Verbal Exam > Verbal Questions > Although initial investigations pointed towar...
Start Learning for Free
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......
- a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crime
- b)the additional information confirmed his guilt
- c)the subsequent events established that he was guilt
- d)the subsequent events proved that he was innocent
- e)he gave an open confession of his crime
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preced...
- The sentence begins with ‘although’ implying a contrast and talks of what the initial investigation revealed. The blank must therefore be about what subsequent events showed or proved.
- Option (d) "the subsequent events proved that he was innocent" is the correct choice.
Most Upvoted Answer
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preced...
Intial investigation pointed, he was gulity. the word although is used.so he was innocent.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preced...
Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'D' - he gave an open confession of his crime.
Initial Investigations:
Initial investigations pointed towards him, implying that there were certain indications or evidence that suggested his involvement in the crime. However, this does not necessarily confirm his guilt. It simply means that the initial investigations raised suspicion.
Preceding Events:
The preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crime. This means that the events or evidence that occurred before the investigation supported the idea that he was guilty. However, corroboration does not prove guilt. It only adds weight to the suspicion.
Additional Information:
The additional information confirmed his guilt. This means that after the initial investigations, further information or evidence was obtained that solidified the belief that he was indeed guilty. However, confirmation does not equate to proof.
Subsequent Events:
The subsequent events established that he was guilty. This means that as the investigation progressed, events or evidence unfolded that clearly indicated his guilt. This could include witnesses, surveillance footage, or any other concrete proof that directly linked him to the crime. Establishing guilt is a stronger form of evidence than mere corroboration or confirmation.
Subsequent Events Proving Innocence:
The subsequent events proved that he was innocent. This statement contradicts the initial investigations, the preceding events, the additional information, and the subsequent events that were mentioned earlier. It suggests that new evidence emerged that completely exonerated him and proved his innocence. However, this contradicts the initial information that pointed towards his involvement.
Open Confession:
The correct option is that he gave an open confession of his crime. An open confession is a clear admission of guilt by the person involved. It removes any doubt or ambiguity about his involvement and serves as strong proof of his guilt. Confessions are often considered one of the most compelling pieces of evidence in criminal cases.
Overall, while initial investigations and preceding events may indicate suspicion or raise doubts about someone's involvement in a crime, it is the subsequent events and, particularly, an open confession that provide stronger evidence of guilt.
The correct answer is option 'D' - he gave an open confession of his crime.
Initial Investigations:
Initial investigations pointed towards him, implying that there were certain indications or evidence that suggested his involvement in the crime. However, this does not necessarily confirm his guilt. It simply means that the initial investigations raised suspicion.
Preceding Events:
The preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crime. This means that the events or evidence that occurred before the investigation supported the idea that he was guilty. However, corroboration does not prove guilt. It only adds weight to the suspicion.
Additional Information:
The additional information confirmed his guilt. This means that after the initial investigations, further information or evidence was obtained that solidified the belief that he was indeed guilty. However, confirmation does not equate to proof.
Subsequent Events:
The subsequent events established that he was guilty. This means that as the investigation progressed, events or evidence unfolded that clearly indicated his guilt. This could include witnesses, surveillance footage, or any other concrete proof that directly linked him to the crime. Establishing guilt is a stronger form of evidence than mere corroboration or confirmation.
Subsequent Events Proving Innocence:
The subsequent events proved that he was innocent. This statement contradicts the initial investigations, the preceding events, the additional information, and the subsequent events that were mentioned earlier. It suggests that new evidence emerged that completely exonerated him and proved his innocence. However, this contradicts the initial information that pointed towards his involvement.
Open Confession:
The correct option is that he gave an open confession of his crime. An open confession is a clear admission of guilt by the person involved. It removes any doubt or ambiguity about his involvement and serves as strong proof of his guilt. Confessions are often considered one of the most compelling pieces of evidence in criminal cases.
Overall, while initial investigations and preceding events may indicate suspicion or raise doubts about someone's involvement in a crime, it is the subsequent events and, particularly, an open confession that provide stronger evidence of guilt.
|
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
|
|
Top Courses for VerbalView all
Question Description
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Although initial investigations pointed towards him ......a)the preceding events corroborated his involvement in the crimeb)the additional information confirmed his guiltc)the subsequent events established that he was guiltd)the subsequent events proved that he was innocente)he gave an open confession of his crimeCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup