All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Verbal Exam  >  Verbal Questions  >  What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at ei... Start Learning for Free
What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight o'clock.

  • a)
    can have happened / would be. 

  • b)
    should have happened / has been

  • c)
    may happen / will have been

  • d)
    would happen / is

  • e)
    might have happened / will be

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Verbal doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have hap...
Correct option is E. might have happened / will be

This is the correct choice because the first part "What might have happened to Phil?" is a speculation about what could have possibly occurred to Phil. The second part "He said he will be here at eight o'clock." is referring to a future event that Phil had planned. Both parts are grammatically correct and contextually appropriate. The other options do not fit contextually and/or are grammatically incorrect.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have hap...
Answer:

Possible explanation for the answer is:

Modal verbs and tenses:

- Modal auxiliary verbs express attitudes, possibilities, obligations, permissions, etc.
- Tenses indicate the time of the action or state (past, present, future, etc.).

Analysis of the options:

- Option A: "might have happened" is a past possibility, and "will be" is a future certainty. They don't match in time and meaning.
- Option B: "should have happened" is a past obligation, and "has been" is a past completion. They don't match in time and meaning.
- Option C: "may happen" is a present or future possibility, and "will have been" is a future perfect state. They don't match in time and meaning.
- Option D: "would happen" is a conditional outcome, and "is" is a present fact. They don't match in time and meaning.
- Option E: "can have happened" is a past possibility or ability, and "would be" is a future conditional state. They match in time and meaning.

Conclusion:

The correct answer is E, "can have happened / would be". This sentence implies that Phil had the option or ability to come at eight o'clock, and that his arrival in the future is conditional on some other factor. For example, if he gets the invitation or confirmation, he would be here at eight o'clock.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam

Similar Verbal Doubts

In public Greek life, a man had to make his way at every step through the immediate persuasion of the spoken word. Whether it be addressing an assembly, a law-court or a more restricted body, his oratory would be a public affair rather than under the purview of a quiet committee, without the support of circulated commentary, and with no backcloth of daily reportage to make his own or others views familiar to his hearers. The oratorys immediate effect was all-important; it would be naive to expect that mere reasonableness or an inherently good case would equate to a satisfactory appeal. Therefore, it was early realized that persuasion was an art, up to a point teachable, and a variety of specific pedagogy was well established in the second half of the fifth century. When the sophists claimed to teach their pupils how to succeed in public life, rhetoric was a large part of what they meant, though, to do them justice, it was not the whole.Skill naturally bred mistrust. If a man of good will had need of expression advanced of mere twaddle, to learn how to expound his contention effectively, the truculent or pugnacious could be taught to dress their case in well-seeming guise. It was a standing charge against the sophists that they made the worse appear the better cause, and it was this immoral lesson which the hero of Aristophanes Clouds went to learn from, of all people, Socrates. Again, the charge is often made in court that the opponent is an adroit orator and the jury must be circumspect so as not to let him delude them. From the frequency with which this crops up, it is patent that the accusation of cleverness might damage a man. In Greece, juries, of course, were familiar with the style, and would recognize the more evident artifices, but it was worth a litigants while to get his speech written for him by an expert. Persuasive oratory was certainly one of the pressures that would be effective in an Athenian law-court.A more insidious danger was the inevitable desire to display this art as an art. It is not easy to define the point at which a legitimate concern with style shades off into preoccupation with manner at the expense of matter, but it is easy to perceive that many Greek writers of the fourth and later centuries passed that danger point. The most influential was Isocrates, who polished for long years his pamphlets, written in the form of speeches, and taught to many pupils the smooth and easy periods he had perfected. Isocrates took to the written word in compensation for his inadequacy in live oratory; the tough and nervous tones of a Demosthenes were far removed from his, though they, too, were based on study and practice. The exaltation of virtuosity did palpable harm. The balance was always delicate, between style as a vehicle and style as an end in itself.We must not try to pinpoint a specific moment when it, once and for all, tipped over; but certainly, as time went on, virtuosity weighed heavier. While Greek freedom lasted, and it mattered what course of action a Greek city decided to take, rhetoric was a necessary preparation for public life, whatever its side effects. It had been a source of strength for Greek civilization that its problems, of all kinds, were thrashed out very much in public. The shallowness which the study of rhetoric might (not must) encourage was the corresponding weakness. Directions: Read the above paragraph and answer the followingQ.Implicit in the statement that the exaltation of virtuosity was not due mainly to Isocrates because public display was normal in a world that talked far more than it read is the assumption that

What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for Verbal 2025 is part of Verbal preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Verbal exam syllabus. Information about What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Verbal 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Verbal. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Verbal Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What ---- to Phil? He said he ---- here at eight oclock.a)can have happened / would be.b)should have happened / has beenc)may happen / will have beend)would happen / ise)might have happened / will beCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Verbal tests.
Explore Courses for Verbal exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup