1.rowlatt act was passed through imperial legislative council in 1919 against the oppose of indian members......................................................................2.this act gave british government the power to repress any political activities........................................3.this act also gablve british government the power to detain all political prisoners for 2 years without any trial...........................................................................................................................................................................because of all the upgiven issues,undians opposed the rowlatt act....

Introduction:
The Rowlatt Act was a law passed by the British government in 1919 that gave the colonial authorities in India sweeping powers to arrest and detain individuals without trial.

Reasons for opposition:
The Indian people opposed the act for several reasons, including:

1. Violation of civil rights: The act violated Indians' civil rights by allowing the government to arrest and detain anyone without trial, essentially giving the government the power to silence critics and political opponents.

2. Lack of consultation: The Indian people were not consulted about the act before it was passed, and it was seen as a betrayal of the British government's promise to grant greater autonomy to India.

3. Political repression: The act was seen as a tool of political repression, aimed at suppressing the Indian independence movement and preventing any kind of political dissent.

Protests and opposition:
The Rowlatt Act sparked widespread protests and opposition throughout India. Some of the key events include:

1. The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre: On April 13, 1919, British troops opened fire on a peaceful crowd of protesters in Jallianwala Bagh, killing at least 379 people and injuring hundreds more. The massacre galvanized Indian opposition to the Rowlatt Act and British rule in general.

2. Non-cooperation movement: In response to the Rowlatt Act and the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi launched the Non-Cooperation Movement, which called for a boycott of British goods and institutions.

3. Civil disobedience: Indian nationalists also engaged in acts of civil disobedience, including strikes, protests, and other forms of resistance.

Conclusion:
The Rowlatt Act was a controversial law that gave the British government in India sweeping powers to suppress political dissent and opposition. The act was widely opposed by the Indian people, who saw it as a violation of their civil rights and an attack on their aspirations for greater autonomy and independence. The opposition to the Rowlatt Act helped to galvanize the Indian independence movement and paved the way for future struggles against British rule.