Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order t...

Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.

a)
property, wealthy
b)
property, poor
c)
territory, atheists
d)
religion, atheists
e)
ideology, hedonists

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as m...

"those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves" controls the first blank—hence property, or territory may fit the blank. "Atheists" eliminates option 3. If the Nazis did not exterminate them for what they own—the writer rules out this reason because most Jews probably had nothing, hence poor fits the next blank.

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Verbal courses

Most Upvoted Answer

Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as m...

Explanation:

The correct answer is option B, i.e., the Nazis did not exterminate the Jews to take their property as most Jews were poor, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.

Reasoning:

• The Nazis did not exterminate the Jews to take their property as they did not consider Jews as human beings, but rather as a subhuman race that had to be eliminated to make room for the Aryan race.
• Moreover, most Jews were poor, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.
• The Nazi regime implemented policies that stripped Jews of their property, businesses, and homes and forced them to wear identifying badges, live in ghettos, and work in forced labor camps.
• The Nazi regime also implemented a policy of exterminating the Jews through mass shootings, gas chambers, and concentration camps, which was part of their larger plan to create a racially pure, Aryan society.
• The Holocaust resulted in the deaths of six million Jews, as well as millions of other people who were considered undesirable by the Nazi regime, including Romani people, disabled people, homosexuals, and political dissidents.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chief: to make a good plan for his army and to keep a strong reserve. Both of these are also obligatory for the painter. To make a plan, thorough reconnaissance of the country where the battle is to be fought is needed. Its fields, its mountains, its rivers, its bridges, its trees, its flowers, its atmosphereall require and repay attentive observation from a special point of view.I think this is one of the chief delights that have come to me through painting. No doubt many people who are lovers of art have acquired it to a high degree without actually practicing. But I expect that nothing will make one observe more quickly or more thoroughly than having to face the difficulty of representing the thing observed. And mind you, if you do observe accurately and with refinement, and if you do record what you have seen with tolerable correspondence, the result follows on the canvas with startling obedience.But in order to make his plan, the General must not only reconnoitre the battle-ground; he must also study the achievements of the great Captains of the past. He must bring the observations he has collected in the field into comparison with the treatment of similar incidents by famous chiefs.Considering this fact, the galleries of Europe take on a newand to me at least a severely practical interest. You see the difficulty that baffled you yesterday; and you see how easily it has been overcome by a great or even by a skilful painter. Not only is your observation of Nature sensibly improved and developed, but also your comprehension of the masterpieces of art.But it is in the use and withholding of their reserves that the great commanders have generally excelled. After all, when once the last reserve has been thrown in, the commanders part is played. If that does not win the battle, he has nothing else to give. Everything must be left to luck and to the fighting troops. But these last reserves, in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or planand consequently without effect. Mere masses count no more. The largest brush, the brightest colours cannot even make an impression. The pictorial battlefield becomes a sea of mud mercifully veiled by the fog of war. Even though the General plunges in himself and emerges bespattered, as he sometimes does, he will not retrieve the day. In painting, the reserves consist in Proportion or Relation. And it is here that the art of the painter marches along the road which is traversed by all the greatest harmonies in thought. At one side of the palette there is white, at the other black; and neither is ever used neat. Between these two rigid limits all the action must lie, all the power required must be generated. Black and white themselves placed in juxtaposition make no great impression; and yet they are the most that you can do in pure contrast. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Following the example of the master Manet, the young Matisse often inserted in his pictures areas of white such as tablecloths or crockery that allowed for striking contrasts with black objects such as a knife or a dark bottle. What is the relevance of this information to the passage?

View answer

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward. If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos.The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.Why does the author compare the universe to a motion picture?

View answer

By regarding the expanding universe as a motion picture, you can easily imagine running the film backward.If you do so, you find the universe getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you come to the moment when its whole mass is crammed into an infinitely dense point. Before that time it didnt exist, or at least it didnt exist in its present form. Though there is some controversy about its exact age, most cosmologists would be inclined to agree that the universe has existed for about ten to twenty billion years. For scale, this can be compared to the four-and-a-half-billion-year age of the solar system, the time since the disappearance of the dinosaurs (sixty-five million years), and the age of the human race (about three million years). The event that marked the beginning of the universe was christened the Big Bang; the term has now entered the vernacular of our culture. Originally the name referred only to the single initiating event; now, however, astronomers have come to use it to mean the entire developmental process of the birth and expansion of the cosmos. The simple statement that the universe had a beginning in time is by now so obvious to astrophysicists that few give it a second thought. Yet it is a statement that has profound implications. Most civilizations embrace one of two opposite concepts of time. Linear time has a beginning, a duration, and an end; cyclical time, as its name suggests, continues around and around forever. In a universe that functions through cyclical time, the question of creation never arises; the universe always was and always will be. The minute you switch to linear time you immediately confront the vexing question not only of creation, but also of the Creator. Although there is no logical reason for the assumption, many people believe that if something comes into existence, it must do so in response to the actions of some rational being. Because of that belief, astronomers, even though they resist becoming involved in theological discussion, find themselves in one when they posit the Big Bang universe. It puts them squarely in the middle of an age-old debate. One common misconception about the Big Bang that should be disposed of immediately is the notion that the universal expansion is analogous to the explosion of an artillery shell. The galaxies are not like bits of shrapnel speeding away from a central explosion. The raisin-indough analogy is a more satisfactory way to think about the whole process. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:In the context of the passage, the phrase age-old debate (line 31) refers to

View answer

Courage is not only the basis of virtue; it is its expression. faith, hope, charity and all the rest dont become virtues until it takes courage to exercise them. There are roughly two types of courage. the first an emotional state which urges a man to risk injury or death, is physical courage. The second, more reasoning attitude which enables him to take coolly his career, happiness, his whole future or his judgement of what he thinks either right or worthwhile, is moral courage.I have known many men, who had marked physical courage, but lacked moral courage. Some of them were in high places, but they failed to be great in themselves because they lacked moral courage. On the other hand I have seen men who undoubtedly possessed moral courage but were very cautious about taking physical risks. But I have never met a man with moral courage who couldnt, when it was really necessary, face a situation boldly.A man with moral courage can

View answer

Courage is not only the basis of virtue; it is its expression. faith, hope, charity and all the rest dont become virtues until it takes courage to exercise them. There are roughly two types of courage. the first an emotional state which urges a man to risk injury or death, is physical courage. The second, more reasoning attitude which enables him to take coolly his career, happiness, his whole future or his judgement of what he thinks either right or worthwhile, is moral courage.I have known many men, who had marked physical courage, but lacked moral courage. Some of them were in high places, but they failed to be great in themselves because they lacked moral courage. On the other hand I have seen men who undoubtedly possessed moral courage but were very cautious about taking physical risks. But I have never met a man with moral courage who couldnt, when it was really necessary, face a situation boldly.All virtues become meaningful because of

View answer

Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Nazis did not exterminate the Jews in order to take their_________as most Jews were _________, and those who owned anything probably would have given it up gladly in order to save themselves.a)property, wealthyb)property, poorc)territory, atheistsd)religion, atheistse)ideology, hedonistsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam