reign of Mahipala, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal. Rajendra I was one of the most powerful and successful rulers of the Chola dynasty, which was one of the dominant powers in South India during the medieval period.
1. The Chola Dynasty
The Chola dynasty was one of the longest-ruling dynasties in the history of South India. It had its origins in the region around modern-day Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. The Cholas are known for their naval power, administrative efficiency, and patronage of arts and culture.
2. Rajendra I's Reign
Rajendra I ascended the throne in 1014 CE after the death of his father, Rajaraja Chola I. He continued the expansionist policies of his predecessor and launched several military campaigns to extend the boundaries of the Chola empire.
3. Invasion of Bengal
During his reign, Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal, which was ruled by Mahipala. Bengal was known for its wealth and resources, and its strategic location made it an attractive target for conquest.
4. Reasons for the Invasion
There could be several reasons for Rajendra I's invasion of Bengal:
- Economic Motives: Bengal was known for its fertile lands, abundant natural resources, and thriving trade networks. The Chola empire, with its naval power, sought to control these economic resources and gain access to valuable commodities.
- Expansionist Ambitions: Rajendra I aimed to extend the boundaries of the Chola empire and establish his authority over new territories. Bengal, with its strategic location and rich resources, presented an opportunity for expansion.
- Political Rivalry: It is possible that there were political rivalries or conflicts between the Chola and Bengal kings, which may have led to the invasion.
5. Outcome of the Invasion
The exact details and outcome of Rajendra I's invasion of Bengal are not well-documented. It is believed that the Cholas were able to establish their control over parts of Bengal, although the extent and duration of their rule are unclear. Bengal continued to be a center of power and influence, with subsequent dynasties ruling the region.
In conclusion, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal during the reign of Mahipala. The reasons for the invasion could be economic motives, expansionist ambitions, or political rivalries. However, the details and outcome of the invasion are not well-documented in historical records.
During the reign of Mahipala, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal. Rajendra I was one of the most powerful and successful rulers of the Chola dynasty, which was one of the dominant powers in South India during the medieval period.
1. The Chola Dynasty
The Chola dynasty was one of the longest-ruling dynasties in the history of South India. It had its origins in the region around modern-day Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. The Cholas are known for their naval power, administrative efficiency, and patronage of arts and culture.
2. Rajendra I's Reign
Rajendra I ascended the throne in 1014 CE after the death of his father, Rajaraja Chola I. He continued the expansionist policies of his predecessor and launched several military campaigns to extend the boundaries of the Chola empire.
3. Invasion of Bengal
During his reign, Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal, which was ruled by Mahipala. Bengal was known for its wealth and resources, and its strategic location made it an attractive target for conquest.
4. Reasons for the Invasion
There could be several reasons for Rajendra I's invasion of Bengal:
- Economic Motives: Bengal was known for its fertile lands, abundant natural resources, and thriving trade networks. The Chola empire, with its naval power, sought to control these economic resources and gain access to valuable commodities.
- Expansionist Ambitions: Rajendra I aimed to extend the boundaries of the Chola empire and establish his authority over new territories. Bengal, with its strategic location and rich resources, presented an opportunity for expansion.
- Political Rivalry: It is possible that there were political rivalries or conflicts between the Chola and Bengal kings, which may have led to the invasion.
5. Outcome of the Invasion
The exact details and outcome of Rajendra I's invasion of Bengal are not well-documented. It is believed that the Cholas were able to establish their control over parts of Bengal, although the extent and duration of their rule are unclear. Bengal continued to be a center of power and influence, with subsequent dynasties ruling the region.
In conclusion, the Chola king Rajendra I is said to have invaded Bengal during the reign of Mahipala. The reasons for the invasion could be economic motives, expansionist ambitions, or political rivalries. However, the details and outcome of the invasion are not well-documented in historical records.
Match the early medieval Indian rulers with their ruling dynasties:(A) Gahadvala (I) Nagabhatta I
(B) Paramaras (II) Chandradeva
(C) Guvara Pratiharas (III) Yasovarman
(D) Chandelas (IV) Upendra- a)(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
- b)(A-II) (B-IV) (C-I) (D-III)
- c)(A-IV) (B-I) (C-II) (D-III)
- d)(A-III) (B-II) (C-I) (D-IV)
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the early medieval Indian rulers with their ruling dynasties:
(A) Gahadvala (I) Nagabhatta I
(B) Paramaras (II) Chandradeva
(C) Guvara Pratiharas (III) Yasovarman
(D) Chandelas (IV) Upendra
(B) Paramaras (II) Chandradeva
(C) Guvara Pratiharas (III) Yasovarman
(D) Chandelas (IV) Upendra
a)
(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
b)
(A-II) (B-IV) (C-I) (D-III)
c)
(A-IV) (B-I) (C-II) (D-III)
d)
(A-III) (B-II) (C-I) (D-IV)
|
|
Sanvi Kapoor answered |
Correct Answer :- B
Explanation : a) Chandradeva, who belonged to Rathore clan of Rajput warriors, established the Gahadavala dynasty. He was the founder of the Gahadwala dynasty at Kannauj.
b) The Paramara Dynasty was founded by a chief called Upendra (Krishanaraja) at the beginning of the 9th century. The capital of Paramaras initially was Ujjain which later was replaced by Dhara. They were able to rule till 1305 when Malwa was conquered finally by Alauddin Khilji.
c) The Gurjara Pratihara dynasty (or Pratihara Dynasty) was founded by Nagabhata I who was the ruler of the kingdom of Avanti in between 730-760 AD. His capital was Ujjain. He defeated an invasion by the Arabs from Sindh and captured Kathiawar, Malwa, Gujarat and many parts of Rajaputana.
d) The Chandelas initially ruled as feudatories of the Gurjara-Pratiharas of Kanyakubja (Kannauj). The 10th century Chandela ruler Yashovarman became practically independent, although he continued to acknowledge the Pratihara suzerainty. By the time of his successor Dhanga, the Chandelas had become a sovereign power.
What was the name of Hindu Shahi king who was first defeated by Subuktbin and then by Mahmud of Ghazni?- a)Anandapala
- b)Kallai
- c)Jayapala
- d)Trilochanapala
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the name of Hindu Shahi king who was first defeated by Subuktbin and then by Mahmud of Ghazni?
a)
Anandapala
b)
Kallai
c)
Jayapala
d)
Trilochanapala
|
Upsc Toppers answered |
Jayapala, the ruler of the Hindu Shahi dynasty, was first defeated by Sabuktigin, the founder of the Ghaznavid dynasty, and later by Mahmud of Ghazni. Jayapala fought several battles to resist these invasions but suffered major defeats. After a significant loss to Mahmud of Ghazni, Jayapala committed self-immolation as an act of atonement for his perceived failure.
Therefore, Correct Answer - Option C
Therefore, Correct Answer - Option C
Which one of the following Rashtrakuta king built the famous rock-out temple of Shiva at Ellora?- a)Indra I
- b)Krishna III
- c)Krishna I
- d)Indra III
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following Rashtrakuta king built the famous rock-out temple of Shiva at Ellora?
a)
Indra I
b)
Krishna III
c)
Krishna I
d)
Indra III
|
|
Anjana Nair answered |
Rashtrakuta king, krishna-1 had built the kailash temple of ellora. It is considered as the wonder of rock-out architecture.
Where was the capital of the Rashtrakutas located?- a)Malkhed
- b)Vengi
- c)Badami
- d)Kalyani
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Where was the capital of the Rashtrakutas located?
a)
Malkhed
b)
Vengi
c)
Badami
d)
Kalyani
|
|
Shounak Malik answered |
The Rashtrakuta empire of Manyakheta was a notable Deccan empire that ruled most of the modern-day region of south and central India between the 8th to the 10th centuries. Their regal capital wasManyakheta in Gulbarga district, Karnataka state, India.
Chapter doubts & questions for The Northern India (800-1200 A.D.) - Lucent for GK 2025 is part of UPSC CSE exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPSC CSE exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPSC CSE 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of The Northern India (800-1200 A.D.) - Lucent for GK in English & Hindi are available as part of UPSC CSE exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC CSE Exam by signing up for free.
Lucent for GK
643 videos|791 docs|420 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup