All Exams >
BPSC (Bihar) >
History for State PSC Exams >
All Questions
All questions of The Mughal Empire for BPSC (Bihar) Exam
What was zawabits?- a)Agricultural taxes
- b)State decrees or laws
- c)Affairs concerning Hindus
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What was zawabits?
a)
Agricultural taxes
b)
State decrees or laws
c)
Affairs concerning Hindus
d)
None of these
|
Zara Khan answered |
The term “ Zawabit” literally mean “ State laws” in Persian language but it is used contextually as “ Secular Decrees” issued by the Mughal state undersigned by the ruler.
Match the following:
- a)[A-I], [B-II], [C-III]
- b)[A-II], [B-I], [C-III]
- c)[A-I], [B-III], [C-II]
- d)[A-III], [B-I], [C-II]
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the following:
a)
[A-I], [B-II], [C-III]
b)
[A-II], [B-I], [C-III]
c)
[A-I], [B-III], [C-II]
d)
[A-III], [B-I], [C-II]
|
Rahul Desai answered |
When Shah Jahan fell ill, a struggle for the throne started between his four sons - Dara Shikoh, Shah Shuja, Aurangzeb and Murad Baksh. Shuja immediately crowned himself the emperor and took imperial titles, November 1657.
He marched with a large army, backed by a good number of war-boats in the river Ganges. However, he was beaten by Dara's army in a hotly contested Battle of Bahadurpur near Banares (in modern Uttar Pradesh, India). Shuja turned back to Rajmahal to make further preparations. He signed a treaty with his elder brother Dara, which left him in control of Bengal, Orissa and a large part of Bihar, 17 May 1658.
The battle of Dharmat was fought between his sons Dara Shikoh (the eldest son and heir apparent) and his two younger brothers Aurangzeb and Murad Baksh (third and fourth sons of Shah Jahan).
Battle of Samugarh, Jang-e-Samugarh, (May 29, 1658), was a decisive battle in the struggle for the throne during the Mughal war of succession (1658–1659) between the sons of the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan after the emperor's serious illness in September 1657.
He marched with a large army, backed by a good number of war-boats in the river Ganges. However, he was beaten by Dara's army in a hotly contested Battle of Bahadurpur near Banares (in modern Uttar Pradesh, India). Shuja turned back to Rajmahal to make further preparations. He signed a treaty with his elder brother Dara, which left him in control of Bengal, Orissa and a large part of Bihar, 17 May 1658.
The battle of Dharmat was fought between his sons Dara Shikoh (the eldest son and heir apparent) and his two younger brothers Aurangzeb and Murad Baksh (third and fourth sons of Shah Jahan).
Battle of Samugarh, Jang-e-Samugarh, (May 29, 1658), was a decisive battle in the struggle for the throne during the Mughal war of succession (1658–1659) between the sons of the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan after the emperor's serious illness in September 1657.
The dual rank of ‘Zat’ and ‘Sawar’ was for the first time mentioned in which of the following contemporary sources?- a)Ain-i-Akbari
- b)Akbar Namah
- c)Iqbal Namah
- d)Tabaqat-i-Akbari
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The dual rank of ‘Zat’ and ‘Sawar’ was for the first time mentioned in which of the following contemporary sources?
a)
Ain-i-Akbari
b)
Akbar Namah
c)
Iqbal Namah
d)
Tabaqat-i-Akbari
|
Poonam Reddy answered |
The correct answer is option (B), Akbar Namah. During later years of his reign, Akbar introduced the rank of ‘Zat’ and ‘Sawar’ in the Mansabdari system. Different views have been expressed regarding these terms. According to Blochmann, every mansabdar had to maintain as many soldiers as were indicated by his rank of Zat’ while the rank of ‘sawar’ indicated the number of horsemen among them. Irvin expressed the view that Zat indicated the actual number of cavalry under a mansabdar besides other soldiers while sawar was an additional honour.
‘Jagir’ of the Mughals is equal to which of the following Sultanate period?- a)Inam
- b)Iqta
- c)Waqf
- d)Khalisa
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
‘Jagir’ of the Mughals is equal to which of the following Sultanate period?
a)
Inam
b)
Iqta
c)
Waqf
d)
Khalisa
|
Aditya Kumar answered |
A jagir, also spelled as jageer, was a type of feudal land grant in the Indian subcontinent at the foundation of its Jagirdar (Zamindar) system.
Iqta means land or land revenue assigned to an individual on certain conditions. The holders of these Iqtas were the trustful agents of the Sultan. There were two kinds of Iqtas viz. Large Iqtas and Small Iqtas.
Iqta means land or land revenue assigned to an individual on certain conditions. The holders of these Iqtas were the trustful agents of the Sultan. There were two kinds of Iqtas viz. Large Iqtas and Small Iqtas.
Match the following
Column I
(a) Akbar
(b) Jahangir
(c) Shah Jahan
Column II
(I) 1627-1658
(II) 1605-1627
(III) 1556-1605- a)(a)-(II),(b)-(III),(c)-(I)
- b)(a)-(II),(b)-(I),(c)-(III)I]
- c)(a)-(III),(b)-(II),(c)-(I)
- d)(a)-(I),(b)-(II),(c)-(III)
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the following
Column I
(a) Akbar
(b) Jahangir
(c) Shah Jahan
Column II
(I) 1627-1658
(II) 1605-1627
(III) 1556-1605
Column I
(a) Akbar
(b) Jahangir
(c) Shah Jahan
Column II
(I) 1627-1658
(II) 1605-1627
(III) 1556-1605
a)
(a)-(II),(b)-(III),(c)-(I)
b)
(a)-(II),(b)-(I),(c)-(III)I]
c)
(a)-(III),(b)-(II),(c)-(I)
d)
(a)-(I),(b)-(II),(c)-(III)
|
|
Pooja Shah answered |
The correct answer is C as all the years are correctly matched with the kings
Which great Mughal is credited with prohibiting ‘Sati’ unless the widow herself, of her own free will, persistently desired it?- a)Akbar
- b)Babur
- c)Humayun
- d)Jahangir
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which great Mughal is credited with prohibiting ‘Sati’ unless the widow herself, of her own free will, persistently desired it?
a)
Akbar
b)
Babur
c)
Humayun
d)
Jahangir
|
|
Priya Menon answered |
Firstly, the sati system was banned by the Humayun emperor but strict laws were not implemented. Afterwards, the sati system was banned by Akbar with law enforcement.
What was the main cause for the war of succession among the four sons of Shahjahan?- a)The Mughals did not follow any definite law of succession.
- b)Shahjahan was more inclined towards Dara.
- c)Aurangzeb was over ambitious.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the main cause for the war of succession among the four sons of Shahjahan?
a)
The Mughals did not follow any definite law of succession.
b)
Shahjahan was more inclined towards Dara.
c)
Aurangzeb was over ambitious.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Shailvi Srivastava answered |
The main cause for the war of succession among the four sons of Shahjahan was because of a tradition that Mughals did not follow any definite law of succession, which means that there is nothing particular about having an elder son on the throne.
Answer is option A.
Answer is option A.
Who wrote the history of Aurangazeb’s reign in total secrecy because of the emperor’s oppositon to it?- a)Khafi Khan—Mutakhab-ul-Labab
- b)Aquil Khan Razi—Zafar Namah-i-Alamgiri
- c)Muhammad Saqi—Masir-i-Alamgiri
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who wrote the history of Aurangazeb’s reign in total secrecy because of the emperor’s oppositon to it?
a)
Khafi Khan—Mutakhab-ul-Labab
b)
Aquil Khan Razi—Zafar Namah-i-Alamgiri
c)
Muhammad Saqi—Masir-i-Alamgiri
d)
None of the above
|
Golu Kumar answered |
A
Which one of the following was not a Mughal province in the Deccan during Akbar’s reign?- a)Berar
- b)Khandesh
- c)Ahmadnagar
- d)Bidar
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following was not a Mughal province in the Deccan during Akbar’s reign?
a)
Berar
b)
Khandesh
c)
Ahmadnagar
d)
Bidar
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
The five Deccan Sultanates were Berar, Khandesh, Ahmadnagar, Bijapur and Golconda.
Match the following
- a)(A-II) (B-IV) (C-I) (D-III)
- b)(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
- c)(A-I) (B-IV) (C-II) (D-III)
- d)(A-IV) (B-I) (C-III) (D-II)
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the following
a)
(A-II) (B-IV) (C-I) (D-III)
b)
(A-I) (B-II) (C-III) (D-IV)
c)
(A-I) (B-IV) (C-II) (D-III)
d)
(A-IV) (B-I) (C-III) (D-II)
|
|
Shadab Alam. answered |
In 1607, William Hawkins commanded the ship “Hector” for East India Company on a voyage to Surat and Aden loaded with letters & presents from King of England James I. He arrived in Surat in August 1608, but the road ahead was not a cakewalk .
As soon as
Hector sailed in, it was captured by the Portuguese. William Hawkins was told that all the ports belong to the “King of Portugal” and none ought to come here without his license. But, he was later let leave and receive a pass for his journey to Agra. He was helped by the Viceroy of the Burhanpur midway and after much labor, toil and many dangers; he was able to reach Agra on April 16, 1609.
Akbar who was contemporary of queen Elizabeth-I was little known in England, but when Hawkins arrived, there was a different personality sitting on the throne who was not at all known in England.
But Captain Hawkins was received by this new emperor Jahangir with all Indian hospitality and warmth. His letter was read in the court with the help of a Portuguese Jesuit. Then he was taken to the private audience chamber and they had a conversation for some 3 hours.
Hawkins was well versed in Turkish and Jahangir and some of his ministers also knew Turkish, the native tongue of Babur. So the discussions took place in Turkish.
Hawkins was able to acquire a footing in the court of Jahangir and in due course of time he got so intimacy with the “talented drunkard” emperor that no Europeans had ever afterwards.
Jahangir called him “English Khan“. This English Khan was able to persuade the emperor to grant a commission for an English factory at Surat but under the Pressure of the Portuguese Viceroy, the grant was withdrawn. Hawkins lived in the court of Mughal emperor till 1611, tried to reverse the orders, but the Portuguese influence over the King was impregnable. He returned in disgust on November 2, 1611. He died a couple of years later.
As soon as
Hector sailed in, it was captured by the Portuguese. William Hawkins was told that all the ports belong to the “King of Portugal” and none ought to come here without his license. But, he was later let leave and receive a pass for his journey to Agra. He was helped by the Viceroy of the Burhanpur midway and after much labor, toil and many dangers; he was able to reach Agra on April 16, 1609.
Akbar who was contemporary of queen Elizabeth-I was little known in England, but when Hawkins arrived, there was a different personality sitting on the throne who was not at all known in England.
But Captain Hawkins was received by this new emperor Jahangir with all Indian hospitality and warmth. His letter was read in the court with the help of a Portuguese Jesuit. Then he was taken to the private audience chamber and they had a conversation for some 3 hours.
Hawkins was well versed in Turkish and Jahangir and some of his ministers also knew Turkish, the native tongue of Babur. So the discussions took place in Turkish.
Hawkins was able to acquire a footing in the court of Jahangir and in due course of time he got so intimacy with the “talented drunkard” emperor that no Europeans had ever afterwards.
Jahangir called him “English Khan“. This English Khan was able to persuade the emperor to grant a commission for an English factory at Surat but under the Pressure of the Portuguese Viceroy, the grant was withdrawn. Hawkins lived in the court of Mughal emperor till 1611, tried to reverse the orders, but the Portuguese influence over the King was impregnable. He returned in disgust on November 2, 1611. He died a couple of years later.
Shahjahan’s Central Asian policy was a failure because- a)Qandhar was lost to the Mughals once and for all.
- b)The Mughals had to vacate Balkh in 1647.
- c)A lot of money had been spent.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Shahjahan’s Central Asian policy was a failure because
a)
Qandhar was lost to the Mughals once and for all.
b)
The Mughals had to vacate Balkh in 1647.
c)
A lot of money had been spent.
d)
None of these.
|
Lakshmi Chavan answered |
Shah Jahan's Central Asian Policy and its failure
Shah Jahan, the fifth Mughal emperor, had a keen interest in Central Asia, which was a region of great strategic importance. He wanted to establish Mughal control over this region and expand his empire's boundaries. To achieve this, he formulated a Central Asian policy, but unfortunately, it turned out to be a failure.
Loss of Qandhar
One of the significant setbacks that Shah Jahan faced was the loss of Qandhar to the Mughals once and for all. Qandhar was a strategically located city that connected Central Asia to India. Shah Jahan had sent his armies to capture it, but after several unsuccessful attempts, the city was lost to the Mughals permanently.
Evacuation of Balkh
Another failure of Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was the evacuation of Balkh in 1647. Shah Jahan had sent his son, Aurangzeb, to capture Balkh, but due to the harsh winter and lack of provisions, the Mughal army had to evacuate the city. This was a significant setback for the Mughals as they had invested a lot of resources in capturing the city.
Wastage of resources
Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was also a failure because a lot of money had been spent on military campaigns and building alliances with Central Asian rulers. This expenditure drained the Mughal treasury, and the empire faced financial problems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was a failure because of the loss of Qandhar, evacuation of Balkh, and wastage of resources. These setbacks weakened the Mughal empire and had long-term consequences on its stability.
Shah Jahan, the fifth Mughal emperor, had a keen interest in Central Asia, which was a region of great strategic importance. He wanted to establish Mughal control over this region and expand his empire's boundaries. To achieve this, he formulated a Central Asian policy, but unfortunately, it turned out to be a failure.
Loss of Qandhar
One of the significant setbacks that Shah Jahan faced was the loss of Qandhar to the Mughals once and for all. Qandhar was a strategically located city that connected Central Asia to India. Shah Jahan had sent his armies to capture it, but after several unsuccessful attempts, the city was lost to the Mughals permanently.
Evacuation of Balkh
Another failure of Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was the evacuation of Balkh in 1647. Shah Jahan had sent his son, Aurangzeb, to capture Balkh, but due to the harsh winter and lack of provisions, the Mughal army had to evacuate the city. This was a significant setback for the Mughals as they had invested a lot of resources in capturing the city.
Wastage of resources
Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was also a failure because a lot of money had been spent on military campaigns and building alliances with Central Asian rulers. This expenditure drained the Mughal treasury, and the empire faced financial problems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Shah Jahan's Central Asian policy was a failure because of the loss of Qandhar, evacuation of Balkh, and wastage of resources. These setbacks weakened the Mughal empire and had long-term consequences on its stability.
During the reign of which great Mughal was tobacco introduced in India?- a)Jahangir
- b)Akbar
- c)Shahjahan
- d)Aurangzeb
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
During the reign of which great Mughal was tobacco introduced in India?
a)
Jahangir
b)
Akbar
c)
Shahjahan
d)
Aurangzeb
|
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
Akbar had great respect for the Rajputs.He realised that with their support, he could consolidate his empire. Tobacco in India is introduced by Portuguese during the reign of Akbar.
Who among the following murdered Abul Fazl, the official historian of Akbar, at the instigation of Prince Salim in 1602?- a)Raja Todar Mal
- b)Raja Bhagwan Das
- c)Bir Singh Bundela
- d)Mirza Ghiyas Beg
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who among the following murdered Abul Fazl, the official historian of Akbar, at the instigation of Prince Salim in 1602?
a)
Raja Todar Mal
b)
Raja Bhagwan Das
c)
Bir Singh Bundela
d)
Mirza Ghiyas Beg
|
Avantika Bose answered |
Murder of Abul Fazl
Abul Fazl was the official historian of Akbar, the Mughal emperor. He was murdered in 1602 at the instigation of Prince Salim, who later became Emperor Jahangir. The murder was carried out by Bir Singh Bundela, a nobleman in the Mughal court.
Bir Singh Bundela
Bir Singh Bundela was a powerful noble in the Mughal court. He was the governor of Orissa and was known for his military skills. He was also a close associate of Prince Salim, who had promised him the governorship of Bengal.
Instigation by Prince Salim
Prince Salim was unhappy with Abul Fazl because he had criticized him in his book, Akbarnama. Salim felt that Abul Fazl was biased towards Akbar and had ignored his contributions to the Mughal empire. He also felt that Abul Fazl was trying to undermine his position in the court.
Prince Salim, therefore, instigated Bir Singh Bundela to murder Abul Fazl. He promised him the governorship of Bengal in return for carrying out the task. Bir Singh Bundela agreed to the plan and attacked Abul Fazl while he was travelling to meet Akbar.
Aftermath
The murder of Abul Fazl was a major setback for Akbar and his court. Abul Fazl was a trusted advisor of Akbar and his death was a loss to the Mughal empire. Prince Salim later regretted his decision and tried to make amends by honoring Abul Fazl's memory. However, the incident had already caused a rift between him and Akbar, which would have far-reaching consequences in the future.
Abul Fazl was the official historian of Akbar, the Mughal emperor. He was murdered in 1602 at the instigation of Prince Salim, who later became Emperor Jahangir. The murder was carried out by Bir Singh Bundela, a nobleman in the Mughal court.
Bir Singh Bundela
Bir Singh Bundela was a powerful noble in the Mughal court. He was the governor of Orissa and was known for his military skills. He was also a close associate of Prince Salim, who had promised him the governorship of Bengal.
Instigation by Prince Salim
Prince Salim was unhappy with Abul Fazl because he had criticized him in his book, Akbarnama. Salim felt that Abul Fazl was biased towards Akbar and had ignored his contributions to the Mughal empire. He also felt that Abul Fazl was trying to undermine his position in the court.
Prince Salim, therefore, instigated Bir Singh Bundela to murder Abul Fazl. He promised him the governorship of Bengal in return for carrying out the task. Bir Singh Bundela agreed to the plan and attacked Abul Fazl while he was travelling to meet Akbar.
Aftermath
The murder of Abul Fazl was a major setback for Akbar and his court. Abul Fazl was a trusted advisor of Akbar and his death was a loss to the Mughal empire. Prince Salim later regretted his decision and tried to make amends by honoring Abul Fazl's memory. However, the incident had already caused a rift between him and Akbar, which would have far-reaching consequences in the future.
Aurangzeb appointed special officers called Muhtasibs. Their function was to see that- a)The Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law.
- b)The Hindus paid pilgrimage tax.
- c)The non-Muslims did not carry arms.
- d)All Hindu students were discharged from the Muslim ‘Maktabas’ and ‘Madarsas’.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb appointed special officers called Muhtasibs. Their function was to see that
a)
The Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law.
b)
The Hindus paid pilgrimage tax.
c)
The non-Muslims did not carry arms.
d)
All Hindu students were discharged from the Muslim ‘Maktabas’ and ‘Madarsas’.
|
|
Nishanth Chaudhary answered |
Muhtasibs were special officers appointed by Aurangzeb to ensure that the Muslims lived their lives according to the Quranic law. The following points explain the role of Muhtasibs in detail:
Role of Muhtasibs:
1. Enforcing Quranic Law: The primary role of the Muhtasibs was to ensure that the Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law. They were responsible for enforcing the Islamic code of conduct and ensuring that the Muslims followed the religious practices prescribed by the Quran.
2. Monitoring Markets: Another important function of the Muhtasibs was to monitor the markets and ensure that the traders followed ethical practices. They were responsible for ensuring that the traders did not cheat their customers and that the weights and measures used in trade were accurate.
3. Collection of Zakat and Ushr: The Muhtasibs were responsible for collecting Zakat and Ushr, which were Islamic taxes levied on Muslims. They ensured that these taxes were collected and utilized for the benefit of the poor and needy.
4. Checking Pilgrimage Tax: The Muhtasibs also checked the payment of pilgrimage tax by the Hindus. This tax was levied on the non-Muslims who visited Muslim holy places. The Muhtasibs ensured that this tax was collected and utilized for the upkeep of the holy places.
5. Restricting Non-Muslims: The Muhtasibs were also responsible for ensuring that the non-Muslims did not carry arms. This was done to prevent any uprising against the Muslim rulers.
In conclusion, Muhtasibs played an important role in enforcing the Islamic code of conduct and ensuring that the Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law. They also monitored the markets, collected Zakat and Ushr, checked the payment of pilgrimage tax, and restricted the non-Muslims from carrying arms.
Role of Muhtasibs:
1. Enforcing Quranic Law: The primary role of the Muhtasibs was to ensure that the Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law. They were responsible for enforcing the Islamic code of conduct and ensuring that the Muslims followed the religious practices prescribed by the Quran.
2. Monitoring Markets: Another important function of the Muhtasibs was to monitor the markets and ensure that the traders followed ethical practices. They were responsible for ensuring that the traders did not cheat their customers and that the weights and measures used in trade were accurate.
3. Collection of Zakat and Ushr: The Muhtasibs were responsible for collecting Zakat and Ushr, which were Islamic taxes levied on Muslims. They ensured that these taxes were collected and utilized for the benefit of the poor and needy.
4. Checking Pilgrimage Tax: The Muhtasibs also checked the payment of pilgrimage tax by the Hindus. This tax was levied on the non-Muslims who visited Muslim holy places. The Muhtasibs ensured that this tax was collected and utilized for the upkeep of the holy places.
5. Restricting Non-Muslims: The Muhtasibs were also responsible for ensuring that the non-Muslims did not carry arms. This was done to prevent any uprising against the Muslim rulers.
In conclusion, Muhtasibs played an important role in enforcing the Islamic code of conduct and ensuring that the Muslims led their lives according to the Quranic law. They also monitored the markets, collected Zakat and Ushr, checked the payment of pilgrimage tax, and restricted the non-Muslims from carrying arms.
Aurangzeb abolished the practice of “Jharokha darshan” (the practice whereby the common people came to the ruler wiith their problems) because- a)It was needlessly popularised by Dara.
- b)It was a Hindu practice.
- c)It diminished the prestige and the authority of the emperor.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb abolished the practice of “Jharokha darshan” (the practice whereby the common people came to the ruler wiith their problems) because
a)
It was needlessly popularised by Dara.
b)
It was a Hindu practice.
c)
It diminished the prestige and the authority of the emperor.
d)
None of these.
|
Maulik Kulkarni answered |
The correct answer is option 'B' i.e. "It was a Hindu practice."
Explanation:
Jharokha Darshan was a practice in which the common people could come to the ruler with their problems and grievances. This practice was prevalent in the Mughal era, where people could approach the emperor in the palace through the jharokha or window.
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal Emperor, abolished this practice during his reign. The reason behind this was that Aurangzeb was a devout Muslim and believed that such practices were against Islamic principles. He considered the practice to be a Hindu tradition that had crept into the Mughal court.
Aurangzeb's decision to abolish Jharokha Darshan was also influenced by the fact that the practice had become too popular under the reign of his brother, Dara Shikoh. Dara Shikoh was known for his liberal views and was a patron of the arts and culture. He had popularized the practice of Jharokha Darshan, which had become a burden on the emperor's time and resources.
Aurangzeb saw the practice as a threat to his authority and prestige. He believed that he should be approached only through formal channels and not through informal practices like Jharokha Darshan. He also believed that the practice gave too much power to the common people and undermined the authority of the emperor.
In conclusion, Aurangzeb abolished the practice of Jharokha Darshan because he considered it to be a Hindu tradition that was against Islamic principles. He also saw it as a threat to his authority and prestige as the emperor of the Mughal Empire.
Explanation:
Jharokha Darshan was a practice in which the common people could come to the ruler with their problems and grievances. This practice was prevalent in the Mughal era, where people could approach the emperor in the palace through the jharokha or window.
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal Emperor, abolished this practice during his reign. The reason behind this was that Aurangzeb was a devout Muslim and believed that such practices were against Islamic principles. He considered the practice to be a Hindu tradition that had crept into the Mughal court.
Aurangzeb's decision to abolish Jharokha Darshan was also influenced by the fact that the practice had become too popular under the reign of his brother, Dara Shikoh. Dara Shikoh was known for his liberal views and was a patron of the arts and culture. He had popularized the practice of Jharokha Darshan, which had become a burden on the emperor's time and resources.
Aurangzeb saw the practice as a threat to his authority and prestige. He believed that he should be approached only through formal channels and not through informal practices like Jharokha Darshan. He also believed that the practice gave too much power to the common people and undermined the authority of the emperor.
In conclusion, Aurangzeb abolished the practice of Jharokha Darshan because he considered it to be a Hindu tradition that was against Islamic principles. He also saw it as a threat to his authority and prestige as the emperor of the Mughal Empire.
Prince Khurram (Shahjahan) rebelled against Jehangir in 1623 A.D. because of- a)The unfair treatment he got in the Deccan due to Jehangir.
- b)The intrigues of Nur Jahan.
- c)The excellent opportunity he had of declaring his independence in the Deccan.
- d)The harmful influence of Mahabat Khan.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Prince Khurram (Shahjahan) rebelled against Jehangir in 1623 A.D. because of
a)
The unfair treatment he got in the Deccan due to Jehangir.
b)
The intrigues of Nur Jahan.
c)
The excellent opportunity he had of declaring his independence in the Deccan.
d)
The harmful influence of Mahabat Khan.
|
|
Pushpa Sahu answered |
B
Aurangzeb discontinued the practice of inscribing Kalima on the coin because- a)It was a practice borrowed from the Turks.
- b)It would have been dishonoured by coming under the feet of the people.
- c)It hampered the smooth functioning of the escheat system.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb discontinued the practice of inscribing Kalima on the coin because
a)
It was a practice borrowed from the Turks.
b)
It would have been dishonoured by coming under the feet of the people.
c)
It hampered the smooth functioning of the escheat system.
d)
None of these.
|
Shreya Mehta answered |
Introduction:
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal emperor of India, ruled from 1658 to 1707. He made several policy changes during his reign, including the discontinuation of inscribing the Kalima (Islamic declaration of faith) on the coins.
Reasons for discontinuing the practice:
1. Dishonoring the Kalima:
The primary reason for discontinuing the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin was the concern that it would be dishonored by coming under the feet of the people. The Kalima holds immense religious significance for Muslims, and stepping on it would be considered disrespectful. Aurangzeb, being a devout and orthodox ruler, wanted to avoid any potential disrespect to the Kalima.
2. Borrowed Practice:
Another reason for discontinuing the practice was that it was borrowed from the Turks. Aurangzeb aimed to establish a more indigenous and Islamic administration, free from any external influences. By discontinuing the practice, he sought to distance himself from the Turkish influence on the Mughal Empire.
3. Smooth Functioning of Escheat System:
The escheat system refers to the process of transferring the property of a deceased person to the state when there are no legal heirs or beneficiaries. Some sources suggest that the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin hampered the smooth functioning of the escheat system. It is believed that the religious inscription on the coins created complications in determining the rightful ownership of the assets.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Aurangzeb discontinued the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin primarily because it would have been dishonored by coming under the feet of the people. Additionally, he aimed to establish a more indigenous and Islamic administration, free from external influences. The discontinuation of the practice also potentially contributed to the smooth functioning of the escheat system.
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal emperor of India, ruled from 1658 to 1707. He made several policy changes during his reign, including the discontinuation of inscribing the Kalima (Islamic declaration of faith) on the coins.
Reasons for discontinuing the practice:
1. Dishonoring the Kalima:
The primary reason for discontinuing the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin was the concern that it would be dishonored by coming under the feet of the people. The Kalima holds immense religious significance for Muslims, and stepping on it would be considered disrespectful. Aurangzeb, being a devout and orthodox ruler, wanted to avoid any potential disrespect to the Kalima.
2. Borrowed Practice:
Another reason for discontinuing the practice was that it was borrowed from the Turks. Aurangzeb aimed to establish a more indigenous and Islamic administration, free from any external influences. By discontinuing the practice, he sought to distance himself from the Turkish influence on the Mughal Empire.
3. Smooth Functioning of Escheat System:
The escheat system refers to the process of transferring the property of a deceased person to the state when there are no legal heirs or beneficiaries. Some sources suggest that the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin hampered the smooth functioning of the escheat system. It is believed that the religious inscription on the coins created complications in determining the rightful ownership of the assets.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Aurangzeb discontinued the practice of inscribing the Kalima on the coin primarily because it would have been dishonored by coming under the feet of the people. Additionally, he aimed to establish a more indigenous and Islamic administration, free from external influences. The discontinuation of the practice also potentially contributed to the smooth functioning of the escheat system.
Qandhar was lost again by the Mughals during the reign of- a)Shahjahan
- b)Aurangzeb
- c)Bahadur Shah I
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Qandhar was lost again by the Mughals during the reign of
a)
Shahjahan
b)
Aurangzeb
c)
Bahadur Shah I
d)
None of these
|
|
Ræjû Bhæï answered |
From Babur to Jahangir the Mughal rulers with some exceptions after the Persian invasion of Kandahar were able to regain it but during the reign of Shah Jahan Kandahar were lost by the Mughals forever and became part of Persia.
Match the following:
- a)[A-I], [B-III], [C-II]
- b)[A-III], [B-II], [C-I]
- c)[A-II], [B-I], [C-III]
- d)[A-III], [B-I], [C-II]
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Match the following:
a)
[A-I], [B-III], [C-II]
b)
[A-III], [B-II], [C-I]
c)
[A-II], [B-I], [C-III]
d)
[A-III], [B-I], [C-II]
|
|
वर्तिका answered |
Promulgation of Din-i-ilahi in 1582
Abolition of Jaziya in 1579
conquest of Gujrat in 1573
Abolition of Jaziya in 1579
conquest of Gujrat in 1573
Aurangzeb reimposed Jaziya in- a)1675
- b)1679
- c)1681
- d)1682
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb reimposed Jaziya in
a)
1675
b)
1679
c)
1681
d)
1682
|
Kiran Mehta answered |
Aurangzeb, the sixth emperor, re-introduced and levied jizya on non-Muslims in 2nd April 1679. His goal was to promote Islam and weaken the Hindu religion.
The tomb of Jehangir was built at Shahdara during the reign of- a)Jehangir
- b)Shahjahan
- c)Aurangzeb
- d)Bahadur Shah I
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The tomb of Jehangir was built at Shahdara during the reign of
a)
Jehangir
b)
Shahjahan
c)
Aurangzeb
d)
Bahadur Shah I
|
|
Deepak Kapoor answered |
The tomb of Jahangir was built after the Mughal emperor's death in 1627 and completed in 1637, in the reign of his son and successor, Shah Jahan, when the Mughal Empire held sway over the entire Indian subcontinent and Lahore was an important urban center.
The Hadas remained high in Akbar’s favour without any matrimonial ties with him. They belonged to- a)Ranthambor
- b)Udaipur
- c)Jodhpur
- d)Malwa
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Hadas remained high in Akbar’s favour without any matrimonial ties with him. They belonged to
a)
Ranthambor
b)
Udaipur
c)
Jodhpur
d)
Malwa
|
|
Garima Desai answered |
A is the correct option.Akbar’s marriage relations with rajpoot princes had forced him to initiate some liberal actions. No matrimonial relations were established with the Hadas of Ranthambore, yet they remained high in Akbar’s favour without any matrimonial ties with him.
Akbar’s enlightened religious policy was based on his philosophy of Sulh-i-kul which meant- a)Universal tolerance
- b)Universal peace
- c)Enlightened benevolence
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Akbar’s enlightened religious policy was based on his philosophy of Sulh-i-kul which meant
a)
Universal tolerance
b)
Universal peace
c)
Enlightened benevolence
d)
None of these
|
|
Anuj Kumar answered |
Akbars enlightened religious policy was based on his philosophy of Sulh-i-kul which meant Universal peace.
Explanation:
Akbars enlightened religious policy was based on his philosophy of Sulh-i-kul, which meant universal peace. This policy was a significant departure from the religious intolerance that had characterized previous Mughal rulers. Akbar believed in promoting religious harmony and tolerance among his subjects, regardless of their faith.
Religious Tolerance:
Under Akbar's rule, religious tolerance was encouraged and promoted. He abolished the discriminatory jizya tax on non-Muslims and allowed people of different religions to practice their faith freely. Akbar held discussions with scholars from various religious traditions, including Hinduism, Jainism, and Christianity, to gain a better understanding of different beliefs and foster mutual respect.
Sulh-i-kul:
Sulh-i-kul, which means universal peace, was the guiding principle behind Akbar's religious policy. He believed that peace and harmony could be achieved by creating an atmosphere of understanding and respect among people of different religions. Akbar considered himself the arbiter of all religious disputes and encouraged dialogue and debate among scholars to promote mutual understanding and tolerance.
Din-i-Ilahi:
As part of his religious policy, Akbar also attempted to create a syncretic faith called Din-i-Ilahi, which aimed to incorporate aspects of different religions into a single belief system. However, this faith did not gain widespread acceptance and remained limited to a small circle of Akbar's courtiers.
Legacy:
Akbar's religious policy had a lasting impact on the Mughal Empire. It created an environment of religious harmony and tolerance, which allowed people of different faiths to coexist peacefully. This policy also contributed to the cultural and intellectual development of the empire, as scholars from different religious and cultural backgrounds were able to exchange ideas and knowledge.
Conclusion:
Akbars philosophy of Sulh-i-kul, which meant universal peace, was the foundation of his enlightened religious policy. By promoting religious tolerance and creating an atmosphere of understanding, Akbar aimed to ensure peace and harmony among his subjects. His policy had a significant impact on the Mughal Empire and set a precedent for religious tolerance that would influence future rulers in the region.
Explanation:
Akbars enlightened religious policy was based on his philosophy of Sulh-i-kul, which meant universal peace. This policy was a significant departure from the religious intolerance that had characterized previous Mughal rulers. Akbar believed in promoting religious harmony and tolerance among his subjects, regardless of their faith.
Religious Tolerance:
Under Akbar's rule, religious tolerance was encouraged and promoted. He abolished the discriminatory jizya tax on non-Muslims and allowed people of different religions to practice their faith freely. Akbar held discussions with scholars from various religious traditions, including Hinduism, Jainism, and Christianity, to gain a better understanding of different beliefs and foster mutual respect.
Sulh-i-kul:
Sulh-i-kul, which means universal peace, was the guiding principle behind Akbar's religious policy. He believed that peace and harmony could be achieved by creating an atmosphere of understanding and respect among people of different religions. Akbar considered himself the arbiter of all religious disputes and encouraged dialogue and debate among scholars to promote mutual understanding and tolerance.
Din-i-Ilahi:
As part of his religious policy, Akbar also attempted to create a syncretic faith called Din-i-Ilahi, which aimed to incorporate aspects of different religions into a single belief system. However, this faith did not gain widespread acceptance and remained limited to a small circle of Akbar's courtiers.
Legacy:
Akbar's religious policy had a lasting impact on the Mughal Empire. It created an environment of religious harmony and tolerance, which allowed people of different faiths to coexist peacefully. This policy also contributed to the cultural and intellectual development of the empire, as scholars from different religious and cultural backgrounds were able to exchange ideas and knowledge.
Conclusion:
Akbars philosophy of Sulh-i-kul, which meant universal peace, was the foundation of his enlightened religious policy. By promoting religious tolerance and creating an atmosphere of understanding, Akbar aimed to ensure peace and harmony among his subjects. His policy had a significant impact on the Mughal Empire and set a precedent for religious tolerance that would influence future rulers in the region.
The Afghan ruler of Malwa who fought against Akbar from 1560 to 1562 A.D. was- a)Asaf Khan
- b)Baz Bahadur
- c)Najibudaulah Khan
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Afghan ruler of Malwa who fought against Akbar from 1560 to 1562 A.D. was
a)
Asaf Khan
b)
Baz Bahadur
c)
Najibudaulah Khan
d)
None of these
|
|
Prasad Chatterjee answered |
The Afghan ruler of Malwa who fought against Akbar from 1560 to 1562 A.D. was Baz Bahadur. Baz Bahadur was the last independent ruler of Malwa, a region in central India. He was born in 1531 and ascended to the throne in 1555 at the age of 24.
Baz Bahadur's Rule in Malwa:
Baz Bahadur is known for his love for music and poetry. During his reign, he patronized many musicians and poets, including the famous court musician Tansen. He was also known for his military skills and bravery.
Conflict with Akbar:
In 1561, the Mughal emperor Akbar sent his general Adham Khan to attack Malwa. Akbar wanted to expand his empire and bring Malwa under his control. Baz Bahadur resisted the Mughal invasion and fought against Akbar's forces. The conflict between Baz Bahadur and Akbar lasted for about two years, from 1560 to 1562.
Defeat and Surrender:
Despite his initial resistance, Baz Bahadur was eventually defeated by the superior forces of Akbar. He was forced to surrender and submit to Mughal authority. After his defeat, Baz Bahadur was allowed to retain his title and was appointed as a mansabdar (officer) in the Mughal court.
Consequences:
The defeat of Baz Bahadur marked the end of independent rule in Malwa. The region came under Mughal control and became a part of the Mughal Empire. Akbar's victory in Malwa further strengthened his empire and consolidated his rule over a larger part of India.
Conclusion:
Baz Bahadur was the Afghan ruler of Malwa who fought against Akbar from 1560 to 1562 A.D. He was known for his love for music and poetry, as well as his military skills. However, he was eventually defeated by Akbar and Malwa came under Mughal control.
Baz Bahadur's Rule in Malwa:
Baz Bahadur is known for his love for music and poetry. During his reign, he patronized many musicians and poets, including the famous court musician Tansen. He was also known for his military skills and bravery.
Conflict with Akbar:
In 1561, the Mughal emperor Akbar sent his general Adham Khan to attack Malwa. Akbar wanted to expand his empire and bring Malwa under his control. Baz Bahadur resisted the Mughal invasion and fought against Akbar's forces. The conflict between Baz Bahadur and Akbar lasted for about two years, from 1560 to 1562.
Defeat and Surrender:
Despite his initial resistance, Baz Bahadur was eventually defeated by the superior forces of Akbar. He was forced to surrender and submit to Mughal authority. After his defeat, Baz Bahadur was allowed to retain his title and was appointed as a mansabdar (officer) in the Mughal court.
Consequences:
The defeat of Baz Bahadur marked the end of independent rule in Malwa. The region came under Mughal control and became a part of the Mughal Empire. Akbar's victory in Malwa further strengthened his empire and consolidated his rule over a larger part of India.
Conclusion:
Baz Bahadur was the Afghan ruler of Malwa who fought against Akbar from 1560 to 1562 A.D. He was known for his love for music and poetry, as well as his military skills. However, he was eventually defeated by Akbar and Malwa came under Mughal control.
Which of the following is incorrect about the institution ofVakil under Akbar?- a)Bairam Khan was the ‘limited’ vakil.
- b)Akbar transferred and appointed vakils.
- c)The institution of Diwan was created to curb the power of the vakil.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is incorrect about the institution ofVakil under Akbar?
a)
Bairam Khan was the ‘limited’ vakil.
b)
Akbar transferred and appointed vakils.
c)
The institution of Diwan was created to curb the power of the vakil.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Sagar Chavan answered |
During era of Babur and Humayun, it had the powers of prime minister while during early era of Akbar, Vakil Bairam Khan acted as regent and ruled on the behalf of Emperor.
Jehangir’s greatest achievement was the signing of a peace treaty with Mewar in 1614. Which was not one of its clauses?- a)Chittor fort was to be repaired.
- b)Prince Karan got a mansab of 5000 zat/sawar at Jehangir’s court.
- c)Rana Amar Singh was to supply 1,500 horses to the Mughals.
- d)All territories including Chittor were given to Rana Amar Singh.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Jehangir’s greatest achievement was the signing of a peace treaty with Mewar in 1614. Which was not one of its clauses?
a)
Chittor fort was to be repaired.
b)
Prince Karan got a mansab of 5000 zat/sawar at Jehangir’s court.
c)
Rana Amar Singh was to supply 1,500 horses to the Mughals.
d)
All territories including Chittor were given to Rana Amar Singh.
|
|
Pragati Banerjee answered |
A is the correct option.In the treaty, it was agreed that:
- The ruler of Mewar, will not be bound to present himself in person at Mughal court, instead, a relative of the Rana would wait upon the Mughal Emperor and serve him.
- It was also agreed that the Ranas of Mewar would not enter matrimonial relations with the Mughals.
- Mewar would have to keep a contingent of 1500 horsemen in the Mughal service.
- Chittor and other Mughal occupied areas of Mewar would be returned to the Rana, but Chittor fort would never be repaired. The reason for this last condition was that the Chittor fort was a very powerful bastion and the mughals were wary of it being used in any future rebellion.
- The Rana would be given a Mughal rank of 5000 zat and 5000 sowar.
- The rulers of Dungarpur and Banswarra (who had become independent during Akbars reign) would once again become vassals of Mewar and pay tribute to the Rana
Which of the following is correct about the system of escheat under Akbar?- a)The deceased noble’s property was inherited by his son.
- b)The deceased noble’s property was given to his widow.
- c)The deceased noble’s property was taken away by the State.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is correct about the system of escheat under Akbar?
a)
The deceased noble’s property was inherited by his son.
b)
The deceased noble’s property was given to his widow.
c)
The deceased noble’s property was taken away by the State.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Kajal Chopra answered |
the law of escheat (zabti), according to which when a Mansabdar died, all his property was confiscated by the king. The Mansabdari system, introduced by Akbar, was a unique feature of the administrative system of the Mughal empire.
What is the correct sequence of the following battles?I. Battlee of Haldighati
II. Battle of Chausa
III. Battle of Samel
IV. Second Battle of the Panipat
V. Battle of Bilgram- a)I, II, IV, III, V
- b)II, V, III, IV, I
- c)I, II, III, IV, V
- d)II, V, IV, III, I
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the correct sequence of the following battles?
I. Battlee of Haldighati
II. Battle of Chausa
III. Battle of Samel
IV. Second Battle of the Panipat
V. Battle of Bilgram
II. Battle of Chausa
III. Battle of Samel
IV. Second Battle of the Panipat
V. Battle of Bilgram
a)
I, II, IV, III, V
b)
II, V, III, IV, I
c)
I, II, III, IV, V
d)
II, V, IV, III, I
|
|
Priya Shah answered |
The correct answer is B as the correct sequence of the battles is B
Aurangzeb followed an aggressive policy towards the Rajputs because- a)The Rajputs were slowly beginning to challenge the might of the Mughal empire.
- b)The Rajputs had come to occupy many high posts in the Mughal administration.
- c)Aurangzeb did not want the Rajputs to hinder the Islamisation of India.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb followed an aggressive policy towards the Rajputs because
a)
The Rajputs were slowly beginning to challenge the might of the Mughal empire.
b)
The Rajputs had come to occupy many high posts in the Mughal administration.
c)
Aurangzeb did not want the Rajputs to hinder the Islamisation of India.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Nitin Unni answered |
Aurangzeb followed an aggressive policy towards the Rajputs because Aurangzeb did not want the Rajputs to hinder the Islamisation of India.
In which language did Babur wrote his memoirs, called “Tuzuk-i-Baburi”?- a)Turkish
- b)Arabic
- c)Mongol
- d)Persian
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In which language did Babur wrote his memoirs, called “Tuzuk-i-Baburi”?
a)
Turkish
b)
Arabic
c)
Mongol
d)
Persian
|
|
Poulomi Nambiar answered |
Baburnama, also known as Tuzk-e-Babri, was written in the Chagatai language, a Turkic language that was prevalent during the time of Babur.
Which is true about the Deccan policy of Shah Jahan?- a)Ahmadnagar was lost.
- b)Ahmadnagar was lost but Bijapur was annexed.
- c)Ahmadnagar was annexed and Bijapur and Golkunda were defeated.
- d)Ahmadnagar was annexed and Bijapur and Golkunda could not be defeated
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which is true about the Deccan policy of Shah Jahan?
a)
Ahmadnagar was lost.
b)
Ahmadnagar was lost but Bijapur was annexed.
c)
Ahmadnagar was annexed and Bijapur and Golkunda were defeated.
d)
Ahmadnagar was annexed and Bijapur and Golkunda could not be defeated
|
|
Akshara Basak answered |
When Babur attacked India there were six Muslim states, viz., Khandesh, Berar, Ahmadnagar, Bijapur, Golkunda and Bidar and one Hindu state, i.e., Vijayanagar in the South. According to Babur, the state of Vijayanagar was the strongest among them. However, Babur and Humayun could not pay any attention towards the South.
By the time Akbar interfered in politics of the Deccan, the political situation had changed there. In January 1565 A.D.,Ahmadnagar was annexed and Bijapur and Golkunda were defeated.
Which of the following describes the correct division of Akbar’s empire in descending order?- a)Sarkar, Subah, Pargana
- b)Pargana, Subah, Sarkar
- c)Subah, Pargana, Sarkar
- d)Subah, Sarkar, Pargana
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following describes the correct division of Akbar’s empire in descending order?
a)
Sarkar, Subah, Pargana
b)
Pargana, Subah, Sarkar
c)
Subah, Pargana, Sarkar
d)
Subah, Sarkar, Pargana
|
|
Anjali Kumar answered |
The answer is option (D) as the divisions were;
Subah was the term for a province in the Mughal Empire. The word is derived from Arabic. The governor of a Subah was known as a subahdar (sometimes also referred to as a "Subah"[64]), which later became subedar to refer to an officer in the Indian Army. The subahs were established by padshah (emperor) Akbar during his administrative reforms of 1572–1580; initially, they numbered 12, but his conquests expanded the number of subahs to 15 by the end of his reign. Subahs were divided into Sarkars, or districts. Sarkars were further divided into Parganas or Mahals. His successors, most notably Aurangzeb, expanded the number of subahs further through their conquests. As the empire began to dissolve in the early 18th century, many subahs became effectively independent, or were conquered by the Marathas or the British.
Subah was the term for a province in the Mughal Empire. The word is derived from Arabic. The governor of a Subah was known as a subahdar (sometimes also referred to as a "Subah"[64]), which later became subedar to refer to an officer in the Indian Army. The subahs were established by padshah (emperor) Akbar during his administrative reforms of 1572–1580; initially, they numbered 12, but his conquests expanded the number of subahs to 15 by the end of his reign. Subahs were divided into Sarkars, or districts. Sarkars were further divided into Parganas or Mahals. His successors, most notably Aurangzeb, expanded the number of subahs further through their conquests. As the empire began to dissolve in the early 18th century, many subahs became effectively independent, or were conquered by the Marathas or the British.
Pick out the two Persian master-painters who came to India with Humayun and later served under Akbar from among the following:I. Khwaja Abdus Samad
II. Sayyid Ali Tabreji
III. Farukh Beg
IV. Tamshad- a)I, II
- b)II, III
- c)III, IV
- d)I, IV
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Pick out the two Persian master-painters who came to India with Humayun and later served under Akbar from among the following:
I. Khwaja Abdus Samad
II. Sayyid Ali Tabreji
III. Farukh Beg
IV. Tamshad
II. Sayyid Ali Tabreji
III. Farukh Beg
IV. Tamshad
a)
I, II
b)
II, III
c)
III, IV
d)
I, IV
|
|
Rahul Mehta answered |
The Iranian painters were brought by Humayun were Mir Sayyid Ali and Abdus Samad. Both the painters were the founders of an independent branch of Persian art popularly known as the Mughal school of miniature painting. The two most notable works accomplished by them during the reign of Akbar was Tutinama and Hamza Nama.
There were some rebellions during Aurangzeb’s reign including those of the Jats, the Satnamis, the Sikhs and so on. Which was possibly the most important cause for their outbreak?- a)Aurangzeb’s religious policy
- b)Aurangzeb’s Deccan policy
- c)Aurangzeb’s land revenue policy
- d)The agrarian crisis
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
There were some rebellions during Aurangzeb’s reign including those of the Jats, the Satnamis, the Sikhs and so on. Which was possibly the most important cause for their outbreak?
a)
Aurangzeb’s religious policy
b)
Aurangzeb’s Deccan policy
c)
Aurangzeb’s land revenue policy
d)
The agrarian crisis
|
|
Kavya Datta answered |
There were instances where peasants refused to pay land revenue and such villages were designated as mawas and zor-talab. Initially the acts of defiance by the peasantry were mere isolated incidents perhaps due to varied level of distress, but later on in this struggle the peasants and zamidnars usually joined hands. The zatnindars could be chieftains or could be a person having rights over portion of a village, but they formed a distinct class enjoying common rights like commanding armed retainers and were the leader of caste group. Some of these zamidnars' like Shobha Singh's rebellion (1695-98) in Bengal had, in fact, shaken the empire and similarly in Kuch-Behar, Bhim Narayan was able to expel the Mughal troops and officials.24 These frequent rebellion produced agrarian crisis. The Jats of Agra region, the Satnamis, the Sikhs and many more rose in revolt during Aurangzeb's reign because of the Agrarian Crisis.
The credit for the defeat of Mahabat Khan during Jehangir’s reign goes to- a)Nur Jahan
- b)Jehangir
- c)Asaf Khan
- d)Shahjahan
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The credit for the defeat of Mahabat Khan during Jehangir’s reign goes to
a)
Nur Jahan
b)
Jehangir
c)
Asaf Khan
d)
Shahjahan
|
Abhishek Rathore answered |
The correct answer is
Option A Nur Jahan
Option A Nur Jahan
Aurangzeb discouraged painting because- a)Many non-Muslims had earned proficiency in painting.
- b)It could weaken the senses of the people.
- c)It was against the sanctions of Islam.
- d)A lot of money that could be used for strengthening the Mughal army was spent onit.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Aurangzeb discouraged painting because
a)
Many non-Muslims had earned proficiency in painting.
b)
It could weaken the senses of the people.
c)
It was against the sanctions of Islam.
d)
A lot of money that could be used for strengthening the Mughal army was spent onit.
|
|
Nandini Bose answered |
Introduction
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal emperor, had a controversial reign marked by a strict interpretation of Islamic principles. His stance against painting can be understood through his religious beliefs and the socio-political context of his time.
Religious Beliefs
- Aurangzeb followed a conservative interpretation of Islam, which viewed the depiction of living beings, especially humans, as contrary to Islamic tenets.
- The creation of images was seen as an imitation of God's creation, which many scholars argued was forbidden in Islam.
Impact on Culture
- Under Aurangzeb's rule, there was a noticeable decline in the arts, particularly painting, which flourished under previous emperors like Akbar and Jahangir.
- His policies led to a cultural shift that emphasized religious orthodoxy over artistic expression.
Political Context
- Aurangzeb believed that promoting painting could distract people from their religious duties and responsibilities, weakening their senses and commitment to Islam.
- He aimed to consolidate power and strengthen the Mughal Empire, often prioritizing military and administrative needs over artistic endeavors.
Conclusion
In summary, option 'C', which states that Aurangzeb discouraged painting because it was against the sanctions of Islam, accurately reflects his motivations. His reign marked a significant shift from the cultural patronage of his predecessors to a more austere and orthodox approach, deeply rooted in his interpretation of Islamic law. This led to a decline in artistic expressions, particularly painting, which he perceived as a threat to religious purity and societal focus.
Aurangzeb, the sixth Mughal emperor, had a controversial reign marked by a strict interpretation of Islamic principles. His stance against painting can be understood through his religious beliefs and the socio-political context of his time.
Religious Beliefs
- Aurangzeb followed a conservative interpretation of Islam, which viewed the depiction of living beings, especially humans, as contrary to Islamic tenets.
- The creation of images was seen as an imitation of God's creation, which many scholars argued was forbidden in Islam.
Impact on Culture
- Under Aurangzeb's rule, there was a noticeable decline in the arts, particularly painting, which flourished under previous emperors like Akbar and Jahangir.
- His policies led to a cultural shift that emphasized religious orthodoxy over artistic expression.
Political Context
- Aurangzeb believed that promoting painting could distract people from their religious duties and responsibilities, weakening their senses and commitment to Islam.
- He aimed to consolidate power and strengthen the Mughal Empire, often prioritizing military and administrative needs over artistic endeavors.
Conclusion
In summary, option 'C', which states that Aurangzeb discouraged painting because it was against the sanctions of Islam, accurately reflects his motivations. His reign marked a significant shift from the cultural patronage of his predecessors to a more austere and orthodox approach, deeply rooted in his interpretation of Islamic law. This led to a decline in artistic expressions, particularly painting, which he perceived as a threat to religious purity and societal focus.
Jehangir’s faithful general Mahabat Khan revolted against him in 1626 A.D. because- a)Mahabat Khan wanted to rule independently in Bengal and Bihar.
- b)His son was executed by Jehangir.
- c)Of Nur Jahan’s intrigues.
- d)All of the above.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Jehangir’s faithful general Mahabat Khan revolted against him in 1626 A.D. because
a)
Mahabat Khan wanted to rule independently in Bengal and Bihar.
b)
His son was executed by Jehangir.
c)
Of Nur Jahan’s intrigues.
d)
All of the above.
|
Anirban Datta answered |
As a result of Nur Jahan's machinations against Jahangir, Mahabat Khan decided to take action, and so in 1626, he led an army of loyal Rajput soldiers to Punjab. He had also brought the wives and families of many of them, so that, if driven to extremity, they would fight to the last for the lives and honour of themselves and their families. Meanwhile, Jahangir and his retinue were preparing to head to Kabul, and were encamped on the banks of the River Jhelum. Mahabat Khan and his forces attacked the royal encampment, and successfully took the emperor hostage; Nur Jahan, however, managed to escape.
The immediate cause of Shahjahan’s rebellion against Jehangir was- a)That Shahjahan had become too powerful.
- b)That Shahjahan had insulted Jehangir in the Mughal court cover the question of Deccan.
- c)That Shahjahan refused to go to Qandhar which had been beseiged by the Persians.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The immediate cause of Shahjahan’s rebellion against Jehangir was
a)
That Shahjahan had become too powerful.
b)
That Shahjahan had insulted Jehangir in the Mughal court cover the question of Deccan.
c)
That Shahjahan refused to go to Qandhar which had been beseiged by the Persians.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Deepak Kapoor answered |
Option C is correct. The immediate cause of Shahjahan's rebellion against Jahangir was that Shahjahan refused to go to Qandhar, which had been besieged by the Persians. Shahjahan believed that Jahangir's orders were reckless and that he should not have to risk his life in such a risky campaign. This led to a rift between the two and eventually resulted in Shahjahan's rebellion against Jahangir.
Which of the following is incorrect about Akbar’smansabdari system?- a)It was for the military only.
- b)Mansab meant a rank.
- c)The ranks were divided into zat and sawar .
- d)It centralised the bureaucracy.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is incorrect about Akbar’smansabdari system?
a)
It was for the military only.
b)
Mansab meant a rank.
c)
The ranks were divided into zat and sawar .
d)
It centralised the bureaucracy.
|
|
Saumya Iyer answered |
Akbar introduced a new system for regulating imperial services which was called Mansabdari system. It was introduced in 1570 A. D. All the gazette imperial officers of the state were styled as Mansabdars. They were classified into (66) grades, from the rank of (10) to ten thousands (10,000) constituted. The (10) was the lowest rank and the ten thousand (10,000) was the highest. The Mansabdars belonged to both Civil and Military department.
Which of the following statements are correct with regard to the Mughal expedition into Balkha and Badakhshan?
(i) There was the proclaimed desire on the part of the Mughal emperors to recover their ancestral lands
(ii) Shahjahan wanted to punish Nazr Muhammad the ruler of Balkh and Badakhashan, who had an eye on Kabul
(iii) Shahjahan wanted to enthrone Prince Dara Shukoh as an independent ruler of Balkh
(iv) Shahjahan desired to assign Badakhshan in Jagir to prince Aurangzeb
Select the answer from the options given below:
- a)(i), (ii) and (iii) only
- b)(i) and (iii) only
.
- c)(i) and (ii) only
- d)(ii) and (iii) only
.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements are correct with regard to the Mughal expedition into Balkha and Badakhshan?
(i) There was the proclaimed desire on the part of the Mughal emperors to recover their ancestral lands
(ii) Shahjahan wanted to punish Nazr Muhammad the ruler of Balkh and Badakhashan, who had an eye on Kabul
(iii) Shahjahan wanted to enthrone Prince Dara Shukoh as an independent ruler of Balkh
(iv) Shahjahan desired to assign Badakhshan in Jagir to prince Aurangzeb
Select the answer from the options given below:
a)
(i), (ii) and (iii) only
b)
(i) and (iii) only
.
c)
(i) and (ii) only
d)
(ii) and (iii) only
.
|
|
Simran Chakraborty answered |
(i) and (ii) only
- In 1646-1647, Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan launched a military expedition to conqueror Balkh and the neighbouring province of Badakhashan. This campaign was to be the first step in the expansion of Mughal rule into Central Asia, where the Ferghana valley lay.
- Ferghana valley was the homeland of the Babur, the first Mughal Emperor and the founder of the dynasty in India.
- Following are the reasons why Emperor Shah Jahan undertook this campaign-
- The first and foremost reason was the proclaimed desire on the part of the Mughal emperors to recover their ancestral lands. As direct descendants of Tamerlane, the Mughals of India considered Central Asia their true home and ancestral domain.
- In 1628, Nazr Mohammed launched a large-scale invasion of Mughal territory with the intention of capturing Kabul. Shahjahan wanted to punish Nar Muhammad the ruler of Balkh and Badakhashan, who had an eye on Kabul.
- Hence, Shah Jahan dispatched an army of 60,000 to Kabul, and then to Badakhshan and Balkh, with his son Murad Baksh as the commander-in-chief. Shahjahan never wanted to enthrone Prince Dara Shukoh as an independent ruler of Balkh.
- Shah Jahan appointed Prince Aurangzeb, then serving as the governor of Gujarat, to lead operations in Central Asia. But he never desired to assign Badakhshan in Jagir to prince Aurangzeb.
- Aurangzeb arrived in Kabul in April 1647 and set out for Balkh to reinforce the Mughal forward positions and expand the campaign.
- By the middle of 1647, both sides had suffered considerably from the back-and-forth fighting. Shortly after Aurangzeb had returned to Balkh, negotiations were opened with Nadr Mohammed, the exiled ex-ruler of the territories occupied by the Mughals since 1645.
- A settlement was concluded by Nadr Mohammed's grandsons and Balkh was formally handed over to the grandsons, and the Mughals began the withdrawal to Kabul.
What is the correct chronology of the following events of Akbar’s reign?I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax
II. Abolition of Jaziya
III. Introduction of Dagh
IV. Issue of Mahjar
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi- a)I, II, III, IV, V
- b)II, III, IV, I, V
- c)I, II, III, V, IV
- d)IV, III, II, I, V
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the correct chronology of the following events of Akbar’s reign?
I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax
II. Abolition of Jaziya
III. Introduction of Dagh
IV. Issue of Mahjar
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi
II. Abolition of Jaziya
III. Introduction of Dagh
IV. Issue of Mahjar
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi
a)
I, II, III, IV, V
b)
II, III, IV, I, V
c)
I, II, III, V, IV
d)
IV, III, II, I, V
|
|
Arnab Kulkarni answered |
Chronology of Events in Akbar's Reign:
I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax
II. Abolition of Jaziya
III. Introduction of Dagh
IV. Issue of Mahjar
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi
Explanation:
I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax: Akbar abolished the pilgrim tax in 1563, which was a tax levied on Hindu pilgrims visiting holy places in the country. This move was aimed at promoting religious harmony and reducing the burden on the common people.
II. Abolition of Jaziya: In 1564, Akbar abolished the Jaziya tax, which was a tax levied on non-Muslims living in the country. This move was aimed at promoting religious tolerance and reducing the burden on the common people.
III. Introduction of Dagh: Akbar introduced the Dagh system in 1572, which was a system of branding horses to prevent fraud in the army. This move was aimed at improving the efficiency of the army.
IV. Issue of Mahjar: In 1579, Akbar issued the Mahjar, which was a decree that allowed people to migrate freely within the country without any restrictions. This move was aimed at promoting economic growth and development.
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi: In 1582, Akbar proclaimed the Tauhit-i-Ilahi, which was a new religion that he had founded. This move was aimed at promoting religious tolerance and reducing the influence of the orthodox clergy.
Therefore, the correct chronology of events in Akbar's reign is I, II, III, IV, V.
I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax
II. Abolition of Jaziya
III. Introduction of Dagh
IV. Issue of Mahjar
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi
Explanation:
I. Abolition of Pilgrim tax: Akbar abolished the pilgrim tax in 1563, which was a tax levied on Hindu pilgrims visiting holy places in the country. This move was aimed at promoting religious harmony and reducing the burden on the common people.
II. Abolition of Jaziya: In 1564, Akbar abolished the Jaziya tax, which was a tax levied on non-Muslims living in the country. This move was aimed at promoting religious tolerance and reducing the burden on the common people.
III. Introduction of Dagh: Akbar introduced the Dagh system in 1572, which was a system of branding horses to prevent fraud in the army. This move was aimed at improving the efficiency of the army.
IV. Issue of Mahjar: In 1579, Akbar issued the Mahjar, which was a decree that allowed people to migrate freely within the country without any restrictions. This move was aimed at promoting economic growth and development.
V. Proclamation of Tauhit-i-Ilahi: In 1582, Akbar proclaimed the Tauhit-i-Ilahi, which was a new religion that he had founded. This move was aimed at promoting religious tolerance and reducing the influence of the orthodox clergy.
Therefore, the correct chronology of events in Akbar's reign is I, II, III, IV, V.
Which of the following were French visitors to the Mughal empire all of whom were in India in 1666?I. Tavernier
II. Bernier
III. Thevenot
IV. Manucci- a)I, II, III
- b)II, III, IV
- c)I, III, IV
- d)II, IV
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following were French visitors to the Mughal empire all of whom were in India in 1666?
I. Tavernier
II. Bernier
III. Thevenot
IV. Manucci
II. Bernier
III. Thevenot
IV. Manucci
a)
I, II, III
b)
II, III, IV
c)
I, III, IV
d)
II, IV
|
|
Shanaya Desai answered |
French visitors to the Mughal empire in 1666:
- Tavernier
- Bernier
- Thevenot
- Manucci
Explanation:
In 1666, there were several French visitors who came to the Mughal empire in India. These visitors played significant roles in documenting and understanding various aspects of the Mughal empire during that time.
I. Tavernier:
Jean-Baptiste Tavernier was a French gem merchant and traveler who visited the Mughal empire multiple times between 1638 and 1668. He had a keen interest in the Indian subcontinent and its riches. Tavernier's travel accounts provide valuable insights into the Mughal court, its rulers, and the state of the empire during his visits.
II. Bernier:
François Bernier was a French physician and traveler who arrived in India in 1658 and stayed for several years. He became acquainted with the Mughal court and its nobles, including Emperor Aurangzeb. Bernier's observations and writings provide important information about the Mughal society, culture, and administration.
III. Thevenot:
Jean de Thévenot was a French traveler who visited the Mughal empire in the mid-17th century. He explored various regions of the empire, including Gujarat, Delhi, and Agra. Thevenot's travel writings give detailed descriptions of the places he visited and the people he encountered, shedding light on the Mughal society and its customs.
IV. Manucci:
Niccolao Manucci was an Italian adventurer who served in the Mughal court and military. Although not French, he is included in the options because he interacted with and worked alongside French visitors during his time in India. Manucci's memoirs provide valuable insights into the Mughal court, its politics, and the lives of its nobles.
Conclusion:
In 1666, the French visitors to the Mughal empire in India were Tavernier, Bernier, and Thevenot. Although Manucci was not French, he had significant interactions with the French visitors and his memoirs contribute to our understanding of the Mughal empire during that period. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - I, II, III.
- Tavernier
- Bernier
- Thevenot
- Manucci
Explanation:
In 1666, there were several French visitors who came to the Mughal empire in India. These visitors played significant roles in documenting and understanding various aspects of the Mughal empire during that time.
I. Tavernier:
Jean-Baptiste Tavernier was a French gem merchant and traveler who visited the Mughal empire multiple times between 1638 and 1668. He had a keen interest in the Indian subcontinent and its riches. Tavernier's travel accounts provide valuable insights into the Mughal court, its rulers, and the state of the empire during his visits.
II. Bernier:
François Bernier was a French physician and traveler who arrived in India in 1658 and stayed for several years. He became acquainted with the Mughal court and its nobles, including Emperor Aurangzeb. Bernier's observations and writings provide important information about the Mughal society, culture, and administration.
III. Thevenot:
Jean de Thévenot was a French traveler who visited the Mughal empire in the mid-17th century. He explored various regions of the empire, including Gujarat, Delhi, and Agra. Thevenot's travel writings give detailed descriptions of the places he visited and the people he encountered, shedding light on the Mughal society and its customs.
IV. Manucci:
Niccolao Manucci was an Italian adventurer who served in the Mughal court and military. Although not French, he is included in the options because he interacted with and worked alongside French visitors during his time in India. Manucci's memoirs provide valuable insights into the Mughal court, its politics, and the lives of its nobles.
Conclusion:
In 1666, the French visitors to the Mughal empire in India were Tavernier, Bernier, and Thevenot. Although Manucci was not French, he had significant interactions with the French visitors and his memoirs contribute to our understanding of the Mughal empire during that period. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - I, II, III.
Which of the following reasons was not responsible for the downfall of Bairam Khan?- a)He had no desire to increase his power.
- b)He disregarded Akbar’s wishes.
- c)His intolerable behaviour towards his nobility.
- d)He got Tardi Beg and other Turanis executed.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following reasons was not responsible for the downfall of Bairam Khan?
a)
He had no desire to increase his power.
b)
He disregarded Akbar’s wishes.
c)
His intolerable behaviour towards his nobility.
d)
He got Tardi Beg and other Turanis executed.
|
|
Nandini Saha answered |
Reasons for the downfall of Bairam Khan:
1. Disregarding Akbar's wishes:
One of the reasons for Bairam Khan's downfall was his disregard for Akbar's wishes. Despite being appointed as the regent and guardian of the young emperor, Bairam Khan often made decisions without consulting Akbar. This angered Akbar and created a rift between them, which eventually led to Bairam Khan's downfall.
2. Intolerable behavior towards nobility:
Another reason for Bairam Khan's downfall was his intolerable behavior towards the nobility. He was known for his arrogance and disregard for the nobles, which created resentment among them. The nobles felt marginalized and excluded from decision-making, leading to a loss of support for Bairam Khan.
3. Execution of Tardi Beg and other Turanis:
Bairam Khan's decision to execute Tardi Beg and other Turanis also contributed to his downfall. Tardi Beg was a powerful noble who had supported Akbar during his early years. However, Bairam Khan saw him as a threat and had him executed, which further alienated the nobility and weakened Bairam Khan's position.
4. Lack of desire to increase power:
Contrary to the other reasons mentioned above, the lack of desire to increase his power was not responsible for Bairam Khan's downfall. In fact, Bairam Khan was ambitious and sought to consolidate his power by making decisions without consulting Akbar. His actions were driven by a desire for personal gain and influence, which ultimately led to his downfall.
In conclusion, Bairam Khan's downfall can be attributed to his disregard for Akbar's wishes, his intolerable behavior towards the nobility, and his execution of Tardi Beg and other Turanis. These factors created a sense of discontent and loss of support among the nobles, ultimately leading to his downfall. However, the lack of desire to increase his power cannot be considered as a reason for his downfall, as Bairam Khan was indeed ambitious and sought to consolidate his power.
1. Disregarding Akbar's wishes:
One of the reasons for Bairam Khan's downfall was his disregard for Akbar's wishes. Despite being appointed as the regent and guardian of the young emperor, Bairam Khan often made decisions without consulting Akbar. This angered Akbar and created a rift between them, which eventually led to Bairam Khan's downfall.
2. Intolerable behavior towards nobility:
Another reason for Bairam Khan's downfall was his intolerable behavior towards the nobility. He was known for his arrogance and disregard for the nobles, which created resentment among them. The nobles felt marginalized and excluded from decision-making, leading to a loss of support for Bairam Khan.
3. Execution of Tardi Beg and other Turanis:
Bairam Khan's decision to execute Tardi Beg and other Turanis also contributed to his downfall. Tardi Beg was a powerful noble who had supported Akbar during his early years. However, Bairam Khan saw him as a threat and had him executed, which further alienated the nobility and weakened Bairam Khan's position.
4. Lack of desire to increase power:
Contrary to the other reasons mentioned above, the lack of desire to increase his power was not responsible for Bairam Khan's downfall. In fact, Bairam Khan was ambitious and sought to consolidate his power by making decisions without consulting Akbar. His actions were driven by a desire for personal gain and influence, which ultimately led to his downfall.
In conclusion, Bairam Khan's downfall can be attributed to his disregard for Akbar's wishes, his intolerable behavior towards the nobility, and his execution of Tardi Beg and other Turanis. These factors created a sense of discontent and loss of support among the nobles, ultimately leading to his downfall. However, the lack of desire to increase his power cannot be considered as a reason for his downfall, as Bairam Khan was indeed ambitious and sought to consolidate his power.
Which of the following concerning Bairam Khan is incorrect?- a)His son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was brought up by Akbar.
- b)He was killed by the Afghans.
- c)He rebelled but was captured and excused by Akbar.
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following concerning Bairam Khan is incorrect?
a)
His son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was brought up by Akbar.
b)
He was killed by the Afghans.
c)
He rebelled but was captured and excused by Akbar.
d)
None of these.
|
|
Aashna Bose answered |
Bairam Khan was a prominent figure during the reign of Emperor Akbar, and he played a key role in the administration and military affairs of the Mughal Empire. Let's analyze each option to identify the incorrect statement.
a) His son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was brought up by Akbar.
This statement is correct. After the death of Bairam Khan, his son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was taken under the care of Emperor Akbar. Akbar treated him like his own son and raised him in the Mughal court. Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana went on to become a prominent poet and noble in the Mughal Empire.
b) He was killed by the Afghans.
This statement is correct. After Bairam Khan's successful military campaigns against the Afghan rebels, he faced opposition from some factions. In 1561, he was assassinated by an Afghan noble named Hasan Khan Mewati. This event occurred in the city of Patan in present-day Gujarat.
c) He rebelled but was captured and excused by Akbar.
This statement is correct. Bairam Khan did rebel against Emperor Akbar's regency after the death of Humayun. He sought to establish his own authority and challenged the young Akbar's rule. However, he was eventually captured by Akbar's forces and brought before the emperor. Remarkably, Akbar forgave him and reinstated him in his court, showing his magnanimity and trust in Bairam Khan.
d) None of these.
This statement is incorrect. As explained above, option b) is correct, stating that Bairam Khan was killed by the Afghans. Therefore, option d) cannot be the correct answer.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option d) None of these, as all the statements mentioned in options a), b), and c) are correct.
a) His son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was brought up by Akbar.
This statement is correct. After the death of Bairam Khan, his son Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was taken under the care of Emperor Akbar. Akbar treated him like his own son and raised him in the Mughal court. Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana went on to become a prominent poet and noble in the Mughal Empire.
b) He was killed by the Afghans.
This statement is correct. After Bairam Khan's successful military campaigns against the Afghan rebels, he faced opposition from some factions. In 1561, he was assassinated by an Afghan noble named Hasan Khan Mewati. This event occurred in the city of Patan in present-day Gujarat.
c) He rebelled but was captured and excused by Akbar.
This statement is correct. Bairam Khan did rebel against Emperor Akbar's regency after the death of Humayun. He sought to establish his own authority and challenged the young Akbar's rule. However, he was eventually captured by Akbar's forces and brought before the emperor. Remarkably, Akbar forgave him and reinstated him in his court, showing his magnanimity and trust in Bairam Khan.
d) None of these.
This statement is incorrect. As explained above, option b) is correct, stating that Bairam Khan was killed by the Afghans. Therefore, option d) cannot be the correct answer.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option d) None of these, as all the statements mentioned in options a), b), and c) are correct.
The first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar was- a)Raja Bhar Mall
- b)Raja Man Singh
- c)Raja Bhagwan Das
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar was
a)
Raja Bhar Mall
b)
Raja Man Singh
c)
Raja Bhagwan Das
d)
None of these
|
|
Shivani Singh answered |
Introduction:
Raja Bhar Mall was the first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar.
Details:
- Raja Bhar Mall: He was the first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar. He belonged to the Kachwaha clan of Rajputs and hailed from the Amber region in present-day Rajasthan.
- Reasons for surrender: Raja Bhar Mall decided to surrender to Akbar after witnessing the military might and diplomatic skills of the Mughal emperor. He realized that it would be in the best interest of his kingdom and people to form an alliance with the powerful Mughal Empire.
- Implications of surrender: Raja Bhar Mall's surrender marked the beginning of a series of alliances between the Rajput chiefs and Akbar. This eventually helped in the consolidation of the Mughal Empire in India.
- Subsequent alliances: After Raja Bhar Mall, several other Rajput chiefs like Raja Man Singh and Raja Bhagwan Das also formed alliances with Akbar. These alliances played a crucial role in the expansion and stability of the Mughal Empire.
Therefore, Raja Bhar Mall's decision to surrender to Akbar was a significant event in the history of medieval India, as it paved the way for closer ties between the Rajputs and the Mughals.
Raja Bhar Mall was the first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar.
Details:
- Raja Bhar Mall: He was the first Rajput chief to surrender to Akbar. He belonged to the Kachwaha clan of Rajputs and hailed from the Amber region in present-day Rajasthan.
- Reasons for surrender: Raja Bhar Mall decided to surrender to Akbar after witnessing the military might and diplomatic skills of the Mughal emperor. He realized that it would be in the best interest of his kingdom and people to form an alliance with the powerful Mughal Empire.
- Implications of surrender: Raja Bhar Mall's surrender marked the beginning of a series of alliances between the Rajput chiefs and Akbar. This eventually helped in the consolidation of the Mughal Empire in India.
- Subsequent alliances: After Raja Bhar Mall, several other Rajput chiefs like Raja Man Singh and Raja Bhagwan Das also formed alliances with Akbar. These alliances played a crucial role in the expansion and stability of the Mughal Empire.
Therefore, Raja Bhar Mall's decision to surrender to Akbar was a significant event in the history of medieval India, as it paved the way for closer ties between the Rajputs and the Mughals.
Which is/are true regarding Akbar’s main objectives in going to the Deccan?- a)He wanted to spread Islam.
- b)He wanted to increase his territories in the South and check the Portuguese.
- c)Both (a) and (b).
- d)None of these.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which is/are true regarding Akbar’s main objectives in going to the Deccan?
a)
He wanted to spread Islam.
b)
He wanted to increase his territories in the South and check the Portuguese.
c)
Both (a) and (b).
d)
None of these.
|
|
Jyoti Singh answered |
Reasons for Akbar's main objectives in going to the Deccan:
- Expansion of territories in the South: One of Akbar's main objectives in going to the Deccan was to increase his territories in the South. The Deccan region was strategically important for the Mughal Empire as it provided access to important trade routes and resources. By expanding his territories in the Deccan, Akbar aimed to strengthen his control over the region and increase his influence in South India.
- Check the Portuguese: Another important reason for Akbar's expedition to the Deccan was to check the influence of the Portuguese in the region. The Portuguese had established a strong presence along the western coast of India and were actively involved in trade and commerce. By expanding his territories in the Deccan, Akbar aimed to limit the Portuguese influence in the region and ensure that they did not pose a threat to the Mughal Empire's interests.
In conclusion, Akbar's main objectives in going to the Deccan were focused on expanding his territories in the South and checking the influence of the Portuguese in the region. These objectives were aimed at strengthening the Mughal Empire's control over the Deccan region and protecting its interests in South India.
Jehangir was buried at Shahdara near- a)Lahore
- b)Agra
- c)Delhi
- d)Badakshan
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Jehangir was buried at Shahdara near
a)
Lahore
b)
Agra
c)
Delhi
d)
Badakshan
|
Keerthana Nambiar answered |
Emperor Jahangir was buried according to his last wish: in Lahore, in Noor Jahan's old pleasure garden known as Dilkusha Garden. The mausoleum is located at Shahdara on the banks of the Ravi, three miles northwest of the city.
Chapter doubts & questions for The Mughal Empire - History for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of The Mughal Empire - History for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.
History for State PSC Exams
125 videos|773 docs|270 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup