Which of the following is/are related to the relationship between the...
- Surat split: This happened after the Swadeshi movement when the Indian National Congress split into extremist and moderates.
- Lucknow Pact: The moderates and extremists joined together.
Which of the following is/are related to the relationship between the...
Relationship between Moderates and Extremists in Indian National Movement
The Indian national movement was marked by a complex relationship between the moderate and extremist factions. The following events highlight this relationship:
1. Surat Split 1907
The Surat split of 1907 was a significant event in the Indian national movement. It was caused by differences between the moderate and extremist factions of the Indian National Congress. The moderates, led by Gopal Krishna Gokhale, believed in a gradual and constitutional approach to achieving independence. On the other hand, the extremists, led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak, believed in a more aggressive and militant approach.
2. Lucknow Pact 1916
The Lucknow Pact of 1916 marked a temporary reconciliation between the moderates and extremists. The pact was signed between the Congress and the Muslim League, with both factions working together towards a common goal of self-rule. The moderates were represented by leaders such as Gokhale and Dadabhai Naoroji, while the extremists were represented by Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai.
3. August Declaration 1917
The August Declaration of 1917 was a significant event in the Indian national movement. It was a statement made by the British government, indicating that they were willing to grant greater self-governance to India. The moderates welcomed this declaration, while the extremists were more skeptical, believing that it did not go far enough.
4. Lahore Session Congress 1929
The Lahore Session of the Congress in 1929 marked a significant shift in the Indian national movement. It was at this session that the demand for complete independence was first made. This demand was put forward by the extremists, who had become increasingly influential within the Congress. The moderates, however, were still hesitant to embrace complete independence, preferring a more cautious approach.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the relationship between the moderate and extremist factions was a complex one, marked by periods of cooperation and conflict. While the moderates believed in a gradual and constitutional approach to achieving independence, the extremists favored a more aggressive and militant approach. The events mentioned above highlight the different positions taken by these factions and their impact on the Indian national movement.