A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct wi...

Join the Discussion on the App

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.

B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.

C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.

D. Kunti has to persuade Karna to leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.

A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?

a)
A only
b)
A and B
c)
C and D
d)
D only

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test: Spotting Errors- 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communic...

A should be corrected to 'one of the ... exercises'. B has to include the definite article " the Kurukshetra war". C should be corrected "another to be ..." D has no error.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communic...

The correct answer is option 'D' - D only.

Explanation:
Let's analyze each part of the given paragraph to identify the errors:

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.
The error in this sentence is the incorrect use of the article. Instead of saying "One of the classroom exercise," it should be "One of the classroom exercises" to indicate that there are multiple exercises.

B. At IIMA is taken from Kurukshetra war.
The error in this sentence is the missing article. It should be "At IIMA, an exercise is taken from the Kurukshetra war" to indicate that a specific exercise is being referred to.

C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.
The error in this sentence is the incorrect use of the article. Instead of saying "I ask a student," it should be "I ask one student" to specify that only one student is being asked to play each role.

D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.
There is no error in this sentence. It is grammatically correct and coherent.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - D only, as it is the only part of the paragraph that does not contain any errors in terms of grammar and usage.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my... more Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karna to leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Historians agree that those seeking public office in modern America make far fewer speeches in the course of their campaign than those seeking a public position in ancient Greece did. The author would most likely explain this by pointing out that

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.If the author of the passage travelled to a political convention and saw various candidates speak he would most likely have the highest regard for an orator who

View answer

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

View answer

Practice Quiz or MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions) with solutions are available for Practice, which would help you prepare for "Paragraph Formation" under Verbal Aptitude. You can practice these practice quizzes as per your speed and improvise the topic. The same topic is covered under various competitive examinations like - CAT, GMAT, Bank PO, SSC and other competitive examinations.Q.Rearrange the following five sentences in proper sequence so as to for a meaningful paragraph, then answer the questions given below them. After Examining him, the doctor smiled at him mischievously and took out a syringe. Thinking that he was really sick, his father summoned the family doctor. That day, Mintu wanted to take a day off from school Immediately, Mintu jumped up from his bed and swore the he was fine Therefor; he pretended to be sick and remained in bed.Which sentence should come third in the paragraph?

View answer

A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2024 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A. One of the classroom exercise I conduct with my Persuasive Communication students.B. at IIMA is taken from Kurukshestra war.C. I ask a student to be Kunti, other to be Karna.D. Kunti has to persuade Karnato leave Duryodhana and join the Pandavas.A paragraph has been broken up into four different parts. Which of the parts has no error?a)A onlyb)A and Bc)C and Dd)D onlyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam