All Exams >
Humanities/Arts >
Political Science CUET Preparation >
All Questions
All questions of Contemporary South Asia for Humanities/Arts Exam
The Seven Party Alliance is a coalition of- a)Maoist parties only.
- b)monarchial forces.
- c)Nepali political parties.
- d)non-governmental organisations in Nepal.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The Seven Party Alliance is a coalition of
a)
Maoist parties only.
b)
monarchial forces.
c)
Nepali political parties.
d)
non-governmental organisations in Nepal.
|
Anirudh Desai answered |
The Seven Party Alliance was a coalition of seven Nepali political parties seeking to end autocratic rule in the country.
| 1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App |
When was the LTTE vanquished?- a)2006
- b)2005
- c)2009
- d)2012
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When was the LTTE vanquished?
a)
2006
b)
2005
c)
2009
d)
2012
|
Vedika Singh answered |
Ltte is a Tamil people group in shreelanka it is a very aggressive violent group in shreelanka .there is a big controversy between sinhili and Ltte in shreelanka
When did Nepal become a democratic state?- a)2005
- b)2004
- c)2008
- d)2011
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When did Nepal become a democratic state?
a)
2005
b)
2004
c)
2008
d)
2011
|
Arjun Chaudhary answered |
Nepal became a democratic state in 2008 when the country's monarchy was abolished and a federal democratic republic was established. This significant political change was the result of a decade-long civil war and a series of protests and movements for democracy.
Background of Nepal's Democratic Movement
- Nepal was ruled by a monarchy for over two centuries, with limited political freedom and human rights violations.
- In 1996, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) launched an armed insurgency against the government, demanding the establishment of a republic and a more inclusive democracy.
- The conflict escalated into a decade-long civil war, resulting in thousands of deaths and displacement.
- In 2006, a ceasefire was declared, and negotiations between the government and Maoist rebels began.
The Process of Democratization in Nepal
- In 2007, an interim constitution was adopted, which declared Nepal a secular, federal, and democratic republic, and stripped the king of his powers.
- In 2008, the Constituent Assembly, elected in 2008, abolished the monarchy, and Nepal became a republic.
- The Constituent Assembly also drafted and adopted a new constitution in 2015, which established a federal democratic republic with a bicameral legislature.
- Nepal's democratic system comprises a president as the head of state and a prime minister as the head of government.
Impact of Democracy in Nepal
- Nepal's transition to democracy has led to greater political freedom and civil liberties for its citizens.
- The country has held several successful elections, including local, provincial, and federal elections.
- Nepal has made progress in addressing human rights issues, including the rights of marginalized groups such as women, Dalits, and ethnic minorities.
- However, Nepal still faces several challenges, including corruption, political instability, and economic inequality.
Conclusion
Nepal's transition to democracy was a significant achievement for the country and its citizens. The establishment of a federal democratic republic has provided greater political space and human rights protection for all Nepalis. However, there is still a long way to go in consolidating democracy and addressing the country's socio-economic challenges.
Background of Nepal's Democratic Movement
- Nepal was ruled by a monarchy for over two centuries, with limited political freedom and human rights violations.
- In 1996, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) launched an armed insurgency against the government, demanding the establishment of a republic and a more inclusive democracy.
- The conflict escalated into a decade-long civil war, resulting in thousands of deaths and displacement.
- In 2006, a ceasefire was declared, and negotiations between the government and Maoist rebels began.
The Process of Democratization in Nepal
- In 2007, an interim constitution was adopted, which declared Nepal a secular, federal, and democratic republic, and stripped the king of his powers.
- In 2008, the Constituent Assembly, elected in 2008, abolished the monarchy, and Nepal became a republic.
- The Constituent Assembly also drafted and adopted a new constitution in 2015, which established a federal democratic republic with a bicameral legislature.
- Nepal's democratic system comprises a president as the head of state and a prime minister as the head of government.
Impact of Democracy in Nepal
- Nepal's transition to democracy has led to greater political freedom and civil liberties for its citizens.
- The country has held several successful elections, including local, provincial, and federal elections.
- Nepal has made progress in addressing human rights issues, including the rights of marginalized groups such as women, Dalits, and ethnic minorities.
- However, Nepal still faces several challenges, including corruption, political instability, and economic inequality.
Conclusion
Nepal's transition to democracy was a significant achievement for the country and its citizens. The establishment of a federal democratic republic has provided greater political space and human rights protection for all Nepalis. However, there is still a long way to go in consolidating democracy and addressing the country's socio-economic challenges.
Maoist means- a)terrorist groups.
- b)freedom fighters.
- c)a secret society.
- d)communists who believe in the ideology of Mao.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Maoist means
a)
terrorist groups.
b)
freedom fighters.
c)
a secret society.
d)
communists who believe in the ideology of Mao.
|
Ishani Gupta answered |
They advocate the revolutionary means to establish the rule of peasants and workers.
What religion was Nepal a kingdom in the past?- a)Muslim
- b)Hindu
- c)Jain
- d)Sikh
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What religion was Nepal a kingdom in the past?
a)
Muslim
b)
Hindu
c)
Jain
d)
Sikh
|
Haamid answered |
Muslim is not a religion .it is islam lol
Nepal was a constitutional monarchy till- a)2006.
- b)2005.
- c)2004.
- d)2003.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Nepal was a constitutional monarchy till
a)
2006.
b)
2005.
c)
2004.
d)
2003.
|
Nitin Chakraborty answered |
Till 2006, Nepal was a constitutional monarchy with the danger of the king taking over executive powers. In 2006 a successful popular uprising led to the restoration of democracy and reduced the king to a nominal position. Nepal is now a republic with a multi-party system. However, the country is still in the process of framing its constitution.
When did India’s government get involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question?- a)1990
- b)1983
- c)1984
- d)1987
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
When did India’s government get involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question?
a)
1990
b)
1983
c)
1984
d)
1987
|
|
Sadiya Parween answered |
See, In Sri Lanka there was a major conflict on ethnicity that is who will dominate in Sri Lanka.
Basically Sinhalas was in majority so it dominated and behaved ruthless with Tamils that migrated from India called Indian Tamils.
There was confrontational between Sinhalas and LTTE. So to save own citizens 'Tamils' in Sri Lanka, India sent its forces to settle dispute in 1987 but LTTE itself opposed Indian Govt. not to interrupt in their internal affairs. So later India sent its Peace Keeping Force in 1989 to pulled out of Sri Lanka
Basically Sinhalas was in majority so it dominated and behaved ruthless with Tamils that migrated from India called Indian Tamils.
There was confrontational between Sinhalas and LTTE. So to save own citizens 'Tamils' in Sri Lanka, India sent its forces to settle dispute in 1987 but LTTE itself opposed Indian Govt. not to interrupt in their internal affairs. So later India sent its Peace Keeping Force in 1989 to pulled out of Sri Lanka
In what year did India and Bangladesh exchange enclaves?- a)2018
- b)2011
- c)2015
- d)2012
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
In what year did India and Bangladesh exchange enclaves?
a)
2018
b)
2011
c)
2015
d)
2012
|
Nandita Joshi answered |
Exchange of Enclaves between India and Bangladesh in 2015
In 1974, India and Bangladesh signed the Land Boundary Agreement (LBA) to resolve border disputes between the two countries. The agreement aimed to exchange enclaves, which are small pockets of territories belonging to one country, surrounded by the other country's territory.
The exchange of enclaves was finally implemented on July 31, 2015, after four decades of negotiations between the two countries. The exchange involved the transfer of 111 Indian enclaves, with an area of 17,160 acres, to Bangladesh and the transfer of 51 Bangladeshi enclaves, with an area of 7,110 acres, to India.
The exchange of enclaves was a significant step towards strengthening India-Bangladesh relations and resolving long-standing border disputes between the two countries. The exchange also provided a sense of security to the people living in the enclaves, who were previously stateless and had no access to basic facilities such as healthcare, education, and employment.
The exchange of enclaves was a complex process, involving the resettlement of thousands of people, the demarcation of new borders, and the transfer of property rights. The process was carried out peacefully and smoothly, with the cooperation of both India and Bangladesh.
In conclusion, the exchange of enclaves between India and Bangladesh took place in 2015, after four decades of negotiations between the two countries. The exchange was a significant step towards strengthening India-Bangladesh relations and resolving long-standing border disputes between the two countries.
In 1974, India and Bangladesh signed the Land Boundary Agreement (LBA) to resolve border disputes between the two countries. The agreement aimed to exchange enclaves, which are small pockets of territories belonging to one country, surrounded by the other country's territory.
The exchange of enclaves was finally implemented on July 31, 2015, after four decades of negotiations between the two countries. The exchange involved the transfer of 111 Indian enclaves, with an area of 17,160 acres, to Bangladesh and the transfer of 51 Bangladeshi enclaves, with an area of 7,110 acres, to India.
The exchange of enclaves was a significant step towards strengthening India-Bangladesh relations and resolving long-standing border disputes between the two countries. The exchange also provided a sense of security to the people living in the enclaves, who were previously stateless and had no access to basic facilities such as healthcare, education, and employment.
The exchange of enclaves was a complex process, involving the resettlement of thousands of people, the demarcation of new borders, and the transfer of property rights. The process was carried out peacefully and smoothly, with the cooperation of both India and Bangladesh.
In conclusion, the exchange of enclaves between India and Bangladesh took place in 2015, after four decades of negotiations between the two countries. The exchange was a significant step towards strengthening India-Bangladesh relations and resolving long-standing border disputes between the two countries.
In East Pakistan the popular struggle against West Pakistan domination was led by- a)Sheikh Mujib Mohammed.
- b)Sheikh Mujib Ur Rahman.
- c)General Yahya Khan.
- d)Sheikh Mujib Ali Rahman.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
In East Pakistan the popular struggle against West Pakistan domination was led by
a)
Sheikh Mujib Mohammed.
b)
Sheikh Mujib Ur Rahman.
c)
General Yahya Khan.
d)
Sheikh Mujib Ali Rahman.
|
Arun Yadav answered |
Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan from 1947 to 1971. But it started protesting against the domination of Western Pakistan and the imposition of Urdu Language. A popular struggle against West Pakistani dominance was led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.
In Nepal there was violent conflict between the armed forces of the King and- a)Maoist guerrillas.
- b)political activists.
- c)people's representatives.
- d)armed military forces.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In Nepal there was violent conflict between the armed forces of the King and
a)
Maoist guerrillas.
b)
political activists.
c)
people's representatives.
d)
armed military forces.
|
Yash Gupta answered |
In Nepal there was a violent conflict between the Maoist guerrillas and the armed forces of the king. For some time, there was a triangular conflict among the monarchist forces, the democrats and the Maoists. In 2002 the king abolished the parliament and dismissed the government, thus ending the limited democracy that existed in Nepal.
The country that is Bhutan’s biggest source of development aid is- a)the USA.
- b)Russia.
- c)India.
- d)Maldives.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The country that is Bhutan’s biggest source of development aid is
a)
the USA.
b)
Russia.
c)
India.
d)
Maldives.
|
Sai Dey answered |
India enjoys a very special relationship with Bhutan and does not have any major conflict with the Bhutanese government. India is involved in big hydroelectric projects in Bhutan and remains the Himalayan kingdom’s biggest source of development aid. For example CHEP, a 336 MW project, located on Wangchu river in Chukha district was built by India on a turnkey basis at a remarkably low cost of Rs. 2460 million.
When was the SAFTA agreement signed?- a)2007
- b)2000
- c)2004
- d)2001
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When was the SAFTA agreement signed?
a)
2007
b)
2000
c)
2004
d)
2001
|
|
Vedika Singh answered |
South Asia free trade agreement
What is the name of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation?- a)ASEAN
- b)The region
- c)SAARC
- d)SEATO
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the name of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation?
a)
ASEAN
b)
The region
c)
SAARC
d)
SEATO
|
Priyanka Chavan answered |
SAARC: South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
SAARC is a regional intergovernmental organization that was established in 1985 to promote economic and cultural cooperation among its member countries in South Asia. It is headquartered in Kathmandu, Nepal.
Member countries:
- Afghanistan
- Bangladesh
- Bhutan
- India
- Maldives
- Nepal
- Pakistan
- Sri Lanka
Objectives:
- To promote regional cooperation in economic, social, cultural, technical and scientific fields
- To strengthen cooperation among the member countries in international forums
- To promote peace, stability and understanding among the member countries
- To provide a platform for the member countries to discuss and resolve their common problems and issues
Activities:
SAARC conducts various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
- Summits and ministerial meetings
- Technical and expert-level meetings
- Cultural exchanges and festivals
- Student exchanges and scholarships
- Economic cooperation and trade agreements
- Poverty alleviation programs
- Disaster management and environmental protection
Challenges:
SAARC faces several challenges in achieving its objectives, including:
- Political instability and mistrust among member countries
- Bilateral disputes and conflicts among member countries
- Uneven economic development and poverty in the region
- Lack of infrastructure and connectivity among member countries
- Limited resources and funding for SAARC programs
Conclusion:
SAARC plays an important role in promoting regional cooperation and integration in South Asia. However, it faces several challenges that need to be addressed to achieve its objectives and improve the lives of people in the region.
SAARC is a regional intergovernmental organization that was established in 1985 to promote economic and cultural cooperation among its member countries in South Asia. It is headquartered in Kathmandu, Nepal.
Member countries:
- Afghanistan
- Bangladesh
- Bhutan
- India
- Maldives
- Nepal
- Pakistan
- Sri Lanka
Objectives:
- To promote regional cooperation in economic, social, cultural, technical and scientific fields
- To strengthen cooperation among the member countries in international forums
- To promote peace, stability and understanding among the member countries
- To provide a platform for the member countries to discuss and resolve their common problems and issues
Activities:
SAARC conducts various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
- Summits and ministerial meetings
- Technical and expert-level meetings
- Cultural exchanges and festivals
- Student exchanges and scholarships
- Economic cooperation and trade agreements
- Poverty alleviation programs
- Disaster management and environmental protection
Challenges:
SAARC faces several challenges in achieving its objectives, including:
- Political instability and mistrust among member countries
- Bilateral disputes and conflicts among member countries
- Uneven economic development and poverty in the region
- Lack of infrastructure and connectivity among member countries
- Limited resources and funding for SAARC programs
Conclusion:
SAARC plays an important role in promoting regional cooperation and integration in South Asia. However, it faces several challenges that need to be addressed to achieve its objectives and improve the lives of people in the region.
A land locked country of South Asia with Maoist guirellas- a)Maldives.
- b)Bangladesh.
- c)Nepal.
- d)Pakistan.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
A land locked country of South Asia with Maoist guirellas
a)
Maldives.
b)
Bangladesh.
c)
Nepal.
d)
Pakistan.
|
|
Anagha Pillai answered |
Nepal, a landlocked country, faces the problem of Maoist guirellas.During te 1990s, the Maoist of Nepal were successful in spreading their influence. In April 2008 elections the Maoist won an absolute majority.
In the political field Pakistan lacks- a)a courageous and relatively free press.
- b)a strong human rights movement.
- c)educated leaders.
- d)genuine international support for democracy.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
In the political field Pakistan lacks
a)
a courageous and relatively free press.
b)
a strong human rights movement.
c)
educated leaders.
d)
genuine international support for democracy.
|
Kunal Verma answered |
Pakistan lacks genuine international support for democratic rule, which has encouraged the military to continue its dominance. Given the western fear of global Islamic terrorism, the military regime in Pakistan is seen as a protector of western interests in West Asia and South Asia.
IPKF stands for- a)Indian Peaceful Knight Foundation.
- b)Indian Peace Keeping Force.
- c)Indian Peace Keeping Federation.
- d)Indian Peace Keeping Forum.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
IPKF stands for
a)
Indian Peaceful Knight Foundation.
b)
Indian Peace Keeping Force.
c)
Indian Peace Keeping Federation.
d)
Indian Peace Keeping Forum.
|
|
Dhruba Malik answered |
Indian Peace Keeping Force was the Indian military force performing a peacekeeping operation in Sri Lanka between 1987 and 1990.
In what year did India conduct a nuclear explosion in Pokhran?- a)1995
- b)2001
- c)1994
- d)1998
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
In what year did India conduct a nuclear explosion in Pokhran?
a)
1995
b)
2001
c)
1994
d)
1998
|
|
Prashanth Goyal answered |
India's Nuclear Explosion in Pokhran in 1998
Introduction:
India conducted its first nuclear test in 1974, but it was considered a peaceful nuclear explosion. However, India's second nuclear test in Pokhran in 1998 was a significant moment in India's nuclear history.
The Event:
On May 11, 1998, India conducted five nuclear explosions at the Indian Army's Pokhran Test Range in the Thar Desert of Rajasthan. These tests were carried out under the code name "Operation Shakti."
The Decision:
The decision to conduct the tests was made by then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who had ordered the preparations for the tests in April 1998. The tests were conducted despite international pressure and warnings from other countries, including the United States.
The Results:
The tests were successful, with the yield being higher than expected. India became the sixth country in the world to possess nuclear weapons, after the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom.
The Response:
The tests were met with international condemnation and led to economic sanctions being imposed on India by several countries, including the United States. However, India defended its decision to conduct the tests, stating that it was necessary for its national security.
Conclusion:
The 1998 nuclear tests in Pokhran marked a significant moment in India's nuclear history. It demonstrated India's capability to develop and possess nuclear weapons and also highlighted the country's determination to protect its national security.
Introduction:
India conducted its first nuclear test in 1974, but it was considered a peaceful nuclear explosion. However, India's second nuclear test in Pokhran in 1998 was a significant moment in India's nuclear history.
The Event:
On May 11, 1998, India conducted five nuclear explosions at the Indian Army's Pokhran Test Range in the Thar Desert of Rajasthan. These tests were carried out under the code name "Operation Shakti."
The Decision:
The decision to conduct the tests was made by then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who had ordered the preparations for the tests in April 1998. The tests were conducted despite international pressure and warnings from other countries, including the United States.
The Results:
The tests were successful, with the yield being higher than expected. India became the sixth country in the world to possess nuclear weapons, after the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom.
The Response:
The tests were met with international condemnation and led to economic sanctions being imposed on India by several countries, including the United States. However, India defended its decision to conduct the tests, stating that it was necessary for its national security.
Conclusion:
The 1998 nuclear tests in Pokhran marked a significant moment in India's nuclear history. It demonstrated India's capability to develop and possess nuclear weapons and also highlighted the country's determination to protect its national security.
What is the only country that has experienced democracy in the region other than Pakistan?- a)India
- b)Pakistan
- c)Bangladesh
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the only country that has experienced democracy in the region other than Pakistan?
a)
India
b)
Pakistan
c)
Bangladesh
d)
None
|
|
Nitin Chakraborty answered |
India is the only country in the region that has experienced democracy other than Pakistan
India and Pakistan share a border and a history of British colonial rule. Both countries gained independence in 1947, but their paths diverged significantly in the years that followed. While Pakistan has struggled with authoritarianism, military coups, and political instability, India has established itself as the world's largest democracy.
India's democratic history
India adopted a Constitution in 1950, which established a parliamentary system of government and guaranteed fundamental rights to its citizens. Since then, India has held regular elections, with the first general election taking place in 1951-52. Today, India is a federal republic with a multi-party system, where power is divided between the central government and the states.
India's democracy has not been without its challenges, including corruption, caste politics, and religious tensions. However, India has managed to maintain a relatively stable democratic system, with peaceful transfers of power between different political parties through elections.
Other countries in the region
In contrast to India, Pakistan has experienced a tumultuous political history, marked by periods of military rule and political instability. Bangladesh, which was formerly part of Pakistan, has also faced political turmoil since gaining independence in 1971. Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka have all experienced political instability and violence in recent decades.
Conclusion
In summary, India is the only country in the region that has experienced democracy other than Pakistan. Despite its challenges, India has managed to maintain a relatively stable democratic system, which is a testament to the resilience of its democratic institutions and the commitment of its citizens to democratic values.
India and Pakistan share a border and a history of British colonial rule. Both countries gained independence in 1947, but their paths diverged significantly in the years that followed. While Pakistan has struggled with authoritarianism, military coups, and political instability, India has established itself as the world's largest democracy.
India's democratic history
India adopted a Constitution in 1950, which established a parliamentary system of government and guaranteed fundamental rights to its citizens. Since then, India has held regular elections, with the first general election taking place in 1951-52. Today, India is a federal republic with a multi-party system, where power is divided between the central government and the states.
India's democracy has not been without its challenges, including corruption, caste politics, and religious tensions. However, India has managed to maintain a relatively stable democratic system, with peaceful transfers of power between different political parties through elections.
Other countries in the region
In contrast to India, Pakistan has experienced a tumultuous political history, marked by periods of military rule and political instability. Bangladesh, which was formerly part of Pakistan, has also faced political turmoil since gaining independence in 1971. Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka have all experienced political instability and violence in recent decades.
Conclusion
In summary, India is the only country in the region that has experienced democracy other than Pakistan. Despite its challenges, India has managed to maintain a relatively stable democratic system, which is a testament to the resilience of its democratic institutions and the commitment of its citizens to democratic values.
When did the Indian peacekeeping force pull out of Sri Lanka?- a)1985
- b)1989
- c)1986
- d)1992
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
When did the Indian peacekeeping force pull out of Sri Lanka?
a)
1985
b)
1989
c)
1986
d)
1992
|
|
Prashanth Das answered |
Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka
The Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) was deployed in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1990 as part of the Indian government's efforts to mediate the ongoing conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) rebel group. The IPKF's primary objective was to enforce the terms of the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord signed between the two governments in July 1987.
Deployment and Objectives
- The conflict in Sri Lanka was rooted in ethnic tensions between the majority Sinhalese community and the Tamil minority, who felt marginalized and discriminated against.
- The LTTE, a militant group fighting for an independent Tamil state, had been involved in an armed insurgency against the Sri Lankan government since 1983.
- In an attempt to bring peace to the island nation, the Indian government intervened and deployed the IPKF in Sri Lanka in accordance with the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord.
Operations and Challenges
- The IPKF's mission was to disarm the LTTE and other militant groups, maintain law and order, and facilitate the return of normalcy in the conflict-affected areas.
- However, the IPKF faced numerous challenges during its deployment, including hostile encounters with LTTE fighters, non-cooperation from the Tamil population, and political complexities within Sri Lanka.
- The LTTE, which initially welcomed the IPKF's arrival, soon turned against them due to disagreements over the implementation of the accord.
- The IPKF was drawn into intense combat operations against the LTTE, resulting in casualties on both sides and strained relations between the Indian forces and the local population.
Withdrawal of the IPKF
- As the conflict escalated and the IPKF faced mounting challenges, public opinion in India began to turn against the deployment.
- The assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in May 1991 further complicated the situation.
- In June 1990, the newly elected Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa requested the withdrawal of the IPKF, citing its inability to fulfill its objectives and the negative impact it had on Sri Lankan sovereignty.
- The IPKF officially pulled out of Sri Lanka in March 1990, marking the end of its intervention in the conflict.
Conclusion
The Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) was deployed in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1990 as part of the Indian government's efforts to mediate the conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE rebel group. However, due to various challenges and changing political dynamics, the IPKF was eventually withdrawn from Sri Lanka in 1990.
The Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) was deployed in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1990 as part of the Indian government's efforts to mediate the ongoing conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) rebel group. The IPKF's primary objective was to enforce the terms of the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord signed between the two governments in July 1987.
Deployment and Objectives
- The conflict in Sri Lanka was rooted in ethnic tensions between the majority Sinhalese community and the Tamil minority, who felt marginalized and discriminated against.
- The LTTE, a militant group fighting for an independent Tamil state, had been involved in an armed insurgency against the Sri Lankan government since 1983.
- In an attempt to bring peace to the island nation, the Indian government intervened and deployed the IPKF in Sri Lanka in accordance with the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord.
Operations and Challenges
- The IPKF's mission was to disarm the LTTE and other militant groups, maintain law and order, and facilitate the return of normalcy in the conflict-affected areas.
- However, the IPKF faced numerous challenges during its deployment, including hostile encounters with LTTE fighters, non-cooperation from the Tamil population, and political complexities within Sri Lanka.
- The LTTE, which initially welcomed the IPKF's arrival, soon turned against them due to disagreements over the implementation of the accord.
- The IPKF was drawn into intense combat operations against the LTTE, resulting in casualties on both sides and strained relations between the Indian forces and the local population.
Withdrawal of the IPKF
- As the conflict escalated and the IPKF faced mounting challenges, public opinion in India began to turn against the deployment.
- The assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in May 1991 further complicated the situation.
- In June 1990, the newly elected Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa requested the withdrawal of the IPKF, citing its inability to fulfill its objectives and the negative impact it had on Sri Lankan sovereignty.
- The IPKF officially pulled out of Sri Lanka in March 1990, marking the end of its intervention in the conflict.
Conclusion
The Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) was deployed in Sri Lanka from 1987 to 1990 as part of the Indian government's efforts to mediate the conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE rebel group. However, due to various challenges and changing political dynamics, the IPKF was eventually withdrawn from Sri Lanka in 1990.
The South Asian leaders signed the SAARC Charter on:- a)7th November 1985.
- b)8th December 1985.
- c)9th January 1987.
- d)5th December, 1988.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The South Asian leaders signed the SAARC Charter on:
a)
7th November 1985.
b)
8th December 1985.
c)
9th January 1987.
d)
5th December, 1988.
|
|
Devanshi Choudhary answered |
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was established when its Charter was formally adopted on 8 December, 1985 at the first summit in Dhaka by the Heads of State or Government of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. SAARC was established with the intention of enhancing regional cooperation among the member countries.
In East Pakistan the popular struggle against West Pakistan domination was led by- a)Sheikh Mujib Ur Rahman.
- b)Sheikh Mujib Mohammed.
- c)General Yahya Khan.
- d)Sheikh Mujib Ali Rahman.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In East Pakistan the popular struggle against West Pakistan domination was led by
a)
Sheikh Mujib Ur Rahman.
b)
Sheikh Mujib Mohammed.
c)
General Yahya Khan.
d)
Sheikh Mujib Ali Rahman.
|
|
Anand Das answered |
He demanded autonomy for eastern region. In the 1970 elections in the then Pakistan, the Awami League led by Sheikh Mujib won all the seats in East Pakistan and secured a majority in the proposed constituent Assembly for the whole of Pakistan.
When did the king accept the demand for a new democratic constitution in Nepal?- a)1990
- b)1993
- c)1986
- d)1987
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
When did the king accept the demand for a new democratic constitution in Nepal?
a)
1990
b)
1993
c)
1986
d)
1987
|
|
Debolina Ahuja answered |
The Acceptance of Demand for Democratic Constitution in Nepal
The king of Nepal accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in the year 1990. This was a significant event in the history of Nepal as it marked the end of the absolute monarchy system and the beginning of a new era of democracy in the country.
Background
Before 1990, Nepal was ruled by an absolute monarchy system where the king had all the power and authority. The political parties were banned, and there was no freedom of speech or expression. The people of Nepal were unhappy with this system and demanded a change.
The Movement for Democracy
In the late 1980s, a movement for democracy started in Nepal, led by various political parties and civil society organizations. The people demanded the restoration of democracy and the drafting of a new constitution that would ensure the protection of human rights and the rule of law.
The King's Response
In response to the demands of the people, King Birendra announced on April 6, 1990, that a new constitution would be drafted, and a multiparty democracy would be established in Nepal. This announcement was a significant turning point in the history of Nepal, as it marked the end of the absolute monarchy system.
The New Constitution
A new constitution was drafted, which established a constitutional monarchy system in Nepal. The king remained as the head of state, but his powers were limited, and a Prime Minister was appointed to lead the government. The constitution also ensured the protection of fundamental human rights and the rule of law.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the king of Nepal accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in 1990, which marked the end of the absolute monarchy system and the beginning of a new era of democracy in the country. The new constitution ensured the protection of human rights and the rule of law and established a constitutional monarchy system in Nepal.
The king of Nepal accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in the year 1990. This was a significant event in the history of Nepal as it marked the end of the absolute monarchy system and the beginning of a new era of democracy in the country.
Background
Before 1990, Nepal was ruled by an absolute monarchy system where the king had all the power and authority. The political parties were banned, and there was no freedom of speech or expression. The people of Nepal were unhappy with this system and demanded a change.
The Movement for Democracy
In the late 1980s, a movement for democracy started in Nepal, led by various political parties and civil society organizations. The people demanded the restoration of democracy and the drafting of a new constitution that would ensure the protection of human rights and the rule of law.
The King's Response
In response to the demands of the people, King Birendra announced on April 6, 1990, that a new constitution would be drafted, and a multiparty democracy would be established in Nepal. This announcement was a significant turning point in the history of Nepal, as it marked the end of the absolute monarchy system.
The New Constitution
A new constitution was drafted, which established a constitutional monarchy system in Nepal. The king remained as the head of state, but his powers were limited, and a Prime Minister was appointed to lead the government. The constitution also ensured the protection of fundamental human rights and the rule of law.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the king of Nepal accepted the demand for a new democratic constitution in 1990, which marked the end of the absolute monarchy system and the beginning of a new era of democracy in the country. The new constitution ensured the protection of human rights and the rule of law and established a constitutional monarchy system in Nepal.
Who was the elected government leader in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977?- a)Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
- b)Yahya Khan
- c)Ayub Khan
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the elected government leader in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977?
a)
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
b)
Yahya Khan
c)
Ayub Khan
d)
None
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
Leader of Pakistan from 1971 to 1977:
- Zulfikar Ali Bhutto: He was the elected government leader in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977. Bhutto served as the President of Pakistan from 1971 to 1973 and then as the Prime Minister from 1973 to 1977.
- Yahya Khan: Yahya Khan was the President of Pakistan during the period of 1969 to 1971, preceding Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
- Ayub Khan: Ayub Khan served as the President of Pakistan from 1958 to 1969, before the tenure of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
- None: This option is incorrect as Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was the elected leader of Pakistan during the specified years.
Who took over the administration of Pakistan after Pakistan framed its first constitution?- a)Yahya Khan
- b)Jinnah
- c)Imran Khan
- d)General Ayub Khan
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who took over the administration of Pakistan after Pakistan framed its first constitution?
a)
Yahya Khan
b)
Jinnah
c)
Imran Khan
d)
General Ayub Khan
|
|
Amrita Dey answered |
After Pakistan framed its first constitution in 1956, General Ayub Khan took over the administration of the country.
Below is a detailed explanation of how General Ayub Khan came to power and assumed control of the administration of Pakistan:
Background:
- Pakistan gained independence from British rule in 1947 and initially functioned as a dominion within the Commonwealth.
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah, also known as Quaid-e-Azam, served as Pakistan's first Governor-General until his death in 1948.
- After Jinnah's death, Liaquat Ali Khan became the Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Election of Constituent Assembly:
- In 1954, the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan was elected to draft the country's constitution.
- However, due to political instability and disagreements among various political parties, the process of constitution-making faced numerous challenges and delays.
Adoption of the First Constitution:
- Finally, on March 23, 1956, Pakistan adopted its first constitution, which declared the country an Islamic Republic.
- The constitution provided for a parliamentary form of government with a President as the Head of State and a Prime Minister as the Head of Government.
Assumption of Power by General Ayub Khan:
- Despite the adoption of the constitution, political instability and ineffectiveness of the civilian government continued to plague the country.
- In 1958, General Ayub Khan, who was serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the Pakistan Army, seized power in a military coup.
- Ayub Khan dissolved the Constituent Assembly, suspended the constitution, and imposed martial law in the country.
- He established a new governing body called the Supreme Council, with himself as the President.
- General Ayub Khan's administration introduced a new constitution in 1962, which established a presidential system of government.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - General Ayub Khan.
Below is a detailed explanation of how General Ayub Khan came to power and assumed control of the administration of Pakistan:
Background:
- Pakistan gained independence from British rule in 1947 and initially functioned as a dominion within the Commonwealth.
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah, also known as Quaid-e-Azam, served as Pakistan's first Governor-General until his death in 1948.
- After Jinnah's death, Liaquat Ali Khan became the Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Election of Constituent Assembly:
- In 1954, the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan was elected to draft the country's constitution.
- However, due to political instability and disagreements among various political parties, the process of constitution-making faced numerous challenges and delays.
Adoption of the First Constitution:
- Finally, on March 23, 1956, Pakistan adopted its first constitution, which declared the country an Islamic Republic.
- The constitution provided for a parliamentary form of government with a President as the Head of State and a Prime Minister as the Head of Government.
Assumption of Power by General Ayub Khan:
- Despite the adoption of the constitution, political instability and ineffectiveness of the civilian government continued to plague the country.
- In 1958, General Ayub Khan, who was serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the Pakistan Army, seized power in a military coup.
- Ayub Khan dissolved the Constituent Assembly, suspended the constitution, and imposed martial law in the country.
- He established a new governing body called the Supreme Council, with himself as the President.
- General Ayub Khan's administration introduced a new constitution in 1962, which established a presidential system of government.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - General Ayub Khan.
Who took over the military in Pakistan after Ayub Khan was elected?- a)Imran Khan
- b)Benazir Bhutto
- c)General Yahya Khan
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who took over the military in Pakistan after Ayub Khan was elected?
a)
Imran Khan
b)
Benazir Bhutto
c)
General Yahya Khan
d)
None
|
Learning Educators answered |
Who took over the military in Pakistan after Ayub Khan was elected?
- A: Imran Khan
- B: Benazir Bhutto
- C: General Yahya Khan
- D: None
Answer: C - General Yahya Khan
Explanation:
- Ayub Khan was elected as the President of Pakistan in 1958.
- After Ayub Khan's resignation in 1969, General Yahya Khan took over as the President and Chief Martial Law Administrator in Pakistan.
- General Yahya Khan ruled during a turbulent period in Pakistan's history, overseeing the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 and the eventual secession of East Pakistan to form Bangladesh.
- His regime came to an end in 1971, and he handed over power to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto after the General Elections of 1970.
Chapter doubts & questions for Contemporary South Asia - Political Science CUET Preparation 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Contemporary South Asia - Political Science CUET Preparation in English & Hindi are available as part of Humanities/Arts exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Political Science CUET Preparation
33 videos|36 docs|57 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup