All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)... Start Learning for Free
Civil equality implies
a)equality before law
b)equality of opportunity
c)equal distribution of wealth
d)equal right to participate in the affairs of the state
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your UPSC doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)...
Civil equality: Meaning and implications

Civil equality refers to the equal treatment of every citizen before the law, without any discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It implies that every individual has the same rights and opportunities and that the law applies to all in the same manner. Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and a cornerstone of human rights.

Implications of civil equality

1. Protection of individual rights: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has equal protection of law, and their rights are not violated. The state cannot discriminate against any individual or group on the grounds of their identity or beliefs.

2. Fair justice system: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has access to a fair and impartial justice system, regardless of their social or economic status. The court of law treats everyone equally and delivers justice without any bias.

3. Promotion of democracy: Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy. It ensures that every citizen has an equal say in the affairs of the state and participates in the decision-making process without any discrimination.

4. Elimination of discrimination: Civil equality promotes social harmony and reduces discrimination based on caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It fosters a sense of belongingness and inclusiveness among citizens.

Conclusion

Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and ensures the protection of individual rights and fair justice. It eliminates discrimination and promotes social harmony. Therefore, civil equality is essential for the development of a just and democratic society.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)...
According to me above answer should be option 'd'. please explain someone else also.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. How many countries did not send even a single participant in any one event?

Passage - 5Access to schooling for those coming of school age is close to universal, but access to quality exhibits a sharp gradient with socio-economic status. Quotas for the weaker sections in private schools is a provision introduced by the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The quotas have imposed a debate on issues of social integration and equity in education that private actors had escaped by and large, The idea of egalitarian education system with equality of opportunity as its primary goal appears to be outside the space that private school principals inhabit. Therefore, the imposition of the quotas has led to resistance, sometimes justified,Q. With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Making equality of opportunity a reality is the fundamental goal of the Indian education system.2. The present Indian school system is unable to provide egalitarian education.3. Abolition of private schools and establishment of more government schools is the only way to ensure egalitarian education.Q.Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Considering all the participants sent by the five countries put together, how many instances were there wherein exactly one participant was sent by a country for an event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Which country sent the maximum number of participants for the high jump event?

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Top Courses for UPSC

Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup