All Exams >
BPSC (Bihar) >
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams >
All Questions
All questions of Previous year Papers for BPSC (Bihar) Exam
The Drafting of the Constitution was completed on- a)26th January, 1950
- b)26th December, 1949
- c)26th November, 1949
- d)30th November, 1949
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The Drafting of the Constitution was completed on
a)
26th January, 1950
b)
26th December, 1949
c)
26th November, 1949
d)
30th November, 1949
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
A draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the Assembly on 4 November 1947, which was debated and over 2000 amendments were moved over a period of two years. Finally on 26 November 1949, the process was completed and the Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution.
Which of the following feature of Indian Constitution was borrowed from USA?- a)Rule of law
- b)Fundamental Right
- c)Rigid Constitution
- d)Directive Principles of State
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following feature of Indian Constitution was borrowed from USA?
a)
Rule of law
b)
Fundamental Right
c)
Rigid Constitution
d)
Directive Principles of State
|
Vikas Choudhury answered |
The Constitution of India is the longest, written constitution in the world, with 448 articles under 25 parts, 12 schedules, 5 appendices, and 101 amendments today. But few know that our Constitution borrowed some of its most salient features from other countries around the world.
From- U.S.A Written Constitution
1. Written Constitution
2. Vice President as the ex office Chairman of Rajya Sabha
3. Fundamental Rights
4. Supreme Court
5. Provision of States
6. Independence of Judiciary and
7. judicial review
8. Preamble
9. Removal of Supreme court and High court Judges
Which one of the following was NOT proposed by the 73rd Constitutional amendment in the area of Panchayati Raj?- a)The Panchayati Raj elected functionaries will be disqualified to hold their offices if they have more than two children
- b)The States will constitute their Finance Commissions to allocate resources to Panchayati Raj institutions
- c)Thirty percent seats in all elected rural local bodies will be reserved for women candidates at all levels
- d)The elections will be held in six months time if Panchayati Raj bodies are superceded or dissolved by the State Government
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following was NOT proposed by the 73rd Constitutional amendment in the area of Panchayati Raj?
a)
The Panchayati Raj elected functionaries will be disqualified to hold their offices if they have more than two children
b)
The States will constitute their Finance Commissions to allocate resources to Panchayati Raj institutions
c)
Thirty percent seats in all elected rural local bodies will be reserved for women candidates at all levels
d)
The elections will be held in six months time if Panchayati Raj bodies are superceded or dissolved by the State Government
|
Athira Mishra answered |
73rd Constitutional Amendment in the area of Panchayat Raj states following
Thirty per cent seats in all elected rural local bodies will be reserved for women candidates at all levels.
The States will constitute their Finance Commissions to allocate resources to Panchayat Raj institutions.
The elections will be held in six months' time if Panchayat Raj bodies are superseded or dissolved by the State government.
A philosophy that the worker should share in industrial decisions termed as- a)industrial democracy
- b)worker sovereignty
- c)industrial socialism
- d)worker dictatorship
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
A philosophy that the worker should share in industrial decisions termed as
a)
industrial democracy
b)
worker sovereignty
c)
industrial socialism
d)
worker dictatorship
|
Sanvi Kapoor answered |
The term democracy says that all the people are equal so here also in industrial democracy consent of all the workers will be asked and this term is known as industrial democracy.
Who was the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly?- a)Dr B R Ambedkar
- b)Dr Rajendra Prasad
- c)Jawaharlal Nehru
- d)Vallabhbhai Patel
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly?
a)
Dr B R Ambedkar
b)
Dr Rajendra Prasad
c)
Jawaharlal Nehru
d)
Vallabhbhai Patel
|
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha was the first chairman (temporary) of Constituent Assembly. Later Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the president and Its vice-president was Harendra Coomar Mookerjee, a Christian from Bengal and former vice-chancellor of Calcutta University.
From which historical work were the words ‘Satyameva Jayate’ appearing under the national emblem taken?- a)Bhagawad Gita
- b)Rig Veda
- c)Ramayana
- d)Mundaka Upanishad
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
From which historical work were the words ‘Satyameva Jayate’ appearing under the national emblem taken?
a)
Bhagawad Gita
b)
Rig Veda
c)
Ramayana
d)
Mundaka Upanishad
|
Alok Verma answered |
"Satyameva Jayate" is a mantra from the ancient Indian scripture Mundaka Upanishad. Following the independence of India, it was adopted as the national motto of India in 26 January 1950. It is inscribed in script at the base of the national emblem. The emblem and the words "Satyameva Jayate" are inscribed on one side of all Indian currency. The emblem is an adaptation of the Lion Capital of Ashoka which was erected around 250 BCE at Sarnath, near Varanasi in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It is inscribed on all currency notes and national documents.
Consider the following statements regarding the National Human Rights Commission of India:
1. Its Chairman must be a retired Chief Justice of India.
2. It has formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission.
3. Its powers are only recommendatory in nature.
4. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission.
Q. Which of the above statements are correct?
- a)1, 2, 3 and 4
- b)2 and 4
- c)2 and 3
- d)1 and 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements regarding the National Human Rights Commission of India:
1. Its Chairman must be a retired Chief Justice of India.
2. It has formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission.
3. Its powers are only recommendatory in nature.
4. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission.
1. Its Chairman must be a retired Chief Justice of India.
2. It has formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission.
3. Its powers are only recommendatory in nature.
4. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission.
Q. Which of the above statements are correct?
a)
1, 2, 3 and 4
b)
2 and 4
c)
2 and 3
d)
1 and 3 and 4
|
Ameya Mukherjee answered |
1, 3, and 4 are correct.
Explanation:
1. The Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) must be a retired Chief Justice of India. This requirement ensures that the person heading the commission has extensive legal knowledge and experience in dealing with human rights issues.
2. The NHRC does not have formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission. However, separate State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) have been established in many Indian states under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. These SHRCs function independently of the NHRC, although they have similar powers and functions.
3. The powers of the NHRC are only recommendatory in nature. The commission does not have the authority to enforce its recommendations or punish those responsible for human rights violations. However, its recommendations carry significant weight, and the government often takes action based on them.
4. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission. The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, specifies that at least one member of the NHRC should be a woman. This provision ensures that there is gender diversity in the commission and that women's human rights issues are adequately represented.
Explanation:
1. The Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) must be a retired Chief Justice of India. This requirement ensures that the person heading the commission has extensive legal knowledge and experience in dealing with human rights issues.
2. The NHRC does not have formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission. However, separate State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) have been established in many Indian states under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. These SHRCs function independently of the NHRC, although they have similar powers and functions.
3. The powers of the NHRC are only recommendatory in nature. The commission does not have the authority to enforce its recommendations or punish those responsible for human rights violations. However, its recommendations carry significant weight, and the government often takes action based on them.
4. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission. The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, specifies that at least one member of the NHRC should be a woman. This provision ensures that there is gender diversity in the commission and that women's human rights issues are adequately represented.
The Constitution of India came into force on- a)26th January, 1950
- b)26th January, 1952
- c)15th August, 1948
- d)26th November, 1949
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Constitution of India came into force on
a)
26th January, 1950
b)
26th January, 1952
c)
15th August, 1948
d)
26th November, 1949
|
|
Amit Kumar answered |
The Republic is governed in terms of the Constitution of India which was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 and came into force on 26th January, 1950.
Along with the budget, the Finance Minister also places other documents before the parliament which include “The Macro-Economic Framework Statement” The aforesaid document is presented because this mandated by (2020)- a) Long-standing parliamentary convention
- b) Article 112 and Article 110(1) of the constitution of India
- c) Article 114 of the Constitution of India
- d) Provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Along with the budget, the Finance Minister also places other documents before the parliament which include “The Macro-Economic Framework Statement” The aforesaid document is presented because this mandated by (2020)
a)
Long-standing parliamentary convention
b)
Article 112 and Article 110(1) of the constitution of India
c)
Article 114 of the Constitution of India
d)
Provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003
|
|
Avantika Das answered |
Explanation:
The Macro-Economic Framework Statement is a document presented by the Finance Minister along with the budget. This document is mandated by the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003.
The following are the reasons why the Macro-Economic Framework Statement is presented:
1. Mandate of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003: The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 mandates the presentation of the Macro-Economic Framework Statement along with the budget. This act was enacted to ensure fiscal discipline, transparency and accountability in the management of public finances.
2. To provide an overview of the macroeconomic scenario: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement provides an overview of the macroeconomic scenario of the country. It presents the macroeconomic projections, fiscal policy strategy, and financial sector reforms envisaged in the budget.
3. To assess the impact of policies and programmes: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement assesses the impact of policies and programmes on the macroeconomic scenario. It also identifies the risks and challenges that may affect the achievement of the macroeconomic targets.
4. To facilitate informed decision-making: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement provides information to the Members of Parliament and the public about the macroeconomic scenario and the government's fiscal policy strategy. This facilitates informed decision-making on the budget.
In conclusion, the presentation of the Macro-Economic Framework Statement is mandated by the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003. This document provides an overview of the macroeconomic scenario, assesses the impact of policies and programmes, identifies risks and challenges, and facilitates informed decision-making on the budget.
The Macro-Economic Framework Statement is a document presented by the Finance Minister along with the budget. This document is mandated by the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003.
The following are the reasons why the Macro-Economic Framework Statement is presented:
1. Mandate of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003: The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 mandates the presentation of the Macro-Economic Framework Statement along with the budget. This act was enacted to ensure fiscal discipline, transparency and accountability in the management of public finances.
2. To provide an overview of the macroeconomic scenario: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement provides an overview of the macroeconomic scenario of the country. It presents the macroeconomic projections, fiscal policy strategy, and financial sector reforms envisaged in the budget.
3. To assess the impact of policies and programmes: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement assesses the impact of policies and programmes on the macroeconomic scenario. It also identifies the risks and challenges that may affect the achievement of the macroeconomic targets.
4. To facilitate informed decision-making: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement provides information to the Members of Parliament and the public about the macroeconomic scenario and the government's fiscal policy strategy. This facilitates informed decision-making on the budget.
In conclusion, the presentation of the Macro-Economic Framework Statement is mandated by the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003. This document provides an overview of the macroeconomic scenario, assesses the impact of policies and programmes, identifies risks and challenges, and facilitates informed decision-making on the budget.
A Secular State is one which- a)takes into consideration the religious sentiments of the people
- b)is irreligious
- c)is anti-religion
- d)has no religion of its own
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
A Secular State is one which
a)
takes into consideration the religious sentiments of the people
b)
is irreligious
c)
is anti-religion
d)
has no religion of its own
|
Ridhi Rajput answered |
The correct answer is "D" bcz secular means that doesn't take into account any specific religion. Thus, a secular state is one, which has no religion of its own and there is no religion based discrimination or authority.
Who is the constitutional head of the Government of India?- a)President
- b)Prime Minister
- c)Chief Justice of India
- d)Attorney General
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who is the constitutional head of the Government of India?
a)
President
b)
Prime Minister
c)
Chief Justice of India
d)
Attorney General
|
|
Amit Kumar answered |
The constitutional head of the Executive of the Union is the President. As per Article 79 of the Constitution of India, the council of the Parliament of the Union consists of the President and two Houses known as the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and the House of the People (Lok Sabha).
Which is an extra-constitutional body?- a)Language Commission
- b)Planning Commission
- c)Election Commission
- d)Finance Commission
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which is an extra-constitutional body?
a)
Language Commission
b)
Planning Commission
c)
Election Commission
d)
Finance Commission
|
|
Ankit Kumar answered |
(Correct Option:- B, Planning Commission was a extra Constitutional Body)
Non Constitutional or Extra Constitutional bodies are the same. These bodies aren't defined in the Constitution of the country.
Non Constitutional or Extra Constitutional bodies are the same. These bodies aren't defined in the Constitution of the country.
Division of powers and independent Judiciary are the two important features ofa) unitary form of governmentb federal form of governmentc) democratic form of governmentd) socialist form of governmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
|
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
‘Federal Government’ is a set of government in which powers are distributed between a central authority and various constitutional units.The key features of a federal government are as follows:
(i)Two or more levels of Government: In a federal government there are two or more levels of government at the State, provincial and local levels. As an exception in India we have third level of government i.e., at the local level.
(ii)Constitutional Status : Federalism provides constitutional guarantees for the existence and authority of each tier of government. The jurisdiction of the respective levels or tiers of government are specified in the constitution.
(iii)Independent Judiciary: Independent judiciary is the essence of federal government. Here courts have the power to interpret the constitution and the powers of the different levels of government. The highest court acts as an umpire if a dispute arises between different levels of government in the exercise of their respective powers.
(iv)Financial Autonomy : In order to ensure financial autonomy federalism provides specified sources of revenue for each level of government. Every level is free in its own way to impose taxes and raise funds through remunerative enterprises.In this way a ‘federal government’ has dual objectives i.e., to safeguard and to promote unity of the country by way of mutual trust and agreement to live together.
(v)Distribution of Powers: In federalism different tiers of government govern the same citizens, but each tier has its own jurisdiction in specific matters of legislation, taxation and administration.
Which was the first act of British rule which was brought for the Good Government of India.A: Regulating Act, 1873B: Government of India Act, 1858C: Indian Council Act, 1861
D: Government of India Act, 1935Correct answer is 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which was the first act of British rule which was brought for the Good Government of India.
A: Regulating Act, 1873
B: Government of India Act, 1858
C: Indian Council Act, 1861
D: Government of India Act, 1935
|
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
On August 2, 1858, less than a month after Canning proclaimed the victory of British arms, Parliament passed the Government of India Act, transferring British power over India from the East India Company, whose ineptitude was primarily blamed for the mutiny, to the crown. The merchant company’s residual powers were vested in the secretary of state for India, a minister of Great Britain’s cabinet, who would preside over the India Office in London and be assisted and advised, especially in financial matters, by a Council of India, which consisted initially of 15 Britons, 7 of whom were elected from among the old company’s court of directors and 8 of whom were appointed by the crown. Though some of Britain’s most powerful political leaders became secretaries of state for India in the latter half of the 19th century, actual control over the government of India remained in the hands of British viceroys—who divided their time between Calcutta (Kolkata) and Simla (Shimla)—and their “steel frame” of approximately 1,500 Indian Civil Service (ICS) officials posted “on the spot” throughout British India.
Which is the national flower of India?- a)Rose
- b)Lotus
- c)Lily
- d)Sunflower
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which is the national flower of India?
a)
Rose
b)
Lotus
c)
Lily
d)
Sunflower
|
|
Rajesh Khatri answered |
Lotus (Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn) is the National Flower of India. It is a sacred flower and occupies a unique position in the art and mythology of ancient India and has been an auspicious symbol of Indian culture since time immemorial.
The two forms of democracy are- a)Parliamentary and Presidential
- b)Direct and Indirect
- c)Monarchical and Republican
- d)Parliamentary and King
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The two forms of democracy are
a)
Parliamentary and Presidential
b)
Direct and Indirect
c)
Monarchical and Republican
d)
Parliamentary and King
|
Manisha Tiwari answered |
Forms of Democracy
There are several forms of democracy, but two of the most common forms are direct and indirect democracy.
Direct Democracy
Direct democracy is a form of democracy in which citizens have a direct say in the decision-making process of the government. In a direct democracy, citizens vote on policies and laws directly, rather than electing representatives to do so on their behalf.
Indirect Democracy
Indirect democracy is a form of democracy in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. These representatives are responsible for making policies and laws, and they are held accountable to the citizens who elected them.
Difference between Direct and Indirect Democracy
The main difference between direct and indirect democracy is the level of citizen participation in the decision-making process. In a direct democracy, citizens have a more direct say in the decision-making process, while in an indirect democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
Other Forms of Democracy
Other forms of democracy include:
- Parliamentary democracy: a form of democracy in which the executive branch is accountable to the legislature, and the head of government is usually the leader of the majority party or coalition in the legislature.
- Presidential democracy: a form of democracy in which the executive branch is separate from the legislature, and the head of government is usually directly elected by the people.
- Monarchical democracy: a form of democracy in which a monarch, usually a king or queen, serves as the head of state, but the government is still subject to the will of the people.
- Republic democracy: a form of democracy in which the head of state is usually a president, and the government is based on the rule of law and the will of the people.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there are several forms of democracy, the two most common forms are direct and indirect democracy. Direct democracy involves citizens having a direct say in the decision-making process of the government, while indirect democracy involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Other forms of democracy include parliamentary, presidential, monarchical, and republic democracy.
There are several forms of democracy, but two of the most common forms are direct and indirect democracy.
Direct Democracy
Direct democracy is a form of democracy in which citizens have a direct say in the decision-making process of the government. In a direct democracy, citizens vote on policies and laws directly, rather than electing representatives to do so on their behalf.
Indirect Democracy
Indirect democracy is a form of democracy in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. These representatives are responsible for making policies and laws, and they are held accountable to the citizens who elected them.
Difference between Direct and Indirect Democracy
The main difference between direct and indirect democracy is the level of citizen participation in the decision-making process. In a direct democracy, citizens have a more direct say in the decision-making process, while in an indirect democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
Other Forms of Democracy
Other forms of democracy include:
- Parliamentary democracy: a form of democracy in which the executive branch is accountable to the legislature, and the head of government is usually the leader of the majority party or coalition in the legislature.
- Presidential democracy: a form of democracy in which the executive branch is separate from the legislature, and the head of government is usually directly elected by the people.
- Monarchical democracy: a form of democracy in which a monarch, usually a king or queen, serves as the head of state, but the government is still subject to the will of the people.
- Republic democracy: a form of democracy in which the head of state is usually a president, and the government is based on the rule of law and the will of the people.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there are several forms of democracy, the two most common forms are direct and indirect democracy. Direct democracy involves citizens having a direct say in the decision-making process of the government, while indirect democracy involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Other forms of democracy include parliamentary, presidential, monarchical, and republic democracy.
From the following languages listed in the 8th Schedule of the Constitution pick out the one which is the official language of a State.- a)Kashmiri
- b)Urdu
- c)Sindhi
- d)Nepali
Correct answer is option 'B,D'. Can you explain this answer?
From the following languages listed in the 8th Schedule of the Constitution pick out the one which is the official language of a State.
a)
Kashmiri
b)
Urdu
c)
Sindhi
d)
Nepali
|
|
Amit Sharma answered |
Urdu is official language of various states but has a shared status with other languages eg. Uttar Pradesh has Hindi and urdu as official language.
The legislative council of a state can be created or abolished by the:- a)President of India on recommendation of the parliament
- b)Parliament through special majority
- c)Governor of the state on recommendation of legislative assembly
- d)Parliament on recommendation of concerned state legislative assembly
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The legislative council of a state can be created or abolished by the:
a)
President of India on recommendation of the parliament
b)
Parliament through special majority
c)
Governor of the state on recommendation of legislative assembly
d)
Parliament on recommendation of concerned state legislative assembly
|
Kabir Verma answered |
Proposals for abolition or re-establishment of a state's Legislative Council require confirmation by the Parliament of India. Abolished by the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960.
The system of privy purse in respect of former rulers of Indian States before independence was abolished by the Constitution through- a)26th Amendment Act, 1971
- b)27th Amendment Act, 1971
- c)38th Amendment Act, 1975
- d)42nd Amendment Act, 1976
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The system of privy purse in respect of former rulers of Indian States before independence was abolished by the Constitution through
a)
26th Amendment Act, 1971
b)
27th Amendment Act, 1971
c)
38th Amendment Act, 1975
d)
42nd Amendment Act, 1976
|
|
Ankit Kumar answered |
Correct Answer:- A ( 26th Amendment Act 1971)
With the passage of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, the British Government granted independence to the areas that were directly under their rule (British India) and left the choice to the princely states to decide their future course of action. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel persuaded these princely states to join Indian Union after independence.
In consideration of such princely states signing the Instrument of Accession, the Government of India granted to them a ‘privy purse’, which was a specified sum of money that was payable annually to the rulers of such States.
Relevance of ‘privy purse’
The payments of ‘privy purse’ were made to the former rulers under constitutional provisions of Art. 291 and Art. 362. However, it was often questioned as a relic of the colonial past.
Privy purse conferred ‘special status’ to ruling class, which continued the British practice of ruler and ruled.
It went against the idea of equality enshrined in Preamble and Part 3 of the Constitution.
Moreover, ‘privy purse’ was an added economic pressure on a newly born independent nation, that was ridden with poverty, hunger and security challenges.
Therefore,the then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, argued the case for abolition of privy purse. So, by the 26th Amendment to the Constitution of India in 1971, ‘privy purse’ was abolished. The amendment lead to the omission of Articles 291 and 362.
Reasons for abolition of ‘privy purse’
The abolition of privy purse was needed because it went against the idea of equal rights for all citizens, as enshrined under fundamental rights of Indian constitution.
The concept of rulership, with ‘privy purse’ and special privileges was incompatible with principles of democracy, equality and social justice and it was unrelated to any current functions and social purposes.
In order to fulfill the aspiration of socialistic pattern of society and burgeoning economic pressure, due to 1971 refugee crisis from east Pakistan, there was a need for the Government to reduce revenue deficit.
Conclusion
Though the abolition of privy purse was alleged as constitutional fraud by the rulers of princely states, but it was in sync with ethos of egalitarian society, as envisaged by the constitution.
With the passage of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, the British Government granted independence to the areas that were directly under their rule (British India) and left the choice to the princely states to decide their future course of action. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel persuaded these princely states to join Indian Union after independence.
In consideration of such princely states signing the Instrument of Accession, the Government of India granted to them a ‘privy purse’, which was a specified sum of money that was payable annually to the rulers of such States.
Relevance of ‘privy purse’
The payments of ‘privy purse’ were made to the former rulers under constitutional provisions of Art. 291 and Art. 362. However, it was often questioned as a relic of the colonial past.
Privy purse conferred ‘special status’ to ruling class, which continued the British practice of ruler and ruled.
It went against the idea of equality enshrined in Preamble and Part 3 of the Constitution.
Moreover, ‘privy purse’ was an added economic pressure on a newly born independent nation, that was ridden with poverty, hunger and security challenges.
Therefore,the then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, argued the case for abolition of privy purse. So, by the 26th Amendment to the Constitution of India in 1971, ‘privy purse’ was abolished. The amendment lead to the omission of Articles 291 and 362.
Reasons for abolition of ‘privy purse’
The abolition of privy purse was needed because it went against the idea of equal rights for all citizens, as enshrined under fundamental rights of Indian constitution.
The concept of rulership, with ‘privy purse’ and special privileges was incompatible with principles of democracy, equality and social justice and it was unrelated to any current functions and social purposes.
In order to fulfill the aspiration of socialistic pattern of society and burgeoning economic pressure, due to 1971 refugee crisis from east Pakistan, there was a need for the Government to reduce revenue deficit.
Conclusion
Though the abolition of privy purse was alleged as constitutional fraud by the rulers of princely states, but it was in sync with ethos of egalitarian society, as envisaged by the constitution.
In India, the concept of single citizenship is adopted from- a)England
- b)U S A
- c)Canada
- d)France
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
In India, the concept of single citizenship is adopted from
a)
England
b)
U S A
c)
Canada
d)
France
|
|
Aruna Singh answered |
In India, the concept-of single citizenship is adopted from England.
In which one of the following countries, will the noconfidence motion to bring down the government passed by the legislature be valid only when the legislature is able to find simultaneously a majority to elect successor government?- a)France
- b)Germany
- c)Italy
- d)Portugal
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
In which one of the following countries, will the noconfidence motion to bring down the government passed by the legislature be valid only when the legislature is able to find simultaneously a majority to elect successor government?
a)
France
b)
Germany
c)
Italy
d)
Portugal
|
|
Meera Chopra answered |
As the possibility of the existing Govt. being voted out in a no-confidence motion results in political instability, two provisions were added to the 1949 Weimar Constitution of Germany. As a result, the Bundestag (German Parliament) can express its lack of confidence in the Chancellor (position comparable to the Prime Minister of India) only by electing a successor with the majority of its members.
The preamble to our Constitution ‘ makes no mention of- a)justice
- b)fraternity
- c)equality of status
- d)adult franchise
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The preamble to our Constitution ‘ makes no mention of
a)
justice
b)
fraternity
c)
equality of status
d)
adult franchise
|
|
Alok Verma answered |
The preamble to the Constitution of India is a brief introductory statement that sets out the guiding purpose and principles of the document.. It says: “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY, of thought expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, DO HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”
Civil equality impliesa)equality before lawb)equality of opportunityc)equal distribution of wealthd)equal right to participate in the affairs of the stateCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
|
|
Aashna Bose answered |
Civil equality: Meaning and implications
Civil equality refers to the equal treatment of every citizen before the law, without any discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It implies that every individual has the same rights and opportunities and that the law applies to all in the same manner. Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and a cornerstone of human rights.
Implications of civil equality
1. Protection of individual rights: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has equal protection of law, and their rights are not violated. The state cannot discriminate against any individual or group on the grounds of their identity or beliefs.
2. Fair justice system: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has access to a fair and impartial justice system, regardless of their social or economic status. The court of law treats everyone equally and delivers justice without any bias.
3. Promotion of democracy: Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy. It ensures that every citizen has an equal say in the affairs of the state and participates in the decision-making process without any discrimination.
4. Elimination of discrimination: Civil equality promotes social harmony and reduces discrimination based on caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It fosters a sense of belongingness and inclusiveness among citizens.
Conclusion
Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and ensures the protection of individual rights and fair justice. It eliminates discrimination and promotes social harmony. Therefore, civil equality is essential for the development of a just and democratic society.
Civil equality refers to the equal treatment of every citizen before the law, without any discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It implies that every individual has the same rights and opportunities and that the law applies to all in the same manner. Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and a cornerstone of human rights.
Implications of civil equality
1. Protection of individual rights: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has equal protection of law, and their rights are not violated. The state cannot discriminate against any individual or group on the grounds of their identity or beliefs.
2. Fair justice system: Civil equality ensures that every citizen has access to a fair and impartial justice system, regardless of their social or economic status. The court of law treats everyone equally and delivers justice without any bias.
3. Promotion of democracy: Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy. It ensures that every citizen has an equal say in the affairs of the state and participates in the decision-making process without any discrimination.
4. Elimination of discrimination: Civil equality promotes social harmony and reduces discrimination based on caste, religion, race, gender, or any other social identity. It fosters a sense of belongingness and inclusiveness among citizens.
Conclusion
Civil equality is a fundamental principle of democracy and ensures the protection of individual rights and fair justice. It eliminates discrimination and promotes social harmony. Therefore, civil equality is essential for the development of a just and democratic society.
Which one of the following States of India has passed a legislation (in 1996) making the maintenance of one's parent mandatory?- a)Kerala
- b)West Bengal
- c)Maharashtra
- d)Himachal Pradesh
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following States of India has passed a legislation (in 1996) making the maintenance of one's parent mandatory?
a)
Kerala
b)
West Bengal
c)
Maharashtra
d)
Himachal Pradesh
|
|
Shraddha Mukherjee answered |
The Himachal Pradesh Maintenance of Parents and Dependants Act, 2001 has made the maintenance of one’s parents mandatory. Now, with the enactment of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Government has made the maintenance of one’s parents mandatory in the whole country.
When was our National Anthem first sung and where?- a)24th January, 1950 in Allahabad
- b)24th January, 1950 in Delhi
- c)26th December, 1942 in Calcutta
- d)27th December, 1911 in Calcutta
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
When was our National Anthem first sung and where?
a)
24th January, 1950 in Allahabad
b)
24th January, 1950 in Delhi
c)
26th December, 1942 in Calcutta
d)
27th December, 1911 in Calcutta
|
|
Tejas Rane answered |
The National Anthem of India, "Jana Gana Mana", was first sung on 27th December 1911 in Calcutta (now Kolkata) at the Indian National Congress session. The song was composed by Rabindranath Tagore, who had earlier written it in Bengali and later translated it into Hindi and Urdu.
Details of the National Anthem's first performance:
- The session of the Indian National Congress was held at the Calcutta (now Kolkata) session of the All India Muslim League.
- Tagore was requested by the Congress to compose a song that would be sung at the beginning of every session.
- Tagore wrote the song in Bengali and it was later translated into Hindi and Urdu.
- On 27th December 1911, "Jana Gana Mana" was sung for the first time at the Congress session, with Tagore himself leading the singing.
- The song quickly became popular and was soon adopted as the national anthem of India.
Significance of the National Anthem:
- The National Anthem is a symbol of national pride and unity, and is played at all important national events and ceremonies.
- The song celebrates the diversity of India and the unity of its people, and calls for the country to be guided by truth and righteousness.
- The lyrics of the song are full of imagery and metaphors that capture the spirit of India and its people.
In conclusion, the National Anthem of India, "Jana Gana Mana", was first sung on 27th December 1911 in Calcutta, at the Indian National Congress session. The song was composed by Rabindranath Tagore and has since become a symbol of national pride and unity.
Details of the National Anthem's first performance:
- The session of the Indian National Congress was held at the Calcutta (now Kolkata) session of the All India Muslim League.
- Tagore was requested by the Congress to compose a song that would be sung at the beginning of every session.
- Tagore wrote the song in Bengali and it was later translated into Hindi and Urdu.
- On 27th December 1911, "Jana Gana Mana" was sung for the first time at the Congress session, with Tagore himself leading the singing.
- The song quickly became popular and was soon adopted as the national anthem of India.
Significance of the National Anthem:
- The National Anthem is a symbol of national pride and unity, and is played at all important national events and ceremonies.
- The song celebrates the diversity of India and the unity of its people, and calls for the country to be guided by truth and righteousness.
- The lyrics of the song are full of imagery and metaphors that capture the spirit of India and its people.
In conclusion, the National Anthem of India, "Jana Gana Mana", was first sung on 27th December 1911 in Calcutta, at the Indian National Congress session. The song was composed by Rabindranath Tagore and has since become a symbol of national pride and unity.
Division of powers is the principle of- a)unitary form of government
- b)federal form of government
- c)socialist form of government
- d)republican form of government
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Division of powers is the principle of
a)
unitary form of government
b)
federal form of government
c)
socialist form of government
d)
republican form of government
|
Pranavi Choudhary answered |
Division of powers is a fundamental principle of federalism, which is a form of government where power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units. In this system, the powers of the government are distributed between the national or federal government and the state or provincial governments.
The principle of division of powers is based on the idea that concentrating too much power in one central authority can lead to tyranny, oppression, and abuse of power. Therefore, the distribution of power between different levels of government helps to ensure that no one entity has too much control or influence over the citizenry.
Under a federal system, the national government is responsible for handling matters that affect the entire nation, such as national defense, foreign policy, and monetary policy. Meanwhile, the state or provincial governments are responsible for handling matters that affect their respective territories, such as education, public transportation, and local law enforcement.
The division of powers is typically outlined in a country's constitution or other legal document. These documents specify which powers are given to the national government and which powers are reserved for the state or provincial governments. In some cases, there may be overlap or ambiguity regarding which level of government has jurisdiction over certain issues. In these situations, the courts may be called upon to interpret the law and resolve any disputes.
Overall, the principle of division of powers is integral to the functioning of federal systems of government. By distributing power and responsibilities across multiple levels of government, federalism helps to ensure that citizens have a voice in the decisions that affect their lives and that power remains in check.
The principle of division of powers is based on the idea that concentrating too much power in one central authority can lead to tyranny, oppression, and abuse of power. Therefore, the distribution of power between different levels of government helps to ensure that no one entity has too much control or influence over the citizenry.
Under a federal system, the national government is responsible for handling matters that affect the entire nation, such as national defense, foreign policy, and monetary policy. Meanwhile, the state or provincial governments are responsible for handling matters that affect their respective territories, such as education, public transportation, and local law enforcement.
The division of powers is typically outlined in a country's constitution or other legal document. These documents specify which powers are given to the national government and which powers are reserved for the state or provincial governments. In some cases, there may be overlap or ambiguity regarding which level of government has jurisdiction over certain issues. In these situations, the courts may be called upon to interpret the law and resolve any disputes.
Overall, the principle of division of powers is integral to the functioning of federal systems of government. By distributing power and responsibilities across multiple levels of government, federalism helps to ensure that citizens have a voice in the decisions that affect their lives and that power remains in check.
How many types of emergencies are envisaged by the Constitution?- a)1
- b)2
- c)3
- d)4
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
How many types of emergencies are envisaged by the Constitution?
a)
1
b)
2
c)
3
d)
4
|
|
Abhishek Phogat answered |
3
National, State and financial emergency
National, State and financial emergency
The annual report of the UPSC is submitted to- a)The Supreme Court
- b)The President
- c)The Prime Minister
- d)The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The annual report of the UPSC is submitted to
a)
The Supreme Court
b)
The President
c)
The Prime Minister
d)
The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
|
|
Ræjû Bhæï answered |
UPSC submits its annual report to the President of India,✓ who further sends it to the Parliament for discussion.
Consider the following statements: An amendment to the Constitution of India can be initiated by the: 1. Lok Sabha 2. Rajya Sabha 3. State Legislatures 4. President Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 alone b)1, 2 and 3c)2, 3 and 4 d)1 and 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
|
|
Nitya Gupta answered |
A constitutional amendment can be initiated by the introduction of a Bill in either House of the Parliament as per Art.368. The Bill further needs to be passed in both the Houses by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each House, present and voting.
The Constitution of India recognizes:- a)only religious minorities
- b)only linguistic minorities
- c)religious and linguistic minorities
- d)religious, linguistic & ethnic minorities
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The Constitution of India recognizes:
a)
only religious minorities
b)
only linguistic minorities
c)
religious and linguistic minorities
d)
religious, linguistic & ethnic minorities
|
|
Rithika Menon answered |
The Constitution of India recognizes religious and linguistic minorities in the following provisions-
(i) Art. 25 provides for the fundamental right to freedom of religion
(ii) Art. 29 recognizes the right of linguistic minorities to preserve their culture, language and script
(iii) Art. 30 recognizes the right of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
(iv) Art. 347 gives the President the power to declare a language used by a substantial population of the State, to make it the official language of that State.
(i) Art. 25 provides for the fundamental right to freedom of religion
(ii) Art. 29 recognizes the right of linguistic minorities to preserve their culture, language and script
(iii) Art. 30 recognizes the right of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
(iv) Art. 347 gives the President the power to declare a language used by a substantial population of the State, to make it the official language of that State.
There is a Parliamentary System of Government in India because the (2015)- a) Lok Sabha is elected directly by the people
- b) Parliament can amend the constitution
- c) Rajya Sabha cannot be dissolved
- d) Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
There is a Parliamentary System of Government in India because the (2015)
a)
Lok Sabha is elected directly by the people
b)
Parliament can amend the constitution
c)
Rajya Sabha cannot be dissolved
d)
Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha
|
|
Aravind Menon answered |
Parliamentary System of Government in India
The Parliamentary System of Government in India is characterized by the Council of Ministers being responsible to the Lok Sabha. This means that the Prime Minister and other Ministers are accountable to the elected representatives in the lower house of Parliament.
Explanation of the Correct Answer: Option D
The correct answer to the question is option D, which states that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha. This is a fundamental feature of the Parliamentary System of Government in India. Let's understand why this is the correct answer:
1. Council of Ministers: The Council of Ministers in India consists of the Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and Ministers of State. They are collectively responsible for the governance of the country and the implementation of policies.
2. Responsibility to the Lok Sabha: In a Parliamentary System, the Council of Ministers is responsible to the lower house of Parliament, which in India is known as the Lok Sabha. This means that they are accountable to the elected representatives in the Lok Sabha.
3. Role of the Lok Sabha: The Lok Sabha is the directly elected house of Parliament in India. Its members are elected by the people through a democratic process. The Lok Sabha represents the will of the people and is responsible for making laws, approving the budget, and scrutinizing the government's actions.
4. Confidence of the Lok Sabha: The Council of Ministers must enjoy the confidence of the Lok Sabha to remain in power. If the government loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha, it may lead to the resignation of the Council of Ministers or the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, followed by fresh elections.
5. Accountability and Oversight: The responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha ensures transparency, accountability, and effective oversight of the government's actions. The elected representatives in the Lok Sabha can question the government, hold it accountable for its decisions, and demand explanations for its actions.
Therefore, the correct answer to the given question is option D, as the Parliamentary System of Government in India is based on the principle that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha. This ensures democratic governance and enables the elected representatives to effectively represent the interests of the people.
The Parliamentary System of Government in India is characterized by the Council of Ministers being responsible to the Lok Sabha. This means that the Prime Minister and other Ministers are accountable to the elected representatives in the lower house of Parliament.
Explanation of the Correct Answer: Option D
The correct answer to the question is option D, which states that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha. This is a fundamental feature of the Parliamentary System of Government in India. Let's understand why this is the correct answer:
1. Council of Ministers: The Council of Ministers in India consists of the Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and Ministers of State. They are collectively responsible for the governance of the country and the implementation of policies.
2. Responsibility to the Lok Sabha: In a Parliamentary System, the Council of Ministers is responsible to the lower house of Parliament, which in India is known as the Lok Sabha. This means that they are accountable to the elected representatives in the Lok Sabha.
3. Role of the Lok Sabha: The Lok Sabha is the directly elected house of Parliament in India. Its members are elected by the people through a democratic process. The Lok Sabha represents the will of the people and is responsible for making laws, approving the budget, and scrutinizing the government's actions.
4. Confidence of the Lok Sabha: The Council of Ministers must enjoy the confidence of the Lok Sabha to remain in power. If the government loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha, it may lead to the resignation of the Council of Ministers or the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, followed by fresh elections.
5. Accountability and Oversight: The responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha ensures transparency, accountability, and effective oversight of the government's actions. The elected representatives in the Lok Sabha can question the government, hold it accountable for its decisions, and demand explanations for its actions.
Therefore, the correct answer to the given question is option D, as the Parliamentary System of Government in India is based on the principle that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha. This ensures democratic governance and enables the elected representatives to effectively represent the interests of the people.
What is the motto incorporated under our National Emblem?- a)Satyam Shivam
- b)Satyam Shivam Sundaram
- c)Satyameva Jayate
- d)Jai Hind
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the motto incorporated under our National Emblem?
a)
Satyam Shivam
b)
Satyam Shivam Sundaram
c)
Satyameva Jayate
d)
Jai Hind
|
Akshara Mukherjee answered |
The motto incorporated under our National Emblem is "Satyameva Jayate", which is written in the Devanagari script. It is a Sanskrit phrase that translates to "Truth alone triumphs" in English. This motto holds great significance and reflects the core values and aspirations of our nation.
Here is a detailed explanation of the motto:
1. Satyameva Jayate:
- "Satyameva Jayate" is derived from a mantra in the ancient Indian scripture, Mundaka Upanishad.
- It is a profound statement that emphasizes the importance and power of truth.
- The word "Satya" means truth, and "Eva" means alone or only. "Jayate" means triumphs or prevails.
- Together, the motto signifies that truth is the ultimate path to victory and success.
2. Historical Significance:
- The motto "Satyameva Jayate" has been part of Indian tradition and culture for centuries.
- It was adopted as the national motto of India on 26th January 1950, when the Constitution of India came into effect.
- It was chosen to reflect the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people, who sought a just and truthful society.
3. Philosophical Meaning:
- The motto represents the deep-rooted belief in the power and supremacy of truth.
- It emphasizes the importance of honesty, integrity, and righteousness in all aspects of life.
- It encourages individuals and the nation as a whole to uphold truth and strive for justice.
4. Symbolism:
- The National Emblem of India, which features the motto "Satyameva Jayate", is a visual representation of the nation's identity.
- The emblem consists of the Lion Capital of Ashoka, which is a sculpture located at Sarnath, Uttar Pradesh.
- The lion symbolizes strength, courage, and leadership.
- The motto beneath the lion's sculpture serves as a reminder of the values that India upholds.
In conclusion, the motto "Satyameva Jayate" encapsulates the essence of truth and its triumph over falsehood. It is a powerful message that inspires individuals and the nation to pursue truth, justice, and righteousness.
Here is a detailed explanation of the motto:
1. Satyameva Jayate:
- "Satyameva Jayate" is derived from a mantra in the ancient Indian scripture, Mundaka Upanishad.
- It is a profound statement that emphasizes the importance and power of truth.
- The word "Satya" means truth, and "Eva" means alone or only. "Jayate" means triumphs or prevails.
- Together, the motto signifies that truth is the ultimate path to victory and success.
2. Historical Significance:
- The motto "Satyameva Jayate" has been part of Indian tradition and culture for centuries.
- It was adopted as the national motto of India on 26th January 1950, when the Constitution of India came into effect.
- It was chosen to reflect the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people, who sought a just and truthful society.
3. Philosophical Meaning:
- The motto represents the deep-rooted belief in the power and supremacy of truth.
- It emphasizes the importance of honesty, integrity, and righteousness in all aspects of life.
- It encourages individuals and the nation as a whole to uphold truth and strive for justice.
4. Symbolism:
- The National Emblem of India, which features the motto "Satyameva Jayate", is a visual representation of the nation's identity.
- The emblem consists of the Lion Capital of Ashoka, which is a sculpture located at Sarnath, Uttar Pradesh.
- The lion symbolizes strength, courage, and leadership.
- The motto beneath the lion's sculpture serves as a reminder of the values that India upholds.
In conclusion, the motto "Satyameva Jayate" encapsulates the essence of truth and its triumph over falsehood. It is a powerful message that inspires individuals and the nation to pursue truth, justice, and righteousness.
Consider the following statements:1. The minimum age prescribed for any person to be a member of Panchayat is 25 years.2. A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution continues only for the remainder period.Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2016)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The minimum age prescribed for any person to be a member of Panchayat is 25 years.
2. A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution continues only for the remainder period.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2016)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
|
Anjali Rao answered |
Statement 1: It is 21 years, so 1 is wrong.
Statement 2: A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution (i.e., before the expiry of the full period of five years) shall continue only for the remainder of the period. But if the remainder of the period is less than six months it shall not be necessary to hold elections.
A parliamentary system of government is one which (2020)- a) All political parties in the parliament are represented in the government
- b) The government is responsible to the Parliament and can be removed by it
- c) The government is elected by the people and can be removed by them
- d) The government is chosen by the parliament but can not be removed by it before completion of a fixed term
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
A parliamentary system of government is one which (2020)
a)
All political parties in the parliament are represented in the government
b)
The government is responsible to the Parliament and can be removed by it
c)
The government is elected by the people and can be removed by them
d)
The government is chosen by the parliament but can not be removed by it before completion of a fixed term
|
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
This is obvious since people don’t remove the government (option C), it is the Parliament that can remove the government.
Out of the following statements, choose the one that brings out the principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government: (2017)- a) An arrangement for minimizing the criticism against the Government whose responsibilities are complex and hard to carry out to the satisfaction of all.
- b) A mechanism for speeding up the activities of the Government whose responsibilities are increasing day by day.
- c) A mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people.
- d) A device for strengthening the hands of the head of the Government whose hold over the people is in a state of decline.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Out of the following statements, choose the one that brings out the principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government: (2017)
a)
An arrangement for minimizing the criticism against the Government whose responsibilities are complex and hard to carry out to the satisfaction of all.
b)
A mechanism for speeding up the activities of the Government whose responsibilities are increasing day by day.
c)
A mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people.
d)
A device for strengthening the hands of the head of the Government whose hold over the people is in a state of decline.
|
|
Shivani Dey answered |
Principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government:
The Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people. This principle is reflected in option (c), which is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Cabinet form of Government is a system of government in which the executive power is vested in a group of ministers who are collectively responsible to the legislature. The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, who is the head of the government.
The principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government is that the Cabinet is collectively responsible to the people through their representatives in the legislature. This means that the Cabinet is accountable for its actions to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
The following are the key features of the Cabinet form of Government:
- Collective responsibility: The Cabinet is collectively responsible for its actions to the legislature. This means that all members of the Cabinet are responsible for decisions taken by the Cabinet, even if they personally disagree with them.
- Leadership: The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, who is the head of the government. The Prime Minister is responsible for appointing the other members of the Cabinet and for leading the government.
- Parliamentary democracy: The Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy, in which the government is accountable to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
- Executive power: The Cabinet is responsible for exercising the executive power of the government. This includes making policy decisions and implementing them.
In conclusion, the Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the government to the people. The Cabinet is responsible for exercising the executive power of the government and is accountable to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
The Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people. This principle is reflected in option (c), which is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Cabinet form of Government is a system of government in which the executive power is vested in a group of ministers who are collectively responsible to the legislature. The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, who is the head of the government.
The principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government is that the Cabinet is collectively responsible to the people through their representatives in the legislature. This means that the Cabinet is accountable for its actions to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
The following are the key features of the Cabinet form of Government:
- Collective responsibility: The Cabinet is collectively responsible for its actions to the legislature. This means that all members of the Cabinet are responsible for decisions taken by the Cabinet, even if they personally disagree with them.
- Leadership: The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, who is the head of the government. The Prime Minister is responsible for appointing the other members of the Cabinet and for leading the government.
- Parliamentary democracy: The Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy, in which the government is accountable to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
- Executive power: The Cabinet is responsible for exercising the executive power of the government. This includes making policy decisions and implementing them.
In conclusion, the Cabinet form of Government is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the government to the people. The Cabinet is responsible for exercising the executive power of the government and is accountable to the legislature and ultimately to the people.
Consider the following statements:1. Speaker of the legislative assembly shall vacate his/her office of he/she ceases to be a member of the assembly2. Whenever the legislative assembly is dissolved the Speaker shall vacate his/her office immediatelyWhich of the statements given above is/are correct? (2018)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 not 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Speaker of the legislative assembly shall vacate his/her office of he/she ceases to be a member of the assembly
2. Whenever the legislative assembly is dissolved the Speaker shall vacate his/her office immediately
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2018)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 not 2
|
|
Varun Sharma answered |
Understanding the Role of the Speaker
The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly plays a crucial role in maintaining order and decorum in the house. The statements regarding the Speaker's office are essential to comprehend.
Statement 1: Cessation of Membership
- The first statement asserts that the Speaker will vacate their office if they cease to be a member of the assembly.
- This statement is correct because the Speaker is typically elected from among the members of the legislative assembly. If they lose their membership (due to resignation, disqualification, etc.), they can no longer serve as Speaker.
Statement 2: Dissolution of the Assembly
- The second statement claims that the Speaker shall vacate their office immediately upon the dissolution of the legislative assembly.
- This statement is incorrect. The Speaker continues to hold office even after the dissolution of the assembly until a new assembly is constituted and a new Speaker is elected. This provision ensures continuity in the legislative process.
Conclusion
- Thus, only the first statement is correct.
- The correct answer to the question is option 'A': 1 only.
This understanding reflects the constitutional provisions regarding the Speaker’s tenure and reinforces the importance of their role in the legislative framework.
The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly plays a crucial role in maintaining order and decorum in the house. The statements regarding the Speaker's office are essential to comprehend.
Statement 1: Cessation of Membership
- The first statement asserts that the Speaker will vacate their office if they cease to be a member of the assembly.
- This statement is correct because the Speaker is typically elected from among the members of the legislative assembly. If they lose their membership (due to resignation, disqualification, etc.), they can no longer serve as Speaker.
Statement 2: Dissolution of the Assembly
- The second statement claims that the Speaker shall vacate their office immediately upon the dissolution of the legislative assembly.
- This statement is incorrect. The Speaker continues to hold office even after the dissolution of the assembly until a new assembly is constituted and a new Speaker is elected. This provision ensures continuity in the legislative process.
Conclusion
- Thus, only the first statement is correct.
- The correct answer to the question is option 'A': 1 only.
This understanding reflects the constitutional provisions regarding the Speaker’s tenure and reinforces the importance of their role in the legislative framework.
Regarding Money Bill, which of the following statements is not correct? (2018)- a) A bill shall be deemed to be money bill if it contains only provisions related to imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax.
- b) A Money Bill has provisions for the custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the Contingency Fund of India.
- c) A Money Bill is concerned with appropriation of moneys out of the Contingency Fund of India.
- d) A Money Bill deals with the regulation of borrowing of money or giving of any guarantee by the government of India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Regarding Money Bill, which of the following statements is not correct? (2018)
a)
A bill shall be deemed to be money bill if it contains only provisions related to imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax.
b)
A Money Bill has provisions for the custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the Contingency Fund of India.
c)
A Money Bill is concerned with appropriation of moneys out of the Contingency Fund of India.
d)
A Money Bill deals with the regulation of borrowing of money or giving of any guarantee by the government of India
|
Deepa Iyer answered |
A110. Definition of Money Bill (1) For the purposes of this Chapter, a Bill shall be deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of the following matters, namely Options~ (a) the imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax; (b) the regulation of the borrowing of money or the giving of any guarantee by the Government of India, or the amendment of the law with respect to any financial obligations undertaken or to be undertaken by the Government of India; (c) the custody of the Consolidated Fund or the Contingency Fund of India, the payment of money into or the withdrawal of money from any such Fund; (d) the appropriation of money out of the consolidated Fund of India (not Contingency Fund of India). So, C is incorrect.
Which of the following statements is/are correct?1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.Select the correct answer using the code given below. (2016)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Select the correct answer using the code given below. (2016)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
|
Bhavana Sen answered |
The correct answer is option 'B' - 2 only. Let's understand the statements and their correctness:
1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
This statement is incorrect. Prorogation is the end of a session of Parliament. When the Lok Sabha is prorogued, all pending Bills, whether introduced in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha, lapse. However, if a Bill is pending in the Lok Sabha and it is not passed by the end of the term of the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse. It remains pending and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
This statement is correct. When the Lok Sabha is dissolved, all pending Bills, whether introduced in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha, lapse. However, if a Bill is pending in the Rajya Sabha and has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse. It remains pending and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
Explanation:
- Prorogation: Prorogation is the end of a session of Parliament. It is the period between the end of one session of Parliament and the beginning of the next session.
- Lapse: When a Bill pending in either House of Parliament is not passed by the end of the term of the House, it lapses. This means that the Bill ceases to exist and cannot be taken up for consideration in the next session or by the newly constituted House.
In summary, a Bill pending in the Lok Sabha does not lapse on its prorogation and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, does not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha and can also be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
This statement is incorrect. Prorogation is the end of a session of Parliament. When the Lok Sabha is prorogued, all pending Bills, whether introduced in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha, lapse. However, if a Bill is pending in the Lok Sabha and it is not passed by the end of the term of the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse. It remains pending and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
This statement is correct. When the Lok Sabha is dissolved, all pending Bills, whether introduced in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha, lapse. However, if a Bill is pending in the Rajya Sabha and has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse. It remains pending and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
Explanation:
- Prorogation: Prorogation is the end of a session of Parliament. It is the period between the end of one session of Parliament and the beginning of the next session.
- Lapse: When a Bill pending in either House of Parliament is not passed by the end of the term of the House, it lapses. This means that the Bill ceases to exist and cannot be taken up for consideration in the next session or by the newly constituted House.
In summary, a Bill pending in the Lok Sabha does not lapse on its prorogation and can be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, does not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha and can also be taken up for consideration by the newly constituted Lok Sabha.
The Constitution of India describes India asa)a union of statesb)quasi-federalc)a federation of State and Union Territoriesd)a unitary stateCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
|
|
Aruna Singh answered |
In the Constitution states that India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States. The territory of India shall consist of: The territories of the states, The Union territories and Any territory that may be acquired. The names of the States and the Unions have been described in the First Schedule.
The Preamble of our Constitution reads India as- a)sovereign,democraric, socialist, secular republic
- b)socialist, democratic, secular republic
- c)democratic, sovereign, secular, socialist republic
- d)sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The Preamble of our Constitution reads India as
a)
sovereign,democraric, socialist, secular republic
b)
socialist, democratic, secular republic
c)
democratic, sovereign, secular, socialist republic
d)
sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic
|
|
Kiran Sarkar answered |
India, one of the world's largest democratic countries, is a Union of Twenty Nine states and seven Union Territories. The country is a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic with a Parliamentary system of government. The Republic is governed in terms of the Constitution adopted by the Constituent Assembly.
The fundamental object of Panchayati Raj system is to ensure which among the following? 1. People’s participation in development 2. Political accountability 3. Democratic decentralization 4. Financial mobilization Select the correct answer using the code given below (2015)- a) 1, 2 and 3 only
- b) 2 and 4 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The fundamental object of Panchayati Raj system is to ensure which among the following?
1. People’s participation in development
2. Political accountability
3. Democratic decentralization
4. Financial mobilization
Select the correct answer using the code given below (2015)
a)
1, 2 and 3 only
b)
2 and 4 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
1, 2, 3 and 4
|
|
Akshara Singh answered |
Overview of Panchayati Raj System
The Panchayati Raj system is a three-tier system of local self-government in rural India, aimed at ensuring effective governance and development. The fundamental objects of this system include enhancing grassroots democracy, promoting local participation, and decentralizing power.
Key Objectives of the Panchayati Raj System
- People’s Participation in Development
- The system encourages local communities to actively participate in decision-making processes, ensuring that development initiatives are aligned with the needs of the people.
- Political Accountability
- While accountability is an important aspect, the main focus of Panchayati Raj is on decentralization and participation rather than direct political accountability of elected representatives.
- Democratic Decentralization
- This principle is central to the Panchayati Raj, as it aims to distribute power from the central government to local bodies, empowering villagers to govern themselves and manage resources effectively.
- Financial Mobilization
- Although financial mobilization is essential for development, it is not a primary objective of the Panchayati Raj system. The focus is more on participatory governance and decentralization.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is option 'C' (1 and 3 only). The primary objectives of the Panchayati Raj system are to ensure people’s participation in development and to promote democratic decentralization. While political accountability and financial mobilization are significant, they are not the core aims of the system.
The Panchayati Raj system is a three-tier system of local self-government in rural India, aimed at ensuring effective governance and development. The fundamental objects of this system include enhancing grassroots democracy, promoting local participation, and decentralizing power.
Key Objectives of the Panchayati Raj System
- People’s Participation in Development
- The system encourages local communities to actively participate in decision-making processes, ensuring that development initiatives are aligned with the needs of the people.
- Political Accountability
- While accountability is an important aspect, the main focus of Panchayati Raj is on decentralization and participation rather than direct political accountability of elected representatives.
- Democratic Decentralization
- This principle is central to the Panchayati Raj, as it aims to distribute power from the central government to local bodies, empowering villagers to govern themselves and manage resources effectively.
- Financial Mobilization
- Although financial mobilization is essential for development, it is not a primary objective of the Panchayati Raj system. The focus is more on participatory governance and decentralization.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is option 'C' (1 and 3 only). The primary objectives of the Panchayati Raj system are to ensure people’s participation in development and to promote democratic decentralization. While political accountability and financial mobilization are significant, they are not the core aims of the system.
With reference to the Constitution of India, consider the following statements:1. No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid.2. An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India.Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2019)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
With reference to the Constitution of India, consider the following statements:
1. No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid.
2. An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2019)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
Stuti Rane answered |
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D, neither 1 nor 2. Let's understand why.
Statement 1: No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid.
The Constitution of India provides for a clear hierarchy of courts, where the Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. According to Article 131 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to hear disputes between the Government of India and one or more States or between two or more States. This means that only the Supreme Court can decide on disputes involving the central government and the state governments.
However, the High Courts, as mentioned in Article 226, have the power to issue writs, orders, or directions to any person or authority within their territorial jurisdiction. This includes the power of judicial review, which allows them to determine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions.
Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect as the High Courts do have the jurisdiction to declare central laws to be constitutionally invalid.
Statement 2: An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India.
Article 368 of the Constitution of India deals with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. It grants the Parliament the authority to amend any provision of the Constitution in the manner prescribed in the article. However, this power is not absolute.
The Supreme Court, as the guardian of the Constitution, has the power of judicial review, which enables it to examine the constitutionality of laws and actions, including constitutional amendments. The Court has the authority to strike down any amendment that violates the basic structure of the Constitution.
Over the years, the Supreme Court has used this power to review and strike down several constitutional amendments, such as the First Amendment, the 39th Amendment, and the 42nd Amendment, among others.
Therefore, statement 2 is also incorrect as the Supreme Court can indeed question the validity of constitutional amendments if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
In conclusion, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct, and the correct answer is option D.
The correct answer is option D, neither 1 nor 2. Let's understand why.
Statement 1: No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid.
The Constitution of India provides for a clear hierarchy of courts, where the Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. According to Article 131 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to hear disputes between the Government of India and one or more States or between two or more States. This means that only the Supreme Court can decide on disputes involving the central government and the state governments.
However, the High Courts, as mentioned in Article 226, have the power to issue writs, orders, or directions to any person or authority within their territorial jurisdiction. This includes the power of judicial review, which allows them to determine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions.
Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect as the High Courts do have the jurisdiction to declare central laws to be constitutionally invalid.
Statement 2: An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India.
Article 368 of the Constitution of India deals with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. It grants the Parliament the authority to amend any provision of the Constitution in the manner prescribed in the article. However, this power is not absolute.
The Supreme Court, as the guardian of the Constitution, has the power of judicial review, which enables it to examine the constitutionality of laws and actions, including constitutional amendments. The Court has the authority to strike down any amendment that violates the basic structure of the Constitution.
Over the years, the Supreme Court has used this power to review and strike down several constitutional amendments, such as the First Amendment, the 39th Amendment, and the 42nd Amendment, among others.
Therefore, statement 2 is also incorrect as the Supreme Court can indeed question the validity of constitutional amendments if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
In conclusion, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct, and the correct answer is option D.
Rajyasabha has equal power with Loksabha in (2020)- a) The matter of creating new all India services
- b) Amending the constitution
- c) The removal of the government
- d) Making cut motions
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Rajyasabha has equal power with Loksabha in (2020)
a)
The matter of creating new all India services
b)
Amending the constitution
c)
The removal of the government
d)
Making cut motions
|
|
Saikat Nair answered |
Amending the Constitution
In India, both the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People) are two houses of the Parliament. When it comes to the amendment of the Constitution, the Rajya Sabha holds equal power with the Lok Sabha.
Process of Amending the Constitution:
- According to Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, the procedure for amending the Constitution involves the introduction of a bill in either house of Parliament.
- The bill must be passed by each house with a special majority, which includes a majority of the total membership of that house and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
- After both houses pass the bill, it is sent to the President for assent. The President cannot withhold assent and must give his approval.
Role of Rajya Sabha in Amending the Constitution:
- The Rajya Sabha plays a crucial role in the amendment process as it acts as a check on hasty decisions by the Lok Sabha.
- The Rajya Sabha can suggest amendments to the bill, send it back to the Lok Sabha for reconsideration, or reject the bill altogether.
- If the Lok Sabha does not agree with the amendments proposed by the Rajya Sabha, both houses must convene in a joint sitting to resolve the differences.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Rajya Sabha has equal power with the Lok Sabha in the matter of amending the Constitution of India. This ensures that the amendment process is thorough, deliberative, and reflective of the diverse opinions and interests of the country.
Which one of the following objectives is not embodied in the Preamble to the Constitution of India? (2017)- a) Liberty of thought
- b) Economic liberty
- c) Liberty of expression
- d) Liberty of belief
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following objectives is not embodied in the Preamble to the Constitution of India? (2017)
a)
Liberty of thought
b)
Economic liberty
c)
Liberty of expression
d)
Liberty of belief
|
|
Rhea Basu answered |
The Preamble secures to all citizens of India liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship, through their Fundamental Rights, enforceable in the court of law, in case of violation. Liberty, as elaborated in the Preamble, is essential for the successful functioning of the Indian democratic system. However, liberty does not mean ‘license’ to do what one likes, and has to be enjoyed within the limitations mentioned in the Constitution itself. Economic liberty is not explicitly mentioned in the Preamble.
The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in:- a)the United Kingdom
- b)Australia
- c)the United States
- d)Canada
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in:
a)
the United Kingdom
b)
Australia
c)
the United States
d)
Canada
|
|
Aashna Nambiar answered |
Public Interest Litigation means a legal action initiated by a member of the society for a public cause. The concept originated in the United States of America and featured for the very first time in the report of Public Interest Law prepared by the Council for Public Interest Law in 1976. Public Interest Litigation in India was initiated by Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer and Justice P.N. Bhagwati in the 1970s and 80s when they started permitting PILs to be filed for redressal of common public problems in cases like Mumbai Kamgar Sabha vs. Abdul Thai(1976) and S.P. Gupta and Others vs. Union of India(1982).
Consider the following statements:1. The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.2. The validity of a law passed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court and no judgment can be made on it.Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2018)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
2. The validity of a law passed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court and no judgment can be made on it.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (2018)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
Prateek Nambiar answered |
Explanation:
Statement 1: The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
- This statement is correct. The Ninth Schedule was added to the Constitution by the First Amendment in 1951 to protect certain laws from judicial review.
- The Parliament has the power to insert laws into the Ninth Schedule to protect them from being challenged in courts.
Statement 2: The validity of a law passed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court and no judgment can be made on it.
- This statement is incorrect. In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court held that even laws placed in the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
- The Court ruled that judicial review is essential to ensure that even laws in the Ninth Schedule do not violate the core principles of the Constitution.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct. The validity of laws placed in the Ninth Schedule can be examined by courts if they infringe upon the basic structure of the Constitution.
Statement 1: The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
- This statement is correct. The Ninth Schedule was added to the Constitution by the First Amendment in 1951 to protect certain laws from judicial review.
- The Parliament has the power to insert laws into the Ninth Schedule to protect them from being challenged in courts.
Statement 2: The validity of a law passed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court and no judgment can be made on it.
- This statement is incorrect. In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court held that even laws placed in the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
- The Court ruled that judicial review is essential to ensure that even laws in the Ninth Schedule do not violate the core principles of the Constitution.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct. The validity of laws placed in the Ninth Schedule can be examined by courts if they infringe upon the basic structure of the Constitution.
Which of the following statements is/are true of the Fundamental Duties of an Indian citizen?1. A legislative process has been provided to enforce these duties.2. They are correlative to legal duties.Select the correct answer using the code given below: (2017)- a) 1 only
- b) 2 only
- c) Both 1 and 2
- d) Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following statements is/are true of the Fundamental Duties of an Indian citizen?
1. A legislative process has been provided to enforce these duties.
2. They are correlative to legal duties.
Select the correct answer using the code given below: (2017)
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
|
Utkarsh Joshi answered |
Statement 1: While FDs can be enforced by legislative processes (for e.g. Environment Protection Act that helps enforce the individual duty of environment protection), the constitution explicitly does not enforce them via legal provisions or does not explicitly mention in Part IVA that there are legislative processes to enforce them. However, since the Parliament has enforced the most fundamental duties already via a legislative process, we will consider this statement 1 as correct.
Statement 2: ‘legal duties’, for all practical purposes can be considered as ‘law of the land’. FDs are in sync with legal duties because what is illegal cannot be a fundamental duty, and what is a fundamental duty has also been made a legal duty (e.g. respecting women). Also, it is an Indian citizen’s fundamental duty to abide by the constitutional laws (legal duties); this brings the correlation. Statement 2 is thus correct.
What are the ‘residuary powers’?- a)Powers which are enumerated in the State List
- b)Powers which are included in the Union List
- c)Powers which are enumerated in the Concurrent List
- d)Powers which are not mentioned in any of the lists
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What are the ‘residuary powers’?
a)
Powers which are enumerated in the State List
b)
Powers which are included in the Union List
c)
Powers which are enumerated in the Concurrent List
d)
Powers which are not mentioned in any of the lists
|
|
Avi Sharma answered |
(1) Parliament has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in the Concurrent List or State List.
(2) Such power shall include the power of making any law imposing a tax not mentioned in either of those Lists.
Chapter doubts & questions for Previous year Papers - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Previous year Papers - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams
149 videos|673 docs|206 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup