All Exams >
UPSC >
Lucent for GK >
All Questions
All questions of The Decline Of Mughal Empire And The Rise Of Autonomous States for UPSC CSE Exam
Arrange the following Mughal Emperors in the correct chronological sequence:
I. Jahandar Shah
II. Shah Alam I
III. Ahmad Shah
IV. Muhammad Shah
V. Farrukh Siyar
- a)II, I, V, IV, III
- b)V, III, I, IV, II
- c)II, III, V, I, IV
- d)I, V, IV, III, II
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange the following Mughal Emperors in the correct chronological sequence:
I. Jahandar Shah
II. Shah Alam I
III. Ahmad Shah
IV. Muhammad Shah
V. Farrukh Siyar
a)
II, I, V, IV, III
b)
V, III, I, IV, II
c)
II, III, V, I, IV
d)
I, V, IV, III, II
|
Amit Sharma answered |
Here’s the explanation for the correct chronological sequence of the Mughal Emperors:
-
Shah Alam I (Bahadur Shah I) (reigned 1707–1712)
- He was the son of Aurangzeb and succeeded him as the Mughal Emperor after his death.
-
Jahandar Shah (reigned 1712–1713)
- He was the son of Bahadur Shah I. His reign was short-lived, lasting less than a year.
-
Farrukh Siyar (reigned 1713–1719)
- He was the grandson of Bahadur Shah I and succeeded Jahandar Shah after deposing him.
-
Muhammad Shah (reigned 1719–1748)
- He was one of the more prominent emperors after Aurangzeb, known for his relatively longer rule during the decline of the Mughal Empire.
-
Ahmad Shah (reigned 1748–1754)
- He succeeded Muhammad Shah and ruled during the later years of the Mughal Empire's decline.
The three major uprisings led by Sitaram Ray, Udai Narayan and Ghulam Muhammad, occured during the reign of- a)Murshid Quli Khan
- b)Alivardi Khan
- c)Shuja-ud-din
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The three major uprisings led by Sitaram Ray, Udai Narayan and Ghulam Muhammad, occured during the reign of
a)
Murshid Quli Khan
b)
Alivardi Khan
c)
Shuja-ud-din
d)
None of these
|
|
Aditya Kumar answered |
Murshid Quli Khan was made Diwan of Bengal by Aurangzeb and Governor of Bengal in 1717, soon became its ruler in true sense.
Though virtually independent, Murshid and his successors sent revenue to Mughal emperor regularly.
The only three major uprisings during his rule were: first by Sitaram Ray, Udai Narayan and Ghulam Muhammad, and then by Shujat Khan, and finally by Najat Khan.
Zulfiqar Khan encouraged ijarah or revenuefarming. Why was it disliked by peasants?- a)It would often lead to fragmentation of land.
- b)It involved collection of revenue at a fixed rate.
- c)It involved farmers and middlemen who could collect whatever they could from them.
- d)It was a semi-annual feature.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Zulfiqar Khan encouraged ijarah or revenuefarming. Why was it disliked by peasants?
a)
It would often lead to fragmentation of land.
b)
It involved collection of revenue at a fixed rate.
c)
It involved farmers and middlemen who could collect whatever they could from them.
d)
It was a semi-annual feature.
|
Afruyash answered |
It involved farmers and middleman who could collect whatever they could from them.
Arrange the last five Mughal rulers chronologically:
I. Ahmad Shah
II. Alamgir II
III. Shah Alam II
IV. Akbar II
V. Bahadur Shah II
- a)I, II, III, lV, V
- b)I, III, II, IV,V
- c)II, III, I, IV, V
- d)III, II, I, IV, V
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange the last five Mughal rulers chronologically:
I. Ahmad Shah
II. Alamgir II
III. Shah Alam II
IV. Akbar II
V. Bahadur Shah II
a)
I, II, III, lV, V
b)
I, III, II, IV,V
c)
II, III, I, IV, V
d)
III, II, I, IV, V
|
|
Aditya Kumar answered |
The correct option is Option A.
Ahmad Shah - (Reign; 1748-1754)
Alamgir ll - (Reign; 1754-1759)
Shah Alam ll - (Reign; 1759-1806)
Akbar lI - (Reign; 1806-1837)
Bahadur Shah II - (Reign; 1837-1857)
Ahmad Shah - (Reign; 1748-1754)
Alamgir ll - (Reign; 1754-1759)
Shah Alam ll - (Reign; 1759-1806)
Akbar lI - (Reign; 1806-1837)
Bahadur Shah II - (Reign; 1837-1857)
Which of the following later Mughal rulers ruled for the longest period?- a)Muhammad Shah
- b)Alamgir II
- c)Shah Alam II
- d)Bahadur Shah II
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following later Mughal rulers ruled for the longest period?
a)
Muhammad Shah
b)
Alamgir II
c)
Shah Alam II
d)
Bahadur Shah II
|
Parth Ghosh answered |
The Longest Ruling Mughal Emperor
Shah Alam II was the Mughal emperor who ruled for the longest period of time. He was the son of Alamgir II and ascended the throne in 1759, after his father's assassination.
Reasons Behind Shah Alam II's Long Reign
1. British Support: The British supported Shah Alam II during his reign, which helped him to maintain his power and position.
2. Political Instability: The political instability in India during the 18th century allowed Shah Alam II to rule for a longer period.
3. Military Weakness: The Mughal army was weak during Shah Alam II's reign, which made it difficult for him to fight against other powers.
4. Economic Crisis: The Mughal empire was facing an economic crisis during his reign, which made it difficult for him to maintain his power.
Conclusion
Shah Alam II's reign was marked by political instability, economic crisis, and military weakness. Despite these challenges, he managed to rule for a long period with the support of the British.
Shah Alam II was the Mughal emperor who ruled for the longest period of time. He was the son of Alamgir II and ascended the throne in 1759, after his father's assassination.
Reasons Behind Shah Alam II's Long Reign
1. British Support: The British supported Shah Alam II during his reign, which helped him to maintain his power and position.
2. Political Instability: The political instability in India during the 18th century allowed Shah Alam II to rule for a longer period.
3. Military Weakness: The Mughal army was weak during Shah Alam II's reign, which made it difficult for him to fight against other powers.
4. Economic Crisis: The Mughal empire was facing an economic crisis during his reign, which made it difficult for him to maintain his power.
Conclusion
Shah Alam II's reign was marked by political instability, economic crisis, and military weakness. Despite these challenges, he managed to rule for a long period with the support of the British.
Which Mughal ruler remained a puppet in the hands of wazir, Imad-ul-Mulk?- a)Shah Alam II
- b)Alamgir II
- c)Akbar II
- d)Ahmad Shah
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which Mughal ruler remained a puppet in the hands of wazir, Imad-ul-Mulk?
a)
Shah Alam II
b)
Alamgir II
c)
Akbar II
d)
Ahmad Shah
|
Mrinalini Kumar answered |
Mughal ruler under the control of wazir Imad-ul-Mulk
Introduction
The Mughal Empire was one of the largest and most powerful empires in Indian history. The Mughal rulers were known for their military prowess, their patronage of the arts, and their efforts to promote religious tolerance. However, towards the end of the empire, the power of the Mughal rulers began to decline, and they became puppets in the hands of their ministers.
The role of wazir Imad-ul-Mulk
Imad-ul-Mulk was a powerful wazir (minister) of the Mughal Empire during the reign of Alamgir II. He was appointed as the wazir in 1754 and remained in this position until 1757. During his tenure, he exercised tremendous power and influence over the Mughal ruler Alamgir II. In fact, Alamgir II was reduced to a puppet ruler who only acted on the advice of his wazir.
Alamgir II
Alamgir II was the son of Mughal Emperor Jahandar Shah. He became the Mughal Emperor in 1754 after deposing his predecessor Ahmad Shah Bahadur. However, Alamgir II was not a strong ruler and was easily influenced by his ministers, especially Imad-ul-Mulk. Under the influence of Imad-ul-Mulk, Alamgir II made a number of decisions that were detrimental to the interests of the Mughal Empire.
The decline of the Mughal Empire
The decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by a number of factors, including the weakening of central authority, the rise of regional powers, and the increasing influence of European powers. However, one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire was the puppetry of the Mughal rulers. The Mughal rulers were no longer independent and were controlled by their ministers, who were often corrupt and self-serving.
Conclusion
Imad-ul-Mulk was one of the most powerful ministers of the Mughal Empire and was responsible for reducing the Mughal ruler Alamgir II to a puppet. This puppetry of the Mughal rulers was one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire. Today, the Mughal Empire is remembered for its architecture, art, and culture, but its decline serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of weak leadership.
Introduction
The Mughal Empire was one of the largest and most powerful empires in Indian history. The Mughal rulers were known for their military prowess, their patronage of the arts, and their efforts to promote religious tolerance. However, towards the end of the empire, the power of the Mughal rulers began to decline, and they became puppets in the hands of their ministers.
The role of wazir Imad-ul-Mulk
Imad-ul-Mulk was a powerful wazir (minister) of the Mughal Empire during the reign of Alamgir II. He was appointed as the wazir in 1754 and remained in this position until 1757. During his tenure, he exercised tremendous power and influence over the Mughal ruler Alamgir II. In fact, Alamgir II was reduced to a puppet ruler who only acted on the advice of his wazir.
Alamgir II
Alamgir II was the son of Mughal Emperor Jahandar Shah. He became the Mughal Emperor in 1754 after deposing his predecessor Ahmad Shah Bahadur. However, Alamgir II was not a strong ruler and was easily influenced by his ministers, especially Imad-ul-Mulk. Under the influence of Imad-ul-Mulk, Alamgir II made a number of decisions that were detrimental to the interests of the Mughal Empire.
The decline of the Mughal Empire
The decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by a number of factors, including the weakening of central authority, the rise of regional powers, and the increasing influence of European powers. However, one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire was the puppetry of the Mughal rulers. The Mughal rulers were no longer independent and were controlled by their ministers, who were often corrupt and self-serving.
Conclusion
Imad-ul-Mulk was one of the most powerful ministers of the Mughal Empire and was responsible for reducing the Mughal ruler Alamgir II to a puppet. This puppetry of the Mughal rulers was one of the key factors that contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire. Today, the Mughal Empire is remembered for its architecture, art, and culture, but its decline serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of weak leadership.
Ar ra nge the fol lowin g Mugha l ru le rs chronologically:I. Bahadur ShahII. Muhammad ShahIII. Jehandar ShahIV. Farrukh Siyar- a)I, II, IV, III
- b)I, III, lV, II
- c)I, IV, III, II
- d)I, IV, II, III
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Ar ra nge the fol lowin g Mugha l ru le rs chronologically:
I. Bahadur Shah
II. Muhammad Shah
III. Jehandar Shah
IV. Farrukh Siyar
a)
I, II, IV, III
b)
I, III, lV, II
c)
I, IV, III, II
d)
I, IV, II, III
|
|
Madhu Sulaniya answered |
Bahadur shah ( 1707-1712)
jahandar shah (1712-1713)
farrukh siyar (1713-1719)
Muhammad shah (1720-1748)
jahandar shah (1712-1713)
farrukh siyar (1713-1719)
Muhammad shah (1720-1748)
Arrange the following events in the reign of Ranjit Singh in the chronological sequence:I. Assumption of the title of Maharaja of Lahore by Ranjit Singh.II. Mission of Metcalfe to Ranjit Singh.III. Acquisition of the Kohinoor by Ranjit Singh from Shah Shuja of Afghanistan.IV. Occupation of Kashmir by Ranjit Singh V. Meeting between William Bentinck and Ranjit Singh.- a)I, II, III, IV, V
- b)II, III, IV, I, V
- c)I, II, IV, V, III
- d)III, II, I, V, IV
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange the following events in the reign of Ranjit Singh in the chronological sequence:
I. Assumption of the title of Maharaja of Lahore by Ranjit Singh.
II. Mission of Metcalfe to Ranjit Singh.
III. Acquisition of the Kohinoor by Ranjit Singh from Shah Shuja of Afghanistan.
IV. Occupation of Kashmir by Ranjit Singh V. Meeting between William Bentinck and Ranjit Singh.
a)
I, II, III, IV, V
b)
II, III, IV, I, V
c)
I, II, IV, V, III
d)
III, II, I, V, IV
|
Kumari Jyoti answered |
B
Match the following:
- a)(A-III) (B-II) (C-I) (D-IV)
- b)(A-III) (B-I) (C-IV) (D-II)
- c)(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
- d)(A-III) (B-I) (C-II) (D-IV)
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the following:
a)
(A-III) (B-II) (C-I) (D-IV)
b)
(A-III) (B-I) (C-IV) (D-II)
c)
(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
d)
(A-III) (B-I) (C-II) (D-IV)
|
|
Alok Verma answered |
- The war started when the Marathas attacked Mysore in 1766. Haider Ali purchased peace with the Marathas on payment of rupees thirty five lakh to them. The Marathas, then, turned back. Next, the Nizam attacked Mysore with the help of an English force. But the attack did not quite succeed. In September 1767, the Nizam left the side of the English and joined hands with Haider Ali. Smith, the English commander, could not face their combined forces and retreated to Trichinopoly where Colonel Wood joined him. The Nizam and Haider Ali failed to gain any success in the battle near Trichinopoly and in December, 1767, Haider Ali was defeated at another place. The English planned to attack Hyderabad which broke up the spirit of the Nizam. He left the side of Haider Ali and entered into a treaty with the English in March, 1768.
- The second Anglo-Mysore War in 1782, both of whom were taken prisoner to Seringapatam. This war saw the rise of Sir Eyre Coote, the British commander who defeated Hyder Ali at the Battle of Porto Novo and Arni. Tipu continued the war following his father's death.
- Third Anglo-Mysore War- General Sir William Medows KB (31 December 1738 – 14 November 1813) was an Englishman and a general in the British Army.
- Major Lachlan Macquarie (77th Regiment) served in the 4th Anglo-Mysore War of 1799 on the General Staff of General James Stuart, commander of the Bombay Army.
Hence, the correct answer is 'B'
The later Mughal emperor who was not allowed to enter Delhi for twelve years and restored his throne only by the Marathas, was- a)Alamgir II
- b)Akbar II
- c)Shah Alam II
- d)Muhammad Shah
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The later Mughal emperor who was not allowed to enter Delhi for twelve years and restored his throne only by the Marathas, was
a)
Alamgir II
b)
Akbar II
c)
Shah Alam II
d)
Muhammad Shah
|
|
Sanvi Kapoor answered |
The correct option is C.
Shah Alam II was considered the only and rightful emperor, but he wasn't able to return to Delhi until 1772, under the protection of the Maratha general Mahadaji Shinde. He also fought against the British East India Company at the Battle of Buxar.
Shah Alam II was considered the only and rightful emperor, but he wasn't able to return to Delhi until 1772, under the protection of the Maratha general Mahadaji Shinde. He also fought against the British East India Company at the Battle of Buxar.
‘His departure was symbolic of the fight of loyalty and virtue from the empire”. This statement is about- a)Nizam-ul-Mulk
- b)Muhammad Amin Khan
- c)Abdulla Beg
- d)Zulfiqar Khan
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
‘His departure was symbolic of the fight of loyalty and virtue from the empire”. This statement is about
a)
Nizam-ul-Mulk
b)
Muhammad Amin Khan
c)
Abdulla Beg
d)
Zulfiqar Khan
|
Kiran Mehta answered |
Nizum-ul-Mulk decided to leave the Emperor and his Empire to their fate and to strike out on his own. He relinquished his office in October 1724 and marched south to find the state of Hyderabad in the Deccan. "His departure was symbolic of the flight of loyalty and virtue from the Empire.”
The Second Mysore War (1780-84) was fought between the British and Haidar Ali. From 1782-84 it was fought by Tipu Sultan, the son of Haidar Ali. This war came to an end with the signing of the- a)Treaty of Pulicat
- b)Treaty of Mangalore
- c)Treaty of Kaveripattam
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Second Mysore War (1780-84) was fought between the British and Haidar Ali. From 1782-84 it was fought by Tipu Sultan, the son of Haidar Ali. This war came to an end with the signing of the
a)
Treaty of Pulicat
b)
Treaty of Mangalore
c)
Treaty of Kaveripattam
d)
None of these
|
|
Madhu Sulaniya answered |
In 1782 Haidar Ali suddenly died amd Tipu became king. In 1783 British took the town of Coimbatore and by January 1784 Tipu retook managalore from British. With neither side in a position to win, the war ended in a stalemate and was concluded by treaty of Mangalore.
Bengal and Oudh were founded as independent states during the reign of- a)Jehandar Shah
- b)Muhammad Shah
- c)Farrukh Siyar
- d)Shah Alam II
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Bengal and Oudh were founded as independent states during the reign of
a)
Jehandar Shah
b)
Muhammad Shah
c)
Farrukh Siyar
d)
Shah Alam II
|
Sandeep Nambiar answered |
The State of Hyderabad was founded by Qamar-ud-din Siddiqi, who wasappointed Viceroy of the Deccan, with the title of Nizam-ul- Mulk, by Emperor Farrukhsiyar in 1712. He established a virtually independent state but returned to Delhi during the reign of Emperor Mohammad Shah.
In which Mughal emperor ’s reign did the administration deteriorate as a result of his reckless grants of jagirs and promotions?- a)Bahadur Shah
- b)Jehandar Shah
- c)Farrukh Siyar
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In which Mughal emperor ’s reign did the administration deteriorate as a result of his reckless grants of jagirs and promotions?
a)
Bahadur Shah
b)
Jehandar Shah
c)
Farrukh Siyar
d)
None of these
|
Ritika Choudhury answered |
- There was further deterioration in the field of administration in Bahadur Shah's reign.
- The position of state finances worsened as a result of his reckless grants of jagirs and promotions.
- During his reign the remnants of the Royal treasure, amounting in 1707 to some 13 crores of rupees, were exhausted.
Hence, the correct option is 'A'.
Arrange the following conquests of Ranjit Singh in the chronological order:
I. Ludhiana
II. Amritsar
III. Kangra
IV. Lahore
- a)II, I, III, IV
- b)IV, II, I, III
- c)I, II, III, IV
- d)IV, III, II, I
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange the following conquests of Ranjit Singh in the chronological order:
I. Ludhiana
II. Amritsar
III. Kangra
IV. Lahore
a)
II, I, III, IV
b)
IV, II, I, III
c)
I, II, III, IV
d)
IV, III, II, I
|
Mohit Saini answered |
Chronological Order of Conquests of Ranjit Singh:
I. Ludhiana
II. Amritsar
III. Kangra
IV. Lahore
Explanation:
Ranjit Singh was the founder of the Sikh Empire in India. He conquered various territories during his reign. The chronological order of his conquests is as follows:
II. Amritsar: Ranjit Singh captured Amritsar in 1802, which was a significant victory for him. Amritsar is a holy city for the Sikhs, and the capture of the city gave Ranjit Singh a lot of prestige and influence among the Sikh community.
I. Ludhiana: Ranjit Singh captured Ludhiana in 1806. Ludhiana was an important commercial and strategic center, and its capture helped Ranjit Singh expand his territory and consolidate his power.
III. Kangra: Ranjit Singh captured Kangra in 1809. Kangra was a fortified city in the Himalayan foothills, and its capture gave Ranjit Singh control over the region and access to the valuable resources of the area.
IV. Lahore: Ranjit Singh captured Lahore in 1799. Lahore was the capital of the Mughal Empire and was a center of power and culture. The capture of Lahore was a significant victory for Ranjit Singh, and it marked the beginning of his rise to power.
In conclusion, the chronological order of Ranjit Singh's conquests is II, I, III, IV, i.e., Amritsar, Ludhiana, Kangra, and Lahore.
I. Ludhiana
II. Amritsar
III. Kangra
IV. Lahore
Explanation:
Ranjit Singh was the founder of the Sikh Empire in India. He conquered various territories during his reign. The chronological order of his conquests is as follows:
II. Amritsar: Ranjit Singh captured Amritsar in 1802, which was a significant victory for him. Amritsar is a holy city for the Sikhs, and the capture of the city gave Ranjit Singh a lot of prestige and influence among the Sikh community.
I. Ludhiana: Ranjit Singh captured Ludhiana in 1806. Ludhiana was an important commercial and strategic center, and its capture helped Ranjit Singh expand his territory and consolidate his power.
III. Kangra: Ranjit Singh captured Kangra in 1809. Kangra was a fortified city in the Himalayan foothills, and its capture gave Ranjit Singh control over the region and access to the valuable resources of the area.
IV. Lahore: Ranjit Singh captured Lahore in 1799. Lahore was the capital of the Mughal Empire and was a center of power and culture. The capture of Lahore was a significant victory for Ranjit Singh, and it marked the beginning of his rise to power.
In conclusion, the chronological order of Ranjit Singh's conquests is II, I, III, IV, i.e., Amritsar, Ludhiana, Kangra, and Lahore.
Which of the following was not granted to the Marathas in the Deccan by Bahadur Shah?- a)Chauth
- b)Sardeshmukhi
- c)Both (a) and (b)
- d)The control over Berar
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following was not granted to the Marathas in the Deccan by Bahadur Shah?
a)
Chauth
b)
Sardeshmukhi
c)
Both (a) and (b)
d)
The control over Berar
|
|
Mayank Kumar answered |
Chauth was a regular tax or tribute imposed, from early 18th century, by the Maratha Empire in India. It was an annual tax nominally levied at 25% on revenue or produce, hence the name. It was levied on the lands which were under nominal Mughal rule. The sardeshmukhi was an additional 10% levy on top of the chauth.
Who was the Governor of Madras who concluded the Treaty of Mangalore with Tipu Sultan?- a)Lord Harris
- b)Lord Stephenson
- c)Lord Hamilton
- d)Lord Macartney
Correct answer is 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the Governor of Madras who concluded the Treaty of Mangalore with Tipu Sultan?
a)
Lord Harris
b)
Lord Stephenson
c)
Lord Hamilton
d)
Lord Macartney
|
|
Prasad Chatterjee answered |
In 1782 Hyder suddenly died and Tipu became king. In 1783 the British took the town of Coimbatore and by January 1784 Tipu retook Mangalore from the British. With neither side in a position to win, the war ended in stalemate and was then concluded with the Treaty of Mangalore.
A fresh revenue settlement was carried out in 1723 by- a)Saadat Khan
- b)Safdar Jang
- c)Salabat Jang
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
A fresh revenue settlement was carried out in 1723 by
a)
Saadat Khan
b)
Safdar Jang
c)
Salabat Jang
d)
None of these
|
Kritika Basak answered |
Fresh Revenue Settlement in 1723 by Saadat Khan
Saadat Khan was the first Nawab of Awadh (1722-1739) appointed by the Mughal Emperor. He was a capable administrator and took several measures to improve the economic condition of Awadh. One such measure was the fresh revenue settlement carried out in 1723.
Reasons for the Revenue Settlement
The revenue settlement was necessary because of the following reasons:
1. The existing revenue system was outdated and ineffective.
2. The revenue collection process was corrupt and inefficient.
3. The revenue rates were arbitrary and unjust.
4. The revenue administration was weak and ineffective.
Features of the Revenue Settlement
The fresh revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan had the following features:
1. The revenue rates were fixed based on the nature of the land and the crops grown.
2. The revenue collection process was streamlined and made more efficient.
3. The revenue administration was reorganized and made more accountable.
4. The revenue settlements were made for a period of ten years.
Impact of the Revenue Settlement
The revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan had the following impacts:
1. It brought about a significant increase in revenue collection.
2. It improved the economic condition of Awadh.
3. It reduced corruption in the revenue administration.
4. It provided stability and certainty to the revenue system.
Conclusion
The fresh revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan in 1723 was a significant reform in the revenue system of Awadh. It brought about several positive changes and improved the economic condition of the region.
Saadat Khan was the first Nawab of Awadh (1722-1739) appointed by the Mughal Emperor. He was a capable administrator and took several measures to improve the economic condition of Awadh. One such measure was the fresh revenue settlement carried out in 1723.
Reasons for the Revenue Settlement
The revenue settlement was necessary because of the following reasons:
1. The existing revenue system was outdated and ineffective.
2. The revenue collection process was corrupt and inefficient.
3. The revenue rates were arbitrary and unjust.
4. The revenue administration was weak and ineffective.
Features of the Revenue Settlement
The fresh revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan had the following features:
1. The revenue rates were fixed based on the nature of the land and the crops grown.
2. The revenue collection process was streamlined and made more efficient.
3. The revenue administration was reorganized and made more accountable.
4. The revenue settlements were made for a period of ten years.
Impact of the Revenue Settlement
The revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan had the following impacts:
1. It brought about a significant increase in revenue collection.
2. It improved the economic condition of Awadh.
3. It reduced corruption in the revenue administration.
4. It provided stability and certainty to the revenue system.
Conclusion
The fresh revenue settlement carried out by Saadat Khan in 1723 was a significant reform in the revenue system of Awadh. It brought about several positive changes and improved the economic condition of the region.
The Carnatic was one of the subahs of the Mughal Deccan. It came under the authority of- a)The Peshwa at Poona
- b)The Nizam of Hyderabad
- c)The ruler of Calicut
- d)The ruler of Bijapur
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Carnatic was one of the subahs of the Mughal Deccan. It came under the authority of
a)
The Peshwa at Poona
b)
The Nizam of Hyderabad
c)
The ruler of Calicut
d)
The ruler of Bijapur
|
Ipsita Mishra answered |
The Carnatic was one of the subahs (provinces) of the Mughal Deccan. It came under the authority of the Nizam of Hyderabad.
Explanation:
The Carnatic region was a significant province in the Deccan during the Mughal period. It encompassed the present-day states of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and parts of Karnataka and Kerala. The Mughal Empire divided its territories into subahs, which were administrative divisions ruled by subahdars or governors. The Nizam of Hyderabad was appointed as the subahdar of the Carnatic region.
The Nizam of Hyderabad:
- The Nizam of Hyderabad was a title used by the monarchs of the Hyderabad State, which was an independent state in southern India.
- The Nizam held substantial power and was considered one of the wealthiest rulers in the world during his time.
- The Nizam initially served as a viceroy or subahdar of the Mughal Empire and was responsible for governing the Carnatic subah.
- However, with the decline of the Mughal Empire, the Nizams of Hyderabad gradually gained more autonomy and became independent rulers in their own right.
Reasons for the authority of the Nizam of Hyderabad over the Carnatic subah:
1. Historical Role: The Nizams of Hyderabad had a long-standing association with the Carnatic region. They had played a crucial role in the Deccan politics and had established their authority over the region over time.
2. Mughal Appointment: The Mughal Empire had appointed the Nizam of Hyderabad as the subahdar of the Carnatic subah, giving him the administrative and political control over the region.
3. Military Strength: The Nizams of Hyderabad had a formidable military force, which further solidified their authority over the Carnatic subah.
4. Local Support: The Nizams also enjoyed the support of the local elites and nobles in the Carnatic region, which helped in maintaining their authority and control.
Overall, the Nizam of Hyderabad was the rightful authority over the Carnatic subah during the Mughal period. Their appointment by the Mughal Empire and their subsequent consolidation of power in the region gave them the necessary legitimacy and control over the administrative affairs of the Carnatic.
Explanation:
The Carnatic region was a significant province in the Deccan during the Mughal period. It encompassed the present-day states of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and parts of Karnataka and Kerala. The Mughal Empire divided its territories into subahs, which were administrative divisions ruled by subahdars or governors. The Nizam of Hyderabad was appointed as the subahdar of the Carnatic region.
The Nizam of Hyderabad:
- The Nizam of Hyderabad was a title used by the monarchs of the Hyderabad State, which was an independent state in southern India.
- The Nizam held substantial power and was considered one of the wealthiest rulers in the world during his time.
- The Nizam initially served as a viceroy or subahdar of the Mughal Empire and was responsible for governing the Carnatic subah.
- However, with the decline of the Mughal Empire, the Nizams of Hyderabad gradually gained more autonomy and became independent rulers in their own right.
Reasons for the authority of the Nizam of Hyderabad over the Carnatic subah:
1. Historical Role: The Nizams of Hyderabad had a long-standing association with the Carnatic region. They had played a crucial role in the Deccan politics and had established their authority over the region over time.
2. Mughal Appointment: The Mughal Empire had appointed the Nizam of Hyderabad as the subahdar of the Carnatic subah, giving him the administrative and political control over the region.
3. Military Strength: The Nizams of Hyderabad had a formidable military force, which further solidified their authority over the Carnatic subah.
4. Local Support: The Nizams also enjoyed the support of the local elites and nobles in the Carnatic region, which helped in maintaining their authority and control.
Overall, the Nizam of Hyderabad was the rightful authority over the Carnatic subah during the Mughal period. Their appointment by the Mughal Empire and their subsequent consolidation of power in the region gave them the necessary legitimacy and control over the administrative affairs of the Carnatic.
Which of the following later Mughal emperors appointed his 2-1/2 years old son as Governor of Punjab and a one year baby as the deputy under him?- a)Alamgir II
- b)Ahmad Shah
- c)Shah Alam II
- d)Farrukh Siyar
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following later Mughal emperors appointed his 2-1/2 years old son as Governor of Punjab and a one year baby as the deputy under him?
a)
Alamgir II
b)
Ahmad Shah
c)
Shah Alam II
d)
Farrukh Siyar
|
Diya Deshpande answered |
The correct answer is option 'B' - Ahmad Shah.
Explanation:
Ahmad Shah was one of the later Mughal emperors who appointed his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab and a one-year-old baby as the deputy under him.
Here is a detailed explanation of the context and significance of this appointment:
Context:
- The Mughal Empire was in a state of decline during the later years, with weak rulers and growing regional powers.
- Ahmad Shah ascended the Mughal throne in 1748 at the age of 22 after the death of his father Muhammad Shah.
- His reign was marked by political instability, weak central authority, and the encroachment of regional powers.
Appointment of his young son as Governor of Punjab:
- Ahmad Shah's decision to appoint his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab reflects the weakened state of the Mughal Empire.
- It highlights the lack of capable and experienced administrators within the empire.
- This appointment can be seen as a desperate attempt to maintain control over the Punjab region, which was strategically important and faced threats from regional powers.
Appointment of a one-year-old baby as the deputy:
- The appointment of a one-year-old baby as the deputy under his young son further emphasizes the lack of capable officials within the empire.
- It indicates a disregard for governance and an inability to make rational decisions.
- This appointment may also suggest a power struggle within the Mughal court, with different factions vying for influence and control.
Significance:
- Ahmad Shah's appointment of his young son and a baby as governors highlights the weakness and decline of the Mughal Empire.
- It showcases the lack of capable leadership and administrative skills within the empire.
- This appointment also symbolizes the fragmentation and disintegration of central authority, with regional powers gaining more control and influence.
In conclusion, Ahmad Shah's decision to appoint his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab and a one-year-old baby as the deputy reflects the weakened state of the Mughal Empire and the lack of capable administrators. This appointment highlights the decline, fragmentation, and disintegration of the empire during the later years.
Explanation:
Ahmad Shah was one of the later Mughal emperors who appointed his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab and a one-year-old baby as the deputy under him.
Here is a detailed explanation of the context and significance of this appointment:
Context:
- The Mughal Empire was in a state of decline during the later years, with weak rulers and growing regional powers.
- Ahmad Shah ascended the Mughal throne in 1748 at the age of 22 after the death of his father Muhammad Shah.
- His reign was marked by political instability, weak central authority, and the encroachment of regional powers.
Appointment of his young son as Governor of Punjab:
- Ahmad Shah's decision to appoint his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab reflects the weakened state of the Mughal Empire.
- It highlights the lack of capable and experienced administrators within the empire.
- This appointment can be seen as a desperate attempt to maintain control over the Punjab region, which was strategically important and faced threats from regional powers.
Appointment of a one-year-old baby as the deputy:
- The appointment of a one-year-old baby as the deputy under his young son further emphasizes the lack of capable officials within the empire.
- It indicates a disregard for governance and an inability to make rational decisions.
- This appointment may also suggest a power struggle within the Mughal court, with different factions vying for influence and control.
Significance:
- Ahmad Shah's appointment of his young son and a baby as governors highlights the weakness and decline of the Mughal Empire.
- It showcases the lack of capable leadership and administrative skills within the empire.
- This appointment also symbolizes the fragmentation and disintegration of central authority, with regional powers gaining more control and influence.
In conclusion, Ahmad Shah's decision to appoint his 2-1/2 years old son as the Governor of Punjab and a one-year-old baby as the deputy reflects the weakened state of the Mughal Empire and the lack of capable administrators. This appointment highlights the decline, fragmentation, and disintegration of the empire during the later years.
Haidar Ali established his authority over the Mysore state by overthrowing- a)Devraj
- b)Nanjaraj
- c)Kaviraj
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Haidar Ali established his authority over the Mysore state by overthrowing
a)
Devraj
b)
Nanjaraj
c)
Kaviraj
d)
None of these
|
|
Gowri Patel answered |
Background:
Haidar Ali was a soldier who rose to power in the 18th century in the region of Mysore, India. He served as a commander in the army of the Wodeyar dynasty, which ruled Mysore at that time.
Overthrow of Nanjaraj:
In 1757, Haidar Ali led a successful military campaign against the Wodeyars and their chief minister Nanjaraj. He defeated the Wodeyar army and took control of Mysore, becoming the de facto ruler of the state.
Consolidation of Power:
After establishing his authority, Haidar Ali began to consolidate his power by reforming the administration and the army. He introduced a new system of revenue collection and taxation, which helped to increase the state's income. He also modernized the army by introducing new weapons and tactics.
Expansion of Territory:
Haidar Ali was a skilled military commander and he used his army to expand the territory of Mysore. He conquered several neighboring states and established a vast empire that extended from the Malabar Coast to the Deccan Plateau.
Legacy:
Haidar Ali was one of the most successful rulers of Mysore and his legacy is still remembered today. He was a patron of the arts and literature and he encouraged the development of Kannada language and culture. He also built several monuments and temples, some of which are still standing today.
Haidar Ali was a soldier who rose to power in the 18th century in the region of Mysore, India. He served as a commander in the army of the Wodeyar dynasty, which ruled Mysore at that time.
Overthrow of Nanjaraj:
In 1757, Haidar Ali led a successful military campaign against the Wodeyars and their chief minister Nanjaraj. He defeated the Wodeyar army and took control of Mysore, becoming the de facto ruler of the state.
Consolidation of Power:
After establishing his authority, Haidar Ali began to consolidate his power by reforming the administration and the army. He introduced a new system of revenue collection and taxation, which helped to increase the state's income. He also modernized the army by introducing new weapons and tactics.
Expansion of Territory:
Haidar Ali was a skilled military commander and he used his army to expand the territory of Mysore. He conquered several neighboring states and established a vast empire that extended from the Malabar Coast to the Deccan Plateau.
Legacy:
Haidar Ali was one of the most successful rulers of Mysore and his legacy is still remembered today. He was a patron of the arts and literature and he encouraged the development of Kannada language and culture. He also built several monuments and temples, some of which are still standing today.
Bahadur Shah conciliated the Bundela chief, Chatarsal. Besides, a Jat chief joined him in fighting Banda Bahadur. Identify him- a)Suraj Mal
- b)Churaman
- c)Gajaraj Singh
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Bahadur Shah conciliated the Bundela chief, Chatarsal. Besides, a Jat chief joined him in fighting Banda Bahadur. Identify him
a)
Suraj Mal
b)
Churaman
c)
Gajaraj Singh
d)
None of these
|
Sravya Bose answered |
Churaman Singh was Zamindar of Sinsini and the head of the Jat state of Bharatpur in Rajasthan, India. He was son of Bhajja Singh and younger brother of Raja Ram Jat. He was the first unanimously elected leader of Jats in 1695.
Between whom was the First Anglo-Mysore War (1767-1769) fought?
- a)Hyder Ali and the British
- b)Hyder Ali and the Portuguese
- c)Tipu Sultan and the Marathas
- d)Tipu Sultan and the French
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Between whom was the First Anglo-Mysore War (1767-1769) fought?
a)
Hyder Ali and the British
b)
Hyder Ali and the Portuguese
c)
Tipu Sultan and the Marathas
d)
Tipu Sultan and the French
|
|
Dhruba Datta answered |
The correct answer is Hyder Ali and the British.Key Points
The series of four wars fought between the British and the Kingdom of Mysore in South India during the 18th century was known as the Anglo-Mysore War.
The series of four wars fought between the British and the Kingdom of Mysore in South India during the 18th century was known as the Anglo-Mysore War.
- First Anglo-Mysore War:
- It was fought between 1767-1769 AD.
- Governor: Lord Verelst was the governor during this period.
Which ruler of Bengal did not permit the English and the French to fortify their factories in Calcutta and Chandernagar?- a)Murshid Quli Khan
- b)Alivardi Khan
- c)Shuja-ud-din
- d)Haidar Jan
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which ruler of Bengal did not permit the English and the French to fortify their factories in Calcutta and Chandernagar?
a)
Murshid Quli Khan
b)
Alivardi Khan
c)
Shuja-ud-din
d)
Haidar Jan
|
|
Preethi Shah answered |
Alivardi Khan did not permit the English and the French to fortify their factories in Calcutta and Chandernagar.
Reasons for Alivardi Khan's decision:
1. Fear of European dominance: Alivardi Khan was apprehensive that allowing the English and the French to fortify their factories would give them an upper hand in Bengal. He did not want to grant them any privileges that could lead to their dominance.
2. Previous experiences: Alivardi Khan had witnessed the Dutch and the Portuguese using their fortified factories to interfere in local politics and engage in smuggling activities. He did not want to repeat the mistakes of his predecessors.
3. Strong military: Alivardi Khan had a strong military and did not feel the need to rely on the Europeans for protection. He believed that he could defend Bengal on his own.
Implications of Alivardi Khan's decision:
1. Limited European influence: Alivardi Khan's decision prevented the English and the French from expanding their influence in Bengal. This limited their ability to acquire resources and trade freely.
2. Tense relations: The English and the French were unhappy with Alivardi Khan's decision and it strained their relations with the Bengal Nawab. This tension would eventually lead to conflicts and battles for control of Bengal.
3. Increased importance of diplomacy: With limited military options, the English and the French had to rely on diplomacy to maintain their presence in Bengal. This led to the establishment of alliances and the use of political influence to achieve their objectives.
In conclusion, Alivardi Khan's decision not to permit the English and the French to fortify their factories in Calcutta and Chandernagar was driven by his fear of European dominance and his strong military. This decision had significant implications for the relationship between Bengal and the Europeans, as well as the methods used by the Europeans to maintain their presence in Bengal.
Reasons for Alivardi Khan's decision:
1. Fear of European dominance: Alivardi Khan was apprehensive that allowing the English and the French to fortify their factories would give them an upper hand in Bengal. He did not want to grant them any privileges that could lead to their dominance.
2. Previous experiences: Alivardi Khan had witnessed the Dutch and the Portuguese using their fortified factories to interfere in local politics and engage in smuggling activities. He did not want to repeat the mistakes of his predecessors.
3. Strong military: Alivardi Khan had a strong military and did not feel the need to rely on the Europeans for protection. He believed that he could defend Bengal on his own.
Implications of Alivardi Khan's decision:
1. Limited European influence: Alivardi Khan's decision prevented the English and the French from expanding their influence in Bengal. This limited their ability to acquire resources and trade freely.
2. Tense relations: The English and the French were unhappy with Alivardi Khan's decision and it strained their relations with the Bengal Nawab. This tension would eventually lead to conflicts and battles for control of Bengal.
3. Increased importance of diplomacy: With limited military options, the English and the French had to rely on diplomacy to maintain their presence in Bengal. This led to the establishment of alliances and the use of political influence to achieve their objectives.
In conclusion, Alivardi Khan's decision not to permit the English and the French to fortify their factories in Calcutta and Chandernagar was driven by his fear of European dominance and his strong military. This decision had significant implications for the relationship between Bengal and the Europeans, as well as the methods used by the Europeans to maintain their presence in Bengal.
Bahadur Shah tried to conciliate the rebellious Sikhs by making peace with a Sikh leader and giving him a high mansab (rank). Identify him- a)Fateh Singh
- b)Kapur Singh
- c)Banda Bahadur
- d)Guru Gobind Singh
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Bahadur Shah tried to conciliate the rebellious Sikhs by making peace with a Sikh leader and giving him a high mansab (rank). Identify him
a)
Fateh Singh
b)
Kapur Singh
c)
Banda Bahadur
d)
Guru Gobind Singh
|
|
Baishali Choudhury answered |
Bahadur Shah had tried to conciliate the rebellious Sikhs by making peacewith Guru Gobind Singh and giving him a high mansab (rank). But after the death of the Guru, the Sikhs once again raised the banner of revolt in Punjab under theleadership of Banda Bahadur.
Ar ra nge f o ll owin g ru le rs o f B e ngal chronologically:I. Alivardi KhanII. Shuja-ud-dinIII. Haidar JangIV. Murshid Quli Khan- a)I, III, II, lV
- b)IV, III, II, I
- c)IV, II, III, I
- d)IV, I, III, II
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Ar ra nge f o ll owin g ru le rs o f B e ngal chronologically:
I. Alivardi Khan
II. Shuja-ud-din
III. Haidar Jang
IV. Murshid Quli Khan
a)
I, III, II, lV
b)
IV, III, II, I
c)
IV, II, III, I
d)
IV, I, III, II
|
|
Debolina Bose answered |
Arrangement of Bengal Rulers Chronologically
Introduction:
Bengal has witnessed several rulers who have significantly contributed to the history of the region. In this question, we are required to arrange the following four rulers of Bengal chronologically: Alivardi Khan, Shuja-ud-din, Haidar Jang, and Murshid Quli Khan.
Chronological Arrangement:
The correct chronological arrangement of the Bengal rulers is as follows:
IV. Murshid Quli Khan: He was the first Nawab of Bengal and served from 1717 to 1727. He was a competent administrator and was successful in consolidating the Mughal rule in Bengal.
II. Shuja-ud-din: He was the second Nawab of Bengal and served from 1727 to 1739. He continued the policies of Murshid Quli Khan and was able to maintain peace and stability in Bengal.
III. Haidar Jang: He was the third Nawab of Bengal and served from 1739 to 1740. He was appointed by the Mughal emperor Muhammad Shah and was successful in suppressing a rebellion in Bihar.
I. Alivardi Khan: He was the fourth Nawab of Bengal and served from 1740 to 1756. He was a competent military leader and was able to repel several invasions by the Marathas and the Afghans. He also initiated several reforms in the administration of Bengal.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct chronological arrangement of the Bengal rulers is IV, II, III, I, which corresponds to Murshid Quli Khan, Shuja-ud-din, Haidar Jang, and Alivardi Khan, respectively.
Introduction:
Bengal has witnessed several rulers who have significantly contributed to the history of the region. In this question, we are required to arrange the following four rulers of Bengal chronologically: Alivardi Khan, Shuja-ud-din, Haidar Jang, and Murshid Quli Khan.
Chronological Arrangement:
The correct chronological arrangement of the Bengal rulers is as follows:
IV. Murshid Quli Khan: He was the first Nawab of Bengal and served from 1717 to 1727. He was a competent administrator and was successful in consolidating the Mughal rule in Bengal.
II. Shuja-ud-din: He was the second Nawab of Bengal and served from 1727 to 1739. He continued the policies of Murshid Quli Khan and was able to maintain peace and stability in Bengal.
III. Haidar Jang: He was the third Nawab of Bengal and served from 1739 to 1740. He was appointed by the Mughal emperor Muhammad Shah and was successful in suppressing a rebellion in Bihar.
I. Alivardi Khan: He was the fourth Nawab of Bengal and served from 1740 to 1756. He was a competent military leader and was able to repel several invasions by the Marathas and the Afghans. He also initiated several reforms in the administration of Bengal.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the correct chronological arrangement of the Bengal rulers is IV, II, III, I, which corresponds to Murshid Quli Khan, Shuja-ud-din, Haidar Jang, and Alivardi Khan, respectively.
Why was the Mughal dynasty plagued by a civil war everytime a ruler died?
- a)Local chiefs wanted greater autonomy.
- b)Mughals had no fixed rule of succession.
- c)Princes hadn't the support of different factions of the nobility.
- d)A civil war rightly determined the person who was fit enough to become the Emperor.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Why was the Mughal dynasty plagued by a civil war everytime a ruler died?
a)
Local chiefs wanted greater autonomy.
b)
Mughals had no fixed rule of succession.
c)
Princes hadn't the support of different factions of the nobility.
d)
A civil war rightly determined the person who was fit enough to become the Emperor.
|
|
Jatin Desai answered |
The correct option is B.
In the absence of a fixed rule for succession, the empire was always plagued after the death of a King by a civil war between the princes resulting in loss of life and property and of capable military commanders. After Bahadur Shah's reign came a long list of weak, worthless and luxury-loving Kings.
In the absence of a fixed rule for succession, the empire was always plagued after the death of a King by a civil war between the princes resulting in loss of life and property and of capable military commanders. After Bahadur Shah's reign came a long list of weak, worthless and luxury-loving Kings.
The Mughal Empire declined during the first half of the 18th century. Matters became so worse that the British army occupied Delhi in- a)1803
- b)1810
- c)1815
- d)1827
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Mughal Empire declined during the first half of the 18th century. Matters became so worse that the British army occupied Delhi in
a)
1803
b)
1810
c)
1815
d)
1827
|
Anshu Khanna answered |
Mughal Empire Decline
The Mughal Empire was one of the most powerful empires in India, ruling from the early 16th century until the mid-19th century. However, the decline of the Mughal Empire began in the first half of the 18th century.
Causes of Decline
The decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by a number of factors, including:
1. Weak Rulers: The Mughal emperors who ruled during the 18th century were weak and ineffective. They lacked the ability to govern effectively and were easily manipulated by their courtiers.
2. Economic Decline: The Mughal Empire's economy began to decline in the 18th century due to the loss of revenue from the declining agricultural sector and the decline of the textile industry.
3. Political Instability: The Mughal Empire was plagued by political instability during the 18th century. There were frequent rebellions by regional governors and the empire was constantly under threat from external powers.
4. Military Weakness: The Mughal Empire's military strength declined significantly during the 18th century. The empire was unable to defend itself against the growing power of the Maratha Confederacy and other regional powers.
British Occupation of Delhi
The decline of the Mughal Empire was so severe that the British army was able to occupy Delhi in 1803. This marked the beginning of British rule in India, which lasted until India gained independence in 1947.
The British initially entered India as traders, but soon began to expand their influence through military conquest. The occupation of Delhi was a major milestone in the British conquest of India, as it gave them control over the Mughal capital and symbol of power.
The British continued to expand their control over India, gradually taking over more and more territory until they became the dominant power in the subcontinent. The decline of the Mughal Empire was a key factor in the British conquest of India, as it weakened the existing power structures and allowed the British to expand their influence.
The Mughal Empire was one of the most powerful empires in India, ruling from the early 16th century until the mid-19th century. However, the decline of the Mughal Empire began in the first half of the 18th century.
Causes of Decline
The decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by a number of factors, including:
1. Weak Rulers: The Mughal emperors who ruled during the 18th century were weak and ineffective. They lacked the ability to govern effectively and were easily manipulated by their courtiers.
2. Economic Decline: The Mughal Empire's economy began to decline in the 18th century due to the loss of revenue from the declining agricultural sector and the decline of the textile industry.
3. Political Instability: The Mughal Empire was plagued by political instability during the 18th century. There were frequent rebellions by regional governors and the empire was constantly under threat from external powers.
4. Military Weakness: The Mughal Empire's military strength declined significantly during the 18th century. The empire was unable to defend itself against the growing power of the Maratha Confederacy and other regional powers.
British Occupation of Delhi
The decline of the Mughal Empire was so severe that the British army was able to occupy Delhi in 1803. This marked the beginning of British rule in India, which lasted until India gained independence in 1947.
The British initially entered India as traders, but soon began to expand their influence through military conquest. The occupation of Delhi was a major milestone in the British conquest of India, as it gave them control over the Mughal capital and symbol of power.
The British continued to expand their control over India, gradually taking over more and more territory until they became the dominant power in the subcontinent. The decline of the Mughal Empire was a key factor in the British conquest of India, as it weakened the existing power structures and allowed the British to expand their influence.
Which of the following statements about the Anglo-Nizam relations are true?- a)The British tried to interfere in the affairs of Hyderabad for the first time in 1750.
- b)They supported Nasir Jang against Muzaffar Jang in the succession dispute between the two.
- c)Colonel Forde concluded a friendship treaty with Muzaffar Jang in 1760.
- d)All of the above.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements about the Anglo-Nizam relations are true?
a)
The British tried to interfere in the affairs of Hyderabad for the first time in 1750.
b)
They supported Nasir Jang against Muzaffar Jang in the succession dispute between the two.
c)
Colonel Forde concluded a friendship treaty with Muzaffar Jang in 1760.
d)
All of the above.
|
|
Om Mehra answered |
The correct option is D.
All the given statements are correct with reference to anglo-nizam relations.
All the given statements are correct with reference to anglo-nizam relations.
Warfare was carried on against the Rohels and the Bangash Pathans by- a)Saadat Khan
- b)Dilwar Khan
- c)Safdar Jang
- d)Salabat Jan
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Warfare was carried on against the Rohels and the Bangash Pathans by
a)
Saadat Khan
b)
Dilwar Khan
c)
Safdar Jang
d)
Salabat Jan
|
|
Rhea Mehta answered |
Correct Answer :- c
Explanation : Rohillas are a community of Pashtun ancestry, historically found in Rohilkhand, a region in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. It forms the largest Pashtun diaspora community in India, and has given its name to the Rohilkhand region.
Warfare was carried on against the Rohels and the Bangash Pathans by Safdar Jang.
Ahmad Shah Abdali greatly weakened the Mughal Empire by invading India repeatedly. His first invasion was during the reign of
- a)Ahmad Shah
- b)Jehandar Shah
- c)Muhammad Shah
- d)Alamgir II
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Ahmad Shah Abdali greatly weakened the Mughal Empire by invading India repeatedly. His first invasion was during the reign of
a)
Ahmad Shah
b)
Jehandar Shah
c)
Muhammad Shah
d)
Alamgir II
|
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
Ahmad Shah Abdali invaded India for the first time in 1748, during the reign of Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah. Muhammad Shah was the 14th and last great Mughal emperor. He ruled from 1719 to 1748.
What is incorrect about jagirs in the 18th centruy?- a)Their income had increased.
- b)Their number was decreased.
- c)Attempts were made to make some jagirs hereditary.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What is incorrect about jagirs in the 18th centruy?
a)
Their income had increased.
b)
Their number was decreased.
c)
Attempts were made to make some jagirs hereditary.
d)
None of these.
|
Amrita Saha answered |
The correct answer is A as the incorrect statement about jangirs was that their income has increased.
Which statement is incorrect?
- a)Artisans were underprivileged in the 17th and 18th centuries .
- b)None of these.
- c)The Mus lims forme d a heter ogenous community during Aurangzeb’s time.
- d)Rajputs and Marathas were the champions of the Hindus .
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which statement is incorrect?
a)
Artisans were underprivileged in the 17th and 18th centuries .
b)
None of these.
c)
The Mus lims forme d a heter ogenous community during Aurangzeb’s time.
d)
Rajputs and Marathas were the champions of the Hindus .
|
|
Akanksha Saha answered |
B)Rajputs and Marathas were the champions of the Hindus. (This statement is incorrect as both Rajputs and Marathas were Hindu dynasties that fought against each other for political power and control, rather than for the protection of Hinduism as a religion.)
After Aurangzeb’s death, Bengal soon became an independent viceroyalty for all practical purposes under- a)Alivardi Khan
- b)Murshid Quli Khan
- c)Shuja-ud-din
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
After Aurangzeb’s death, Bengal soon became an independent viceroyalty for all practical purposes under
a)
Alivardi Khan
b)
Murshid Quli Khan
c)
Shuja-ud-din
d)
None of these
|
|
Saniyasanu44 answered |
MughalEmpire after the death of Aurangzeb, Bengal became an independent viceroyalty for all practical purposes under Murshid Quli Khan who justified the confidence reposed in him by the efficient management, which raised Bengal to the highest degree of prosperity.
Muazzam, who took the title of Bahadur Shah, tried to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber by replacing Jai Singh by his younger brother- a)Partap Singh
- b)Ajit Singh
- c)Vijay Singh
- d)Sangram Singh
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Muazzam, who took the title of Bahadur Shah, tried to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber by replacing Jai Singh by his younger brother
a)
Partap Singh
b)
Ajit Singh
c)
Vijay Singh
d)
Sangram Singh
|
|
Arshiya Kulkarni answered |
Title: Bahadur Shah's Attempt to Gain Control over the Rajput State of Amber
Introduction:
Muazzam, who took the title of Bahadur Shah, was a Mughal emperor who attempted to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber. In his pursuit, he sought to replace Jai Singh, the ruler of Amber, with his younger brother. Among the given options, the correct answer is option 'C', Vijay Singh. Let's explore the details behind this answer.
Background:
During the 17th century, the Mughal Empire faced numerous challenges, including the expansionist policies of various Rajput states. The Rajput rulers, including Jai Singh of Amber, were known for their valor and military prowess. This posed a threat to the Mughal Empire's authority over the region.
Attempt to Replace Jai Singh:
Bahadur Shah, also known as Muazzam, aimed to weaken the Rajput states by replacing their powerful rulers with individuals who would be more loyal to the Mughal Empire. In his pursuit to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber, Bahadur Shah sought to replace Jai Singh with his younger brother, Vijay Singh.
Vijay Singh as a Puppet Ruler:
By installing Vijay Singh as the ruler of Amber, Bahadur Shah hoped to have a more compliant and submissive ruler who would serve the interests of the Mughal Empire. Vijay Singh, being the younger brother of Jai Singh, was chosen as a potential puppet ruler who could be easily manipulated by Bahadur Shah.
Reasoning behind Choosing Vijay Singh:
Among the given options, Vijay Singh is the most likely choice for Bahadur Shah to replace Jai Singh. It is important to note that the other options, namely Partap Singh, Ajit Singh, and Sangram Singh, do not hold historical significance in relation to the attempted control over the Rajput state of Amber. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C', Vijay Singh.
Conclusion:
In his attempt to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber, Bahadur Shah, also known as Muazzam, tried to replace Jai Singh with his younger brother, Vijay Singh. By installing Vijay Singh as the ruler, Bahadur Shah aimed to have a more compliant and easily manipulated leader who would serve the interests of the Mughal Empire.
Introduction:
Muazzam, who took the title of Bahadur Shah, was a Mughal emperor who attempted to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber. In his pursuit, he sought to replace Jai Singh, the ruler of Amber, with his younger brother. Among the given options, the correct answer is option 'C', Vijay Singh. Let's explore the details behind this answer.
Background:
During the 17th century, the Mughal Empire faced numerous challenges, including the expansionist policies of various Rajput states. The Rajput rulers, including Jai Singh of Amber, were known for their valor and military prowess. This posed a threat to the Mughal Empire's authority over the region.
Attempt to Replace Jai Singh:
Bahadur Shah, also known as Muazzam, aimed to weaken the Rajput states by replacing their powerful rulers with individuals who would be more loyal to the Mughal Empire. In his pursuit to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber, Bahadur Shah sought to replace Jai Singh with his younger brother, Vijay Singh.
Vijay Singh as a Puppet Ruler:
By installing Vijay Singh as the ruler of Amber, Bahadur Shah hoped to have a more compliant and submissive ruler who would serve the interests of the Mughal Empire. Vijay Singh, being the younger brother of Jai Singh, was chosen as a potential puppet ruler who could be easily manipulated by Bahadur Shah.
Reasoning behind Choosing Vijay Singh:
Among the given options, Vijay Singh is the most likely choice for Bahadur Shah to replace Jai Singh. It is important to note that the other options, namely Partap Singh, Ajit Singh, and Sangram Singh, do not hold historical significance in relation to the attempted control over the Rajput state of Amber. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C', Vijay Singh.
Conclusion:
In his attempt to gain control over the Rajput state of Amber, Bahadur Shah, also known as Muazzam, tried to replace Jai Singh with his younger brother, Vijay Singh. By installing Vijay Singh as the ruler, Bahadur Shah aimed to have a more compliant and easily manipulated leader who would serve the interests of the Mughal Empire.
Treaty of Seringapatam, signed by Tipu and Cornwallis, containedI. Payment of a war indemnity of about Rs.3 crores by Tipu.II. S tationing o f a British R esi d ent at Seringapatam.III. Sending two of his sons by Tipu as hostages to the British camp.IV. Surrender of almost half of Tipu‘s territories,which were to be shared among the English, the Nizam and the Marathas.- a)I, II, III, IV
- b)II, III, IV
- c)I, III, IV
- d)I, II, III
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Treaty of Seringapatam, signed by Tipu and Cornwallis, contained
I. Payment of a war indemnity of about Rs.3 crores by Tipu.
II. S tationing o f a British R esi d ent at Seringapatam.
III. Sending two of his sons by Tipu as hostages to the British camp.
IV. Surrender of almost half of Tipu‘s territories,
which were to be shared among the English, the Nizam and the Marathas.
a)
I, II, III, IV
b)
II, III, IV
c)
I, III, IV
d)
I, II, III
|
|
Sinjini Kumar answered |
's territories to the British.
V. Agreement to maintain friendly relations between the two sides.
VI. Release of all prisoners of war on both sides.
VII. Pledge to not form alliances with any other European powers without the consent of the British.
VIII. Agreement to open up trade and commerce between Mysore and the British East India Company.
IX. Recognition of the British as the supreme power in South India.
X. Acceptance of the terms of the Treaty of Mangalore (1784) between Mysore and the British.
Overall, the Treaty of Seringapatam marked the end of the Anglo-Mysore Wars and solidified British control over South India.
V. Agreement to maintain friendly relations between the two sides.
VI. Release of all prisoners of war on both sides.
VII. Pledge to not form alliances with any other European powers without the consent of the British.
VIII. Agreement to open up trade and commerce between Mysore and the British East India Company.
IX. Recognition of the British as the supreme power in South India.
X. Acceptance of the terms of the Treaty of Mangalore (1784) between Mysore and the British.
Overall, the Treaty of Seringapatam marked the end of the Anglo-Mysore Wars and solidified British control over South India.
Ahmad Shah Abdali defeated the Marathas in the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761. This happened in the reign of- a)Alamgir II
- b)Muhammad Shah
- c)Shah Alam II
- d)Ahmad Shah
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Ahmad Shah Abdali defeated the Marathas in the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761. This happened in the reign of
a)
Alamgir II
b)
Muhammad Shah
c)
Shah Alam II
d)
Ahmad Shah
|
|
Mayank Kumar answered |
Ali Gohar, historically known as Shah Alam II, was the sixteenth Mughal Emperor and the son of Alamgir II. Shah Alam II became the emperor of a crumbling Mughal empire.
What is true about the Mughal army in the 18th century?- a)It was well-disciplined.
- b)It was large.
- c)Its soldiers were often on the verge of mutiny.
- d)Its soldiers and officers were paid on a monthly basis.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What is true about the Mughal army in the 18th century?
a)
It was well-disciplined.
b)
It was large.
c)
Its soldiers were often on the verge of mutiny.
d)
Its soldiers and officers were paid on a monthly basis.
|
|
Sarthak Chaudhary answered |
During the eighteenth century, the Mughal army lacked discipline and fighting morale. Lack of finance made it difficult to maintain a large army. Its soldiers and officers were not paid for months, and, since they were mere mercenaries, they were constantly disaffected and often verged on a mutiny.
Bahadur Shah was succeeded by- a)Muhammad Shah
- b)Jehandar Shah
- c)Farrukh Siyar
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Bahadur Shah was succeeded by
a)
Muhammad Shah
b)
Jehandar Shah
c)
Farrukh Siyar
d)
None of these
|
|
Swati Das answered |
Jahandar Shah faced trouble from Muhammad Farrukhsiyar, grandson of Bahadur Shah, and the second son of Azim-ush-Shan. Farrukhsiyar, after the death of his father, proclaimed himself as the emperor. With the help of the Saiyid brothers, he was able to defeat Jahandar Shah in the battlefield of Samugarh, on January 6, 1713. Jahandar Shah and Lal Kanwar escaped and went back to Delhi and sought help of Zulfiqar Khan. Instead of helping Jahandar Shah, Zulfiqar Khan imprisoned him in order to gain favor of the new emperor. Jahandar Shah was murdered in prison on February 11, 1713, and was buried in the vault of Humayun’s tomb at the side of other members of the family.
A powerful noble of Muhammad Shah founded the state of Hyderabad (1724). Identify him- a)Nizum-ul-Mulk
- b)Dilawar Khan
- c)Fafi-ud-Darajat
- d)Ahmad Shah
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
A powerful noble of Muhammad Shah founded the state of Hyderabad (1724). Identify him
a)
Nizum-ul-Mulk
b)
Dilawar Khan
c)
Fafi-ud-Darajat
d)
Ahmad Shah
|
|
Sounak Basu answered |
The Nizam of Hyderabad was a monarch of the Hyderabad State, now divided into Telangana state, Hyderabad-Karnataka region of Karnataka and Marathwada region of Maharashtra.
During the reign of which ruler the company took the control of Carnatic into its own hand?- a)Nawab Muhammad Ali
- b)Tipu Sultan
- c)Qmdut-ul-Umera
- d)Haider Ali
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
During the reign of which ruler the company took the control of Carnatic into its own hand?
a)
Nawab Muhammad Ali
b)
Tipu Sultan
c)
Qmdut-ul-Umera
d)
Haider Ali
|
|
Abhishek Phogat answered |
Carnatic was the region along the eastern ghats,between krishna and kaveri river.. In mid 18th century colonisation of east Indian company was at its peak. There was also a conflict going on between French and east indian company at that time in carnatic region.. As u can see the ruler of carnatic region at that time was Muhammad Ali who preferred English instead of French. He was bound to do so as his kingdom was under a huge debt....
What is true about the Bengal nawabs?- a)They had strong armies.
- b)They firmly tried to put down the use of military force by the English East India Comapany.
- c)They checked growing corruption among their officials.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What is true about the Bengal nawabs?
a)
They had strong armies.
b)
They firmly tried to put down the use of military force by the English East India Comapany.
c)
They checked growing corruption among their officials.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Disha Ahuja answered |
The correct option is D.
None of the statements is correct.
None of the statements is correct.
Who remarked “The Avadh chiefs were capable of creating a distrubance in the twinkling of an eye and were more dangerous than the Marathas of the Deccan”?- a)Safdar Jang
- b)Salabat Jang
- c)Saadat Khan
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who remarked “The Avadh chiefs were capable of creating a distrubance in the twinkling of an eye and were more dangerous than the Marathas of the Deccan”?
a)
Safdar Jang
b)
Salabat Jang
c)
Saadat Khan
d)
None of these
|
Rahul Pillai answered |
"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world"?
Which of the following did not revolt against Aurangzeb?- a)Shayista Khan
- b)The Sikhs
- c)The Satnamis
- d)The Marathas
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following did not revolt against Aurangzeb?
a)
Shayista Khan
b)
The Sikhs
c)
The Satnamis
d)
The Marathas
|
|
Navya Chauhan answered |
Shayista Khan was subahdar and a general in the Mughal army. He did not revolt against Aurangzeb because Aurangzeb made him governor of Bengal during his period and he was a maternal uncle of Aurangzeb.
The Maratha ruler, Sahu, agreed to support the Mughals in the Deccan with 15,000 mounted soldiers during the reign of- a)Bahadur Shah
- b)Jehandar Shah
- c)Farrukh Siyar
- d)Muhammad Shah
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The Maratha ruler, Sahu, agreed to support the Mughals in the Deccan with 15,000 mounted soldiers during the reign of
a)
Bahadur Shah
b)
Jehandar Shah
c)
Farrukh Siyar
d)
Muhammad Shah
|
Gauri Chakraborty answered |
C is the correct option. Arriving at the Deccan, Syed Hussain made a treaty with Maratha ruler Shahu I in February 1718. Shahu was allowed to collect sardeshmukhi in Deccan, and received the lands of Berar and Gondwana to govern. In return, Shahu agreed to pay one million rupees annually and maintain an army of 15,000 horses for the Sayyids. This agreement was reached without “Farrukhsiyar” approval.
What was the major weakness of the Mughal nobilityduring the 18th century?- a)Decline in average ability of the nobility.
- b)Moral decay of the nobility.
- c)Selfishness of the nobles and their lack of devotion to the state.
- d)The numerous factions and groups by the nobles against each other.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the major weakness of the Mughal nobilityduring the 18th century?
a)
Decline in average ability of the nobility.
b)
Moral decay of the nobility.
c)
Selfishness of the nobles and their lack of devotion to the state.
d)
The numerous factions and groups by the nobles against each other.
|
|
Aryan Kumar answered |
Major Weakness of the Mughal Nobility during the 18th Century:
Weakness: Selfishness of the Nobles and their Lack of Devotion to the State
- The major weakness of the Mughal nobility during the 18th century was their selfishness and lack of devotion to the state.
- Instead of working together for the betterment of the empire, many nobles were more focused on advancing their own interests and power.
- This lack of unity and cooperation among the nobles weakened the overall strength of the Mughal Empire and made it more vulnerable to external threats.
- The nobles' selfishness also led to corruption and inefficiency in the administration, further contributing to the decline of the empire.
- Without the support and loyalty of the nobility, the Mughal emperors struggled to maintain control over their vast empire and were unable to effectively address the various challenges they faced.
In conclusion, the selfishness of the Mughal nobles and their lack of devotion to the state were significant weaknesses that contributed to the decline of the empire during the 18th century.
Weakness: Selfishness of the Nobles and their Lack of Devotion to the State
- The major weakness of the Mughal nobility during the 18th century was their selfishness and lack of devotion to the state.
- Instead of working together for the betterment of the empire, many nobles were more focused on advancing their own interests and power.
- This lack of unity and cooperation among the nobles weakened the overall strength of the Mughal Empire and made it more vulnerable to external threats.
- The nobles' selfishness also led to corruption and inefficiency in the administration, further contributing to the decline of the empire.
- Without the support and loyalty of the nobility, the Mughal emperors struggled to maintain control over their vast empire and were unable to effectively address the various challenges they faced.
In conclusion, the selfishness of the Mughal nobles and their lack of devotion to the state were significant weaknesses that contributed to the decline of the empire during the 18th century.
The Sikh leader, Banda Bahadur, was captured and executed during the reign of- a)Bahadur Shah
- b)Jehandar Shah
- c)Muhammad Shah
- d)Farrukh Siyar
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The Sikh leader, Banda Bahadur, was captured and executed during the reign of
a)
Bahadur Shah
b)
Jehandar Shah
c)
Muhammad Shah
d)
Farrukh Siyar
|
|
Gauri Bose answered |
Baba Banda Singh Bahadur was a Sikh leader who, by early 1700, had captured parts of the Punjab region. Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah I failed to suppress Bahadur's uprising. In 1714, the Sirhind faujdar (garrison commander) Zainuddin Ahmad Khan attacked the Sikhs near Ropar. In 1715, Farrukhisyar sent 20,000 troops under Qamaruddin Khan, Abdus Samad Khan and Zakariya Khan Bahadur to defeat Bahadur. After an eight-month siege at Gurdaspur, Bahadur surrendered after he ran out of ammunition. Bahadur and his 200 companions were arrested and brought to Delhi; he was paraded around the city of Sirhind. Bahadur was put into an iron cage and the remaining Sikhs were chained.
Chapter doubts & questions for The Decline Of Mughal Empire And The Rise Of Autonomous States - Lucent for GK 2025 is part of UPSC CSE exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPSC CSE exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPSC CSE 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of The Decline Of Mughal Empire And The Rise Of Autonomous States - Lucent for GK in English & Hindi are available as part of UPSC CSE exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC CSE Exam by signing up for free.
Lucent for GK
643 videos|791 docs|420 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup