All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Lack of ‘internal democracy’ with... Start Learning for Free
Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies
1. Concentration of power at the top in the party
2. Provincial decentralization of the party
Which of the above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your UPSC doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties impl...
  • All over the world, there is a tendency in political parties towards the concentration of power in one or few leaders at the top. Parties do not keep membership registers, do not hold organisational meetings and do not conduct internal elections regularly.
  • Ordinary members of the party do not get sufficient information on what happens inside the party.
  • They do not have the means or the connections needed to influence the decisions. As a result, the leaders assume greater power to make decisions in the name of the party.
  • Since one or a few leaders exercise paramount power in the party, those who disagree with the leadership find it difficult to continue in the party. More than loyalty to party principles and policies, personal loyalty to the leader becomes more important.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties impl...

Concentration of power at the top in the party:
- Lack of internal democracy within political parties often leads to a concentration of power at the top.
- This means that key decision-making processes are controlled by a select few individuals within the party.
- Without internal democracy, party members may not have a say in important matters such as candidate selection, policy decisions, or party strategies.
- This can result in a lack of transparency and accountability within the party.

Provincial decentralization of the party:
- On the other hand, provincial decentralization of the party implies that power is distributed among different regions or provinces.
- This can help in ensuring that the party is more responsive to the needs and concerns of different communities.
- However, lack of internal democracy can hinder effective decentralization as power may still be centralized at the top levels of the party.
- Without mechanisms for internal democracy, even decentralized structures may not function effectively.

Therefore, in the context of the given options, the correct statement is "1 only" as lack of internal democracy is more likely to lead to a concentration of power at the top within a political party.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage Gandhiji would agree with which of the following statements:I. State owes its existence to violence.II. State represents violence in full form.III. State is not an end but a means to make people’s life better.IV. State should have centralized power to ensure good governance.Select the correct answer using the code given below

There has been a significant trend worldwide towards regionalism in government, resulting in a widespread transfer of powers downwards towards regions and communities since 1990s. This process, which involves the creation of new political entities and bodies at a sub-national level and an increase in their content and powers, is known as devolution. Devolution has been characterized as being made up of three factors—political legitimacy, decentralization of authority and decentralization of resources. Political legitimacy here means a mass demand from below for the decentralization process, which is able to create a political force for it to take place. In many cases, decentralization is initiated by the upper tier of government without sufficient political mobilization for it at the grassroots level, and in such cases the decentralization process often does not fulfil its objectives.Q.Which among the following is the most logical, rational and critical inference that can be made from the above passage?

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. Q. Gandhiji contented himself with Thoreau’s classical statement because

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Top Courses for UPSC

Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Lack of ‘internal democracy’ within political parties implies1. Concentration of power at the top in the party2. Provincial decentralization of the partyWhich of the above is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)NoneCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup