To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful...

Join the Discussion on the App

To play second fiddle

a)
To be happy, cheerful and healthy
b)
To reduce importance of one's senior
c)
To support the role and view of another person
d)
To do back seat driving

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Idioms And Proverbs- 2

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce i...

To play a supporting or minor role in relation to someone else: “Tired of playing second fiddle, she resigned and started her own company.” In an orchestra, the position of second violinist (fiddle) is not as glamorous as that of first violinist.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce i...

To play second fiddle means to support the role and view of another person. It refers to being in a subordinate position and willingly accepting a secondary role. This idiom is often used in situations where someone voluntarily takes on a supporting role and allows someone else to take the lead.

Explanation:

Supporting Role: When someone plays second fiddle, they are consciously choosing to support and assist another person. They recognize that the other person's role is more important or prominent and willingly accept a secondary position. This could be in a personal or professional context, where someone takes on a supporting role to help another person achieve their goals or objectives.

Acknowledging Importance: Playing second fiddle also involves recognizing and acknowledging the importance and expertise of the person in the lead role. It requires humility and a willingness to put the needs and interests of the other person ahead of one's own. This can lead to a harmonious and cooperative relationship where both parties work together effectively.

Teamwork and Collaboration: Playing second fiddle often involves working as part of a team and collaborating with others. It requires effective communication, trust, and a shared vision. By supporting the role and view of another person, individuals can contribute their unique skills and perspectives to achieve a common goal.

Learning and Growth: Choosing to play second fiddle can also be an opportunity for personal growth and learning. It allows individuals to observe and learn from someone in a leadership or senior position. This can help them develop new skills, gain valuable experience, and broaden their knowledge.

Conclusion:

Playing second fiddle is not about reducing the importance of oneself or engaging in backseat driving. It is about willingly supporting and assisting another person, acknowledging their importance, and working together towards a common goal. This attitude of cooperation and collaboration fosters effective teamwork and can lead to positive outcomes for all involved.

Free Test

FREE

Test: Idioms And Proverbs- 2
25 Ques | 25 Min

Start Free Test

View all free Verbal tests

Community Answer

To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce i...

< b="" />Definition of "to play second fiddle"< />
To play second fiddle is an idiom that means to support or take a subordinate role to someone else, particularly in a situation where one's contributions or opinions are overshadowed or less valued. It often implies being in a position of lesser importance or authority.

< b="" />Explanation of the Correct Answer< />
The correct answer to the question is option 'C' - to support the role and view of another person.

< b="" />Explanation:< />
Playing second fiddle means supporting the role and view of another person, often in a subordinate capacity. It is about accepting a secondary position and putting the needs and goals of another person ahead of one's own. This can involve stepping back, compromising, and prioritizing the success and well-being of the other person.

< b="" />Comparison with Other Options:< />
a) To be happy, cheerful, and healthy: This option does not directly relate to the idiom "to play second fiddle." It focuses on personal well-being and does not capture the meaning of supporting someone else.
b) To reduce importance of one's senior: This option is incorrect as it suggests diminishing the significance of someone in a higher position. However, playing second fiddle is about supporting someone else, not undermining their importance.
d) To do back seat driving: This option is also incorrect as it refers to someone who offers unwanted advice or interference while someone else is driving. It does not capture the essence of playing second fiddle.

< b="" />Conclusion:< />
To play second fiddle means to support the role and view of another person. It involves accepting a subordinate position and prioritizing the success and well-being of the other person. This idiom highlights the importance of collaboration, teamwork, and selflessness in various personal and professional relationships.

Share via Whatsapp

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

The person who, with inner conviction, loathes stealing, killing, and assault, may find himself performing these acts with relative ease when commanded by authority. Behaviour that is unthinkable in an individual who is acting of his own volition may be executed without hesitation when carried out under orders. An act carried out under command is, psychologically, of a profoundly different character than spontaneous action. The important task, from the standpoint of a psychological study of obedience, is to be able to take conceptions of authority and translate them into personal experience. It is one thing to talk in abstract terms about the respective rights of the individual and of authority; it is quite another to examine a moral choice in a real situation. We all know about the philosophic problems of freedom and authority. But in every case where the problem is not merely academic there is a real person who must obey or disobey authority. All musing prior to this moment is mere speculation, and all acts of disobedience are characterized by such a moment of decisive action. When we move to the laboratory, the problem narrows: if an experimenter tells a subject to act with increasing severity against another person, under what conditions will the subject comply, and under what conditions will he disobey? The laboratory problem is vivid, intense, and real. It is not something apart from life, but carries to an extreme and very logical conclusion certain trends inherent in the ordinary functioning of the social world. The question arises as to whether there is any connection between what we have studied in the laboratory and the forms of obedience we have so often deplored throughout history. The differences in the two situations are, of course, enormous, yet the difference in scale, numbers, and political context may be relatively unimportant as long as certain essential features are retained. To the degree that an absence of compulsion is present, obedience is coloured by a cooperative mood; to the degree that the threat of force or punishment against the person is intimated, obedience is compelled by fear. The major problem for the individual is to recapture control of his own regnant processes once he has committed them to the purposes of others. The difficulty this entails represents the poignant and in some degree tragic element in the situation, for nothing is bleaker than the sight of a person striving yet not fully able to control his own behaviour in a situation of consequence to him. The essence of obedience is the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another‘s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as culpable for his actions. Once this critical shift of viewpoint has occurred, all of the essential features of obedience—the adjustment of thought, the freedom to engage in cruel behaviour, and the types of justification experienced by the person (essentially similar whether they occur in a psychological laboratory or on the battlefiel d)—follow. The question of generality, therefore, is not resolved by enumerating all of the manifest differences between the psychological laboratory and other situations, but by carefullyconstructing a situation that captures the essence of obedience—a situation in which a person gives himself over to authority and no longer views himself as the cause of his own actions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q.In the context of the points being made by the author in the passage, the phrase absence of compulsion (line 30) refers to

View answer

The person who, with inner conviction, loathes stealing, killing, and assault, may find himself performing these acts with relative ease when commanded by authority. Behaviour that is unthinkable in an individual who is acting of his own volition may be executed without hesitation when carried out under orders. An act carried out under command is, psychologically, of a profoundly different character than spontaneous action.The important task, from the standpoint of a psychological study of obedience, is to be able to take conceptions of authority and translate them into personal experience. It is one thing to talk in abstract terms about the respective rights of the individual and of authority; it is quite another to examine a moral choice in a real situation. We all know about the philosophic problems of freedom and authority. But in every case where the problem is not merely academic there is a real person who must obey or disobey authority. All musing prior to this moment is mere speculation, and all acts of disobedience are characterized by such a moment of decisive action. When we move to the laboratory, the problem narrows: if an experimenter tells a subject to act with increasing severity against another person, under what conditions will the subject comply, and under what conditions will he disobey? The laboratory problem is vivid, intense, and real. It is not something apart from life, but carries to an extreme and very logical conclusion certain trends inherent in the ordinary functioning of the social world. The question arises as to whether there is any connection between what we have studied in the laboratory and the forms of obedience we have so often deplored throughout history. The differences in the two situations are, of course, enormous, yet the difference in scale, numbers, and political context may be relatively unimportant as long as certain essential features are retained. To the degree that an absence of compulsion is present, obedience is coloured by a cooperative mood; to the degree that the threat of force or punishment against the person is intimated, obedience is compelled by fear. The major problem for the individual is to recapture control of his own regnant processes once he has committed them to the purposes of others. The difficulty this entails represents the poignant and in some degree tragic element in the situation, for nothing is bleaker than the sight of a person striving yet not fully able to control his own behaviour in a situation of consequence to him. The essence of obedience is the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out anothers wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as culpable for his actions. Once this critical shift of viewpoint has occurred, all of the essential features of obediencethe adjustment of thought, the freedom to engage in cruel behaviour, and the types of justification experienced by the person (essentially similar whether they occur in a psychological laboratory or on the battlefiel d)follow. The question of generality, therefore, is not resolved by enumerating all of the manifest differences between the psychological laboratory and other situations, but by carefullyconstructing a situation that captures the essence of obediencea situation in which a person gives himself over to authority and no longer views himself as the cause of his own actions.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.Which of the following findings would serve to most WEAKEN the authors claim in the passage about obedience to authority?

View answer

As formal organizations, business corporations are distinguished by their particular goals, which include maximization of profits, growth, and survival. Providing goods and services is a means to this end. If, for example, a number of individuals (outsiders or even insiders) believe that a company‘s aggressive marketing of infant formula in third world countries is morally wrong, the company is unlikely to be moved by arguments based on ethos alone as long as what it is doing remains profitable. But if those opposed to the company‘s practice organize a highly effective boycott of the company‘s products, their moral views will soon enter into the company‘s deliberations indirectly as limiting operating conditions. They can, at this point, no more be ignored than a prohibitive increase in the costs of certain raw materials. Although the concepts and categories of ethics may be applied to the conduct of corporations, there are important differences between the values and principles underlying corporate behaviour and those underlying the actions of most individuals. If corporations are by their nature end- or goal-directed how can they acknowledge acts as wrong in and of themselves? Is it possible to hold one criminally responsible for acts that if performed by a human person would result in criminal liability? The first case of this type to achieve widespread public attention was the attempt to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for manslaughter as the result of alleged negligent or reckless decision making concerning the safety engineering of the Pinto vehicle. Although the defendant corporation and its officers were found innocent after trial, the case can serve as an exemplar for our purposes. In essence, the prosecution in this case attempted to show that the corporation had produced and distributed a vehicle that was known to be defective at the time of production and sale, and that even after a great deal of additional information accumulated regarding the nature of the problems, the corporation took no action to correct them. The obvious non-corporate analogy would be the prosecution of a person who was driving a car with brakes known to be faulty, who does not have them repaired because it would cost too much, and who kills someone when the brakes eventually fail and the car does not stop in time. Such cases involving individuals are prosecuted and won regularly. If corporations have no concept of right or wrong because they are exclusively goal-directed, can they be convicted in cases of this type, and what purpose would be served by such a conviction? Perhaps we can make a utilitarian argument for convicting corporations of such crimes. The argument would be that of deterrence; conviction and punishment would deter other corporations from taking similar actions under similar circumstances. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that deterrence does not work on corporations, even if, arguably, it works on individuals. The possibility of being discovered and the potential magnitude of the fine merely become more data to be included in the analysis of limiting conditions. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following: Q. If a company that produced shampoo products opted to stop the routine testing of its products on animals because it decided that it is wrong to cause the animals pain, what effect would this have on the argument made in the passage?

View answer

The person who, with inner conviction, loathes stealing, killing, and assault, may find himself performing these acts with relative ease when commanded by authority. Behaviour that is unthinkable in an individual who is acting of his own volition may be executed without hesitation when carried out under orders. An act carried out under command is, psychologically, of a profoundly different character than spontaneous action.The important task, from the standpoint of a psychological study of obedience, is to be able to take conceptions of authority and translate them into personal experience. It is one thing to talk in abstract terms about the respective rights of the individual and of authority; it is quite another to examine a moral choice in a real situation. We all know about the philosophic problems of freedom and authority. But in every case where the problem is not merely academic there is a real person who must obey or disobey authority. All musing prior to this moment is mere speculation, and all acts of disobedience are characterized by such a moment of decisive action. When we move to the laboratory, the problem narrows: if an experimenter tells a subject to act with increasing severity against another person, under what conditions will the subject comply, and under what conditions will he disobey? The laboratory problem is vivid, intense, and real. It is not something apart from life, but carries to an extreme and very logical conclusion certain trends inherent in the ordinary functioning of the social world. The question arises as to whether there is any connection between what we have studied in the laboratory and the forms of obedience we have so often deplored throughout history. The differences in the two situations are, of course, enormous, yet the difference in scale, numbers, and political context may be relatively unimportant as long as certain essential features are retained. To the degree that an absence of compulsion is present, obedience is coloured by a cooperative mood; to the degree that the threat of force or punishment against the person is intimated, obedience is compelled by fear. The major problem for the individual is to recapture control of his own regnant processes once he has committed them to the purposes of others. The difficulty this entails represents the poignant and in some degree tragic element in the situation, for nothing is bleaker than the sight of a person striving yet not fully able to control his own behaviour in a situation of consequence to him. The essence of obedience is the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out anothers wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as culpable for his actions. Once this critical shift of viewpoint has occurred, all of the essential features of obediencethe adjustment of thought, the freedom to engage in cruel behaviour, and the types of justification experienced by the person (essentially similar whether they occur in a psychological laboratory or on the battlefiel d)follow. The question of generality, therefore, is not resolved by enumerating all of the manifest differences between the psychological laboratory and other situations, but by carefullyconstructing a situation that captures the essence of obediencea situation in which a person gives himself over to authority and no longer views himself as the cause of his own actions.Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the following:Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT false?

View answer

In the world today we make health and end in itself. We have forgotten that health is really means to enable a person to do his work and do it well. a lot of modern medicine and this includes many patients as well as many physicians pays very little attention to health but very much attention to those who imagine that they are ill. Our great concern with health is shown by the medical columns in newspapers. the health articles in popular magazines and the popularity of television programmes and all those books on medicine. We talk about health all the time. Yet for the most part the only result is more people with imaginary illness. The healthy man should not be wasting time talking about health: he should be using health for work. The work does the work that good health possible.The passage suggests that

View answer

To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2024 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice To play second fiddle a)To be happy, cheerful and healthyb)To reduce importance of one's senior c)To support the role and view of another persond)To do back seat drivingCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.

Explore Courses for Verbal exam