Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the ...

Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.

a)
Toppled over
b)
Bribed
c)
Given advance information
d)
Threatened

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in...

tipped off : to give someone a warning or secret information about something.

Free Test

FREE

Test: Idioms And Proverbs- 2
25 Ques | 25 Min

Start Free Test

View all free Verbal tests

Community Answer

Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in...

Introduction:
In the given statement, it is mentioned that Sobhraj was easily arrested because the police were tipped off in advance. This means that the police received information before the arrest that helped them apprehend Sobhraj without much difficulty. Among the given options, the correct answer is option 'C', which states that Sobhraj was arrested because the police were given advance information.

Explanation:
Here is a detailed explanation of why option 'C' is the correct answer:

1. Tipped off:
- The phrase "tipped off" means that someone provided information or a warning in advance.
- In this context, it means that someone informed the police about Sobhraj's activities or location before his arrest.

2. Advance information:
- Option 'C' states that the police were given advance information, which aligns with the meaning of being tipped off.
- Advance information means that the police received details about Sobhraj's whereabouts, plans, or criminal activities ahead of time.
- This gave the police an advantage as they could plan their actions and make necessary arrangements to arrest Sobhraj without much difficulty.

3. Importance of advance information:
- When the police receive advance information, they have an advantage in apprehending a suspect.
- They can gather evidence, assemble a team, and strategize their approach before making the arrest.
- Having prior knowledge allows them to be prepared and increases the chances of a successful arrest.
- In Sobhraj's case, the advance information provided to the police made his arrest easier and more efficient.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, Sobhraj was easily arrested because the police were tipped off in advance, providing them with crucial information about his activities or whereabouts. This advance information allowed the police to plan and carry out the arrest more effectively. Option 'C' accurately captures this scenario by stating that Sobhraj was arrested because the police were given advance information.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

Direction:Readthefollowing paragraphcarefully andanswerthequestiongivenbelow: Suspicious as they are of American intentions, and bolstered by court rulings that seem to give them license to seek out and publish any and all government secrets, the media‘s distrust of our government, combined with their limited understanding of the world at large, damages our ability to design and conduct good policy in ways that the media rarely imagine. The leak through which sensitive information flows from the government to the press is detrimental to policy in so far as it almost completely precludes the possibility of serious discussion. The fear that anything they say, even in what is construed as a private forum, may appear in print, makes many people, whether our own government officials or the leaders of foreign countries, unwilling to speak their minds. Must we be content with the restriction of our leaders‘ policy discussions to a handful of people who trust each other, thus limiting the richness and variety of ideas that could be brought forward through a larger group because of the nearly endemic nature of this problem? It is vitally important for the leaders of the United States to know the real state of affairs internationally, and this can occur only if foreign leaders feel free to speak their minds to our diplomats. Until recently, it looked as if the media had convinced the public that journalists were more reliable than the government; however, this may be changing. With the passage of time, the media have lost lustre. They—having grown large and powerful—provoke the same public skepticism that other large institutions in the society do. A series of media scandals has contributed to this. Many Americans have concluded that the media are no more credible than the government, and public opinion surveys reflect much ambivalence about the press. While leaks are generally defended by media officials on the grounds of the public‘s right to know,in reality they are part of the Washington political power game, as well as part of the policy process. The "leaker" may be currying favour with the media, or may be planting information to influence policy. In the first case, he is helping himself by enhancing the prestige of a journalist; in the second, he is using the media as a stage for his preferred policies. In either instance, it closes the circle: the leak begins with a political motive, is advanced by a politicized media, and continues because of politics. Although some of the journalists think they are doing the work, they are more often than not instruments of the process, not prime movers. The media must be held accountable for their activities, just like every other significant institution in our society, and the media must be forced to earn the public‘s trust. Based on the information in the passage, with which of the following statements would the author most likely agree?

View answer

Suspicious as they are of American intentions, and bolstered by court rulings that seem to give them license to seek out and publish any and all government secrets, the medias distrust of our government, combined with their limited understanding of the world at large, damages our ability to design and conduct good policy in ways that the media rarely imagine.The leak through which sensitive information flows from the government to the press is detrimental to policy in so far as it almost completely precludes the possibility of serious discussion. The fear that anything they say, even in what is construed as a private forum, may appear in print, makes many people, whether our own government officials or the leaders of foreign countries, unwilling to speak their minds.Must we be content with the restriction of our leaders policy discussions to a handful of people who trust each other, thus limiting the richness and variety of ideas that could be brought forward through a larger group because of the nearly endemic nature of this problem? It is vitally important for the leaders of the United States to know the real state of affairs internationally, and this can occur only if foreign leaders feel free to speak their minds to our diplomats. Until recently, it looked as if the media had convinced the public that journalists were more reliable than the government; however, this may be changing. With the passage of time, the media have lost lustre. Theyhaving grown large and powerfulprovoke the same public skepticism that other large institutions in the society do. A series of media scandals has contributed to this. Many Americans have concluded that the media are no more credible than the government, and public opinion surveys reflect much ambivalence about the press. While leaks are generally defended by media officials on the grounds of the publics right to know, in reality they are part of the Washington political power game, as well as part of the policy process. The leaker may be currying favour with the media, or may be planting information to influence policy. In the first case, he is helping himself by enhancing the prestige of a journalist; in the second, he is using the media as a stage for his preferred policies. In either instance, it closes the circle: the leak begins with a political motive, is advanced by a politicized media, and continues because of politics. Although some of the journalists think they are doing the work, they are more often than not instruments of the process, not prime movers. The media must be held accountable for their activities, just like every other significant institution in our society, and the media must be forced to earn the publics trust.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.What is the main idea of the passage?

View answer

Suspicious as they are of American intentions, and bolstered by court rulings that seem to give them license to seek out and publish any and all government secrets, the medias distrust of our government, combined with their limited understanding of the world at large, damages our ability to design and conduct good policy in ways that the media rarely imagine.The leak through which sensitive information flows from the government to the press is detrimental to policy in so far as it almost completely precludes the possibility of serious discussion. The fear that anything they say, even in what is construed as a private forum, may appear in print, makes many people, whether our own government officials or the leaders of foreign countries, unwilling to speak their minds.Must we be content with the restriction of our leaders policy discussions to a handful of people who trust each other, thus limiting the richness and variety of ideas that could be brought forward through a larger group because of the nearly endemic nature of this problem? It is vitally important for the leaders of the United States to know the real state of affairs internationally, and this can occur only if foreign leaders feel free to speak their minds to our diplomats. Until recently, it looked as if the media had convinced the public that journalists were more reliable than the government; however, this may be changing. With the passage of time, the media have lost lustre. Theyhaving grown large and powerfulprovoke the same public skepticism that other large institutions in the society do. A series of media scandals has contributed to this. Many Americans have concluded that the media are no more credible than the government, and public opinion surveys reflect much ambivalence about the press.While leaks are generally defended by media officials on the grounds of the publics right to know, in reality they are part of the Washington political power game, as well as part of the policy process. The leaker may be currying favour with the media, or may be planting information to influence policy. In the first case, he is helping himself by enhancing the prestige of a journalist; in the second, he is using the media as a stage for his preferred policies. In either instance, it closes the circle: the leak begins with a political motive, is advanced by a politicized media, and continues because of politics. Although some of the journalists think they are doing the work, they are more often than not instruments of the process, not prime movers. The media must be held accountable for their activities, just like every other significant institution in our society, and the media must be forced to earn the publics trust.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.Based on the passage, when the media now challenge the actions of a public official, the public assumes that

View answer

Suspicious as they are of American intentions, and bolstered by court rulings that seem to give them license to seek out and publish any and all government secrets, the medias distrust of our government, combined with their limited understanding of the world at large, damages our ability to design and conduct good policy in ways that the media rarely imagine. The leak through which sensitive information flows from the government to the press is detrimental to policy in so far as it almost completely precludes the possibility of serious discussion. The fear that anything they say, even in what is construed as a private forum, may appear in print, makes many people, whether our own government officials or the leaders of foreign countries, unwilling to speak their minds.Must we be content with the restriction of our leaders policy discussions to a handful of people who trust each other, thus limiting the richness and variety of ideas that could be brought forward through a larger group because of the nearly endemic nature of this problem? It is vitally important for the leaders of the United States to know the real state of affairs internationally, and this can occur only if foreign leaders feel free to speak their minds to our diplomats. Until recently, it looked as if the media had convinced the public that journalists were more reliable than the government; however, this may be changing. With the passage of time, the media have lost lustre. Theyhaving grown large and powerfulprovoke the same public skepticism that other large institutions in the society do. A series of media scandals has contributed to this. Many Americans have concluded that the media are no more credible than the government, and public opinion surveys reflect much ambivalence about the press.While leaks are generally defended by media officials on the grounds of the publics right to know, in reality they are part of the Washington political power game, as well as part of the policy process. The leaker may be currying favour with the media, or may be planting information to influence policy. In the first case, he is helping himself by enhancing the prestige of a journalist; in the second, he is using the media as a stage for his preferred policies. In either instance, it closes the circle: the leak begins with a political motive, is advanced by a politicized media, and continues because of politics. Although some of the journalists think they are doing the work, they are more often than not instruments of the process, not prime movers. The media must be held accountable for their activities, just like every other significant institution in our society, and the media must be forced to earn the publics trust.Direction: Read the above Paragraph and answer the follownig QuetionsQ.Implicit in the authors argument that leaks result in far more limited and unreliable policy discussions with foreign leaders is the idea that

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a companys aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the companys practice organize a highly effective boycott of the companys products, their moral views will soon enter into the companys deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly.If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.A claim that things have ethical value to corporations only insofar as they are instrumental in furthering the ultimate goals of the corporation is

View answer

Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Sobhraj could be easily arrested because the police were tipped off in a advance.a)Toppled overb)Bribed c)Given advance informationd)ThreatenedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam