What were the recommendations of the Ashok Mehta committee?1. A distri...
Recommendations of the Ashok Mehta Committee:
1. Decentralisation at the District Level: The Ashok Mehta Committee recommended that decentralisation should begin at the district level. The district should be the first point for decentralisation under popular supervision below the state level. This would ensure that decision-making is closer to the people and more responsive to their needs.
2. Zila Parishad as Supervisory Body: The committee recommended that the Zila Parishad should be the supervisory body and made responsible for planning at the district level. This would ensure that planning is done in a holistic manner, taking into account the needs of all sections of society.
3. Political Participation in Panchayat Elections: The committee recommended that there should be an official participation of political parties at all levels of Panchayat elections. This would ensure that the Panchayat system is more democratic and political parties are held accountable for the decisions taken by the Panchayats.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Ashok Mehta Committee made some important recommendations for strengthening the Panchayat system in India. These recommendations focused on decentralisation at the district level, the role of the Zila Parishad in planning, and political participation in Panchayat elections. These recommendations have been instrumental in shaping the Panchayat system in India and ensuring that it is more responsive to the needs of the people.
What were the recommendations of the Ashok Mehta committee?1. A distri...
The main recommendations of the committee were:
The 3-tier system of Panchayati Raj should be replaced by the 2-tier system: Zilla Parishad at the district level, and below it, the Mandal Panchayat Consisting of a group of villages covering a population of 15000 to 20000.
A district should be the first point for decentralisation under popular supervision below the state level.
Zila Parishad should be the executive body and made responsible for planning at the district level.
There should be an official participation of political parties at all levels of Panchayat elections. The Panchayat Raj institutions should have compulsory powers of taxation to mobilise their own financial resources.
There should be a regular social audit by a district level agency and by a committee of legislators to check whether the funds allotted for the vulnerable social and economic groups are actually spent on them.
The state government should not supersede the Panchayat Raj institutions. In case of an imperative supersession, the election should be held within 6 months from the date of supersession.
The Nyaya Panchayats should be kept as separate bodies from that of development Panchayats. They should be presided over by a qualified judge etc.